MICRO2D: A Large, Statistically Diverse, Heterogeneous Microstructure Dataset

1. Jordan MI, Mitchell TM (2015) Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349(6245):255–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa841510.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗

2. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uskoreit J, Jones L, Gomez A, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I. Attention is all you need, NeurIPS

3. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y Generative adversarial networks, NeurIPS

4. Chen N, Zhang Y, Zen H, Weiss R, Norouzi M, Chan W (2009) Wavegrad: estimating gradients for waveform generation, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2009.0071310.48550/arxiv.2009.00713 ↗

5. Mahdavifar S, Ghorbani AA (2019) Application of deep learning to cybersecurity: a survey. Neurocomputing 347:149–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.02.05610.1016/j.neucom.2019.02.056 ↗

6. Cai L, Gao J, Zhao D (2020) A review of the application of deep learning in medical image classification and segmentation. Ann Translat Med 8:713. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.4410.21037/atm.2020.02.44 ↗

7. Jiang W (2021) Applications of deep learning in stock market prediction: recent progress. Expert Syst Appl 184:115537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11553710.1016/j.eswa.2021.115537 ↗

8. Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv:1810.04805

9. Song Y, Sohl-Dickstein J, Kigma DP, Kumar A, Ermon S, Poole B (2021) Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In: International congress for learning representation, pp 1–36

10. Ho J, Jain A, Abbeel P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. NeurIPS

11. Ho J, Salimans T, Gritsenko A, Chan W, Norouzi M, Fleet D. Video diffusion models, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2204.0345810.48550/arxiv.2204.03458 ↗

12. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, In: Pereira F, Burges C, Bottou L, Weinberger K (eds), Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 25, Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2012/file/c399862d3b9d6b76c8436e924a68c45b-Paper.pdf

13. Hamilton W, Ying Z, Leskovec J (2017) Inductive representation learning on large graphs, In: Guyon I, Luxburg UV, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R (eds), Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/5dd9db5e033da9c6fb5ba83c7a7ebea9-Paper.pdf

14. Wu Y, Schuster M, Chen Z, Le QV, Norouzi M, Macherey W, Krikun M, Cao Y, Gao Q, Macherey K, Klingner J, Shah A, Johnson M, Liu X, Kaiser L, Gouws S, Kato Y, Kudo T, Kazawa H, Stevens K, Kurian G, Patil N, Wang W, Young C, Smith J, Riesa J, Rudnick A, Vinyals O, Corrado G, Hughes M, Dean J (2016) Google’s neural machine translation system: bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv:1609.08144

15. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronnberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Zidek A, Potapenko A, Bridgland A, Meyer C, Kohl S, Ballard A, Cowie A, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Jain R, Adler J, Back T, Peterson S, Reiman D, Clancy E, Zielinski M, Steinegger M, Pacholska M, Berghammer T, Bodenstein S, Silver D, Vinyals O, Senior A, Kavukcuoglu K, Kohli P, Hassabis D (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold. Nature 596:583–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-210.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗

16. Anand N, Achim T. Protein structure and sequence generation with equivariant denoising diffusion probabilistic models, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2205.1501910.48550/arxiv.2205.15019 ↗

17. Burley SK, Bhikadiya C, Bi C, Bittrich S, Chen L, Crichlow GV, Christie CH, Dalenberg K, Di Costanzo L, Duarte JM, Dutta S, Feng Z, Ganesan S, Goodsell DS, Ghosh S, Green RK, Guranovi V, Guzenko D, Hudson BP, Lawson CL, Liang Y, Lowe R, Namkoong H, Peisach E, Persikova I, Randle C, Rose A, Rose Y, Sali A, Segura J, Sekharan M, Shao C, Tao Y-P, Voigt M, Westbrook JD, Young JY, Zardecki C, Zhuravleva M (2020) RCSB Protein Data Bank: powerful new tools for exploring 3D structures of biological macromolecules for basic and applied research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology, bioengineering and energy sciences. Nucleic Acids Res 49(D1):D437–D451. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa103810.1093/nar/gkaa1038 ↗

18. Fersht A (2021) Alphafold: a personal perspective on the impact of machine learning. J Mol Biol 433(20):167088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2021.16708810.1016/j.jmb.2021.167088 ↗

19. Zheng S, He J, Liu C, Shi Y, Lu Z, Feng W, Ju F, Wang J, Zhu J, Min Y, Zhang H, Tang S, Hao H, Jin P, Chen C, Noé F, Liu H, Liu T-Y (2023) Towards predicting equilibrium distributions for molecular systems with deep learning. arxiv:2306.05445

20. Materials genome initiative for global competitiveness

21. Generale A, Robertson A, Kelly C, Kalidindi S. Inverse stochastic microstructure design, SSRN: preprint https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.459069110.2139/ssrn.4590691 ↗

22. Gao Y, Liu Y. Relibaility-based topology optimization with stochastic heterogeneous microstructure properties. Mater Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10971310.1016/j.matdes.2021.109713 ↗

23. Marshall A, Kalidindi S (2021) Autonomous development of a machine-learning model for the plastic response of two-phase composites from micromechanical finite element models. JOM 73:2085–2095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-04696-w10.1007/s11837-021-04696-w ↗

24. Kalidindi S, Binci M, Fullwood D, Adams B (2006) Elastic properties closures using second-order homogenization theories: case studies in composites of two isotropic constituents. Acta Mater 54:3117–3126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.00510.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.005 ↗

25. Hasan M, Mao Y, Tavazza F, Choudhary A, Agrawal A, Acar P. Data-driven multi-scale modeling and optimization for elastic properties of cubic microstructures. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-022-00258-310.1007/s40192-022-00258-3 ↗

26. Acar P, Sundararaghavan V (2019) Stochastic design optimization of microstructural features using linear programming for robust design. AIAA J 57:448–45510.2514/1.J057377 ↗

27. Xiong Y, Duong P, Wang D, Park S-I, Ge Q, Raghavan N, Rosen D (2019) Data-driven design space exploration and exploitation for design for additive manufacturing. J Mech Des 141:101101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404358710.1115/1.4043587 ↗

28. Morris C, Bekker L, Haberman M, Seepersad C (2018) Design exploration of reliably manufacturable materials and structures with applications to negative stiffness metamaterials and microstereolithography. J Mech Des 140:111415. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404125110.1115/1.4041251 ↗

29. Pei Z, Rozman KA, Dogan ÖN, Wen Y, Gao N, Holm EA, Hawk JA, Alman DE, Gao MC (2021) Machine-learning microstructure for inverse material design. Adv Sci 8:2101207. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20210120710.1002/advs.202101207 ↗

30. Fung V, Zhang J, Hu G, Ganesh P, Sumpter BG (2021) Inverse design of two-dimensional materials with invertible neural networks. npj Comput Mater 7:200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00670-x10.1038/s41524-021-00670-x ↗

31. Abram M, Burghardt K, Steeg GV, Galstyan A, Dingreville R. Inferring topological transitions in pattern forming processes with self supervised learning, NPJ: Comput Mater 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00889-210.1038/s41524-022-00889-2 ↗

32. Diehl M, Groeber M, Haase C, Molodov D, Roters F, Raabe D (2017) Identifying structure-property relationships through dream. 3d representative volume elements and damask crystal plasticity simulations: An integrated computational materials engineering approach. JOM 69:848–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2303-010.1007/s11837-017-2303-0 ↗

33. Muir C, Swaminathan B, Almansour A, Sevener K, Smith C, Presby M, Kiser J, Pollock T, Daly S. Damage mechanism identification in composites via machine learning and acoustic emission, NPJ: Comput Mater 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00565-x10.1038/s41524-021-00565-x ↗

34. Hashemi S, Kalidindi SR (2023) Gaussian process autoregression models for the evolution of polycrystalline microstructures subjected to arbitrary stretching tensors. Int J Plast 162:103532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.10353210.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103532 ↗

35. Yabansu YC, Steinmetz P, Hötzer J, Kalidindi SR, Nestler B (2017) Extraction of reduced-order process-structure linkages from phase-field simulations. Acta Mater 124:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.07110.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.071 ↗

36. Dornheim J, Morand L, Zeitvogel S, Iraki T, Link N, Helm D. Deep reinforcement learning methods for structure-guided processing path optimization. J Intell Manuf 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01805-z10.1007/s10845-021-01805-z ↗

37. Vlassis NN, Sun W (2023) Denoising diffusion algorithm for inverse design of microstructures with fine-tuned nonlinear material properties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 413:116126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.11612610.1016/j.cma.2023.116126 ↗

38. Jain A, Ong S, Hautier G, Chen W, Richards W, Dacek S, Cholia S, Gunter D, Skinner D, Ceder G, Persson K (2013) Commentary: The materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater 1:011002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗

39. Groeber M, Jackson M (2014) Dream.3d: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3d, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing. Innovation 3:56–72. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9772-3-510.1186/2193-9772-3-5 ↗

40. Groeber M, Ghosh S, Uchic M, Dimiduk D (2008) A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3d polycrystalline microstructures. part 2: synthetic microstructure generation. Acta Mater 56:1274–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.04010.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.040 ↗

41. Pilchak AL, Shank J, Tucker JC, Srivatsa S, Fagin PN, Semiatin SL(2016) A dataset for the development, verification, and validation of microstructure-sensitive process models for near-alpha titanium alloys. Integr Mater Manuf Innov, 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-016-0056-110.1186/s40192-016-0056-1 ↗

42. DeCost BL, Holm EA (2016) A large dataset of synthetic SEM images of powder materials and their ground truth 3d structures. Data Brief 9:727–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.10.01110.1016/j.dib.2016.10.011 ↗

43. Kalidindi S, Khosravani A, Yucel B, Shanker A, Blekh A (2019) Data infrastructure elements in support of accelerated materials innovation: ELA, PyMKS, and MATIN. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8:441–45410.1007/s40192-019-00156-1 ↗

44. Hart KA, Rimoli JJ (2020) Microstructpy: a statistical microstructure mesh generator in python. SoftwareX 12:100595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.10059510.1016/j.softx.2020.100595 ↗

45. Song K, Yan Y (2013) A noise robust method based on completed local binary patterns for hot-rolled steel strip surface defects. Appl Surf Sci 285P:858–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.00210.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.002 ↗

46. DeCost BL, Hecht M, Francis T, Webler BA, Picard YN, Holm E (2017) Uhcsdb: ultra high carbon steel micrograph database. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0097-010.1007/s40192-017-0097-0 ↗

47. Barber Z, Leake J, Clyne T. The doitpoms project: micrograph library. https://www.doitpoms.ac.uk/miclib/index.php

48. Saal J, Kirklin S, Aykol M, Meredig B, Wolverton C (2013) Materials design and discovery with high-throughput denisty functional theory: the open quantum materials database. JOM 65:1501–1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-410.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗

49. Choudhary K, Garrity KF, Reid ACE, DeCost B, Biacchi AJ, Walker ARH, Trautt Z, Hattrick-Simpers J, Kusne AG, Centrone A, Davydov A, Jiang J, Pachter R, Cheon G, Reed E, Agrawal A, Qian X, Sharma V, Zhuang H, Kalinin SV, Sumpter BG, Pilania G, Acar P, Mandal S, Haule K, Vanderbilt D, Rabe K, Tavazza F, The joint automated repository for various integrated simulations (JARVIS) for data-driven materials design. npj Comput Mater 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00440-110.1038/s41524-020-00440-1 ↗

50. Tanifuji M, Matsuda A, Yoshikawa H (2019) Materials data platform: a fair system for data-driven materials science, In: 2019 8th International congress on advanced applied informatics (IIAI-AAI), pp 1021–1022. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.0020610.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.00206 ↗

51. Ma R, Luo T (2020) PI1M: a benchmark database for polymer informatics. J Chem Inf Model 60(10):4684–4690. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c0072610.1021/acs.jcim.0c00726 ↗

52. Borysov S, Geilhufe R, Balatsky A. Organic materials database: an open-access online database for data mining. PLoS ONE 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.017150110.1371/journal.pone.0171501 ↗

53. Kench S, Squires I, Dahari A Microlib: A library of 3d microstructures generated from 2d micrographs using slicegan. Sci Data 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01744-110.1038/s41597-022-01744-1 ↗

54. Bargmann S, Klusemann B, Markmann J, Schnabel J, Schneider K, Soyarslan C, Wilmers J (2018) Generation of 3d representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials: a review. Prog Mater Sci 96:322–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.003 ↗

55. Mosser L, Dubrule O, Blunt M (2018) Stochastic reconstruction of oolitic limestone by generative adversarial networks. Transp Porous Med 125:81–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1039-910.1007/s11242-018-1039-9 ↗

56. Kench S, Cooper S (2021) Generating three-dimensional structures from a two-dimensional slice with generative adversarial network-based dimensionality expansion. Nature Mach Intell 3:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00322-110.1038/s42256-021-00322-1 ↗

57. Fokina D, Muravleva E, Ovchinnikov G, Oseledets I (2020) Microstructure synthesis using style-based generative adversarial networks. Phys Rev E 101:043308. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.04330810.1103/PhysRevE.101.043308 ↗

58. Noguchi S, Inoue J (2021) Stochastic characterization and reconstruction of material microstructures for establishment of process-structure-property linkage using the deep generative model. Phys Rev E 104:025302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.02530210.1103/PhysRevE.104.025302 ↗

59. Fullwood D, Niezgoda S, Adams B, Kalidindi S (2010) Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Prog Mater Sci 55:477–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.08.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.08.002 ↗

60. Torquato S (2002) Random heterogeneous materials. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-6355-3 ↗

61. Adams B, Kalidindi S, Fullwood D (2013) Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Butterworth-Heinemann, Waltham

62. Gao Y, Jiao Y, Liu Y (2021) Ultra-efficient reconstruction of 3d microstructure and distribution of properties of random heterogeneous materials containing multiple phases. Acta Mater 204:116526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11652610.1016/j.actamat.2020.116526 ↗

63. Robertson A, Kalidindi S (2022) Efficient generation of n-field microstructures from 2-point statistics using multi-output gaussian random fields. Acta Mater 232:117927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11792710.1016/j.actamat.2022.117927 ↗

64. Robertson AE, Kelly C, Buzzy M, Kalidindi SR (2023) Local-global decompositions for conditional microstructure generation. Acta Mater 253:118966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.11896610.1016/j.actamat.2023.118966 ↗

65. Seibert P, Ambati M, Rabloff A, Kastner M (2021) Reconstructing random heterogeneous media through differentiable optimization. Comput Mater Sci 196:110455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11045510.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110455 ↗

66. Seibert P, Rabloff A, Ambati M, Kastner M (2022) Descriptor-based reconstruction of three-dimensional microstructures through gradient-based optimization. Acta Mater 227:117667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11766710.1016/j.actamat.2022.117667 ↗

67. Seibert P, Husert M, Wollner M, Kalina K, Kastner M. Fast reconstruction of microstructures with ellipsoidal inclusions using analytic descriptors, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.0831610.48550/arxiv.2306.08316 ↗

68. Falco S, Jiang J, Cola FD, Petrinic N (2017) Generation of 3d polycrystalline microstructures with a conditioned Laguerre–Voronoi tessellation technique. Comput Mater Sci 136:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.04.01810.1016/j.commatsci.2017.04.018 ↗

69. Prasad M, Vajragupta N, Hartmaier A (2019) Kanapy: a python package for generating complex synthetic polycrystalline microstructures. J Open Source Softw 4:1732. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.0173210.21105/joss.01732 ↗

70. Mandal S, Lao J, Donegan S, Rollett A (2018) Generation of statistically representative synthetic three-dimensional microstructures. Scripta Mater 146:128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.11.03410.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.11.034 ↗

71. Niezgoda S, Fullwood D, Kalidindi S (2008) Delineation of the space of 2-point correlations in a composite material system. Acta Mater 56:5285–5292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.00510.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.005 ↗

72. de Oca Zapiain DM, Stewart J, Dingreville R (2021) Accelerating phase field based microstructure evolution predictions via surrogate models trained by machine learning methods. NPJ Comput Mater 3:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00471-810.1038/s41524-020-00471-8 ↗

73. Attari V, Honarmandi P, Duong T, Sauceda DJ, Allaire D, Arroyave R (2020) Uncertainty propagation in a multiscale calphad-reinforced elastochemical phase-field model. Acta Mater 183:452–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.03110.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.031 ↗

74. Hsu T, Epting WK, Kim H, Abernathy HW, Hackett GA, Rollett AD, Salvador PA, Holm EA (2021) Microstructure generation via generative adversarial network for heterogeneous, topoligically complex 3d materials. JOM 73:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04484-y10.1007/s11837-020-04484-y ↗

75. NIMS, Nims materials database. https://mits.nims.go.jp/en/

76. Lee K, Yun G Microstructure reconstruction using diffusion-based generative models

77. Lin H, Brown LP, Long AC (2011) Modelling and simulating textile structures using texgen, In: Advances in textile engineering, vol. 331 of advanced materials research, pp 44–47. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.331.4410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.331.44 ↗

78. Krishnamoorthi S, Bandyopadhyay R, Sangid MD (2023) A microstructure-based fatigue model for additively manufactured ti-6al-4v, including the role of prior $$\beta $$ boundaries. Int J Plast 163:103569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.10356910.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103569 ↗

79. Du P, Zebrowski A, Zola J, Ganapathysubramanian B, Wodo O. Microstructure design using graphs. Comput Mater 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-018-0108-510.1038/s41524-018-0108-5 ↗

80. Dureth C, Seibert P, Rucker D, Handford S, Kastner M, Gude M. Conditional diffusion-based microstructure reconstruction

81. Jung J, Yoon JI, Park HK, Jo H, Kim HS (2020) Microstructure design using machine learning generated low dimensional and continuous design space. Materialia 11:100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2020.10069010.1016/j.mtla.2020.100690 ↗

82. Tang J, Geng X, Li D, Shi Y, Tong J, Xiao H, Peng F (2021) Machine learned-based microstructure prediction during laser sintering of alumina. Sci Rep 11:10724. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89816-x10.1038/s41598-021-89816-x ↗

83. Iyer A, Dey B, Dasgupta A, Chen W. A conditional generative model for predicting material microstructures from processing methods

84. Kanit T, Forest S, Galliet I, Mounoury V, Jeulin D (2003) Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach. Int J Solids Struct 40(13):3647–3679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-410.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4 ↗

85. Kim Y, Jung J, Park H, Kim H (2023) Importance of microstructural features in bimodal structure-property linkage. Met Mater Int 29:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-022-01200-010.1007/s12540-022-01200-0 ↗

86. Paulson N, Priddy M, McDowell D, Kalidindi S (2019) Reduced-order microstructure-sensitive protocols to rank-order the transition fatigue resistance of polycrystalline microstructures. Int J Fatigue 119:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.011 ↗

87. Latypov M, Toth L, Kalidindi S (2019) Materials knowledge system for nonlinear composites. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 346:180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.03410.1016/j.cma.2018.11.034 ↗

88. Paulson N, Priddy M, McDowell D, Kalidindi S (2017) Reduced-order structure-property linkages for polycrystalline microstructures based on 2-point statistics. Acta Mater 129:428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.00910.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.009 ↗

89. Kaundinya PR, Choudhary K, Kalidindi SR. Machine learning approaches for feature engineering of the crystal structure: application to the prediction of the formation energy of cubic compounds, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.1131910.48550/arXiv.2105.11319 ↗

90. Generale A, Kalidindi S (2021) Reduced-order models for microstructure-sensitive effective thermal conductivity of woven ceramic matrix composites with residual porosity. Compos Struct 274:114399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11439910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114399 ↗

91. Fast T, Wodo O, Ganapathysubramanian B, Kalidindi S (2016) Microstructure taxonomy based on spatial correlations: application to microstructure coarsening. Acta Mater 108:176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.04610.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.046 ↗

92. Harrington G, Kelly C, Attari V, Arroyave R, Kalidindi S (2022) Application of a chained-ann for learning the process-structure mapping in $$mg_2si_xsn_1-x$$ spinodal decomposition. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 11:433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-022-00274-310.1007/s40192-022-00274-3 ↗

93. Barry MC, Gissinger JR, Chandross M, Wise KE, Kalidindi SR, Kumar S (2023) Voxelized atomic structure framework for materials design and discovery. Comput Mater Sci 230:112431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11243110.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112431 ↗

94. Yabansu YC, Iskakov A, Kapustina A, Rajagopalan S, Kalidindi S. Application of gaussian process regression models for capturing the evolution of microstructure statistics in aging of nickel-based superalloys. Acta Mater 17810.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.048 ↗

95. Altschuh P, Yabansu YC, Hötzer J, Selzer M, Nestler B, Kalidindi SR (2017) Data science approaches for microstructure quantification and feature identification in porous membranes. J Membr Sci 540:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.02010.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.020 ↗

96. Latypov M, Kalidindi S (2017) Data-driven reduced order models for effective yield strength and partitioning of strain in multiphase materials. J Comput Phys 346:242–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.06.01310.1016/j.jcp.2017.06.013 ↗

97. Wilson A, Adams R (2013) Gaussian process kernels for pattern discovery and extrapolation, In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on machine learning, vol 28 of proceedings of machine learning research, PMLR, pp 1067–1075

98. Lazaro-Gredilla M, Quinonero-Candela J, Rasmussen C, Figueiras-Vidal A (2010) Sparse spectrum gaussian process regression. J Mach Learn Res, 1865–1881

99. Soutis C (2005) Fibre reinforced composites in aircraft construction. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.00410.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004 ↗

100. Brown Jr WF (1955) Solid mixture permittivities. J Chem Phys 23:1514–151710.1063/1.1742339 ↗