journal article·2024-10-22Open access

Enhanced Crashworthiness Parameters of Nested Thin-Walled Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer and Al Structures: Effect of Using Expanded Polypropylene Foam

Muhammet Muaz Yalçın, Mehmet İskender Özsoy

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 21

Abstract

The in-plane loading conditions of carbon fiber/epoxy composite (CFRP) and aluminum nested-tube-reinforced expanded polypropylene (EPP) blocks were empirically examined. This study used crashworthiness metrics to estimate the best design configuration under quasi-static loading rates. The experimental phase began with lateral loading testing of single and nested aluminum and CFRP specimen. In-plane crushing experiments were performed on EPP foam blocks reinforced with nested tubes. Both single and nested aluminum tubes had comparable force–response curves and maintained their load-bearing capacity throughout testing. Despite a load-carrying capacity drop above a particular displacement threshold, the CFRP specimens had superior specific energy absorption (SEA) values due to their lightweight nature. The triple-tube nested specimens with two smaller tubes exhibited the best SEA results (1.72 and 1.88 J/g, respectively, for the aluminum and CFRP nested samples). During concurrent tube deformation, the nested samples showed a synergistic connection that increased energy absorption, especially in the EPP foam blocks with reinforced tubes. The study also examined the effects of building nested specimens with aluminum exterior tubes and CFRP inner tubes, and vice versa. This method showed that CFRP tubes within aluminum outer tubes lowered specimen weight (from 93.1 g to 67.7 g) and energy absorption (from 160.2 J to 153.3 J). However, the weight reduction outweighed the energy absorption, increasing SEA values for certain composite material configurations (from 1.72 J/g to 2.26 J/g).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sakarya University, Sakarya 54050, Turkey

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Theoretical prediction and crashworthiness optimization of multi-cell square tubes under oblique impact loading10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.08.027 ↗
2. Mechanical behavior of nested multi-tubular structures under quasi-static axial load10.1016/j.tws.2016.05.012 ↗
3. Experimental and numerical investigation of impact behavior of nested tubes with and without honeycomb filler10.1016/j.tws.2019.106256 ↗
4. Mechanical properties of a novel nested tube and its application as anti-explosion layer10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103242 ↗
5. Internally nested self-locked tube system for energy absorption10.1016/j.tws.2017.06.014 ↗
6. On the crashworthiness performance of thin-walled energy absorbers: Recent advances and future developments10.1016/j.tws.2017.05.018 ↗
7. A review of advanced materials, structures and deformation modes for adaptive energy dissipation and structural crashworthiness10.1016/j.tws.2022.109808 ↗
8. Comparative Analysis of Energy Absorption Capacity of Single and Nested Metal Matrix Composite Tubes Under Quasi-Static Lateral and Axial Loading
9. On the crashworthiness of thin-walled multi-cell structures and materials: State of the art and prospects10.1016/j.tws.2023.110734 ↗
10. Internally nested circular tube system subjected to lateral impact loading10.1016/j.tws.2015.02.014 ↗
11. An efficient energy absorber based on fourfold-tube nested circular tube system10.1016/j.tws.2019.01.026 ↗
12. Energy absorption performance of a new circular–triangular nested tube and its application as sacrificial cladding10.1016/j.tws.2020.106992 ↗
13. Crashworthiness analysis and optimization of multi-functional gradient foam-aluminum filled hierarchical thin-walled structures10.1016/j.tws.2023.110906 ↗
14. Experimental and numerical investigation of static and dynamic axial crushing of circular aluminum tubes10.1016/j.tws.2004.03.001 ↗
15. Crushing behavior of laterally compressed composite elliptical tubes: Experiments and predictions using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.05.009 ↗
16. Theoretical study of absorbed energy by empty and foam-filled composite tubes under lateral compression10.1016/j.tws.2017.01.029 ↗
17. Experimental investigation on the lateral compression in the foam-filled circular tubes10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.047 ↗
18. Excellent combination of plasticity and ultra-high strength in a low-alloy automotive steel treated by conventional continuous annealing10.1016/j.msea.2020.139694 ↗
19. Investigation of the effect of friction force on the energy absorption characteristics of thin-walled structures loaded with axial impact force10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106420 ↗
20. Influence of pre-strain on tensile response of extra deep drawing (EDD) steel under varying strain rates and crash performance
21. Dynamic plastic behavior of single and nested rings under lateral impact10.1016/j.tws.2020.107373 ↗
22. Optimised design of nested circular tube energy absorbers under lateral impact loading10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.04.005 ↗
23. Quasi-static, impact and energy absorption of internally nested tubes subjected to lateral loading10.1016/j.tws.2015.10.001 ↗
24. Experimental investigation on deformation behavior and energy absorption capability of nested steel tubes under lateral loading
25. Hot stamping of aerospace aluminium alloys: Automotive technologies for the aeronautics industry10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.032 ↗
26. Minimum cost design of fibre-reinforced concrete-filled steel tubular columns10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.06.003 ↗
27. Energy absorption characteristics of nested corrugated-elliptical tubes subjected to a lateral crushing load10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115926 ↗
28. An internally nested circular-elliptical tube system for energy absorption10.1016/j.tws.2019.03.012 ↗
29. Foam filling options for crashworthiness optimization of thin-walled multi-tubular circular columns10.1016/j.tws.2018.06.043 ↗
30. The effect of percent foam fill ratio on the energy absorption capacity of axially compressed thin-walled multi-cell square and circular tubes10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.07.003 ↗
31. Energy-absorbing mechanism and crashworthiness performance of thin-walled tubes diagonally filled with rib-reinforced foam blocks under axial crushing10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116149 ↗
32. Deformation Pattern and Energy Absorption Characteristics of A Four-Tube Nested System Under Lateral and Oblique Loadings10.1590/1679-78256550 ↗
33. Energy absorption behaviour of an aluminium foam-filled circular-triangular nested tube energy absorber under impact loading10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.065 ↗
34. Advanced lightweight materials for Automobiles: A review10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110994 ↗
35. Optimization of a thin-walled composite crash absorber10.1016/j.tws.2020.106826 ↗
36. Lightweight hybrid materials and structures for energy absorption: A state-of-the-art review and outlook10.1016/j.tws.2021.108760 ↗
37. Review of the crushing response of collapsible tubular structures10.1007/s11465-019-0579-1 ↗
38. Superior energy dissipation mechanisms compounded within composite AA6061/H130 foam structures10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107843 ↗
39. Study of lateral compression of round metallic tubes10.1016/j.tws.2004.12.002 ↗
40. Theoretical prediction of cross-sectional deformation of circular thin-walled tube in large elastic–plastic deformation stage under lateral compression10.1016/j.tws.2022.109957 ↗
41. Potentiality of MWCNT fillers on the lateral crashworthiness behaviour of polymer composite cylindrical tubes under quasi-static loading10.1177/1528083721997927 ↗
42. Comparative study on aluminum/GFRP/CFRP tubes for oblique lateral crushing10.1016/j.tws.2019.106420 ↗
43. Composites for electric vehicles and automotive sector: A review10.1016/j.geits.2022.100043 ↗
44. Theoretical and numerical crush analysis of multi-stage nested aluminium alloy tubular structures under axial impact loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.072 ↗
45. Bhutada, S., and Goel, M.D. (2021). Crashworthiness parameters and their improvement using tubes as an energy absorbing structure: An overview. Int. J. Crashworthiness, 1–32.10.1080/13588265.2021.1969845 ↗
46. Alagesan, P.K., Dirgantara, T., Jusuf, A., Gladys, A.K., and Ma, Q. (2024). Comparison of the lateral crushing response of thin-walled aluminum-thermoplastic polymer composite cylindrical shells. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct.10.1080/15376494.2024.2398732 ↗
47. Yang, H., Guo, X., Wang, H., Qu, J., Ma, Y., Lei, H., and Chen, H. (2021). Low-velocity impact performance of composite-aluminum tubes prepared by mesoscopic hybridization. Compos. Struct., 274.10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114348 ↗
48. Yang, H., and Ren, Y. (2024). On energy absorption capability and controllable failure modes of CFRP circular tube using numerical simulation. Thin-Walled Struct., 205.10.1016/j.tws.2024.112423 ↗