journal article·2024-09-12Open access

Lithofacies Prediction from Well Log Data Based on Deep Learning: A Case Study from Southern Sichuan, China

Yu Shi, Junqiao Liao, Lu Gan, Rongjiang Tang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 18

Abstract

This paper utilizes prevalent deep learning techniques, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Residual Neural Networks (ResNets), along with the well-established machine learning technique, Random Forest, to efficiently distinguish between common lithologies including coal, sandstone, limestone, and others. This approach is highly significant for resource extraction—such as coal, oil, natural gas, and groundwater—by streamlining the process and minimizing the need for the time-consuming manual interpretation of geophysical logging data. The natural gamma ray, density, and resistivity log data were collected from 22 wells in the mountainous region of Southern Sichuan, China, yielding approximately 70,000 samples for developing lithofacies prediction models. All the models achieved around 80% accuracy in classifying carbonaceous lithologies and up to 88% accuracy in predicting other lithologies. The trained models were applied to the logging data in the validation dataset, and the outputs were validated against geological core data, showing overall consistency, although variations in the classification results were observed across different wells. These findings suggest that deep learning techniques have the potential to develop a general model for effectively handling lithology classification with well logging data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Yangtze Region Delta Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Huzhou 313002, China

Sixth Geological Brigade of Sichuan Province, Luzhou 611731, China

Funding

Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Seedling Project · Huzhou Public Welfare Research Project

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Buryakovsky, L., Chilingar, G.V., Rieke, H.H., and Shin, S. (2012). Fundamentals of the Petrophysics of Oil and Gas Reservoirs, Wiley.10.1002/9781118472750 ↗
2. Towards Optimization of Boosting Models for Formation Lithology Identification10.1155/2019/5309852 ↗
3. Sun, Z., Jiang, B., Li, X., Li, J., and Xiao, K. (2020). A Data-Driven Approach for Lithology Identification Based on Parameter-Optimized Ensemble Learning. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13153903 ↗
4. Influence of thermal damage on physical properties of a granite rock: Porosity, permeability and ultrasonic wave evolutions10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.04.002 ↗
5. Automated lithology prediction from PGNAA and other geophysical logs10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.07.012 ↗
6. In situ estimation of roof rock strength using sonic logging10.1016/j.coal.2010.07.002 ↗
7. Lithology prediction from well log data using machine learning techniques: A case study from Talcher coalfield, Eastern India10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104605 ↗
8. Study on Fracture Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Tight Sandstone Reservoir: A Case Study on the Huagang Formation in the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin, China10.2113/2021/3310886 ↗
9. Microfacies characteristics and reservoir potential of Triassic Baikouquan Formation, northern Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China10.1016/j.jnggs.2019.03.001 ↗
10. Physics-driven deep-learning inversion with application to transient electromagnetics10.1190/geo2020-0760.1 ↗
11. Physics-informed deep neural networks for transient electromagnetic analysis10.1109/OJAP.2020.3013830 ↗
12. Fast Forecasting of water-filled bodies position using transient electromagnetic method based on deep learning10.1109/TGRS.2024.3355543 ↗
13. Quality classification and inversion of receiver functions using convolutional neural network10.1093/gji/ggac417 ↗
14. A support vector machine algorithm to classify lithofacies and model permeability in heterogeneous reservoirs10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.05.005 ↗
15. Automatic lithology prediction from well logging using kernel density estimation10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.012 ↗
16. Determination of electrofacies using wireline logs based on multivariate statistical analysis for the Kareem Formation, Gulf of Suez, Egypt
17. Electrofacies characterization using self-organizing maps10.22564/rbgf.v30i3.186 ↗
18. Evaluation of automated lithology classification architectures using highly-sampled wireline logs for coal exploration10.1016/j.cageo.2015.07.013 ↗
19. Electrofacies analysis using high-resolution wireline geophysical data as a proxy for inertinite-rich coal distribution in Late Permian Coal Seams, Bowen Basin10.1016/j.coal.2015.08.003 ↗
20. Electrofacies modelling and lithological classification of coals and mud-bearing fine-grained siliciclastic rocks based on neural networks
21. Evaluation of machine learning methods for formation lithology identification: A comparison of tuning processes and model performances10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.028 ↗
22. Improving coal quality estimation through multiple geophysical log analysis10.1016/j.coal.2016.09.013 ↗
23. Applications of machine learning for facies and fracture prediction using Bayesian Network Theory and Random Forest: Case studies from the Appalachian basin, USA10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.075 ↗
24. Complex lithofacies identification using improved probabilistic neural networks
25. Automated classification of metamorphosed coal from geophysical log data using supervised machine learning techniques10.1016/j.coal.2019.103284 ↗
26. Buduma, N., Buduma, N., and Papa, J. (2022). Fundamentals of Deep Learning, O’Reilly Media, Inc.
27. Deep learning (CNN) and transfer learning: A review10.1088/1742-6596/2273/1/012029 ↗
28. Banerjee, C., Mukherjee, T., and Pasiliao, E. (2019, January 18–20). An empirical study on generalizations of the ReLU activation function. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Southeast Conference, Kennesaw, GA, USA.10.1145/3299815.3314450 ↗
29. Gan, L., Tang, R., Li, F., and Shen, F. (2024). A Deep learning estimation for probing Depth of Transient Electromagnetic Observation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14167123 ↗
30. Targ, S., Almeida, D., and Lyman, K. (2016). Resnet in resnet: Generalizing residual architectures. arXiv.
31. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
32. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
33. Cortes, C., Mohri, M., and Rostamizadeh, A. (2012). L2 regularization for learning kernels. arXiv.
34. Keskar, N.S., Mudigere, D., Nocedal, J., Smelyanskiy, M., and Tang, P.T.P. (2016). On large-batch training for deep learning: Generalization gap and sharp minima. arXiv.
35. Parameter tuning in random forest based on grid search method for gender classification based on voice frequency
36. Machine learning and deep learning10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2 ↗
37. The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 ↗