journal article·2024-07-15Open access

Borehole Breakout Prediction Based on Multi-Output Machine Learning Models Using the Walrus Optimization Algorithm

Rui Zhang, Jian Zhou, Ming Tao, Chuanqi Li, Pingfeng Li, Taoying Liu

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 14

Abstract

Borehole breakouts significantly influence drilling operations’ efficiency and economics. Accurate evaluation of breakout size (angle and depth) can enhance drilling strategies and hold potential for in situ stress magnitude inversion. In this study, borehole breakout size is approached as a complex nonlinear problem with multiple inputs and outputs. Three hybrid multi-output models, integrating commonly used machine learning algorithms (artificial neural networks ANN, random forests RF, and Boost) with the Walrus optimization algorithm (WAOA) optimization techniques, are developed. Input features are determined through literature research (friction angle, cohesion, rock modulus, Poisson’s ratio, mud pressure, borehole radius, in situ stress), and 501 related datasets are collected to construct the borehole breakout size dataset. Model performance is assessed using the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (R2), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Variance Accounted For (VAF), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). Results indicate that WAOA-ANN exhibits excellent and stable prediction performance, particularly on the test set, outperforming the single-output ANN model. Additionally, SHAP sensitivity analysis conducted on the WAOA-ANN model reveals that maximum horizontal principal stress (σH) is the most influential parameter in predicting both the angle and depth of borehole breakout. Combining the results of the studies and analyses conducted, WAOA-ANN is considered to be an effective hybrid multi-output model in the prediction of borehole breakout size.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Laboratory 3SR, CNRS UMR 5521, Grenoble Alpes University, 38000 Grenoble, France

Hongda Blasting Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510623, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Distinguished Youth Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China · Outstanding Youth Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education · Zhumadian Key R&D Special Project

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Borehole breakouts induced in arkosic sandstones and a discrete element analysis10.1007/s00603-015-0812-0 ↗
2. Addis, M., Barton, N., Bandis, S., and Henry, J. (1990, January 23–26). Laboratory studies on the stability of vertical and deviated boreholes. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, USA. SPE-20406-MS.10.2523/20406-MS ↗
3. Influence of borehole diameter on the formation of borehole breakouts in black shale10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.03.012 ↗
4. The treatment of stress in rock: I. The rock stress measurement: II. Borehole rock stress measuring instrument: III. The results of some rock stress investigations
5. Cox, J.W. (1970, January 3–6). The high resolution dipmeter reveals dip-related borehole and formation characteristics. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Los Angeles, CA, USA. SPWLA-1970-D.
6. Stress orientations from oil-well fractures in Alberta and Texas10.1139/e81-056 ↗
7. In situ stress evaluation from borehole breakouts. Experimental studies
8. Laboratory study of borehole breakouts in Cordova Cream: A case of shear failure mechanism10.1016/0148-9062(93)90070-T ↗
9. Haimson, B.C., and Song, I. (1998, January 8–10). Borehole breakouts in Berea sandstone: Two porosity-dependent distinct shapes and mechanisms of formation. Proceedings of the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Trondheim, Norway. SPE-47249-MS.10.2523/47249-MS ↗
10. Well bore breakouts and in situ stress10.1029/JB090iB07p05523 ↗
11. Stability analysis of vertical boreholes using the Mogi–Coulomb failure criterion10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.001 ↗
12. Villarroel, F., Júnior, E., Rabello, G., Bloch, M., and de Azevedo, V. (2010, January 14–17). Breakouts: Physical and numerical modeling. Proceedings of the SPE Europec featured at EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain. SPE-131656-MS.10.2118/131656-MS ↗
13. Wu, B., Chen, Z., and Zhang, X. (2016, January 26–29). Stability of borehole with breakouts—An experimental and numerical modelling study. Proceedings of the ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, TX, USA. ARMA-2016-2466.
14. Simulation of borehole breakouts using FRACOD2D10.2516/ogst:2002039 ↗
15. Numerical simulation on borehole breakout and borehole size effect using discrete element method10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.05.019 ↗
16. Zhang, H., Yin, S., and Aadnoy, B.S. (2019). Numerical investigation of the impacts of borehole breakouts on breakdown pressure. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12050888 ↗
17. Numerical Analysis of V-Shaped Borehole Breakout Using Three-Dimensional Discrete-Element Method10.1007/s00603-023-03226-1 ↗
18. True triaxial strength of the KTB amphibolite under borehole wall conditions and its use to estimate the maximum horizontal in situ stress10.1029/2001JB000647 ↗
19. Deformation and fracture around cylindrical openings in rock—II. Initiation, growth and interaction of fractures10.1016/0148-9062(90)92714-P ↗
20. Deformation and fracture around cylindrical openings in rock—I. Observations and analysis of deformations10.1016/0148-9062(90)92713-O ↗
21. Martin, C., Martino, J., and Dzik, E. (1994, January 29–31). Comparison of borehole breakouts from laboratory and field tests. Proceedings of the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands. SPE-28050-MS.10.2523/28050-MS ↗
22. Transient thermo-poroelastic finite element analysis of borehole breakouts10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.08.008 ↗
23. State-of-the-art review of machine learning and optimization algorithms applications in environmental effects of blasting10.1007/s10462-023-10636-8 ↗
24. Short-term rockburst damage assessment in burst-prone mines: An explainable XGBOOST hybrid model with SCSO algorithm10.1007/s00603-023-03522-w ↗
25. Microseismic location in hardrock metal mines by machine learning models based on hyperparameter optimization using bayesian optimizer10.1007/s00603-023-03483-0 ↗
26. Sharma, A., Burak, T., Nygaard, R., Hoel, E., Kristiansen, T., Hellvik, S., and Welmer, M. (2023, January 5–8). Projecting Petrophysical Logs at the Bit through Multi-Well Data Analysis with Machine Learning. Proceedings of the SPE Offshore Europe Conference and Exhibition, Aberdeen, UK. D031S012R001.
27. Application of extreme gradient boosting method for evaluating the properties of episodic failure of borehole breakout10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211837 ↗
28. Poroelastic modeling of borehole breakouts for in-situ stress determination by finite element method10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.085 ↗
29. Finite-element modeling of borehole breakouts for in situ stress determination10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001322 ↗
30. Inference of in situ stress from thermoporoelastic borehole breakouts based on artificial neural network10.1002/nag.2982 ↗
31. Using single-and multi-target regression trees and ensembles to model a compound index of vegetation condition10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.01.037 ↗
32. Multioutput support vector regression for remote sensing biophysical parameter estimation10.1109/LGRS.2011.2109934 ↗
33. Latent variable multivariate regression modeling10.1016/S0169-7439(99)00018-0 ↗
34. A survey on multi-output regression10.1002/widm.1157 ↗
35. Soroush, H. (July, January 28). A Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network Model to Predict Borehole Breakouts Full Geometry using Rock Properties. Proceedings of the ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Virtual. ARMA-2020-1440.
36. A combined approach for estimating horizontal principal stress magnitudes from borehole breakout data via artificial neural network and rock failure criterion10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104539 ↗
37. Sensitivity analysis of effective parameters in borehole failure, using neural network10.1155/2022/4958004 ↗
38. An investigation of machine learning techniques to estimate minimum horizontal stress magnitude from borehole breakout10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.06.005 ↗
39. Zhang, H., Wu, B., Nie, Y., Zhang, X., and Chen, Z. (2023, January 25–28). Prediction of in-situ stresses by using machine learning and intelligent optimization algorithms. Proceedings of the ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Atlanta, GA, USA. ARMA-2023-0453.10.56952/ARMA-2023-0453 ↗
40. Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research10.1016/S0731-7085(99)00272-1 ↗
41. Introduction to artificial neural network (ANN) methods: What they are and how to use them
42. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
43. Qi, Y. (2012). Random forest for bioinformatics. Ensemble Machine Learning: Methods and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_11 ↗
44. Long-term energy and peak power demand forecasting based on sequential-XGBoost10.1109/TPWRS.2023.3289400 ↗
45. A new bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems based on walruses behavior10.1038/s41598-023-35863-5 ↗
46. Evolution of stress-induced borehole breakout in inherently anisotropic rock: Insights from discrete element modeling10.1002/2015JB012676 ↗
47. Thermoporoelastoplastic Wellbore Breakout Modeling by Finite Element Method10.3390/mining2010004 ↗
48. Experimental and analytical investigations of the effect of hole size on borehole breakout geometries for estimation of in situ stresses10.1007/s00603-019-01944-z ↗
49. Herrick, C.G., and Haimson, B.C. (1994, January 1–3). Modeling of episodic failure leading to borehole breakouts in Alabama limestone. Proceedings of the ARMA North America Rock Mechanics Symposium, Austin, TX, USA. ARMA-1994-0217.
50. Borehole breakouts and compaction bands in two high-porosity sandstones10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.09.001 ↗
51. Lee, H., and Haimson, B. (2006, January 19–21). Borehole breakouts and in-situ stress in sandstones. Proceedings of the In-Situ Rock Stress: International Symposium on In-Situ Rock Stress, Trondheim, Norway.10.1201/9781439833650.ch26 ↗
52. A true triaxial strength criterion for rocks by gene expression programming10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.004 ↗
53. Machine learning models to predict the tunnel wall convergence10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101022 ↗
54. Enhanced multi-task learning models for pile drivability prediction: Leveraging metaheuristic algorithms and statistical evaluation10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101288 ↗
55. Prediction of flyrock distance in surface mining using a novel hybrid model of harris hawks optimization with multi-strategies-based support vector regression10.1007/s11053-023-10259-4 ↗
56. Li, E., Zhang, N., Xi, B., Yu, Z., Fissha, Y., Taiwo, B.O., Segarra, P., Feng, H.B., and Zhou, J. (2024). Analysis and modelling of gas relative permeability in reservoir by hybrid KELM methods. Earth Sci. Inform., 1–28.10.1007/s12145-024-01326-2 ↗
57. Performance evaluation of hybrid WOA-XGBoost, GWO-XGBoost and BO-XGBoost models to predict blast-induced ground vibration10.1007/s00366-021-01393-9 ↗
58. Proposing several hybrid SSA—Machine learning techniques for estimating rock cuttability by conical pick with relieved cutting modes10.1007/s11440-022-01685-4 ↗
59. Yang, P., Yong, W., Li, C., Peng, K., Wei, W., Qiu, Y., and Zhou, J. (2023). Hybrid random forest-based models for earth pressure balance tunneling-induced ground settlement prediction. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042574 ↗
60. Wang, Z., Zhou, J., and Peng, K. (2024). The Potential of Multi-Task Learning in CFDST Design: Load-Bearing Capacity Design with Three MTL Models. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17091994 ↗
61. Zhang, Y.L., Qiu, Y.G., Armaghsni, D.J., Monjezi, M., and Zhou, J. (2024). Enhancing rock fragmentation prediction in mining operations: A Hybrid GWO-RF model with SHAP interpretability. J. Cent. South Univ., 1–14.10.3390/buildings14030591 ↗
62. Qiu, Y., Zhou, J., He, B., Armaghani, D.J., Huang, S., and He, X. (2024). Evaluation and interpretation of blasting-induced tunnel overbreak: Using heuristic-based ensemble learning and gene expression programming techniques. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 1–29.10.1007/s00603-024-03947-x ↗
63. Guan, J., Yu, Z., Liao, Y., Tang, R., Duan, M., and Han, G. (2024). Predicting Critical Path of Labor Dispute Resolution in Legal Domain by Machine Learning Models Based on SHapley Additive exPlanations and Soft Voting Strategy. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12020272 ↗
64. Novel rockburst prediction criterion with enhanced explainability employing CatBoost and nature-inspired metaheuristic technique10.1016/j.undsp.2024.03.003 ↗