journal article·2024-06-27Open access

Prediction and Optimization of Open-Pit Mine Blasting Based on Intelligent Algorithms

Jiang Guo, Zekun Zhao, Peidong Zhao, Jingjing Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 13

Abstract

Blasting prediction and parameter optimization can effectively improve blasting effectiveness and control production energy consumption. However, the presence of multiple factors and diverse effects in open-pit blasting increases the difficulty of effective prediction and optimization. Therefore, this study takes blasting fragmentation as the prediction indicator and proposes a hybrid intelligent model based on multiple parameters. The model employs a least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) optimized by a genetic algorithm (GA) for prediction. Additionally, the performance of GA-LSSVM was compared with LSSVM optimized by rime optimization algorithms (RIME-LSSVM) and by particle swarm optimization algorithms (PSO-LSSVM), unoptimized LSSVM, and the Kuz–Ram empirical model. Furthermore, considering both blasting fragmentation and blasting cost, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm was used for blasting parameter optimization, followed by field validation. The results indicated that the GA-LSSVM model provided the best prediction of blasting fragmentation, achieving optimal evaluation metrics: a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.947, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.688, and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.962. Moreover, the MOPSO optimization model yielded the optimal blasting parameter combination: a burden of 5.5 m, spacing of 4.3 m, specific charge of 0.51 kg/m3, and subdrilling of 2.0 m. Field blasting tests confirmed the reliability of these parameters. This study can provide scientific recommendations for open-pit mine blasting design and cost control.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mineral Processing and Grinding · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Hongda Blasting Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510623, China

Key Laboratory of Safety Intelligent Mining in Non-Coal Open-Pit Mines, National Mine Safety Administration, Guangzhou 510623, China

Funding

Postgraduate Innovative Project of Central South University · Central South University-Hongda Blasting Engineering Group Postgraduate Joint Training Base · State Key Laboratory of Safety Intelligent Mining in Non-coal Open-pit Mines, National Mine Safety Administration

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Ke, B., Pan, R., Zhang, J., Wang, W., Hu, Y., Lei, G., Chi, X., Ren, G., and You, Y. (2022). Parameter Optimization and Fragmentation Prediction of Fan-Shaped Deep Hole Blasting in Sanxin Gold and Copper Mine. Minerals, 12.10.3390/min12070788 ↗
2. Prediction of rock fragmentation based on IGWO-CatBoost model
3. Rock factor prediction in the Kuz–Ram model and burden estimation by mean fragment size10.1016/j.gete.2022.100415 ↗
4. Modified Kuz—Ram fragmentation model and its use at the Sungun Copper Mine10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.05.003 ↗
5. Study on accuracy assessment of mine blasting based on the modified KUZ-RAM model
6. Empirical and probabilistic analysis of blast-induced ground vibrations10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.038 ↗
7. Assessment of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration at Jinduicheng Molybdenum Open Pit Mine10.1007/s11053-020-09623-5 ↗
8. Operational and geological parameters in assessing blast-induced airblast-overpressure in quarries10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.06.004 ↗
9. Development of an empirical model for predicting the effects of controllable blasting parameters on flyrock distance in surface mines10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.03.011 ↗
10. Development of soft computing based mathematical models for predicting mean fragment size coupled with their Monte Carlo simulation estimations10.1007/s12517-022-09568-4 ↗
11. Blasting fragmentation prediction based on support vector machine model
12. Support vector machines approach to mean particle size of rock fragmentation due to bench blasting prediction10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61195-3 ↗
13. Application of neural network model in predicting fragmentation of bench blasting
14. Predicting the average size of blasted rocks in aggregate quarries using artificial neural networks10.1007/s10064-018-1270-1 ↗
15. Mean fragmentation size prediction in an open-pit mine using machine learning techniques and the Kuz-Ram model
16. Chandrahas, N.S., Choudhary, B.S., Teja, M.V., Venkataramayya, M.S., and Prasad, N.S.R.K. (2022). XG Boost Algorithm to Simultaneous Prediction of Rock Fragmentation and Induced Ground Vibration Using Unique Blast Data. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12105269 ↗
17. Neuro-fuzzy based approach for prediction of blast-induced ground vibration10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.03.023 ↗
18. Prediction and minimization of blast-induced ground vibration using two robust meta-heuristic algorithms10.1007/s00366-017-0501-6 ↗
19. Prediction of rock fragmentation based on grey relational analysis and GA-BP model
20. Modeling of rock fragmentation by firefly optimization algorithm and boosted generalized additive model10.1007/s00521-020-05197-8 ↗
21. Prediction of rock fragmentation using LOO-XGboost model
22. A novel ensemble machine learning model to predict mine blasting-induced rock fragmentation10.1007/s10064-023-03138-y ↗
23. Enhancing the performance of LSSVM model in predicting rock fragmentation size via optimization algorithms10.1007/s12205-023-1327-y ↗
24. Predicting the rock fragmentation in surface mines using optimized radial basis function and cascaded forward neural network models
25. Figueiredo, J., Torres, V., Cruz, R., and Moreira, D. (2023). Blasting Fragmentation Study Using 3D Image Analysis of a Hard Rock Mine. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13127090 ↗
26. Minimization of blast-induced dust emission using gene-expression programming and grasshopper optimization algorithm: A smart mining solution based on blasting plan optimization10.1007/s10098-022-02327-9 ↗
27. A hybrid paretosearch algorithm and goal attainment method for maximizing production and reducing blast-induced ground vibration: A blast design parameter selection approach10.1080/25726668.2020.1790262 ↗
28. Multi-objective mixture design of cemented paste backfill using particle swarm optimisation algorithm10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106385 ↗
29. Reduction of the undesirable bench-blasting consequences with emphasis on ground vibration using a developed multi-objective stochastic programming10.1080/17480930.2016.1158964 ↗
30. Guo, J., Zhao, P., and Li, P. (2023). Prediction and Optimization of Blasting-Induced Ground Vibration in Open-Pit Mines Using Intelligent Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13127166 ↗
31. Implementation of artificial intelligence and support vector machine learning to estimate the drilling fluid density in high-pressure high-temperature wells10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.092 ↗
32. Machine-learning models for activity class prediction: A comparative study of feature selection and classification algorithms10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.06.017 ↗
33. Learning SVM in Kreĭn Spaces10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2477830 ↗
34. Least squares support vector machine classifiers10.1023/A:1018628609742 ↗
35. Improvement of PSO optimized LSSVM for liquid rocket engine fault detection
36. Prediction of blasting vibration effects in open-pit mines based on PSO-LSSVM model
37. Komadja, G.C., Rana, A., Glodji, L.A., Anye, V., Jadaun, G., Onwualu, P.A., and Sawmliana, C. (2022). Assessing ground vibration caused by rock blasting in surface mines using machine-learning approaches: A comparison of CART, SVR and MARS. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141711060 ↗
38. Nguyen, H., Choi, Y., Bui, X.-N., and Nguyen-Thoi, T. (2020). Predicting blast-induced ground vibration in open-pit mines using vibration sensors and support vector regression-based optimization algorithms. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20010132 ↗
39. Automatic generation system of path planning programs based on collective intelligence achievements
40. Xie, M., Huang, T.L., and Zhu, X. (2010, January 2). A Novel Routing Algorithm for Energy-Efficient in Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic & Evolutionary Computing, Guilin, China.10.1109/WGEC.2009.116 ↗
41. Mohd Yamin, M.N., Ab. Aziz, K., Siang, T.G., and Ab. Aziz, N.A. (2023). Particle Swarm Optimisation for Emotion Recognition Systems: A Decade Review of the Literature. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13127054 ↗
42. Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization10.1007/s12517-013-1174-0 ↗
43. Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067 ↗
44. Evaluation and optimization of blasting approaches to reducing oversize boulders and toes in open-pit mine10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.03.010 ↗
45. “RIME: A Physics-Based Optimization10.1016/j.neucom.2023.02.010 ↗
46. Study on optimization of blasting parameters based on MOPSO from the perspective of energy consumption control
47. Study on prediction of blasting fragmentation in Changjiushanshan limestone mine
48. Optimizing a Hybrid Wind-PV-Battery System Using GA-PSO and MOPSO for Reducing Cost and Increasing Reliability10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.057 ↗