A Process-Structure-Property Simulation Framework for Quantifying Uncertainty in Additive Manufacturing: Application to Fatigue in Ti-6Al-4V
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes produce heterogeneous microstructures, leading to significant uncertainty in mechanical behavior. Process-induced defects cause additional uncertainty and can degrade performance, particularly for local processes like fatigue. However, time and monetary costs impose constraints on using repeated experiments to quantify this uncertainty across the process parameter space. Applying uncertainty quantification methods with computational materials simulations can help to alleviate these costs. In this paper, a physics-based process-structure–property (PSP) simulation framework is developed and applied to laser powder bed fusion AM of Ti-6Al-4V. Microstructures are generated from process-structure simulations that combine an analytical temperature field solution with a kinetic Monte Carlo-based model incorporating crystallographic texture and porosity development. The microstructures are passed to structure-property simulations comprising a fast Fourier transform-based crystal plasticity solver to predict a fatigue indicator parameter. Two uncertainty quantification problems are addressed: (1) probabilistic parameter calibration for the thermal model and (2) prediction of extreme values and the associated uncertainty of the fatigue indicator parameter using the full PSP framework. The simulations demonstrate the detrimental influence of keyhole porosity on fatigue, while also showing that pore-microstructure interaction increases uncertainty in the fatigue indicator parameter extreme values. The uncertainty quantification capabilities of the PSP framework provide a path toward using computational materials simulations to support qualification and certification of AM parts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (99)
Show source-provided references
1. Mahadevan S, Nath P, Hu Z (2022) Uncertainty quantification for additive manufacturing process improvement: recent advances. ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Eng 8(1):010801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405318410.1115/1.4053184 ↗
2. Yadollahi A, Shamsaei N (2017) Additive manufacturing of fatigue resistant materials: challenges and opportunities. Int J Fatigue 98:14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.001 ↗
3. Seifi M, Gorelik M, Waller J, Hrabe N, Shamsaei N, Daniewicz S et al (2017) Progress towards metal additive manufacturing standardization to support qualification and certification. JOM 69(3):439–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2265-210.1007/s11837-017-2265-2 ↗
4. Li P, Warner DH, Fatemi A, Phan N (2016) Critical assessment of the fatigue performance of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V and perspective for future research. Int J Fatigue 85:130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.12.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.12.003 ↗
5. Additive manufacturing requirements for spaceflight systems. In: National aeronautics and space administration (2021). NASA Technical Standard 6030
6. Molaei R, Fatemi A, Sanaei N, Pegues J, Shamsaei N, Shao S et al (2020) Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, part II: the relationship between microstructure, material cyclic properties, and component performance. Int J Fatigue 132:105363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10536310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105363 ↗
7. Sanaei N, Fatemi A, Phan N (2019) Defect characteristics and analysis of their variability in metal L-PBF additive manufacturing. Mater Des 182:108091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10809110.1016/j.matdes.2019.108091 ↗
8. Kouraytem N, Li X, Tan W, Kappes B, Spear AD (2021) Modeling process-structure-property relationships in metal additive manufacturing: a review on physics-driven versus data-driven approaches. J Phys Mater 4(3):032002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/abca7b10.1088/2515-7639/abca7b ↗
9. Peralta AD, Enright M, Megahed M, Gong J, Roybal M, Craig J (2016) Towards rapid qualification of powder-bed laser additively manufactured parts. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 5(1):154–176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-016-0052-510.1186/s40192-016-0052-5 ↗
10. Whelan G, McDowell DL (2020) Machine learning-enabled uncertainty quantification for modeling structure-property linkages for fatigue critical engineering alloys using an ICME workflow. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9(4):376–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-020-00192-210.1007/s40192-020-00192-2 ↗
11. Agius D, O’Toole P, Wallbrink C, Sterjovski Z, Wang CH, Schaffer GB (2021) Integrating phase field and crystal plasticity finite element models for simulations of titanium alloy Ti–5553. J Phys Mater 4(4):044014. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ac194f10.1088/2515-7639/ac194f ↗
12. Herriott C, Li X, Kouraytem N, Tari V, Tan W, Anglin B et al (2019) A multi-scale, multi-physics modeling framework to predict spatial variation of properties in additive-manufactured metals. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 27(2):025009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/aaf75310.1088/1361-651X/aaf753 ↗
13. Liu PW, Wang Z, Xiao YH, Lebensohn RA, Liu YC, Horstemeyer MF et al (2020) Integration of phase-field model and crystal plasticity for the prediction of process-structure-property relation of additively manufactured metallic materials. Int J Plast 128:102670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10267010.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102670 ↗
14. Yan W, Lian Y, Yu C, Kafka OL, Liu Z, Liu WK et al (2018) An integrated process-structure-property modeling framework for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 339:184–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.05.00410.1016/j.cma.2018.05.004 ↗
15. Kafka OL, Jones KK, Yu C, Cheng P, Liu WK (2021) Image-based multiscale modeling with spatially varying microstructures from experiments: demonstration with additively manufactured metal in fatigue and fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 150:104350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2021.10435010.1016/j.jmps.2021.104350 ↗
16. Prithivirajan V, Sangid MD (2018) The role of defects and critical pore size analysis in the fatigue response of additively manufactured IN718 via crystal plasticity. Mater Des 150:139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.02210.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.022 ↗
17. Cao M, Liu Y, Dunne FPE (2022) A crystal plasticity approach to understand fatigue response with respect to pores in additive manufactured aluminium alloys. Int J Fatigue 161:106917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10691710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106917 ↗
18. Yeratapally SR, Lang CG, Cerrone AR, Niebur GL, Cronberger K (2022) Effect of defects on the constant-amplitude fatigue behavior of as-built Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion process: assessing performance with metallographic analysis and micromechanical simulations. Addit Manuf 52:102639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10263910.1016/j.addma.2022.102639 ↗
19. Wang Z, Liu P, Ji Y, Mahadevan S, Horstemeyer MF, Hu Z et al (2019) Uncertainty quantification in metallic additive manufacturing through physics-informed data-driven modeling. JOM 71(8):2625–2634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03555-z10.1007/s11837-019-03555-z ↗
20. Saunders R, Rawlings A, Birnbaum A, Iliopoulos A, Michopoulos J, Lagoudas D et al (2022) Additive manufacturing melt pool prediction and classification via multifidelity Gaussian process surrogates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-022-00276-110.1007/s40192-022-00276-1 ↗
21. Liu S, Stebner AP, Kappes BB, Zhang X (2021) Machine learning for knowledge transfer across multiple metals additive manufacturing printers. Addit Manuf 39:101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10187710.1016/j.addma.2021.101877 ↗
22. Herriott C, Spear AD (2020) Predicting microstructure-dependent mechanical properties in additively manufactured metals with machine- and deep-learning methods. Comput Mater Sci 175:109599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10959910.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109599 ↗
23. Collins PC, Haden CV, Ghamarian I, Hayes BJ, Ales T, Penso G et al (2014) Progress toward an integration of process-structure-property-performance models for three-dimensional (3-D) printing of titanium alloys. JOM 66(7):1299–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-014-1007-y10.1007/s11837-014-1007-y ↗
24. Cunningham R, Zhao C, Parab N, Kantzos C, Pauza J, Fezzaa K et al (2019) Keyhole threshold and morphology in laser melting revealed by ultrahigh-speed x-ray imaging. Science 363(6429):849–852. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav468710.1126/science.aav4687 ↗
25. Gordon JV, Narra SP, Cunningham RW, Liu H, Chen H, Suter RM et al (2020) Defect structure process maps for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 36:101552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10155210.1016/j.addma.2020.101552 ↗
26. Gan Z, Kafka OL, Parab N, Zhao C, Fang L, Heinonen O et al (2021) Universal scaling laws of keyhole stability and porosity in 3D printing of metals. Nat Commun 12(1):2379. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22704-010.1038/s41467-021-22704-0 ↗
27. Huang Y, Fleming TG, Clark SJ, Marussi S, Fezzaa K, Thiyagalingam J et al (2022) Keyhole fluctuation and pore formation mechanisms during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Nat Commun 13(1):1170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28694-x10.1038/s41467-022-28694-x ↗
28. Webb III EB, Garcia Cardona C, Wagner G, Tikare V, Holm E, Plimpton S, et al (2009) Crossing the mesoscale no-mans land via parallel kinetic Monte Carlo. SAND2009-622610.2172/966942 ↗
29. Lebensohn RA, Kanjarla AK, Eisenlohr P (2012) An elasto-viscoplastic formulation based on fast Fourier transforms for the prediction of micromechanical fields in polycrystalline materials. Int J Plast 32–33:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.12.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2011.12.005 ↗
30. Kusuma C (2016) The effect of laser power and scan speed on melt pool characteristics of pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy for selective laser melting. Wright State University, Dayton, OH
31. Bidare P, Maier RRJ, Beck RJ, Shephard JD, Moore AJ (2017) An open-architecture metal powder bed fusion system for in-situ process measurements. Addit Manuf 16:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.00710.1016/j.addma.2017.06.007 ↗
32. Rosenthal D (1946) The theory of moving sources of heat and its application to metal treatments. Trans ASME 68(8):849–865. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.401862410.1115/1.4018624 ↗
33. Pauza JG, Tayon WA, Rollett AD (2021) Computer simulation of microstructure development in powder-bed additive manufacturing with crystallographic texture. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 29(5):055019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ac03a610.1088/1361-651X/ac03a6 ↗
34. King WE, Barth HD, Castillo VM, Gallegos GF, Gibbs JW, Hahn DE et al (2014) Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 214(12):2915–2925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005 ↗
35. Holm EA, Battaile CC (2001) The computer simulation of microstructural evolution. JOM 53(9):20–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0063-210.1007/s11837-001-0063-2 ↗
36. Zinovieva O, Zinoviev A, Ploshikhin V (2018) Three-dimensional modeling of the microstructure evolution during metal additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci 141:207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.01810.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.018 ↗
37. Rodgers TM, Moser D, Abdeljawad F, Jackson ODU, Carroll JD, Jared BH et al (2021) Simulation of powder bed metal additive manufacturing microstructures with coupled finite difference-Monte Carlo method. Addit Manuf 41:101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10195310.1016/j.addma.2021.101953 ↗
38. Dezfoli ARA, Hwang WS, Huang WC, Tsai TW (2017) Determination and controlling of grain structure of metals after laser incidence: theoretical approach. Sci Rep 7(1):41527. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep4152710.1038/srep41527 ↗
39. Rodgers TM, Madison JD, Tikare V (2017) Simulation of metal additive manufacturing microstructures using kinetic Monte Carlo. Comput Mater Sci 135:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.05310.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.053 ↗
40. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21(6):1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.169911410.1063/1.1699114 ↗
41. Raabe D (2000) Scaling Monte Carlo kinetics of the Potts model using rate theory. Acta Mater 48(7):1617–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00451-610.1016/S1359-6454(99)00451-6 ↗
42. Khairallah SA, Anderson AT, Rubenchik A, King WE (2016) Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater 108:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.01410.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 ↗
43. Pegues JW, Shao S, Shamsaei N, Sanaei N, Fatemi A, Warner DH et al (2020) Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, part I: the effects of powder feedstock, manufacturing, and post-process conditions on the resulting microstructure and defects. Int J Fatigue 132:105358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10535810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105358 ↗
44. Burgers WG (1934) On the process of transition of the cubic-body-centered modification into the hexagonal-close-packed modification of zirconium. Physica 1(7–12):561–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(34)80244-310.1016/S0031-8914(34)80244-3 ↗
45. Glavicic MG, Goetz RL, Barker DR, Shen G, Furrer D, Woodfield A et al (2008) Modeling of texture evolution during hot forging of alpha/beta titanium alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 39(4):887–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-007-9376-210.1007/s11661-007-9376-2 ↗
46. Glavicic MG, Kobryn PA, Bieler TR, Semiatin SL (2003) A method to determine the orientation of the high-temperature beta phase from measured EBSD data for the low-temperature alpha phase in Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Eng A 346(1–2):50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00535-X10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00535-X ↗
47. Silversmith W (2023) cc3d: connected components on multilabel 3D & 2D images. https://pypi.org/project/connected-components-3d/
48. McDowell DL, Dunne FPE (2010) Microstructure-sensitive computational modeling of fatigue crack formation. Int J Fatigue 32(9):1521–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.003 ↗
49. Brockman RA, Hoffman RM, Golden PJ, Musinski WD, Jha SK, John R (2021) A computational framework for microstructural crack propagation. Int J Fatigue 152:106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10639710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106397 ↗
50. Leicht A, Yu CH, Luzin V, Klement U, Hryha E (2020) Effect of scan rotation on the microstructure development and mechanical properties of 316L parts produced by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Charact 163:110309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11030910.1016/j.matchar.2020.110309 ↗
51. Tang M, Pistorius PC, Beuth JL (2017) Prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity for powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 14:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.12.00110.1016/j.addma.2016.12.001 ↗
52. Gil FJ, Planell JA (1991) Growth order and activation energies for grain growth of Ti–6Al–4V alloy in ß phase. Scr Metall Mater 25(12):2843–2848. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-716X(91)90167-Y10.1016/0956-716X(91)90167-Y ↗
53. Smithells CJ, Gale WF, Totemeier TC (2004) Smithells metals reference book, 8th edn. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam
54. Mayeur JR, McDowell DL (2007) A three-dimensional crystal plasticity model for duplex Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Plast 23(9):1457–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.006 ↗
55. Zhang M, Zhang J, McDowell DL (2007) Microstructure-based crystal plasticity modeling of cyclic deformation of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Plast 23(8):1328–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.009 ↗
56. Bridier F, McDowell DL, Villechaise P, Mendez J (2009) Crystal plasticity modeling of slip activity in Ti–6Al–4V under high cycle fatigue loading. Int J Plast 25(6):1066–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.08.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2008.08.004 ↗
57. Ozturk T, Rollett AD (2018) Effect of microstructure on the elasto-viscoplastic deformation of dual phase titanium structures. Comput Mech 61(1–2):55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1467-310.1007/s00466-017-1467-3 ↗
58. Gu T, Stopka KS, Xu C, McDowell DL (2020) Prediction of maximum fatigue indicator parameters for duplex Ti–6Al–4V using extreme value theory. Acta Mater 188:504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.02.00910.1016/j.actamat.2020.02.009 ↗
59. Cocke CK, Rollett AD, Lebensohn RA, Spear AD (2021) The AFRL additive manufacturing modeling challenge: predicting micromechanical fields in AM IN625 using an FFT-based method with direct input from a 3D microstructural image. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(2):157–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00211-w10.1007/s40192-021-00211-w ↗
60. Brent RP (1973) Algorithms for minimization without derivatives. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
61. Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Lane B, Moylan S, Donmez A, Özel T (2017) Laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625: experimental investigations of effects of process parameters on melt pool size and shape with spatter analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 121:22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.03.00410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.03.004 ↗
62. Groeber MA, Jackson MA (2014) DREAM.3D: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3(1):56–72. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9772-3-510.1186/2193-9772-3-5 ↗
63. Pesach A, Tiferet E, Vogel SC, Chonin M, Diskin A, Zilberman L et al (2018) Texture analysis of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V using neutron diffraction. Addit Manuf 23:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.01010.1016/j.addma.2018.08.010 ↗
64. Saville AI, Vogel SC, Creuziger A, Benzing JT, Pilchak AL, Nandwana P et al (2021) Texture evolution as a function of scan strategy and build height in electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf 46:102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10211810.1016/j.addma.2021.102118 ↗
65. Przybyla CP, McDowell DL (2010) Microstructure-sensitive extreme value probabilities for high cycle fatigue of Ni-base superalloy IN100. Int J Plast 26(3):372–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.08.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2009.08.001 ↗
66. Lane B, Heigel J, Ricker R, Zhirnov I, Khromschenko V, Weaver J et al (2020) Measurements of melt pool geometry and cooling rates of individual laser traces on IN625 bare plates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9(1):16–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-020-00169-110.1007/s40192-020-00169-1 ↗
67. Carroll JD, Brewer LN, Battaile CC, Boyce BL, Emery JM (2012) The effect of grain size on local deformation near a void-like stress concentration. Int J Plast 39:46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.06.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2012.06.002 ↗
68. Shamir M, Syed AK, Janik V, Biswal R, Zhang X (2020) The role of microstructure and local crystallographic orientation near porosity defects on the high cycle fatigue life of an additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Charact 169:110576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11057610.1016/j.matchar.2020.110576 ↗
69. Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M (1984) A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Trans B 15(2):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0266733310.1007/BF02667333 ↗
70. Schwalbach EJ, Donegan SP, Chapman MG, Chaput KJ, Groeber MA (2019) A discrete source model of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing thermal history. Addit Manuf 25:485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.00410.1016/j.addma.2018.12.004 ↗
71. Wolfer AJ, Aires J, Wheeler K, Delplanque JP, Rubenchik A, Anderson A et al (2019) Fast solution strategy for transient heat conduction for arbitrary scan paths in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 30:100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10089810.1016/j.addma.2019.100898 ↗
72. Le Biavant K, Pommier S, Prioul C (2002) Local texture and fatigue crack initiation in a Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 25(6):527–545. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00480.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00480.x ↗
73. Germain L, Gey N, Humbert M, Bocher P, Jahazi M (2005) Analysis of sharp microtexture heterogeneities in a bimodal IMI 834 billet. Acta Mater 53(13):3535–3543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.04310.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.043 ↗
74. Kapoor K, Yoo YSJ, Book TA, Kacher JP, Sangid MD (2018) Incorporating grain-level residual stresses and validating a crystal plasticity model of a two-phase Ti–6Al–4 V alloy produced via additive manufacturing. J Mech Phys Solids 121:447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.07.02510.1016/j.jmps.2018.07.025 ↗
75. Foehring D, Chew HB, Lambros J (2018) Characterizing the tensile behavior of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V using multiscale digital image correlation. Mater Sci Eng A 724:536–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.03.09110.1016/j.msea.2018.03.091 ↗
76. Moridi A, Demir AG, Caprio L, Hart AJ, Previtali B, Colosimo BM (2019) Deformation and failure mechanisms of Ti–6Al–4V as built by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 768:138456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13845610.1016/j.msea.2019.138456 ↗
77. Geathers J, Torbet CJ, Jones JW, Daly S (2015) Investigating environmental effects on small fatigue crack growth in Ti-6242S using combined ultrasonic fatigue and scanning electron microscopy. Int J Fatigue 70:154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.007 ↗
78. Li P, Warner DH, Pegues JW, Roach MD, Shamsaei N, Phan N (2019) Investigation of the mechanisms by which hot isostatic pressing improves the fatigue performance of powder bed fused Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Fatigue 120:342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.10.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.10.015 ↗
79. Simonelli M, Tse YY, Tuck C (2014) On the texture formation of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. Metall Mater Trans A 45(6):2863–2872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2218-010.1007/s11661-014-2218-0 ↗
80. Xiang H, Van Paepegem W, Kestens LAI (2022) Variant selection during BCC to HCP phase transformation in selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. Materialia 24:101470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2022.10147010.1016/j.mtla.2022.101470 ↗
81. DeMott R, Collins P, Kong C, Liao X, Ringer S, Primig S (2020) 3D electron backscatter diffraction study of $$\alpha $$ lath morphology in additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Ultramicroscopy 218:113073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.11307310.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113073 ↗
82. Pinz M, Benzing JT, Pilchak A, Ghosh S (2022) A microstructure-based porous crystal plasticity FE model for additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloys. Int J Plast 153:103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10325410.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103254 ↗
83. Deka D, Joseph DS, Ghosh S, Mills MJ (2006) Crystal plasticity modeling of deformation and creep in polycrystalline Ti-6242. Metall Mater Trans A 37(5):1371–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-0082-210.1007/s11661-006-0082-2 ↗
84. Castioni F, Cazottes S, Rollett AD, Dancette S (2021) Plastic behavior of the $$\alpha $$’ phase in Ti-6Al-4V alloys. Mater Lett 283:128719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12871910.1016/j.matlet.2020.128719 ↗
85. Stinville JC, Charpagne MA, Cervellon A, Hemery S, Wang F, Callahan PG et al (2022) On the origins of fatigue strength in crystalline metallic materials. Science 377(6610):1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn039210.1126/science.abn0392 ↗
86. Abuzaid W, Sehitoglu H, Lambros J (2013) Plastic strain localization and fatigue micro-crack formation in Hastelloy X. Mater Sci Eng A 561:507–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.10.07210.1016/j.msea.2012.10.072 ↗
87. Stopka KS, McDowell DL (2020) Microstructure-sensitive computational estimates of driving forces for surface versus subsurface fatigue crack formation in duplex Ti-6Al-4V and Al 7075–T6. JOM 72:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03804-110.1007/s11837-019-03804-1 ↗
88. Wilson D, Zheng Z, Dunne FPE (2018) A microstructure-sensitive driving force for crack growth. J Mech Phys Solids 121:147–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.07.00510.1016/j.jmps.2018.07.005 ↗
89. Hochhalter J, Bomarito G, Yeratapally S, Leser P, Ruggles T, Warner J et al (2020) Non-deterministic calibration of crystal plasticity model parameters. In: Ghosh S, Woodward C, Przybyla C (eds) Integrated computational materials engineering (ICME). Springer, Cham, pp 165–19810.1007/978-3-030-40562-5_6 ↗
90. Bomarito GF, Townsend TS, Stewart KM, Esham KV, Emery JM, Hochhalter JD (2021) Development of interpretable, data-driven plasticity models with symbolic regression. Comput Struct 252:106557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.10655710.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106557 ↗
91. Quintana MJ, Temple AJ, Harlow DG, Collins PC (2022) On the prediction of uniaxial tensile behavior beyond the yield point of wrought and additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 11(3):327–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-022-00265-410.1007/s40192-022-00265-4 ↗
92. Hayes BJ, Martin BW, Welk B, Kuhr SJ, Ales TK, Brice DA et al (2017) Predicting tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V produced via directed energy deposition. Acta Mater 133:120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.02510.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.025 ↗
93. Levine L, Lane B, Heigel J, Migler K, Stoudt M, Phan T et al (2020) Outcomes and conclusions from the 2018 AM-bench measurements, challenge problems, modeling submissions, and conference. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-019-00164-110.1007/s40192-019-00164-1 ↗
94. Menasche DB, Musinski WD, Obstalecki M, Shah MN, Donegan SP, Bernier JV et al (2021) AFRL additive manufacturing modeling series: challenge 4, in situ mechanical test of an IN625 sample with concurrent high-energy diffraction microscopy characterization. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(3):338–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00218-310.1007/s40192-021-00218-3 ↗
95. Brooks S, Gelman A, Jones GL, Meng XL (eds) (2011) Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo. Chapman & Hall/CRC handbooks of modern statistical methods. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL
96. Del Moral P, Doucet A, Jasra A (2006) Sequential Monte Carlo samplers. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 68(3):411–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00553.x10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00553.x ↗
97. Del Moral P, Doucet A, Jasra A (2012) On adaptive resampling strategies for sequential Monte Carlo methods. Bernoulli 18(1):252–278. https://doi.org/10.3150/10-BEJ33510.3150/10-BEJ335 ↗
98. Owen AB (2013) Monte Carlo theory, methods and examples. https://artowen.su.domains/mc/
99. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D et al (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python. Nat Methods 17:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗