journal article·2024-03-15Open access

Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of Seismic Response in Structures: Perspectives from Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis to Pushover Analysis

César A. Rodríguez, Ángel Mariano Rodríguez Pérez, Raúl López, Julio José Caparrós Mancera

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

This study presents a detailed comparative analysis of different methods for evaluating seismic response in structures, focusing on maximum displacements and collapse assessment. The results obtained through modal spectral analysis, non-linear dynamic analysis, and the incremental pushover analysis applied to a specific structure are compared. It has been found that the choice of time step and the consideration of ductility are critical for obtaining accurate predictions. The results of the non-linear dynamic analysis of the building’s response indicate that an earthquake equivalent to the one that affected the city of Lorca (southeast Iberian Peninsula) in 2011 would have a devastating impact on the studied structure, highlighting the importance of the finite element method modelling in predicting the formation of plastic hinges and assessing structural safety. These findings highlight the importance of utilising multiple analysis approaches and detailed modelling to fully understand the seismic behaviour of structures and ensure adequate resistance and stability to extreme events.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mining, Mechanical, Energy and Construction Engineering, University of Huelva, 21004 Huelva, Spain

Department of Engineering, University of Almería, CIMEDES Research Center (CeiA3), Carretera Sacramento, s/n, La Cañada, 04120 Almería, Spain

Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences and Engineering, University of Lleida, 25003 Lleida, Spain

Fluvial Dynamics Research Group (RIUS), University of Lleida, 25003 Lleida, Spain

Funding

CIMEDES Research Center (CeiA3) of University of Almería · Government of Cataloni

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Silva, P.G., Bardají, T., Roquero, E., Martínez-Graña, A., Perucha, M.A., Lario, J., Giner-Robles, J.L., Rodríguez-Pascua, M.A., Pérez-López, R., and Cabero, A. (2015). Seismic palaeogeography of coastal zones in the Iberian Peninsula: Understanding ancient and historic earthquakes in Spain. Cuat. Geomorfol., 29, Available online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5208869.10.17735/cyg.v29i1-2.31012 ↗
2. A regional approach for earthquake early warning in south west Iberia: A feasibility study10.1785/0120140101 ↗
3. Análisis estructural de daños orientados en el terremoto de Lorca del 11 de mayo de 2011. Aplicaciones en Arqueosismología
4. Cabañas Rodríguez, L., Carreño Herrero, E., Izquierdo Álvarez, A., Martínez Solares, J.M., Capote, R., Martínez-Díaz, J.J., Benito, B., Gaspar Escribano, J., Gaspar Escribano, A., and García Mayordomo, J. (2024, January 15). Informe del Sismo de Lorca del 11 de Mayo de 2011. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/62381.
5. Efectos arquitectónicos del terremoto de Lorca del 11 de mayo de 2011. Neoformación y reactivación de efectos en el Patrimonio Cultural
6. Rupture directivity of the 2011, Mw 5.2 Lorca earthquake (Spain)
7. The 2011 Lorca earthquake slip distribution controlled by groundwater crustal unloading10.1038/ngeo1610 ↗
8. Models for reproducing the damage scenario of the Lorca earthquake10.1007/s10518-014-9593-1 ↗
9. Spanish national strong motion network. Recording of the Huelva earthquake of 20 December 198910.1007/BF00878577 ↗
10. Observed and calculated intensities as a test of a probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis of Spain10.1785/0220130020 ↗
11. Ministerio de Transportes y Mobilidad Sostenible (2024, February 20). Gobierno de España. Anejo Nacional AN/UNE-EN 1998-1:2011(con su Modificación UNE-EN 1998–1:2011/A1:2013). Eurocódigo 8: Proyecto de Estructuras Sismorresistentes. Parte 1: Reglas Generales, Acciones Sísmicas y Reglas para Edificación. AN.5 Valores de Aceleración Horizontal pico de Referencia en Suelo Tipo A y Parámetro K, Available online: https://www.transportes.gob.es/recursos_mfom/listado/recursos/an-une-en1998-6-partes-rev-tabla_0.pdf.
12. Ribeiro, F.L., Candeias, P.X., Correia, A.A., Carvalho, A.R., and Costa, A.C. (2022). Risk and Resilience Assessment of Lisbon’s School Buildings Based on Seismic Scenarios. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178570 ↗
13. The great historical 1755 earthquake. Effects and damage in Spain10.1023/B:JOSE.0000021365.94606.03 ↗
14. Impact of a 1755-like tsunami in Huelva, Spain10.5194/nhess-10-139-2010 ↗
15. An archetype-based automated procedure to derive global-local seismic fragility of masonry building aggregates: META-FORMA-XL10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103903 ↗
16. Displacement-based design procedure for the seismic retrofit of existing buildings with self-centering dissipative braces10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106174 ↗
17. Modeling considerations in seismic assessment of RC bridges using state-of-practice structural analysis software tools10.1007/s11709-017-0389-7 ↗
18. Dirección General del Instituo Geográfico Nacional (2024, March 12). Gobierno de España. Norma de Construcción Sismorresistente: Puentes (NCSP-07), Available online: https://cvp.mitma.gob.es/downloadcustom/sample/475.
19. Seismic behavior of a novel liftable connection for modular steel buildings: Experimental and numerical studies10.1016/j.tws.2024.111563 ↗
20. Seismic performance of concrete-filled steel tubular composite columns with ultra high performance concrete plates10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115500 ↗
21. Seismic performance of steel-PEC spliced frame beam10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107456 ↗
22. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8 ↗
23. Ruggieri, S., and Uva, G. (2020). Accounting for the Spatial Variability of Seismic Motion in the Pushover Analysis of Regular and Irregular RC Buildings in the New Italian Building Code. Buildings, 10.10.3390/buildings10100177 ↗
24. Kuria, K.K., and Kegyes-Brassai, O.K. (2023). Pushover Analysis in Seismic Engineering: A Detailed Chronology and Review of Techniques for Structural Assessment. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14010151 ↗
25. Colajanni, P., Granata, M.F., and La Mendola, L. (2023). Seismic Vulnerability of Segmental Bridges with Drop-In Span by Pushover Analysis. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14010202 ↗
26. Yang, Y., Cao, J., Qu, R., and Xu, Z. (2023). Numerical Simulation of the Seismic Damage of Daikai Station Based on Pushover Analyses. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13030760 ↗
27. Seismic behavior of a replaceable artificial controllable plastic hinge for precast concrete beam-column joint10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112848 ↗
28. Seismic behavior of a friction-type artificial plastic hinge for the precast beam–column connection10.1007/s43452-022-00526-1 ↗
29. Comparative Study of the Design Seismic Spectra for Spain in the EC-8 and NCSE-02 Standards10.1007/s13369-022-06721-9 ↗
30. Would RC wide-beam buildings in Spain have survived Lorca earthquake (11-05-2011)?10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.020 ↗
31. Peak Ground Accelerarion (2024, February 20). Turquia 08/17/1999 & Lorca (Murcia, Spain). Available online: https://www.architrave.es/ejemplos/sismos.php.
32. Ministerio de Vivienda y Agenda Urbana (2024, February 20). Gobierno de España. Código Técnico de la Edificación. CTE-DB-SE-C. Seguridad estructural. Cimientos, Available online: https://www.codigotecnico.org/pdf/Documentos/SE/DBSE-C.pdf.
33. Performance-based standard specifications for maintenance and repair of concrete structures in Japan10.2749/101686607782359119 ↗
34. Ministerio de Transportes y Mobilidad Sostenible (2024, February 20). Gobierno de España. Eurocodigos, Available online: https://www.transportes.gob.es/organos-colegiados/marcado-ce-y-eurocodigos/eurocodigos.
35. Ministerio de Vivienda y Agenda Urbana (2024, February 20). Gobierno de España. Código Técnico de la Edificación. CTE-DB-SE-AE. Seguridad estructural. Acciones en la edificación, Available online: https://www.codigotecnico.org/pdf/Documentos/SE/DBSE-AE.pdf.
36. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. Eurocode EC-8(2004)).
37. Modified Mercalli intensity scale of 193110.1785/BSSA0210040277 ↗
38. El terremoto de Lorca de 11 de mayo de 2011 y la sismicidad de la región/The 11 May 2011 Lorca earthquake and the seismicity of the region
39. Rodríguez González, C.A., Caparrós-Mancera, J.J., Hernández-Torres, J.A., and Rodríguez-Pérez, Á.M. (2022). Nonlinear Analysis of Rotational Springs to Model Semi-Rigid Frames. Entropy, 24.10.3390/e24070953 ↗