journal article·2024-01-11Open access

Assessment of In Situ Compactness and Air Void Content of New Asphalt Layers Using Ground-Penetrating Radar Measurements

Péter Primusz, Enas Abdelsamei, Ahmed M. Ali, György Sipos, István Fi, András Herceg, Csaba Tóth

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 2

Abstract

This paper deals with the possibilities of ground-penetrating radar (GPR)-based quality control testing, which was demonstrated on an experimental road section of a ~220–240 m long Hungarian residential street. The measurements and their assessment aimed to control the prescribed compactness and air void content of newly built asphalt layers. Research has discussed the relationship between the air void content and the dielectric constant of asphalt layers, and provided empirical results for this relationship. We suggest a new logistic model with lower and upper asymptotes instead of the exponential formula often used in the literature. Contrary to this newly developed robust model, existing models are sensitive to extreme dielectric constant values due to the mathematical nature of their exponential function. The results of the new logistic model are compared to those of the Hoegh–Dai (HD) and Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) models on the basis of a few calibration data points. Through systematic data collection and analysis, the developed robust empirical model demonstrates a significant correlation between the relative permittivity and air void content in asphalt mixes, enabling accurate estimation of the air void content within a ±0.5% margin of error. The air void content can be applied to estimate the asphalt layer modulus. The developed model can be further exploited by utilizing a combination of GPR and drone technology. The “symbiosis” of these technologies can lead to a totally non-destructive imaging system, which can then be applied to environmental monitoring of roads and their surroundings in terms of quality control of asphalt compaction work and the hot asphalt mix behind the compaction roller during pavement construction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Geomatics and Civil Engineering, University of Sopron, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Street 4, H-9400 Sopron, Hungary

Department of Geoinformatics, Physical and Environmental Geography, University of Szeged, Egyetem U. 2-6, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary

Department of Highway and Railway Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem Rakpart 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary

Funding

Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary · National Research, Development and Innovation Office of the Ministry of Innovation and Technology

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review Study of The Effect of Air Voids on Asphalt Pavement Life10.21467/proceedings.4.29 ↗
2. Finn, F.N., and Epps, J.A. (1980). Compaction of Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete, Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A & M University System.
3. Bonnaure, F.P., Gest, G., Gravois, A., and Uge, P. (1977, January 21–23). A New Method of Predicting the Stiffness of Asphalt Paving Mixtures. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, San Antonio, TX, USA.
4. Pellinen, T.K., Song, J., and Xiao, S. (2004, January 12–16). Characterization of Hot Mix Asphalt with Varying Air Voids Content Using Triaxial Shear Strength Test. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA’04), Sun City, South Africa.
5. Epps, J.A., Gallaway, B.M., Harper, W.J., Scott, W.W., and Seay, J.W. (1969). Compaction of Asphalt Concrete Pavements, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University.
6. Linden, R.N., Mahoney, J.P., and Jackson, N.C. (1989). Effect of Compaction on Asphalt Concrete Performance, National Academy of Sciences.
7. Effects of Asphalt Content and Air Void Content on Mix Fatigue and Stiffness10.1177/0361198196154300105 ↗
8. TxDOT (2004). Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges.
9. Estimating the Hotmix Asphalt Air Voids from Ground Penetrating Radar10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.08.008 ↗
10. Brown, E.R., and Cross, S.A. (2023, March 21). A Study of In-Place Rutting of Asphalt Pavements, Available online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/14139.
11. Research on Transversely Isotropic Permeability of Asphalt Pavement: Laboratory Tests and Computational Simulation10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118958 ↗
12. Enhanced Model for Continuous Dielectric-Based Asphalt Compaction Evaluation10.1177/0361198118794068 ↗
13. Nondestructive Testing of Asphalt Pavements for Structural Condition Evaluation: A State of the Art10.1080/10589750701848697 ↗
14. Asphalt Pavement Density Measurement Using Non-Destructive Testing Methods: Current Practices, Challenges, and Future Vision10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128154 ↗
15. Noviello, C., Gennarelli, G., Esposito, G., Ludeno, G., Fasano, G., Capozzoli, L., Soldovieri, F., and Catapano, I. (2022). An Overview on Down-Looking UAV-Based GPR Systems. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14143245 ↗
16. Detection of Asphalt Pavement Potholes and Cracks Based on the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Multispectral Imagery10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2865528 ↗
17. Rodriguez, M.J.D. (2019). Towards the Application of UAS Forroad Maintenance at the Norvik Port. [Master’s Thesis, KTH, Structural Engineering and Bridges].
18. Silva, L.A., Sanchez San Blas, H., Peral García, D., Sales Mendes, A., and Villarubia González, G. (2020). An Architectural Multi-Agent System for a Pavement Monitoring System with Pothole Recognition in UAV Images. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20216205 ↗
19. Roberts, R., Inzerillo, L., and Di Mino, G. (2020). Using UAV Based 3D Modelling to Provide Smart Monitoring of Road Pavement Conditions. Information, 11.10.3390/info11120568 ↗
20. Elamin, A., and El-Rabbany, A. (2022, January 11–15). UAV-Based Pavement Crack Detection Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the XXVII FIG Congress, Volunteering for the Future—Geospatial Excellence for a Better Living, Warsaw, Poland.
21. Detection of Delamination in Concrete Pavements Using Ground-Coupled Ground-Penetrating Radar Technique10.3141/2087-08 ↗
22. An Overview of Ground-Penetrating Radar Signal Processing Techniques for Road Inspections10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.016 ↗
23. Elseicy, A., Alonso-Díaz, A., Solla, M., Rasol, M., and Santos-Assunçao, S. (2022). Combined Use of GPR and Other NDTs for Road Pavement Assessment: An Overview. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14174336 ↗
24. Study on Pavement Defect Detection Based on Image Processing Utilizing UAV10.1088/1742-6596/1168/4/042011 ↗
25. Maser, K., and Carmichael, A. (2023, March 21). Ground Penetrating Radar Evaluation of New Pavement Density, Available online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/28605.
26. Daniels, D.J. (2004). Ground Penetrating Radar, Institution of Engineering and Technology.10.1049/PBRA015E ↗
27. Automated Pavement Subsurface Profiling Using Radar: Case Studies of Four Experimental Field Sites
28. Road Evaluation with Ground Penetrating Radar10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00052-X ↗
29. GPR Abilities in Investigation of the Pavement Transversal Cracks10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.03.010 ↗
30. Field Observations and Numerical Models of GPR Response from Vertical Pavement Cracks10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.09.006 ↗
31. Radar Technique Application in Structural Analysis and Identification of Interlayer Bonding
32. Analysis of Air-Launched Ground-Penetrating Radar Techniques to Measure the Soil Surface Water Content10.1029/2006WR005097 ↗
33. Using Ground-Penetrating Radar and Dielectric Probe Measurements in Pavement Density Quality Control10.3141/1575-05 ↗
34. Pellinen, T., Eskelinen, P., Huuskonen-Snicker, E., and Hartikainen, A. (2015). Assessment of Air Void Content of Asphalt Using Dielectric Constant Measurements by GPR and with VNA, School of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Highway Engineering. Available online: https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/items/5d1d09aa-1519-4204-801a-2c235309f60e.
35. Hoegh, K., Roberts, R., Dai, S., and Zegeye Teshale, E. (2019). Toward Core-Free Pavement Compaction Evaluation: An Innovative Method Relating Asphalt Permittivity to Density. Geosciences, 9.10.3390/geosciences9070280 ↗
36. Method for Assessment of Modeling Quality for Asphalt Dielectric Constant to Density Calibration10.1061/JPEODX.0000210 ↗
37. Empirical Equations for Representing Viscoelastic Functions and for Deriving Spectra10.1002/polc.5070350105 ↗
38. Garcia, G., and Thompson, M. (2007). HMA Dynamic Modulus Predictive Models (A Review), Illinois Center for Transportation Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois.
39. Pursuit of the Simple Performance Test for Asphalt Concrete Fracture/Cracking
40. Babalghaith, A.M., Alsolieman, H.A., Al-Suhaibani, A.S., and Koting, S. (2020). Master Curve of Dynamic Modulus for Modified Asphalt Mixtures, AIP Publishing.10.1063/5.0027224 ↗
41. Brown, E.R. (1990). Density of Asphalt Concrete-How Much Is Needed?, National Center for Asphalt Technology.