Path Optimization Using Metaheuristic Techniques for a Surveillance Robot
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an innovative approach to optimize the trajectories of a robotic surveillance system, employing three different optimization methods: genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and pattern search (PS). The research addresses the challenge of efficiently planning routes for a LiDAR-equipped mobile robot to effectively cover target areas taking into account the capabilities and limitations of sensors and robots. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of these trajectory optimization approaches, significantly improving detection efficiency and coverage of critical areas. Furthermore, it is observed that, among the three techniques, pattern search quickly obtains feasible solutions in environments with good initial trajectories. On the contrary, in cases where the initial trajectory is suboptimal or the environment is complex, PSO works better. For example, in the high complexity map evaluated, PSO achieves 86.7% spatial coverage, compared to 85% and 84% for PS and GA, respectively. On low- and medium-complexity maps, PS is 15.7 and 18 s faster in trajectory optimization than the second fastest algorithm, which is PSO in both cases. Furthermore, the fitness function of this proposal has been compared with that of previous works, obtaining better results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · UAV Applications and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Digitalization, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain
Institute of Knowledge Technology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, 570 01 Thessaloniki, Greece
Funding
European Commission
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Intelligent UAV map generation and discrete path planning for search and rescue operations10.1155/2018/6879419 ↗
2. UV-C mobile robots with optimized path planning: Algorithm design and on-field measurements to improve surface disinfection against SARS-CoV-210.1109/MRA.2020.3045069 ↗
3. Perminov, S., Mikhailovskiy, N., Sedunin, A., Okunevich, I., Kalinov, I., Kurenkov, M., and Tsetserukou, D. (2021, January 23–27). Ultrabot: Autonomous mobile robot for indoor uv-c disinfection. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Lyon, France.10.1109/CASE49439.2021.9551413 ↗
4. Chun, W.H., and Papanikolopoulos, N. (2016). Springer Handbook of Robotics, Springer.
5. Surveillance routing of COVID-19 infection spread using an intelligent infectious diseases algorithm10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036347 ↗
6. Kim, S.D., and Bae, C.O. (2023). Unmanned Engine Room Surveillance Using an Autonomous Mobile Robot. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11030634 ↗
7. Automated guided vehicles and autonomous mobile robots for recognition and tracking in civil engineering10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104699 ↗
8. UAV-UGV-UMV multi-swarms for cooperative surveillance10.3389/frobt.2021.616950 ↗
9. A competitive Predator–Prey approach to enhance surveillance by UAV swarms10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107701 ↗
10. Sun, Y., Fesenko, H., Kharchenko, V., Zhong, L., Kliushnikov, I., Illiashenko, O., Morozova, O., and Sachenko, A. (2022). UAV and IoT-based systems for the monitoring of industrial facilities using digital twins: Methodology, reliability models, and application. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22176444 ↗
11. Prykhodchenko, R., Rocha, R.P., and Couceiro, M.S. (2020, January 15–17). People detection by mobile robots doing automatic guard patrols. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC), Ponta Delgada, Portugal.10.1109/ICARSC49921.2020.9096147 ↗
12. Lee, M.F.R., and Shih, Z.S. (2022). Autonomous Surveillance for an Indoor Security Robot. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10112175 ↗
13. Arjun, D., Indukala, P.K., and Menon, K.U. (2017, January 6–8). Border surveillance and intruder detection using wireless sensor networks: A brief survey. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP), Chennai, India.10.1109/ICCSP.2017.8286552 ↗
14. Tharmalingam, K., and Secco, E.L. (2022, January 23–24). A Surveillance Mobile Robot Based on Low-Cost Embedded Computers. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advances and Applications: ICAIAA 2022, Jaipur, India.
15. Tracking people in a mobile robot from 2d lidar scans using full convolutional neural networks for security in cluttered environments10.3389/fnbot.2018.00085 ↗
16. Yang, T., Li, Y., Zhao, C., Yao, D., Chen, G., Sun, L., Krajnik, T., and Yan, Z. (2022). 3D ToF LiDAR in mobile robotics: A review. arXiv Preprint.
17. Uhm, T., Park, J., Lee, J., Bae, G., Ki, G., and Choi, Y. (2022). Design of multimodal sensor module for outdoor robot surveillance system. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11142214 ↗
18. Chaudhuri, R., Acharjee, J., and Deb, S. (2023). Machine Learning, Image Processing, Network Security and Data Sciences, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on MIND 2021, Online, 11–12 December 2021, Springer Nature.
19. Poduval, D.R., and Rajalakshmy, P. (2022, January 5). A review paper on autonomous mobile robots. Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings.10.1063/5.0116722 ↗
20. Ayvali, E., Salman, H., and Choset, H. (2017, January 24–28). Ergodic coverage in constrained environments using stochastic trajectory optimization. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/IROS.2017.8206410 ↗
21. Mitchell, M. (1995). Genetic Algorithms: An Overview, Complex.10.1002/cplx.6130010108 ↗
22. Particle swarm optimization: An overview10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0 ↗
23. Pattern search optimization with applications on synthesis of linear antenna arrays10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.012 ↗
24. An intelligence-based hybrid PSO-SA for mobile robot path planning in warehouse10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101938 ↗
25. A review of methodologies for path planning and optimization of mobile robots10.5937/jouproman2301122S ↗
26. Multiobjective path optimization of an indoor AGV based on an improved ACO-DWA10.3934/mbe.2022585 ↗
27. Abdulsaheb, J.A., and Kadhim, D.J. (2023). Classical and heuristic approaches for mobile robot path planning: A survey. Robotics, 12.10.3390/robotics12040093 ↗
28. Reeman Robotics (2023, September 27). Hussar Autonomous Robot. Available online: http://www.reemanrobot.com/robot-chassis/square-robot-chassis/automatic-square-robot-chassis.html.
29. Beltrán, J., Guindel, C., Moreno, F.M., Cruzado, D., Garcia, F., and De La Escalera, A. (2018, January 4–7). Birdnet: A 3d object detection framework from lidar information. Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569311 ↗
30. SICK (2023, September 27). Multiscan100—Sensores 3D LiDAR. Available online: https://www.sick.com/es/es/sensores-lidar/sensores-3d-lidar/multiscan100/c/g574914.
31. Rodrigo, D.V., Sierra García, J.E., and Santos, M. (2023). Glasius Bioinspired Neural Networks Based UV-C Disinfection Path Planning Improved by Preventive Deadlock Processing Algorithm, Elsevier.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103330 ↗
32. Peñacoba, M., and Sierra, J.E. (2023, January 28–30). Optimization of UV-C disinfection robot trajectories by genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the Actas de XVIII Simposio de Control Inteligente (SCI2023), Valencia, Spain.
33. Genetic algorithm: Review and application
34. Analysis of particle swarm optimization algorithm
35. Wetter, M., and Wright, J. (2003, January 11–14). Comparison of a generalized pattern search and a genetic algorithm optimization method. Proceedings of the 8th IBPSA Conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
36. Fetanat, M., Haghzad, S., and Shouraki, S.B. (2015, January 12). Optimization of dynamic mobile robot path planning based on evolutionary methods. Proceedings of the 2015 AI & Robotics (IRANOPEN), Qazvin, Iran.10.1109/RIOS.2015.7270743 ↗