Show source-provided references
3. Impact of water withdrawals from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations
5. Assessing groundwater depletion and dynamics using GRACE and InSAR: Potential and limitations
10.1111/gwat.12453 ↗8. Recent land deformation detected by Sentinel-1A InSAR data (2016–2020) over Hanoi, Vietnam, and the relationship with groundwater level change
10.1080/15481603.2020.1868198 ↗10. Extreme subsidence in a populated city (Mashhad) detected by PSInSAR considering groundwater withdrawal and geotechnical properties
10.1038/s41598-020-67989-1 ↗11. Monitoring of land subsidence due to excessive groundwater extraction using small baseline subset technique in Konya, Turkey
10.1007/s10661-021-08962-x ↗12. Spatial Variability of Relative Sea-Level Rise in Tianjin, China: Insight from InSAR, GPS, and Tide-Gauge Observations
10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3054395 ↗13. Determining the groundwater vulnerability using the aquifer vulnerability index (AVI) in the Salatiga groundwater basin in Indonesia
10.1063/1.5062740 ↗14. Application of DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC models for modeling groundwater vulnerability of Malda District in West Bengal
10.1007/s12524-020-01176-7 ↗17. Land management impacts on runoff sources in small Amazon watersheds
10.1002/hyp.6803 ↗18. Van Dijck, S.J., Laouina, A., Carvalho, A.V., Loos, S., Schipper, A.M., Van der Kwast, H., Nafaa, R., Antari, M., Rocha, A., and Borrego, C. (2006). Desertification in the Mediterranean Region. A Security Issue, Springer.
19. Cui, Y., Liao, Z., Wei, Y., Xu, X., Song, Y., and Liu, H. (2020). The Response of Groundwater Level to Climate Change and Human Activities in Baotou City, China. Water, 12.
10.3390/w12041078 ↗21. Mohammed, O.A., and Sayl, K.N. (2020, January 14–17). Determination of groundwater potential zone in arid and semi-arid regions: A review. Proceedings of the 2020 13th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), Virtual.
10.1109/DeSE51703.2020.9450782 ↗22. Comparative effect of lateritic shield in groundwater vulnerability assessment using GLSI and LC models: A case study of Ijero mining site, Ijero-Ekiti
10.1007/s40808-023-01689-3 ↗26. A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing shallow groundwater vulnerability in the Zhangye Basin, northwestern China
10.1007/s00254-008-1421-y ↗27. Robert, S. (1987). DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings, Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency.
28. Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS
10.1007/s10040-005-0008-x ↗30. Assessment of intrinsic aquifer vulnerability at continental scale through a critical application of the drastic framework: The case of South America
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153748 ↗31. Assessment of groundwater quality and groundwater vulnerability in the northern Ordos Cretaceous Basin, China
10.1007/s12517-018-3449-y ↗33. Changes of groundwater flow field of Luanhe River Delta under the human activities and its impact on the ecological environment in the past 30 years
34. (2023, August 28). Hydrogeological Manual, China Geological Survey. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=SNAD&filename=SNAD000001542056.
35. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1985). DRASTIC: A Standard System for Evaluating Groundwater Potential Using Hydrogeological Settings, Oklahoma WA/EPA Series, Ada.
36. China Geological Survey (2022). Delineation of Priority Areas for Groundwater Pollution Prevention and Control Technical Guideline.
37. Integrated variable weight model and improved DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability assessment in a shallow porous aquifer
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127538 ↗39. Watershed-scale response of groundwater recharge to inter-annual and inter-decadal variability in precipitation (Alberta, Canada)
10.1007/s10040-014-1176-3 ↗40. Groundwater vulnerability assessment of an urban coastal phreatic aquifer in India using GIS-based DRASTIC model
10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100810 ↗42. Predictive modeling of groundwater nitrate pollution using Random Forest and multisource variables related to intrinsic and specific vulnerability: A case study in an agricultural setting (Southern Spain)
45. Cl, Br, B, Li, and noble gases isotopes to study the origin and evolution of deep groundwater in sedimentary basins: A review
10.1007/s10311-021-01371-z ↗46. Evaluation of drought impact on groundwater recharge rate using SWAT and Hydrus models on an agricultural island in western Japan
47. Evaluation of special vulnerability of groundwater in Guangzhou based on fuzzy comprehensive judgment
48. Special vulnerability of groundwater in the Guanzhong Basin and its evaluation
49. Modeling and validation of groundwater pollution prevention performance zoning in reclaimed water irrigation areas
50. (2017). China Environmental Quality Standards for Groundwater (Standard No. GB14848-2017).
51. Balacco, G., Alfio, M.R., and Fidelibus, M.D. (2022). Groundwater Drought Analysis under Data Scarcity: The Case of the Salento Aquifer (Italy). Sustainability, 14.
10.3390/su14020707 ↗52. Kruseman, G.P., De Ridder, N.A., and Verweij, J.M. (1983). Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data, International Institute for land Reclamation and Improvement. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284969758.