Three-Dimensional Printed Liver Models for Surgical Planning and Intraoperative Guidance of Liver Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Successful liver cancer resection requires a comprehensive pre- and intraoperative understanding of the spatial relationships between a patient’s cancer and intrahepatic anatomy. The recent literature has highlighted that patient-specific 3D-printed liver models (3DPLMs) reconstructed from medical imaging data may enhance the comprehension of patients’ liver anatomy and thereby provide a useful preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance tool for liver cancer resection (LCR). The purpose of this systematic review was to critically examine the utility and feasibility of 3DPLMs for LCR surgical planning and intraoperative guidance and explore whether these applications improve patient outcomes. Articles were retrieved from four electronic databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Curtin University Database) according to predetermined eligibility criteria. In total, 22 eligible articles were identified, including 11 original research articles and 11 case reports. Key concepts were synthesised using an inductive content analysis approach suitable for this heterogeneous body of literature. There is significant descriptive and case-report evidence that 3DPLMs strengthen pre- and intraoperative comprehension of patient liver and liver tumour anatomy and can enhance pre- and intraoperative surgical decision making for LCR. The analysis of these studies presents large variances in the times and costs necessary to produce 3DPLMs, as studies did not provide the full expenses of materials, software, and equipment. Production times were focused on different aspects of the 3D printing process and were not comparable. The review nonetheless demonstrates the potential value of 3DPLMs as preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance tools for LCR. Future studies should detail these economic data points to ensure 3DPLMs’ viability. Further experimental research and randomised controlled trials are also necessary to examine the relationship between 3DPLMs and patient’s intra- and postoperative outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques · Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis · Surgical Simulation and Training
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Discipline of Medical Radiation Science, Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia
Funding
Perth Radiological Clinic Foundation Grant
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 204010.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021 ↗
2. Global trends in incidence rates of primary adult liver cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.3389/fonc.2020.00171 ↗
3. Incidence and survival outcomes of secondary liver cancer: A Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database analysis10.21037/tcr-20-3319 ↗
4. Primary and secondary liver tumours10.1177/1755738016653419 ↗
5. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657 ↗
6. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.020 ↗
7. Surgery for cholangiocarcinoma10.1111/liv.14089 ↗
8. Surgical management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer10.1200/JOP.2015.009407 ↗
9. Application of three-dimensional printing for intraoperative guidance during liver resection of a hepatocellular carcinoma with sophisticated location10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.2.265 ↗
10. The role of imaging in surgical planning for liver resection: What the radiologist needs to know
11. Three-dimensional printing of liver tumors using CT data: Proof of concept morphological study
12. Guachi, R., Bici, M., Bini, F., Calispa, M.E., Oscullo, C., Guachi, L., Campana, F., and Marinozzi, F. (2021, January 9–10). 3D printing of prototypes starting from medical imaging: A liver case study. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering, Rome, Italy.10.1007/978-3-030-91234-5_54 ↗
13. Experiences with three-dimensional printing in complex liver surgery10.1097/SLA.0000000000004348 ↗
14. Development of a patients-specific 3D-printed preoperative planning and training tool, with functionalized internal surfaces, for complex oncologic cases10.1108/RPJ-03-2018-0063 ↗
15. Virtual reality and 3D printing improve preoperative visualization of 3D liver reconstructions—Results from a preclinical comparison of presentation modalities and user’s preference10.21037/atm-21-512 ↗
16. Impact of 3D printing technology on the comprehension of surgical liver anatomy10.1007/s00464-018-6308-8 ↗
17. Decision-making based on 3D printed models in laparoscopic liver resections with intraoperative ultrasound: A prospective observational study
18. Role of CT in two-stage liver surgery10.1148/rg.210067 ↗
19. Cheng, J., Wang, Z., Liu, J., Dou, C., Yao, W., and Zhang, C. (2022). Value of 3D printing technology combined with indocyanine green fluorescent navigation in complex laparoscopic hepatectomy. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0272815 ↗
20. A systematic review of three-dimensional printing in liver disease10.1007/s10278-018-0067-x ↗
21. Wake, N. (2021). 3D Printing for the Radiologist, Elsevier.
22. Valls-Esteve, A., Tejo-Otero, A., Lustig-Gainza, P., Buj-Corral, I., Fenollosa-Artés, F., Rubio-Palau, J., Barber, I., Munuera, J., Fondevilla, C., and Krauel, L. (2023). Patient-specific 3D printed soft models for liver surgical planning and hands-on training. Gels, 9.10.3390/gels9040339 ↗
23. 3D printing in liver surgery: A systematic review10.1089/tmj.2017.0049 ↗
24. Role of innovative 3D printing models in the management of hepatobiliary malignancies10.4254/wjh.v11.i7.574 ↗
25. Wake, N. (2021). 3D Printing for the Radiologist, Elsevier.
26. RadioGraphics update: Medical 3D printing for the radiologist10.1148/rg.2020190217 ↗
27. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 ↗
28. 3D printing surgical phantoms and their role in the visualization of medical procedures10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100057 ↗
29. Comparison of 3D printing model to 3D virtual reconstruction and 2D imaging for the clinical education of interns in hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled study10.21037/jgo-23-28 ↗
30. 3D liver model-based surgical education improves preoperative decision-making and patient satisfaction—A randomized pilot trial10.1007/s00464-023-09915-w ↗
31. Applicability of 3D-printed models in hepatobiliary surgey: Results from “LIV3DPRINT” multicenter study10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.020 ↗
32. Assisting difficult liver operations using 3D printed models10.3390/livers1030013 ↗
33. Application value of three-dimensional printing technology assisted laparoscopic anatomic liver resection of segment 8
34. Personalized 3D-printed transparent liver model using the hepatobiliary phase MRI: Usefulness in the lesion-by-lesion imaging-pathologic matching of focal liver lesions—Preliminary results10.1097/RLI.0000000000000521 ↗
35. The impact of using three-dimensional printed liver models for patient education10.1177/0300060518755267 ↗
36. Producing three-dimensional printed models of the hepatobiliary system from computed tomography imaging data10.1308/rcsann.2020.0191 ↗
37. Soft liver phantom with a hollow biliary system10.1007/s10439-021-02726-x ↗
38. Estermann, S.-J., Pahr, D.H., and Reisinger, A. (2020). Quantifying tactile properties of liver tissue, silicone elastomers, and a 3D printed polymer for manufacturing realistic organ models. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 104.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103630 ↗
39. 3D printed soft surgical planning prototype for a biliary tract rhabdomyosarcoma
40. There is a great future in plastics: Personalized approach to the management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma using a 3-D-printed liver model10.1007/s10620-020-06326-y ↗
41. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: The development and evaluation of a new tool10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01662.x ↗
42. Lau, F., and Kuziemsky, C. (2017). Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach, University of Victoria. Chapter 9.
43. Kyngäs, H., Mikkonen, K., and Kääriäinen, M. (2019). The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6 ↗
44. The qualitative content analysis process10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x ↗
45. Include or not to include conference abstracts in systematic reviews? Lessons learned from a large Cochrane network meta-analysis including 585 trials10.1186/s13643-022-02048-6 ↗
46. Patient-individualized resection planning in liver surgery using 3D print and virtual reality (i-LiVR)—A study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial10.1186/s13063-022-06347-0 ↗
47. Evaluating the potential utility of three-dimensional printed models in preoperative planning and patient consent in gastrointestinal cancer surgery10.1308/rcsann.2020.7102 ↗
48. Obtaining informed consent using patient specific 3D printing cerebral aneurysm model10.3340/jkns.2019.0092 ↗
49. Effectiveness of personalized 3D printed models for patient education in degenerative lumbar disease10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.006 ↗
50. Wake, N. (2021). 3D Printing for the Radiologist, Elsevier.
51. Liver segmentation: Indications, techniques and future directions10.1007/s13244-017-0558-1 ↗
52. How 3D printing software enhances and rewards student learning of brain anatomy
53. Wake, N. (2021). 3D Printing for the Radiologist, Elsevier.