Fragility Analysis Based on Damaged Bridges during the 2021 Flood in Germany
Source abstract
Abstract
Floods trigger the majority of expenses caused by natural disasters and are also responsible for more than half of bridge collapses. In this study, empirical fragility curves were generated by referring to actual failures that occurred in the 2021 flood in Germany. To achieve this, a calibrated hydraulic model of the event was used. Data were collected through surveys, damage reports and condition ratings from bridge owners. The database comprises 250 bridges. The analysis revealed recurrent failure mechanisms belonging to two main categories: those induced by scour and those caused by hydraulic forcing. The severity of the damage was primarily dependent on the bridge typology and, subsequently, on the deck’s weight. The analysis allowed us to draw conclusions regarding the robustness of certain bridge typologies compared to others for a given failure mechanism. The likelihood of occurrence of the triggering mechanism was also highlighted as a factor to consider alongside the damage probability. This study sheds light on existing vulnerabilities of bridges to river floods, discussing specific areas in which literature data are contradictory. The paper also strengthens the call for a shift towards a probabilistic approach for estimating hydraulic force in bridge design and assessment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Hydraulic flow and structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, ARISE, ISISE, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt), 51427 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Funding
FCT/MCTES · Associate Laboratory Advanced Production and Intelligent Systems ARISE · FCT Foundation for Science and Technology
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of Recent Bridge Failures in the United States10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144) ↗
2. Proske, D. (2018). Bridge Collapse Frequencies versus Failure Probabilities, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-73833-8 ↗
3. Causes and Statistical Characteristics of Bridge Failures: A Review
4. Climate-Driven Variability in the Occurrence of Major Floods across North America and Europe10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.027 ↗
5. Changing Climate Both Increases and Decreases European River Floods10.1038/s41586-019-1495-6 ↗
6. Understanding Heavy Tails of Flood Peak Distributions10.1029/2021WR030506 ↗
7. Are We Adapting to Floods? Evidence from Global Flooding Fatalities10.1111/risa.13245 ↗
8. Causes, Impacts and Patterns of Disastrous River Floods10.1038/s43017-021-00195-3 ↗
9. Characteristics of River Floods and Flooding: A Global Overview, 1985–200310.1002/ird.239 ↗
10. Assessment and Spatiotemporal Analysis of Global Flood Vulnerability in 2005–202010.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103201 ↗
11. EC, and EEA (2023, February 10). Economic Losses from Climate-Related Extremes in Europe, Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/economic-losses-from-climate-related.
12. New Insights into US Flood Vulnerability Revealed from Flood Insurance Big Data10.1038/s41467-020-15264-2 ↗
13. Review Article “Assessment of Economic Flood Damage”10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010 ↗
14. Fragility of Transport Assets Exposed to Multiple Hazards: State-of-the-Art Review toward Infrastructural Resilience10.1016/j.ress.2019.106567 ↗
15. Failure Scenarios of Small Bridges in Case of Extreme Rainstorms10.1080/23789689.2017.1301696 ↗
16. Benefits of Compiling and Analyzing Hydraulic-Design Data for Bridges10.1177/03611981211023757 ↗
17. Cao, X.-Y. (2023). An Iterative PSD-Based Procedure for the Gaussian Stochastic Earthquake Model with Combined Intensity and Frequency Nonstationarities: Its Application into Precast Concrete Structures. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11061294 ↗
18. A Delphi Method Expert Survey to Derive Standards for Flood Damage Data Collection10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01325.x ↗
19. Probabilistic Seismic Performance Assessment of RC Frames Retrofitted with External SC-PBSPC BRBF Sub-Structures10.1080/13632469.2021.1887011 ↗
20. Seismic Collapse and Reparability Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frames Retrofitted with External PBSPC BRBF Sub-Frame in near-Fault Regions10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105716 ↗
21. Vulnerability and Economic Loss Evaluation Model of a Typical Group Structure Considering Empirical Field Inspection Data10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103617 ↗
22. Seismic Reliability and Risk Assessment of Structures Based on Fragility Analysis—A Review10.1260/1369-4332.18.10.1653 ↗
23. Scour-Dependent Empirical Fragility Modelling of Bridge Structures under Earthquakes10.1177/1369433218815433 ↗
24. Vulnerability of Bridges to Individual and Multiple Hazards- Floods and Earthquakes10.1016/j.ress.2021.107564 ↗
25. How Much Does an Extreme Rainfall Event Cost? Material Damage and Relationships between Insurance, Rainfall, Land Cover and Urban Flooding10.1080/02626667.2019.1595625 ↗
26. Drag-Induced Displacement of a Simply Supported Bridge Span during Hurricane Katrina10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001305 ↗
27. Statistical Analysis of Coastal Bridge Vulnerability Based on Empirical Evidence from Hurricane Katrina10.1080/15732470902855343 ↗
28. Analysis of Bridge and Stream Conditions of over 300 Vermont Bridges Damaged in Tropical Storm Irene10.1080/15732479.2017.1285329 ↗
29. Parameterized Fragility Models for Multi-Bridge Classes Subjected to Hurricane Loads10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110213 ↗
30. Hybrid Simulation of a Structure to Tsunami Loading10.1177/1369433219857847 ↗
31. Using Rapid Damage Observations for Bayesian Updating of Hurricane Vulnerability Functions: A Case Study of Hurricane Dorian Using Social Media10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102839 ↗
32. Retrospective Analysis of Hydraulic Bridge Collapse10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001378 ↗
33. Okui, A., and Ueda, B. (2015). Proceedings of the IABSE-JSCE Joint Conference on Advances in Bridge Engineering-III, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 21–22 August 2015, University of Asia Pacific.
34. Observations and Trends among Collapsed Bridges in New York State10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000996 ↗
35. Invited Perspectives: Challenges and Future Directions in Improving Bridge Flood Resilience10.5194/nhess-22-795-2022 ↗
36. ATC (2018). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Volume 1—Methodology, P-58.
37. A Mechanism-Based Assessment Framework for Masonry Arch Bridges under Scour-Induced Support Rotation10.1177/13694332211009325 ↗
38. Risk-Based Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Retrofit of Bridges Exposed to Extreme Hydrologic Events Considering Multiple Failure Modes10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.029 ↗
39. Management of Bridges with Shallow Foundations Exposed to Local Scour10.1080/15732479.2017.1406960 ↗
40. Uncertainty in Risk of Highway Bridges Assessed for Integrated Seismic and Flood Hazards10.1080/15732479.2017.1402065 ↗
41. Das Hochwasser 2021: Ingenieuranalyse Der Bauwerksschäden10.1002/bate.202200062 ↗
42. Brief Communication—Impact Forecasting Could Substantially Improve the Emergency Management of Deadly Floods: Case Study July 2021 Floods in Germany
43. Kreienkamp, F., Philip, S.Y., Tradowsky, J.S., Kew, S.F., Lorenz, P., Arrighi, J., Belleflamme, A., Bettmann, T., Caluwaerts, S., and Chan, S.C. (2021). Rapid Attribution of Heavy Rainfall Events Leading to the Severe Flooding in Western Europe during July 2021, World Weather Attribution.
44. A Multi-Disciplinary Analysis of the Exceptional Flood Event of July 2021 in Central Europe. Part 1: Event Description and Analysis
45. Schüttrumpf, H., Birkmann, J., Brüll, C., Burghardt, L., Johann, G., Klopries, E., Lehmkuhl, F., Schüttrumpf, A., and Wolf, S. (2022). Herausforderungen an den Wiederaufbau nach dem Katastrophenhochwasser 2021 in der Eifel, Technische Universität Dresden, Institut für Wasserbau und technische Hydromechanik.
46. Szymczak, S., Backendorf, F., Bott, F., Fricke, K., Junghänel, T., and Walawender, E. (2022). Impacts of Heavy and Persistent Precipitation on Railroad Infrastructure in July 2021: A Case Study from the Ahr Valley, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. Atmosphere, 13.10.3390/atmos13071118 ↗
47. Truedinger, A.J., Jamshed, A., Sauter, H., and Birkmann, J. (2023). Adaptation after Extreme Flooding Events: Moving or Staying? The Case of the Ahr Valley in Germany. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15021407 ↗
48. Huffman, G.J., Stocker, E.F., Bolvin, D.T., Nelkin, E.J., and Jackson, T. (2019). GPM IMERG Final Precipitation L3 1 Day 0.1 Degree × 0.1 Degree V06.
49. Hochwasser der Ahr im Juli 2021–Abflussabschätzung und Einordnung
50. (2022, November 03). BKG NUTS250. Available online: https://daten.gdz.bkg.bund.de/produkte/vg/nuts250_1231/aktuell/nuts250_12-31.utm32s.shape.zip.
51. (2022, November 03). BfG Waterbody-DE. Available online: https://geoportal.bafg.de/inspire/download/HY/servicefeed.xml.
52. Landesamt für Umwelt Rheinland-Pfalz (2022). Hochwassermeldedienst.
53. Reconstructing Peak Discharges of Historic Floods of the River Ahr, Germany10.3112/erdkunde.2014.01.05 ↗
54. A Multi-Disciplinary Analysis of the Exceptional Flood Event of July 2021 in Central Europe. Part 2: Historical Context and Relation to Climate Change10.5194/nhess-23-1287-2023 ↗
55. Vorogushyn, S., Apel, H., Kemter, M., and Thieken, A. (June, January 29). Statistical and Hydraulic Analysis of Flood Hazard in the Ahr Valley, Germany Considering Historical Floods. Proceedings of the IAHS-AISH Scientific Assembly 2022, Montpellier, France.10.5194/iahs2022-660 ↗
56. Seeger, M. (2023). Agricultural Soil Degradation in Germany, Springer.10.1007/698_2022_948 ↗
57. Oudenbroek, K., Naderi, N., Bricker, J.D., Yang, Y., van der Veen, C., Uijttewaal, W., Moriguchi, S., and Jonkman, S.N. (2018). Hydrodynamic and Debris-Damming Failure of Bridge Decks and Piers in Steady Flow. Geosciences, 8.10.3390/geosciences8110409 ↗
58. (2022, August 15). BKG Digitales Geländemodell Gitterweite 5 M (DGM5). Available online: https://gdz.bkg.bund.de/index.php/default/digitales-gelandemodell-gitterweite-5-m-dgm5.html.
59. (2022, August 15). LVermGeo Digitales Geländemodell Gitterweite 1 M (DGM1). Available online: https://lvermgeo.rlp.de/fileadmin/lvermgeo/pdf/produktblaetter/ProduktbeschreibungRP_DGM.pdf.
60. System Identification via Fast Relaxed Vector Fitting for the Structural Health Monitoring of Masonry Bridges10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.073 ↗
61. Machine Learning-based Automatic Operational Modal Analysis: A Structural Health Monitoring Application to Masonry Arch Bridges
62. Quantifying the Value of SHM Information for Bridges under Flood-Induced Scour10.1080/15732479.2022.2048030 ↗
63. Arneson, L.A., Zevenbergen, L.W., Lagasse, P.F., and Clopper, P.E. (2012). Evaluating Scour at Bridges, HEC-18.
64. Probability of Drift Blockage at Bridge Decks10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000319 ↗
65. Towards a Robust Assessment of Bridge Clogging Processes in Flood Risk Management10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.002 ↗
66. Majtan, E., Cunningham, L.S., and Rogers, B.D. (2022). Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Floating Large Woody Debris Impact on a Masonry Arch Bridge. JMSE, 10.10.3390/jmse10070911 ↗
67. Bauwerkspruefung Nach DIN 1076-Eine Verantwortungsvolle Aufgabe Fuer Die Sicherheit/Bridge Inspection According to DIN 1076-A Responsible Task for Safety
68. Haardt, P. (1999). Algorithmen zur Zustandsbewertung von Ingenieurbauwerken.
69. Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances10.1080/01621459.1974.10482955 ↗
70. Teoria Statistica Delle Classi e Calcolo Delle Probabilità
71. Merz, B., Apel, H., Kreibich, H., and Vorogushyn, S. (June, January 29). Disastrous Flooding in July 2021 in Germany—Event Analysis and Consequences for Risk Assessment Approaches. Proceedings of the IAHS-AISH Scientific Assembly 2022, Montpellier, France.10.5194/iahs2022-183 ↗
72. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916 ↗
73. Peirce’s Criterion for the Elimination of Suspect Experimental Data
74. Falconer, R., Boughton, B., Lane, R., Paterson, F., and Way, W. (2010, January 15–17). Strenghtening of Masonry Bridges against Traffic and Flooding. Proceedings of the Structural Faults and Repair 2010 13th International Congress and Exhibition, Edinburgh, UK.
75. Numerical Study on the Structural Response of a Masonry Arch Bridge Subject to Flood Flow and Debris Impact10.1016/j.istruc.2022.12.100 ↗
76. Jempson, M. (2000). Flood and Debris Loads on Bridges. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland].
77. Kerenyi, K., Sofu, T., and Guo, J. (2009). Hydrodynamic Forces on Inundated Bridge Decks.
78. Dean, M.T. (2020). Laboratory Study of Hydrodynamics of Submerged Bridges. [Master’s Thesis, University of Texas at Arlington].
79. Grates, H. (2023, February 20). Domhof-Brücke Schuld. Available online: https://www.aw-wiki.de/w/images/1/16/Schuld_-_Heinz_Grates_%28337%29.jpg.
80. Pucci, A., Sousa, H.S., Giresini, L., Matos, J.C., and Castelli, F. (Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 2023). Fragility of Bridge Decks Exposed to Hydraulic and Driftwood Actions, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., accepted for publication.10.1080/15732479.2023.2272725 ↗
81. (2005). Eurocodes (Standard No. CEN EN 1991-1-6:2005).
82. (2017). Bridge Design Design Loads (Standard No. Committee BD-090 AS 5100.2:2017).