Quantitative Analysis of Coal Quality by a Portable Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and Three Chemometrics Methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) technology has the characteristics of small sample demand, simple sample preparation, simultaneous measurement of multiple elements and safety, which has great potential application in the rapid detection of coal quality. In this paper, 59 kinds of coal commonly used in Chinese power plants were tested by a lab-designed field-portable laser-induced breakdown spectrometer. The data set division methods and the quantitative analysis algorithm of ash content, volatile matter and calorific value of coal samples were carried out. The accuracy and prediction accuracy of three kinds of dataset partitioning methods, random selection (RS), Kennard–Stone (KS) and sample partitioning based on joint X-Y distances (SPXY), coupled with three quantitative algorithms, partial least squares regression (PLS), support vector machine regression (SVR) and random forest (RF), were compared and analyzed in this paper. The results show that the model featuring SPXY combined with RF has the best prediction performance. The R2 of ash content by the RF and SPXY method is 0.9843, the RMSEP of ash content is 1.3303 and the mean relative error (MRE) is 7.47%. The R2 of volatile matter is 0.9801, RMSEP is 0.7843 and MRE is 2.19%. The R2 of calorific value is 0.9844, RMSEP is 0.7324 and MRE is 2.27%. This study demonstrates that the field-portable LIBS device combining appropriate chemometrics algorithms has a wide application prospect in the rapid analysis of coal quality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Analytical chemistry methods development
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanjing Coal Quality Supervision and Inspection Co. Ltd., China Energy Corporation, Nanjing 210031, China
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
Funding
China National Energy Group Science and Technology Project · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. (2008). Determination of Calorific Value of Coal (Standard No. GB/T 213-2008).
2. (2007). Determination of Total Sulfur in Coal (Standard No. GB-T 214-2007).
3. (2014). Proximate Analysis of Coal by Instrumental Method (Standard No. GB/T 30732-2014).
4. Miziolek, A.W., Palleschi, V., and Schechter, I. (2006). Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy, Cambridge University Press. (LIBS): Fundamentals and Applications.10.1017/CBO9780511541261 ↗
5. Quantitative Analysis of Coal Quality by Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Assisted with Different Chemometric Methods10.1039/D0AY00905A ↗
6. Multivariate analysis of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy chemical signatures for geomaterial classification10.1016/j.sab.2009.07.005 ↗
7. Direct analysis of aluminum alloys by CSigma laser induced breakdown spectroscopy10.1016/j.aca.2018.01.019 ↗
8. LIBS development methodology for forensic nuclear materials analysis10.1039/C7AY02520C ↗
9. Limbeck A critical review of recent trends in sample classification using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)10.1016/j.trac.2022.116859 ↗
10. Effect of ambiance on the coal characterization using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)10.1007/s00339-020-03558-7 ↗
11. A review of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for coal analysis10.1016/j.trac.2021.116357 ↗
12. Analysis of Lakhra Coal by Calibration Free Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (CF-LIBS) and Comparison of Self-Absorption Correction Procedures10.1080/00032719.2021.1910831 ↗
13. Coal analysis by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: A tutorial review10.1039/C9JA00016J ↗
14. Determination of Ash Content of coal by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy10.1016/j.sab.2019.03.012 ↗
15. Accurate sulfur determination of coal using double-pulse laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy10.1039/C9JA00448C ↗
16. Quantitative Analysis of Coal by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Using TEA CO2 Laser as the Excitation Source10.1007/s11090-022-10234-6 ↗
17. LIBS analysis of ash content, volatile matter, and calorific value in coal by partial least squares regression based on ash classification10.1039/D0JA00186D ↗
18. Quantitative analysis of cadmium in rice roots based on LIBS and chemometrics methods10.1186/s12302-021-00480-4 ↗
19. Enhancement of carbon detection sensitivity in laser induced breakdown spectroscopy with low pressure ambient helium gas10.1016/j.sab.2018.11.001 ↗
20. Palleschi, V. (2022). Chemometrics and Numerical Methods in LIBS, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9781119759614 ↗
21. Automatic preprocessing of laser-induced breakdown spectra using partial least squares regression and feed-forward artificial neural network: Applications to Earth and Mars data10.1016/j.sab.2020.105930 ↗
22. Accuracy improvement of quantitative analysis of calorific value of coal by combining support vector machine and partial least square methods in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy10.1088/2058-6272/ab8972 ↗
23. Sánchez-Esteva, S., Knadel, M., Kucheryavskiy, S., de Jonge Lis, W.G., Rubæk, H., Hermansen, C., and Heckrath, G. (2020). Combining Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and Visible Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (Vis-NIRS) for Soil Phosphorus Determination. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20185419 ↗
24. Retraction: Novel techniques for enhancing the performance of support vector regression chemo-metric in quantitative analysis of LIBS spectra10.1039/C9JA90061F ↗
25. Improved measurement in quantitative analysis of coal properties using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy10.1039/C9JA00429G ↗
26. Kramida, A., Ralchenko, Y., and Reader, J. (2023, January 03). NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.10), Available online: https://physics.nist.gov/asd.
27. Computer aided design of experiments10.1080/00401706.1969.10490666 ↗
28. Improving data splitting for classification applications in spectrochemical analyses employing a random-mutation Kennard-Stone algorithm approach10.1093/bioinformatics/btz421 ↗
29. Artificial neural networks in classification of NIR spectral data: Design of the training set10.1016/0169-7439(95)00077-1 ↗
30. Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications: A Systematic Review10.1007/s11831-021-09694-4 ↗
31. Support Vector Regression Based on the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Tight Oil Recovery Prediction10.1021/acsomega.1c04923 ↗