Evolution of Model-Based Materials Definitions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu X, Furrer D, Kosters J, Holmes J (2018) Vision 2040: a roadmap for integrated, multiscale modeling and simulation of materials and systems. NASA/CR-2018–219771, E-19477, GRC-E-DAA-TN52454 (NASA)
2. Furrer DU. Development and industrial application of integrated computational materials engineering. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 31(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/aced5910.1088/1361-651X/aced59 ↗
3. Furrer DU, Dimiduk DM, Cotton JD, Ward CH (2017) Making the case for a model-based definition of engineering materials. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6:249–26310.1007/s40192-017-0102-7 ↗
4. Venkatesh V, Green R, O’Connell J, Cernatescu I, Goetz R, Wong T, Streich B, Saraf V, Glavicic M, Slavik D, Sampath R, Sharp A, Song B, Bocchin P (2018) An ICME framework for incorporating bulk residual stresses in rotor component design. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 7:173–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-018-0119-610.1007/s40192-018-0119-6 ↗
5. Furrer D (2023) Application of computational materials and process modeling to current and future aero-engine component development and validation. In: Ott EA et al Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Superalloy 718 and Derivatives. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27447-3_2110.1007/978-3-031-27447-3_21 ↗
6. Jha SK, Szczepanski CJ, John R, Larsen JM (2015) Deformation heterogeneities and their role in life-limiting fatigue failures in a two-phase titanium alloy. Acta Mater 82(2015):378–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.03410.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.034 ↗
7. Carlbom I, Paciorek J, (1978) Planar geometric projections and viewing transformations. ACM Comput Surveys 10(4):465–502, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.532.4774. https://doi.org/10.1145/356744.356750, S2CID 70800810.1145/356744.356750 ↗
8. NIST (1999) STEP, The grand experience, SP 939 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
9. Final Report, Model-Based Engineering Subcommittee, NDIA, 10 Feb. 2011. https://www.ndia.org/-/media/sites/ndia/meetings-and-events/divisions/systems-engineering/modeling-and-simulation/reports/model-based-engineering.ashx
10. Kaiser B, Dion B, Tolchinsky I, Le Sergent T, Najork M (2022) An AEBS use case for model-based system design integrating safety analyses and simulation. In: Seguin C, Zeller M, Prosvirnova T (eds) Model-based safety and assessment. IMBSA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13525. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15842-1_110.1007/978-3-031-15842-1_1 ↗
11. Yang Z, Li JY, Zhang YP, Li HL, Gao XH (2016) Analysis of the properties of mechanical materials and parts based on ANSYS software. KEM 723:388–393. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.723.38810.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.723.388 ↗
12. Han SH, Bang JS, Rim CW, Lee KS, Lee KK, Song SY (2006) Process integration of fatigue analysis for welded bogie frames. In Key Engineering Materials (vol 321–323, pp 624–627). Trans Tech Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.321-323.62410.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.321-323.624 ↗
13. Padula SL, Gillian RE (2006) Multidisciplinary environments: a history of engineering framework development, 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 06 September 2006–08 September 2006, Portsmouth, Virginia. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-708310.2514/6.2006-7083 ↗
14. Padula SL, Korte JJ, Dunn HJ, Salas AO (1999) Multidisciplinary optimization branch experience using ISIGHT Software, Volume 99, Issue 209714 of NASA technical memorandum, 1999 International iSIGHT Users’ Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, October 4–6,1999
15. Ghosh S, Dimiduk D, Furrer D (2023) Statistically equivalent representative volume elements (SERVE) for material behaviour analysis and multiscale modelling. Int Mater Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2023.224676610.1080/09506608.2023.2246766 ↗
16. Weber G, Pinz M, Ghosh S (2020) 2020, Machine learning-aided parametrically homogenized crystal plasticity model (PHCPM) for single crystal Ni-based superalloys. JOM 72:4404–441910.1007/s11837-020-04344-9 ↗
17. Bandyopadhyay R, Sangid MD (2021) A probabilistic fatigue framework to enable location-specific lifing for critical thermo-mechanical engineering applications. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10:20–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00198-410.1007/s40192-021-00198-4 ↗
18. Horsch MT, Morgado JF, Goldbeck G, Iglezakis D, Konchakova NA, Schembera B (2021) Domain-specific metadata standardization in materials modelling. In: Domain Ontologies for Research Data Management in Industry Commons of Materials and Manufacturing
19. Pratt MJ (2001) Introduction to ISO 10303—the STEP standard for product data exchange. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 1(1):102–10310.1115/1.1354995 ↗
20. Jacobsen A et al (2020) FAIR principles: interpretations and implementation considerations. Data Intell 2(1–2):10–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_r_0002410.1162/dint_r_00024 ↗
21. Warren JA, Ward CH (2018) Evolution of a materials data infrastructure. JOM 70:1652–1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-2968-z10.1007/s11837-018-2968-z ↗
22. Westbrook JH, Rumble JR Jr (1983) Computerized materials data systems. National Bureau of Standards. Computerized materials data systems workshop: diverted to discussion of problems confronting their development, Fairfield Glades, TN. OSTI identifier 6969565
23. Machinchick MF, Rettberg LH, Haynes AL, Stanley JM, Venkatesh V, Furrer DU, Murdock JR, Gynther D, Linden MJ (2020) Method of making integrally bladed rotor (2020), US Patent US10,792,771 B2
24. NIST (2018) Materials innovation case study: Questek's ferrium® M54® steel for hook shank application. www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2018/06/26/materials_innovation_case_study_questek_090616.pdf
25. Rice RC, Goode RJ, Bakuckas Jr J G, Thompson SR (2003) Development of MMPDS Handbook Aircraft Design Allowables, Prepared for the 7th Joint DOD/FAA/NASA Conference on Aging Aircraft, September 8–11, 2003, New Orleans, LA
26. Burlatsky S, Furrer D, Venkatesh V, Noraas R, Barker S (2024) Probabilistic dwell fatigue modeling of titanium components, to be published in the proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Titanium (Ti-2023)
27. Clymer DR, Cagan J, Beuth J (2017) Power-velocity process design charts for powder bed additive manufacturing. J Mech Des 139(10):100907. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.40373022810.1115/1.403730228 ↗
28. Gordon JV, Narra SP, Cunningham RW, Liu H, Chen H, Suter RM, Beuth JL, Rollett AD (2020) Defect structure process maps for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 36:101552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10155210.1016/j.addma.2020.101552 ↗
29. Furrer DU, Burlatsky SF (2022) Model-assisted validation and certification of AM components. AM Bench Conference Presentation (Bethesda, MD, 15–18 August 2022)
30. Burlatsky SF, El-Wardany T, Sharon J, Furrer D (2019) Application and validation of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) defect prediction models to guide optimal processing windows. RAPID conference presentation
31. Furrer D, Ghosh S, Rollett A, Burlatsky S, Anahid M, Model-based material and process definitions for additive component design and qualification, to be published
32. Donegan SP, Schwalbach EJ, Groeber MA (2020) Zoning additive manufacturing process histories using unsupervised machine learning. Mater Charact 161:110123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11012310.1016/j.matchar.2020.110123 ↗
33. Runkle RL, Ventura AP, Rebbecchi TA (2019) US Patent 20190155254A1
34. Dimiduk DM, Holm EA, Niezgoda SR (2018) Perspectives on the impact of machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence on materials, processes, and structures engineering. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 7:157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-018-0117-810.1007/s40192-018-0117-8 ↗
35. Noraas R, Venkatesh V, Rettberg L, Somanath N, Oshin O, Giering M (2020) Recognition and quantification of dual phase titanium alloy microstructures using convolutional neural networks. MATEC Web of Conferences, vol 321, p 11084, EDP Sciences10.1051/matecconf/202032111084 ↗
36. Halle A, Campanile LF, Hasse A (2021) An artificial intelligence-assisted design method for topology optimization without pre-optimized training data. Appl Sci 11(19):904110.3390/app11199041 ↗
37. Tshitoyan V, Dagdelen J, Weston L, Dunn A, Rong Z, Kononova O, Persson KA, Ceder G, Jain AW (2019) Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature. Nature 571:95–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1335-810.1038/s41586-019-1335-8 ↗
38. Kononova O, He T, Huo H, Trewartha A, Olivetti EA, Ceder G (2021) Opportunity and challenges of text mining in materials research, iScience 24:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.10215510.1016/j.isci.2021.102155 ↗
39. Kulik HJ, Tiwary P (2022) Artificial Intelligence in computational materials science: special issue overview. MRS Bull 47:927–929. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-022-00431-110.1557/s43577-022-00431-1 ↗
40. Ceriotti M (2022) Beyond potentials: integrated machine-learning models for materials. MRS Bull 47:1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-022-00440-010.1557/s43577-022-00440-0 ↗