journal article·2023-07-20Open access

Rethinking the Public Space Design Process Using Extended Reality as a Game Changer for 3D Co-Design

Mario Matthys, Laure De Cock, Lieze Mertens, Kobe Boussauw, Philippe De Maeyer, Nico Van de Weghe

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 14

Abstract

Public space design processes are complex. Numerous preconditions and the involvement of stakeholders impede rapid decision making. Two-dimensional drawings remain the norm, although these are difficult for citizen stakeholders to understand. Public space designers rarely use 3D city models, infrastructure building information modeling, digital twins, or extended reality. Usually, 3D images (without animation) are only rendered after decision making for communication purposes. This study consists of an online questionnaire of 102 Flemish region (Belgium) stakeholders to show the appeal of and resistance to the use of 3D and extended reality in public space design processes. In a follow-up experiment, 37 participants evaluated various graphic techniques by their designs and observations. The questionnaire showed that all stakeholders lack experience with the use of virtual reality in design processes. We found that non-designer stakeholders and designers indicated that using virtual reality and interactive online 3D tools using game engines provided a better insight into communication and design. Reusing 3D designs in cycling simulators during the design process results in cost-effective quality optimization, and integration into digital twins or animated spatial time machines paves the way for hybrid, 4D cities. Extended reality supports 3D co-design that has simplicity and clarity from the outset of the design process, a trait that makes it a game changer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Land Use and Ecosystem Services

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geography, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 (Building S8), B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

Cosmopolis Centre for Urban Research, Geography Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium

City of Ghent, Botermarkt 1, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

Department of Movement & Sports Sciences, Physical Activity & Health, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

Funding

Research Foundation—Flanders F.W.O.

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. Designing Public Space for Sustainability: Lessons from Historical Perspectives
2. Carmona, M., Haet, T., Oc, T., and Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Places-Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis.
3. The Science of Urban Design?10.1057/udi.2015.28 ↗
4. Cooper, R., Boyko, C., Pemberton-Billing, N., and Cadman, D. (2009). Designing Sustainable Cities, Springer.
5. Urban Design and the National Planning Policy Framework for England10.1057/udi.2012.3 ↗
6. Principles for Public Space Design, Planning to Do Better10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3 ↗
7. Opportunities and Challenges for GeoBIM in Europe: Developing a Building Permits Use-Case to Raise Awareness and Examine Technical Interoperability Challenges10.1080/14498596.2019.1627253 ↗
8. Evaluation of Visual Preference for Seasonal Streetscape Design Using 3D Simulation Technology10.1088/1757-899X/686/1/012003 ↗
9. Nyberg, M., Sapsford Newman, C., and Westerberg, P. (2019). Mixed Reality for Public Participation in Urban and Public Space Design Towards a New Way of Crowdsourcing More Inclusive Smart Cities, UN-Habitat and Ericsson.
10. Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research10.3390/su3081090 ↗
11. The Use of 2D and 3D Displays for Shape-Understanding versus Relative-Position Tasks10.1518/001872001775992534 ↗
12. Planning Participants’ Preferential Differences under Immersive Virtual Reality and Conventional Representations: An Experiment of Street Renewal10.1177/2399808320942776 ↗
13. Toward the Participatory Human-Centred Community an Exploration of Cyber-Physical Public Design for Urban Experience10.1049/iet-cps.2019.0007 ↗
14. Owen, J. (2023, May 10). Urban Design: A Definition, Approach and Conceptual Framework. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/523470761/URBAN-DESIGN-a-Deifinition-Approach-and-Conceptual-Framework.
15. What Is Urban Design? A Proposal for a Common Understanding10.1080/13574809.2019.1705776 ↗
16. The Problem with Thinking about or for Urban Design10.1080/13574809.2011.646251 ↗
17. Belderbos, M., and Verbeke, J. (2005). The Unthinkable Doctorate, Hogeschool voor Wetenschap & Kunst.
18. Roggema, R. (2016). Research by Design: Proposition for a Methodological Approach. Urban Sci., 1.10.3390/urbansci1010002 ↗
19. Llinares, C., Higuera-Trujillo, J.L., Montañana, A., and Castilla, N. (2020). Improving the Pedestrian’s Perceptions of Safety on Street Crossings. Psychological and Neurophysiological Effects of Traffic Lanes, Artificial Lighting, and Vegetation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17228576 ↗
20. Model for Assessment of Public Space Quality in Town Centers10.1515/esrp-2016-0005 ↗
21. United Nations (2017). New Urban Agenda, United Nations.
22. Sidewalk Design in Multi-Cultural Settings: A Study of Street Furniture Layout and Design10.1057/s41289-020-00121-x ↗
23. A Study on Urban Furniture: Nicosia Old City10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n2p1 ↗
24. Evaluating Pedestrian Perceptions of Street Design with a 3D Stated Preference Survey10.1177/2399808320946050 ↗
25. Hjort, M., Martin, W.M., Stewart, T., and Troelsen, J. (2018). Design of Urban Public Spaces: Intent vs. Reality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15.10.3390/ijerph15040816 ↗
26. Schrenk, M., Popovich, V.V., Zeile, P., Elisei, P., and Beyer, C. (2015, January 5–7). “Ghent 3D, in 4th Dimension”, Startup for a Holistic Multi-D City Model, Using Augmented Virtuality. Proceedings of the REAL CORP 2015 Tagungsband, Ghent, Belgium.
27. Zlatanova, S., Yan, J., Wang, Y., Diakité, A., Isikdag, U., Sithole, G., and Barton, J. (2020). Spaces in Spatial Science and Urban Applications—State of the Art Review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9010058 ↗
28. Ascensão, A., Costa, L., Fernandes, C., Morais, F., and Ruivo, C. (2019). 3D Space Syntax Analysis: Attributes to Be Applied in Landscape Architecture Projects. Urban Sci., 3.10.3390/urbansci3010020 ↗
29. A New 3D Space Syntax Metric Based on 3D Isovist Capture in Urban Space Using Remote Sensing Technology10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.11.009 ↗
30. BIM Maturity Models Evaluated by Design Principles
31. BIM and GIS Integration for Infrastructure asset management: A bibliometric analysis10.5194/isprs-annals-VI-4-W1-2020-77-2020 ↗
32. An Online Visualization Tool for Internet-Based Local Townscape Design10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.09.002 ↗
34. A Digital Twin Smart City for Citizen Feedback10.1016/j.cities.2020.103064 ↗
35. Delivering Time-Evolving 3D City Models for Web Visualization10.1080/13658816.2020.1749637 ↗
36. Design of the City Logistics Simulation Model Using PTV VISSIM Software10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.033 ↗
37. Paz, A., Veeramisti, N., De La Fuente-Mella, H., Modorcea, L.V., and Monteiro, H. (2015, January 3–5). Towards a Realistic Traffic and Driving Simulation Using 3D Rendering. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP), Cluj-Napoca, Romania.10.1109/ICCP.2015.7312683 ↗
38. Experimental Analysis of Walkability Evaluation Using Virtual Reality Application10.1177/2399808320980747 ↗
39. Visibility of Urban Activities and Pedestrian Routes: An Experiment in a Virtual Environment10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.03.007 ↗
40. Using Virtual Reality for Assessing the Role of Noise in the Audio-Visual Design of an Urban Public Space10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.018 ↗
41. Riggs, W. (June, January 30). Technology, Civic Engagement and Street Science: Hacking the Future of Participatory Street Design in the Era of Self-Driving Cars. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, Delft, The Netherlands.
42. Szczepańska, A., Kaźmierczak, R., and Myszkowska, M. (2021). Virtual Reality as a Tool for Public Consultations in Spatial Planning and Management. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14196046 ↗
43. To Go Where No Man Has Gone before: Virtual Reality in Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.05.001 ↗
44. The Public’s Acceptance of and Intention to Use ICTs When Participating in Urban Planning Processes10.1080/10630732.2020.1852816 ↗
45. Would 3D Digital Participatory Planning Improve Social Sustainability in Smart Cities? An Empirical Evaluation Study in Less-Advantaged Areas10.1080/10630732.2021.1900772 ↗
46. Dalsgaard, P., Halskov, K., and Iversen, O.S. (2016, January 7–12). Participation Gestalt: Analysing Participatory Qualities of Interaction in Public Space. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA.10.1145/2858036.2858147 ↗
47. Yu, L., Zhang, X., He, F., Liu, Y., and Wang, D. (2020). Participatory Rural Spatial Planning Based on a Virtual Globe-Based 3D Pgis. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, 9.10.3390/ijgi9120763 ↗
48. The Challenge of Time in Community-Based Participatory Design10.1057/s41289-016-0017-5 ↗
49. Architectural and Urban Design of Public Space Based on Social Cooperation10.15503/jecs20182.187.194 ↗
50. Citizen Design Science: A Strategy for Crowd-Creative Urban Design10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.018 ↗
51. Co-Designing Vacant Lots Using Interactive 3D Visualizations—Development and Application of the Land.Info DSS10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104082 ↗
52. Citizen Participatory Design Method Using VR and a Blog as a Media in the Process
53. Using Virtual Environment Technology to Improve Public Participation in Urban Planning Process10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2007)133:4(233) ↗
54. Integrating Agent-Based Modeling, Serious Gaming, and Co-Design for Planning Transport Infrastructure and Public Spaces10.1057/s41289-020-00117-7 ↗
55. The Urban CoBuilder—A Mobile Augmented Reality Tool for Crowd-Sourced Simulation of Emergent Urban Development Patterns: Requirements, Prototyping and Assessment10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.05.003 ↗
56. Alatalo, T., Pouke, M., Koskela, T., Hurskainen, T., Florea, C., and Ojala, T. (2017, January 5–7). Two Real-World Case Studies on 3dweb Applications for Participatory Urban Planning. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on 3D Web Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.10.1145/3055624.3075950 ↗
57. Gamification and Citizen Motivation and Validity in Smart Cities: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis Study10.1007/s10708-020-10295-0 ↗
58. Gnat, M., Leszek, K., and Olszewski, R. (2016, January 4–7). The Use of Geoinformation Technology, Augmented Reality and Gamification in the Urban Modeling Process. Proceedings of the Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2016: 16th International Conference, Beijing, China.10.1007/978-3-319-42108-7_37 ↗
59. González Mendoza, B. (2020). Building Participatory Accountability Systems for City Policies—Handbook, UN-Habitat.
60. A User-Centred Virtual City Information Model for Inclusive Community Design: State-of-Art10.1016/j.cities.2023.104203 ↗
61. Christelle, L., and Chiara, M. (2021). Global Public Space Programme Annual Report 2020, UN-Habitat.
62. (2021, December 20). Block by Block. Available online: www.blockbyblock.org/.
63. Matthys, M., De Cock, L., Vermaut, J., Van de Weghe, N., and De Maeyer, P. (2021). An “Animated Spatial Time Machine” in Co-Creation: Reconstructing History Using Gamification Integrated into 3D City Modelling, 4D Web and Transmedia Storytelling. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10.10.3390/ijgi10070460 ↗
64. Higher Dimensional Graphics: Conceiving Worlds in Four Spatial Dimensions and Beyond10.1111/cgf.142614 ↗
65. A Spatio-Temporal Decision Support System for Designing with Street Trees
66. Planning and 3D Spatial Media: Progress, Prospects, and the Knowledge and Experiences of Local Government Planners in Ireland10.1080/14649357.2021.1921832 ↗
67. Using Virtual Reality to Investigate Physical Environmental Factors Related to Cycling in Older Adults: A Comparison between Two Methodologies10.1016/j.jth.2020.100921 ↗
68. Creating Immersive Virtual Environments Based on Open Geospatial Data and Game Engines10.1007/s42489-020-00069-6 ↗