Textile Fabric Defect Detection Based on Improved Faster R-CNN
Source abstract
Abstract
To identify and locate industrial textile defects accurately, this study proposes a textile detection model based on a convolution neural network (CNN) known as Faster R-CNN. First, a textile defect feature map was extracted by ResNet-101 deep convolution network. Faster R-CNN only extracts features from the last layer of the feature map, which leads to a loss of low-level location information. The proposed method adds the feature pyramid network (FPN) to the network architecture to make an independent prediction for each level in the feature extraction stage. The extracted feature map is input into the regional proposal network, among which the overlapping regional proposals are suppressed. The proposed improved Faster R-CNN model with Region Proposal Network (RPN), Soft Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS), and Region of Interest (ROI) Align can achieve a detection accuracy of 98% and an mean of Average Precision (mAP) of 85%, which is more competitive than the state-of-the-art deep learning-based object detection algorithms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Textile materials and evaluations · Digital Media Forensic Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shenzhen University
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Hua B.O. · Research on Computation of GLCM of Image Texture, Acta Electronica Sinica · 2006 · 1 · 155
2. Ojala T. · Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns, IEEE, Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2002 · 24 · 971
3. 10.1117/12.47707110.1117/12.477071 ↗
4. Gao W., Zhang X., Lei Y. An improved Sobel edge detection, IEEE International Conference on Computer Science & Information Technology, 2010.
5. Krizhevsky A., Sutskever I., Hinton G.E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2012.
6. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9110.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
7. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.24310.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
8. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.257703110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
9. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
10. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.10610.1109/CVPR.2017.106 ↗
11. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.59310.1109/ICCV.2017.593 ↗
12. 10.1109/ICPR.2006.47910.1109/ICPR.2006.479 ↗
13. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.32210.1109/ICCV.2017.322 ↗
14. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.8110.1109/CVPR.2014.81 ↗
15. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.16910.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
16. Burges C. J. C. · A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition, IEEE Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · 1998 · 2 · 121
17. Viola P. · Robust Real-time Face Detection, International Journal of Computer Vision · 2004 · 57 · 137
18. Viola P., Jones M. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition. 2003.
19. He K. · Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence · 2014 · 37 · 1904
20. 10.1016/j.patcog.2015.09.02210.1016/j.patcog.2015.09.022 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_210.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
22. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.59310.1109/ICCV.2017.593 ↗