journal article·2023-07-08Open access

Chromosome Cluster Type Identification Using a Swin Transformer

Indu Joshi, Arnab Kumar Mondal, Nassir Navab

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 14

Abstract

The analysis of chromosome karyotypes is crucial for diagnosing genetic disorders such as Patau syndrome, Edward syndrome, and Down syndrome. Chromosome cluster type identification is a key step in the automated analysis of chromosome karyotypes. State-of-the-art chromosome cluster-type identification techniques are based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and fail to exploit the global context. To address this limitation of the state of the art, this paper proposes a transformer network, chromosome cluster transformer (CCT), that exploits a swin transformer backbone and successfully captures long-range dependencies in a chromosome image. Additionally, we find that the proposed CCT has a large number of model parameters, which makes it prone to overfitting on a (small) dataset of chromosome images. To alleviate the limited availability of training data, the proposed CCT also utilizes a transfer learning approach. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed CCT outperforms the state-of-the-art chromosome cluster type identification methods as well as the traditional vision transformer. Furthermore, to provide insights on the improved performance, we demonstrate the activation maps obtained using Gradient Attention Rollout.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities · Chromosomal and Genetic Variations · Gene expression and cancer classification

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP), Technical University of Munich, 85748 Munich, Germany

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India

Funding

Prime Minister’s Research Fellows scheme of the government of India · IMI BigPicture project

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Chromosome-scale genome assembly of Glycyrrhiza uralensis revealed metabolic gene cluster centred specialized metabolites biosynthesis10.1093/dnares/dsac043 ↗
2. Chromosome image enhancement using multiscale differential operators10.1109/TMI.2003.812255 ↗
3. Varifocal-net: A chromosome classification approach using deep convolutional networks10.1109/TMI.2019.2905841 ↗
4. A review of metaphase chromosome image selection techniques for automatic karyotype generation10.1007/s11517-015-1419-z ↗
5. Traditional and deep-based techniques for end-to-end automated karyotyping: A review10.1111/exsy.12799 ↗
6. Preprocessing G-banded metaphase: Towards the design of automated karyotyping10.1007/s42452-019-1754-z ↗
7. Classification of Giemsa staining chromosome using input-aware deep convolutional neural network with integrated uncertainty estimates10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103120 ↗
8. Huang, K., Lin, C., Huang, R., Zhao, G., Yin, A., Chen, H., Guo, L., Shan, C., Nie, R., and Li, S. (2021, January 18–22). A novel chromosome instance segmentation method based on geometry and deep learning. Proceedings of the 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Shenzhen, China.10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9533523 ↗
9. Chromenet: A CNN architecture with comparison of optimizers for classification of human chromosome images10.1007/s11045-022-00819-x ↗
10. A novel chromosome cluster types identification method using ResNeXt WSL model10.1016/j.media.2020.101943 ↗
11. Lin, C., Yin, A., Wu, Q., Chen, H., Guo, L., Zhao, G., Fan, X., Luo, H., and Tang, H. (2020, January 16–19). Chromosome cluster identification framework based on geometric features and machine learning algorithms. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/BIBM49941.2020.9313369 ↗
12. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2020, January 26–30). An Image is Worth 16×16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
13. A transformer-based deep neural network for arrhythmia detection using continuous ECG signals10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105325 ↗
14. A survey on vision transformer10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3152247 ↗
15. Transformers in vision: A survey
16. Hatamizadeh, A., Tang, Y., Nath, V., Yang, D., Myronenko, A., Landman, B., Roth, H.R., and Xu, D. (2022, January 4–8). Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/WACV51458.2022.00181 ↗
17. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021, January 11–17). Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
18. Chefer, H., Gur, S., and Wolf, L. (2021, January 20–25). Transformer interpretability beyond attention visualization. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00084 ↗
19. Morphological image processing for quantitative shape analysis of biomedical structures: Effective contrast enhancement10.1107/S0909049513020761 ↗
20. Automatic pattern extraction and classification for chromosome images10.1007/s10762-010-9640-1 ↗
21. Fully automatic raw G-band chromosome image segmentation10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.1104 ↗
22. SRAS-net: Low-resolution chromosome image classification based on deep learning10.1049/syb2.12042 ↗
23. A variable region scalable fitting energy approach for human Metaspread chromosome image segmentation10.1007/s11042-018-6550-z ↗
24. Analysis of human chromosome images: Application towards an automated chromosome classification10.1002/ima.22274 ↗
25. Minaee, S., Fotouhi, M., and Khalaj, B.H. (2014, January 13). A geometric approach to fully automatic chromosome segmentation. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB), Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.1109/SPMB.2014.7163174 ↗
26. Kubola, K., and Wayalun, P. (2018, January 11–13). Automatic determination of the g-band chromosomes number based on geometric features. Proceedings of the 2018 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), Nakhonpathom, Thailand.10.1109/JCSSE.2018.8457330 ↗
27. A novel approach for segmentation of human metaphase chromosome images using region based active contours
28. Sharma, M., and Vig, L. (2018, January 8–13). Automatic chromosome classification using deep attention based sequence learning of chromosome bands. Proceedings of the 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1109/IJCNN.2018.8489321 ↗
29. Overlapping chromosome segmentation using u-net: Convolutional networks with test time augmentation10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.207 ↗
30. An improved denoising of G-banding chromosome images using cascaded CNN and binary classification network10.1007/s00371-021-02273-5 ↗
31. A review of co-saliency detection algorithms: Fundamentals, applications, and challenges
32. Color feature reinforcement for cosaliency detection without single saliency residuals10.1109/LSP.2017.2681687 ↗
33. Low-rank weighted co-saliency detection via efficient manifold ranking10.1007/s11042-019-7403-0 ↗
34. Re-thinking the relations in co-saliency detection10.1109/TCSVT.2022.3150923 ↗
35. Tan, Z., Wan, L., Feng, W., and Pun, C.M. (2013, January 26–31). Image co-saliency detection by propagating superpixel affinities. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638027 ↗
36. Co-saliency detection via a self-paced multiple-instance learning framework10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2567393 ↗
37. A unified metric learning-based framework for co-saliency detection10.1109/TCSVT.2017.2706264 ↗
38. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗
39. SupCAM: Chromosome cluster types identification using supervised contrastive learning with category-variant augmentation and self-margin loss10.3389/fgene.2023.1109269 ↗
40. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.C. (2018, January 18–23). Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
41. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 21–26). Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
42. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
43. Xie, S., Girshick, R., Dollár, P., Tu, Z., and He, K. (2017, January 21–26). Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.634 ↗
44. Yao, T., Li, Y., Pan, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, X.P., and Mei, T. (2023). Dual vision transformer. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1–13.10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3268446 ↗