journal article·2023-06-30Open access

Development of Fire Safety Assessment Model for Buildings Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Ghasan Alfalah, Munther Al-Shalwi, Nehal Elshaboury, Abobakr Al-Sakkaf, Othman Alshamrani, Altyeb Qassim

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 13

Abstract

Fires pose significant risks, encompassing loss of life, destruction of property, and substantial adverse impacts on the economy. Therefore, the prioritization of fire safety in building structures must be embraced by all relevant stakeholders, including building owners, authorities, and the general public. However, traditional fire safety assessment methods can be laborious and challenging, impeding the identification of potential fire hazards and the selection of optimal fire safety measures. To this end, this research study offers an analytic hierarchy process for assessing building fire safety. Two case studies are presented to support this model’s outperformance compared with conventional assessment techniques. The proposed method yields hazard ratings of 5.3 and 4.3 along with safety ratings of 5.5 and 5.9 for the two case studies. Additionally, the proposed model yields comprehensible, well-documented, and comparable results. Therefore, it serves as a valuable decision-making tool for evaluating fire hazards and enhancing the efficiency of building structures. As a result, decision-makers can identify current and future fire protection and prevention requirements with greater ease and precision, making the decision-making process more effective.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Fire dynamics and safety research · Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Architecture and Building Science, College of Architecture and Planning, King Saud University, Riyadh 145111, Saudi Arabia

College of Architecture and Planning Building Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31451, Saudi Arabia

Construction and Project Management Research Institute, Housing and Building National Research Centre, Giza 12311, Egypt

Department of Buildings, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada

Department of Architecture and Environmental Planning, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Hadhramout University, Mukalla 50512, Yemen

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. General Authority for Statistics (2022, December 30). Fire Accidents by Type of Damaged Property and Reason, Available online: https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/5895.
2. An integrated method for fire risk assessment in residential buildings
3. World Health Organization (2023, June 21). Saudi Arabia: Fires. Available online: https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/saudi-arabia-fires.
4. Khalife, L. (2023, June 21). Massive Fire Breaks Out in Public Prosecution Building in Saudi Arabia. Available online: https://stepfeed.com/massive-fire-breaks-out-in-public-prosecution-building-in-saudi-arabia-1825.
5. Factors influencing fire safety on building construction sites: A fire officer’s perspective10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002144 ↗
6. Li, W., Li, H., Liu, Y., Wang, S., Pei, X., and Li, Q. (2020). Fire risk assessment of high-rise buildings under construction based on unascertained measure theory. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0239166 ↗
7. Kumar, A., Khare, R., Sankat, S., and Madhavi, P. (Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt., 2022). Fire safety assessment for older adults in high-rise residential buildings in India: A comprehensive study, Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt., ahead-of-print.10.1108/IJBPA-02-2022-0030 ↗
8. Design and implementation of BIM-based fire risk assessment system10.1088/1742-6596/1584/1/012064 ↗
9. Fire risk analysis of residential buildings based on scenario clusters and its application in fire risk management10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.09.022 ↗
10. Risk assessment model for building fires based on a Bayesian network
11. Omar, M., Mahmoud, A., and Aziz, S.B.A. (2023). Fire safety index for high-rise buildings in the Emirate of Sharjah, UAE. Fire, 6.10.3390/fire6020051 ↗
12. A fire safety assessment system for existing buildings10.1023/A:1015463821818 ↗
13. Decision analysis on fire safety design based on evaluating building fire risk to life10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.011 ↗
14. Brzezińska, D., and Bryant, P. (2020). Risk index method-A tool for sustainable, holistic building fire strategies. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12114469 ↗
15. Fire safety in the built-environment: A case study in a residential facility
16. A framework for fire safety management in school facilities10.11113/ijbes.v9.n2.901 ↗
17. (2023, March 12). Saudi Building Code, Available online: https://www.sbc.gov.sa/en/Pages/default.aspx.
18. Civil Defense (2023, April 25). Protective Requirements from Fire in Facilities, Available online: https://998.gov.sa/English/safety/SafetyInstructionList/Pages/SafetyInstForFacilitis.aspx.
19. Ramezanifar, E., Gholamizadeh, K., Mohammadfam, I., and Mirzaei Aliabadi, M. (2023). Risk assessment of methanol storage tank fire accident using hybrid FTA-SPA. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0282657 ↗
20. A methodical approach for knowledge-based fire and explosion accident likelihood analysis10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.074 ↗
21. Brzezińska, D., and Bryant, P. (2021). Risk index method-A tool for building fire safety assessments. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11083566 ↗
22. Fire hazard in buildings: Review, assessment and strategies for improving fire safety10.1108/PRR-12-2018-0033 ↗
23. Li, X., Wang, C., Kassem, M.A., Zhang, Z., Xiao, Y., and Lin, M. (2022). Safety risk assessment in urban public space using structural equation modelling. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122312318 ↗
24. Wu, L., and Guo, S. (2018, January 23–25). Comparison and analysis of building fire risk assessment methods. Proceedings of the 2018 3rd International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICSRS.2018.8688723 ↗
25. Evaluation of a fire safety risk prediction model for an existing building10.1515/jmbm-2022-0007 ↗
26. Fire risk assessment for building operation and maintenance based on BIM technology10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108188 ↗
27. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I ↗
28. Tan, S., Weinert, D., Joseph, P., and Moinuddin, K. (2020). Impact of technical, human, and organizational risks on reliability of fire safety systems in high-rise residential buildings-Applications of an integrated probabilistic risk assessment model. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10248918 ↗
29. Tan, S., Weinert, D., Joseph, P., and Moinuddin, K. (2021). Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of human and organizational risks in fire safety systems for high-rise residential buildings with probabilistic THO-risk methodology. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11062590 ↗
30. AHP-based weighting of factors affecting safety on construction sites with tower cranes10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:4(307) ↗
31. Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects10.1016/j.jsr.2013.05.003 ↗
32. Assessing safety measures in residential buildings in Saudi Arabia10.1080/0961321042000221025 ↗
33. Research on building fire risk fast assessment method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and SVM10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.121 ↗
34. Research on the fire safety assessment of high building with intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method
35. An evaluation of fire safety measures in high-rise buildings in Nigeria10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.035 ↗
36. Fire safety evaluation of high-rise buildings based on Shapley-DS
37. The most critical issues and challenges of fire safety for building sustainability in Jakarta10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101133 ↗
38. Conceptual framework for quantifying fire resilience-A new perspective on fire safety performance of buildings10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103052 ↗
39. Fire safety risk assessment of workplace facilities: A case study10.3389/fbuil.2022.861662 ↗
40. Peron, M., Arena, S., Paltrinieri, N., Sgarbossa, F., and Boustras, G. (2022). Risk assessment for handling hazardous substances within the European industry: Available methodologies and research streams. Risk Anal., 1–29.10.1111/risa.14010 ↗
41. A fuzzy ANP–DEMATEL model on faulty behavior risks: Implications for improving safety in the workplace10.1080/10803548.2020.1847486 ↗
42. Evaluating the severity of building fires with the analytical hierarchy process, big data analysis, and remote sensing10.1007/s11069-020-04057-x ↗
43. Wang, Y., Hou, L., Li, M., and Zheng, R. (2021). A novel fire risk assessment approach for large-scale commercial and high-rise buildings based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and coupling revision. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18137187 ↗
44. Improving analytic hierarchy process applied to fire risk analysis of public building10.1007/s11434-009-0056-z ↗
45. Chen, J.J., Fang, Z., Wang, J.H., and Guo, X.J. (2014, January 25–26). Research on building fire risk assessment based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Proceedings of the 2014 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, Changsha, China.10.1109/ICICTA.2014.128 ↗
46. High-rise building group regional fire risk assessment model based on AHP10.2991/jrarc.2016.6.1.5 ↗
47. Factors affecting adoption of emergency evacuation strategies in high-rise office buildings10.22452/jdbe.vol20no3.1 ↗
48. Mullins-Jaime, C., and Smith, T.D. (2022). Nanotechnology in residential building materials for better fire protection and life safety outcomes. Fire, 5.10.3390/fire5060174 ↗
49. Research of integrity of fire insulation cladding with mineral wool of steel beam under fire impact10.1088/1757-899X/1021/1/012024 ↗
50. Influence of design and installation of emergency exit signs on evacuation speed10.1080/13467581.2019.1599897 ↗
51. Safety by design: Engineers and entrepreneurs invent fire safety in Mexico City, 1860–191010.1017/S0963926813000242 ↗