A Machine Learning Strategy for Race-Tracking Detection During Manufacturing of Composites by Liquid Moulding
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work presents a supervised machine learning (ML) model to detect race-tracking disturbances during the liquid moulding manufacturing of structural composites. Race-tracking is generated by unexpected resin channels at mould edges that may induce dry spots and porosity formation. The ML model uses the pressure signals recorded by a sensor network as input, providing a classification of the race-tracking event from a set of possible scenarios, and a subsequent variable regression for their position, size and strength. Such a model is based on the residual network (ResNet), a well-known artificial intelligence architecture that makes use of convolutional neural networks for image recognition. Training of the ML classifier and regressors was carried out with the aid of a synthetically generated simulation data set obtained throughout computational fluid dynamics simulations. The time evolution of the pressure sensors was used as grey-level images, or footprints, as inputs to the ResNet ML. The trained model was able to recognise the presence of race-tracking channels from the pressure data yielding good accuracy in terms of label prediction as well as position, size and strength. The model correlation was carried out with a set of injection experiments performed with a constant thickness closed mould containing induced race-tracking channels. The ability of ML models to provide an approximation to the inverse problem, relating the pressure sensor distortions to the cause of such events, is analysed and discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. González C, Vilatela J, Molina-Aldareguía J et al (2017) Structural composites for multifunctional applications: current challenges and future trends. Prog Mater Sci 89:194–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.00510.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.005 ↗
2. Llorca J, González C, Molina-Aldareguía J et al (2011) Multiscale modeling of composite materials: a roadmap towards virtual testing. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110168310.1002/adma.201101683 ↗
3. Liu X, Furrer D, Kosters J, et al (2018) Vision 2040: a roadmap for integrated, multiscale modeling and simulation of materials and systems. NASA/CR—2018-219771 Report
4. Kalil T, Whitman L (2016) The materials genome initiative: the first five years
5. Furrer DU, Dimiduk DM, Cotton JD et al (2017) Making the case for a model-based definition of engineering materials. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0102-710.1007/s40192-017-0102-7 ↗
6. Karpatne A, Atluri G, Faghmous JH et al (2017) Theory-guided data science: a new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2017.272016810.1109/TKDE.2017.2720168 ↗
7. Advani S, Hsiao KT (2012) Introduction to composites and manufacturing processes. In: Advani SG, Hsiao KT (eds) Manufacturing techniques for polymer matrix composites (PMCs). Woodhead publishing series in composites science and engineering. Woodhead Publishing, pp 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096258.1.1. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978085709067650001810.1533/9780857096258.1.1 ↗
8. Rudd CD, Long AC, Kendall KN, et al (eds) (1997) Liquid moulding technologies. Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85573-242-1.50002-7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978185573242150002710.1016/B978-1-85573-242-1.50002-7 ↗
9. Bickerton S, Advani SG (1999) Characterization and modeling of race-tracking in liquidcomposite molding processes. Compos Sci Technol 59(15):2215–2229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00077-910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00077-9 ↗
10. Devillard M, Hsiao KT, Gokce A et al (2003) On-line characterization of bulk permeability and race-tracking during the filling stage in resin transfer molding process. J Compos Mater 37(17):1525–154110.1177/0021998303034459 ↗
11. Devillard M, Hsiao KT, Advani SG (2005) Flow sensing and control strategies to address race-tracking disturbances in resin transfer molding-part II: automation and validation. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 36(11):1581–158910.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.009 ↗
12. Lawrence JM, Hsiao KT, Don RC et al (2002) An approach to couple mold design and on-line control to manufacture complex composite parts by resin transfer molding. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 33(7):981–99010.1016/S1359-835X(02)00043-X ↗
13. Lawrence JM, Fried P, Advani SG (2005) Automated manufacturing environment to address bulk permeability variations and race tracking in resin transfer molding by redirecting flow with auxiliary gates. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 36(8):1128–114110.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.024 ↗
14. Siddig NA, Binetruy C, Syerko E et al (2018) A new methodology for race-tracking detection and criticality in resin transfer molding process using pressure sensors. J Compos Mater 52(29):4087–4103. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831877482910.1177/0021998318774829 ↗
15. Di Fratta C, Klunker F, Ermanni P (2013) A methodology for flow-front estimation in lcm processes based on pressure sensors. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 47:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.11.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2012.11.008 ↗
16. Fratta CD, Koutsoukis G, Klunker F et al (2016) Fast method to monitor the flow front and control injection parameters in resin transfer molding using pressure sensors. J Compos Mater 50(21):2941–2957. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831561499410.1177/0021998315614994 ↗
17. Bock FE, Aydin RC, Cyron CJ et al (2019) A review of the application of machine learning and data mining approaches in continuum materials mechanics. Front Mater. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.0011010.3389/fmats.2019.00110 ↗
18. Brunton SL, Noack BR, Koumoutsakos P (2020). Machine learning for fluid mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-06021410.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
19. Wuest T, Weimer D, Irgens C et al (2016) Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications. Prod Manuf Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2016.119251710.1080/21693277.2016.1192517 ↗
20. Meng L, McWilliams B, Jarosinski W et al (2020). Machine learning in additive manufacturing: a review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y ↗
21. Wang J, Ma Y, Zhang L et al (2018) Deep learning for smart manufacturing: nethods and applications. J Manuf Syst 48:144–156 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.003. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612518300037. Special issue on smart manufacturing10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.003 ↗
22. Tao F, Qi Q, Liu A et al (2018) Data-driven smart manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 48:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.0010.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.00 ↗
23. Wang J, Fu P, Gao RX (2019) Machine vision intelligence for product defect inspection based on deep learning and Hough transform. J Manuf Syst 51:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.03.00210.1016/j.jmsy.2019.03.002 ↗
24. Iglesias M, Park M, Tretyakov MV (2018) Bayesian inversion in resin transfer molding. Inverse Probl 34(10):1–49. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/aad1cc. https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:arXiv:1707.03575v210.1088/1361-6420/aad1cc ↗
25. González C, Fernández-León J (2020) A machine learning model to detect flow disturbances during manufacturing of composites by liquid moulding. J Compos Sci 4(2):71. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs402007110.3390/jcs4020071 ↗
26. Matveev M, Endruweit A, Long A et al (2021) Bayesian inversion algorithm for estimating local variations in permeability and porosity of reinforcements using experimental data. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 143(106):323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10632310.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106323 ↗
27. Mendikute J, Plazaola J, Baskaran M et al (2021) Impregnation quality diagnosis in resin transfer moulding by machine learning. Compos B Eng 221(108):973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10897310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108973 ↗
28. Foreman-Mackey D, Hogg DW, Lang D et al (2013) emcee: The MCMC hammer. Publ Astron Soc Pac 125(925):306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/67006710.1086/670067 ↗
29. Weller HG, Tabor G, Jasak H et al (1998) A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques. Comput Phys 12(6):620–631. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.16874410.1063/1.168744 ↗
30. Deshpande SS, Anumolu L, Trujillo MF (2012) Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interFoam. Comput Sci Discov 5(1):014–016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1749-4699/5/1/01401610.1088/1749-4699/5/1/014016 ↗
31. PyDOE (2019) The experimental design package for Python. https://pythonhosted.org/pyDOE/
32. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, et al (2019) Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Wallach H, Larochelle H, Beygelzimer A, et al (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 32. Curran Associates, Inc., pp 8024–8035. http://papers.neurips.cc/paper/9015-pytorch-an-imperative-style-high-performance-deep-learning-library.pdf
33. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 770–778. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
34. Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, et al (2017) Densely connected convolutional networks. In: 2017 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 2261–2269. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.24310.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
35. Tan M, Le Q (2019) EfficientNet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 36th international conference on machine learning, pp 6105–6114
36. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:150203167
37. Furusho Y, Ikeda K (2020) Theoretical analysis of skip connections and batch normalization from generalization and optimization perspectives. APSIPA Trans Signal Inf Process 9:e9. https://doi.org/10.1017/ATSIP.2020.710.1017/ATSIP.2020.7 ↗