journal article·2025-12Open access

Data-Efficient Inverse Design of Spinodoid Metamaterials

Max Rosenkranz, Markus Kästner, Ivo F. Sbalzarini

Abstract

Abstract We present a data-efficient neural-network model for predicting linear-elastic properties of spinodoid metamaterials from their mesoscale structure. Our machine-learning model requires 75 data points for training, greatly improving data efficiency over previous models that required thousands of training samples. We achieve this by leveraging concepts from geometric learning. Specifically, we exploit physical properties, such as positive semi-definiteness of the elasticity tensor, as well as structural invariances and equivariances of the problem, for example with respect to coordinate axes permutations. The neural network model is designed to exactly fulfill these constraints; it does not have to learn them from data. The resulting model enables data- and compute-efficient inverse design of spinodoid metamaterials. In inverse design, the goal is to find a material mesostructure that leads to desired mechanical properties on the macroscale. Exactly fulfilling physical and structural constraints, the present neural network model remains differentiable. This allows using fast gradient-based optimizers for inverse design. We demonstrate this by inversely designing spinodoid metamaterials that achieve desired linear elastic target properties in three dimensions. Inverse design is treated as a constrained optimization problem over the parameters describing the metamaterial. The results confirm that the present approach requires significantly less training data than previous machine-learning approaches and allows incorporating multiple objectives in the inverse design process. Since the structure of the design space is independent of the target material properties, we hope that such data-efficient models will be useful also for inverse design of spinodoids beyond linear elasticity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Structural Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Bastek JH, Kochmann DM (2023) Inverse design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion models. Nat Mach Intell 5(12):1466–1475. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00762-x10.1038/s42256-023-00762-x ↗
2. Bastek JH, Kumar S, Telgen B, Glaesener RN, Kochmann DM (2022) Inverting the structure-property map of truss metamaterials by deep learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 119(1):e2111505119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211150511910.1073/pnas.2111505119 ↗
3. Berger JB, Wadley HNG, McMeeking RM (2017) Mechanical metamaterials at the theoretical limit of isotropic elastic stiffness. Nature 543(7646):533–537. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2107510.1038/nature21075 ↗
4. Calderon CE, Plata JJ, Toher C, Oses C, Levy O, Fornari M, Natan A, Mehl MJ, Hart G, Buongiorno Nardelli M, Curtarolo S (2015) The aflow standard for high-throughput materials science calculations. Comput Mater Sci 108:233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.01910.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.019 ↗
5. Cheng X, Zhang Y, Ren X, Han D, Jiang W, Zhang XG, Luo HC, Xie YM (2022) Design and mechanical characteristics of auxetic metamaterial with tunable stiffness. Int J Mech Sci 223:107286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10728610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107286 ↗
6. Coli GM, Boattini E, Filion L, Dijkstra M (2022) Inverse design of soft materials via a deep learning-based evolutionary strategy. Sci Adv 8(3):eabj6731. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj673110.1126/sciadv.abj6731 ↗
7. Correa DM, Klatt T, Cortes S, Haberman M, Kovar D, Seepersad C (2015) Negative stiffness honeycombs for recoverable shock isolation. Rapid Prototyping J 21(2):193–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-018210.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0182 ↗
8. Correa DM, Seepersad CC, Haberman MR (2015) Mechanical design of negative stiffness honeycomb materials. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 4(1):165–175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-015-0038-810.1186/s40192-015-0038-8 ↗
9. Guo Y, Sharma S, Kumar S (2024) Inverse designing surface curvatures by deep learning. Adv Intell Syst 6(6):2300789. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.20230078910.1002/aisy.202300789 ↗
10. Hanaoka K (2021) Bayesian optimization for goal-oriented multi-objective inverse material design. iScience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.10278110.1016/j.isci.2021.102781 ↗
11. Hariharan A, Ackermann M, Koss S, Khosravani A, Schleifenbaum JH, Köhnen P, Kalidindi SR, Haase C (2025) High-speed 3D printing coupled with machine learning to accelerate alloy development for additive manufacturing. Adv Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20241488010.1002/advs.202414880 ↗
12. Jadoon AA, Kalina KA, Rausch MK, Jones R, Fuhg JN (2024) Inverse design of anisotropic microstructures using physics-augmented neural networks. arXiv:2412.1337010.1016/j.jmps.2025.106161 ↗
13. Jiang H, Bednarcyk BA, Barbenchon L, Chen Y (2023) Elastically anisotropic architected metamaterials with enhanced energy absorption. Thin-Walled Struct 192:111115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.11111510.1016/j.tws.2023.111115 ↗
14. Jin H, Zhang B, Cao Q, Zhang E, Bora A, Krishnaswamy S, Karniadakis GE, Espinosa HD (2023) Mechanical characterization and inverse design of stochastic architected metamaterials using neural operators. arXiv:2311.13812
15. Jin T, Park I, Park T, Park J, Shim JH (2021) Accelerated crystal structure prediction of multi-elements random alloy using expandable features. Sci Rep 11(1):5194. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84544-810.1038/s41598-021-84544-8 ↗
16. Kadic M, Bückmann T, Schittny R, Wegener M (2013) On anisotropic versions of three-dimensional pentamode metamaterials. New J Phys 15(2):023029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/2/02302910.1088/1367-2630/15/2/023029 ↗
17. Kraft D (1988) A software package for sequential quadratic programming. Forschungsbericht—Deutsche Forschungs—und Versuchsanstalt fur Luft—und Raumfahrt
18. Kumar S, Tan S, Zheng L, Kochmann DM (2020) Inverse-designed spinodoid metamaterials. NPJ Comput Mater 6(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-0341-610.1038/s41524-020-0341-6 ↗
19. Kusampudi N, Diehl M (2023) Inverse design of dual-phase steel microstructures using generative machine learning model and Bayesian optimization. Int J Plast 171:103776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.10377610.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103776 ↗
20. Lakes R (1987) Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science 235(4792):1038–1040. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4792.103810.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
21. Leuschner M, Fritzen F (2018) Fourier-accelerated nodal solvers (fans) for homogenization problems. Comput Mech 62(3):359–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1501-510.1007/s00466-017-1501-5 ↗
22. Liu S, Acar P (2024) Generative adversarial networks for inverse design of two-dimensional spinodoid metamaterials. AIAA J 62(7):2433–2442. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J06369710.2514/1.J063697 ↗
23. Liu T, Lin C, Zhang Y, Cai J, Yang J (2025) Viscoelastic negative stiffness metamaterial with multistage load bearing and programmable energy absorption ability. Int J Smart Nano Mater 16(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2024.242817210.1080/19475411.2024.2428172 ↗
24. Maurizi M, Gao C, Berto F (2022) Inverse design of truss lattice materials with superior buckling resistance. NPJ Comput Mater 8(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00938-w10.1038/s41524-022-00938-w ↗
25. Mehreganian N, Fallah AS, Sareh P (2021) Structural mechanics of negative stiffness honeycomb metamaterials. J Appl Mech 88:051006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404995410.1115/1.4049954 ↗
26. Meyer PP, Tancogne-Dejean T, Mohr D (2024) Non-symmetric plate-lattices: recurrent neural network-based design of optimal metamaterials. Acta Mater 278:120246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2024.12024610.1016/j.actamat.2024.120246 ↗
27. Mohsenizadeh M, Gasbarri F, Munther M, Beheshti A, Davami K (2018) Additively-manufactured lightweight metamaterials for energy absorption. Mater Des 139:521–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.03710.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.037 ↗
28. Nordmann J, Aßmus M, Altenbach H (2018) Visualising elastic anisotropy: theoretical background and computational implementation. Contin Mech Thermodyn 30(4):689–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-018-0635-910.1007/s00161-018-0635-9 ↗
29. Ravanbakhsh S, Schneider J, Poczos B (2017) Equivariance through parameter-sharing. arXiv:1702.08389
30. Raßloff A, Seibert P, Kalina KA, Kästner M (2025) Inverse design of spinodoid structures using Bayesian optimization. Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-024-02587-w10.1007/s00466-024-02587-w ↗
31. Rittiruam M, Noppakhun J, Setasuban S, Aumnongpho N, Sriwattana A, Boonchuay S, Saelee T, Wangphon C, Ektarawong A, Chammingkwan P, Taniike T, Praserthdam S, Praserthdam P (2022) High-throughput materials screening algorithm based on first-principles density functional theory and artificial neural network for high-entropy alloys. Sci Rep 12(1):16653. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21209-010.1038/s41598-022-21209-0 ↗
32. Rosenkranz M, Kästner M, Sbalzarini IF (2025). Code and Data for Data-efficient inverse design of spinodoid metamaterials. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1691970010.5281/zenodo.16919700 ↗
33. Röding M, Wåhlstrand Skärström V, Lorén N (2022) Inverse design of anisotropic spinodoid materials with prescribed diffusivity. Sci Rep 12(1):17413. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21451-610.1038/s41598-022-21451-6 ↗
34. Van ’t Sant S, Thakolkaran P, Martínez J, Kumar S (2023) Inverse-designed growth-based cellular metamaterials. Mech Mater 182:104668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.10466810.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104668 ↗
35. Shi J, Ju K, Chen H, Mirabolghasemi A, Akhtar S, Sasmito A, Akbarzadeh A (2024) 3d printed architected shell-based ferroelectric metamaterials with programmable piezoelectric and pyroelectric properties. Nano Energy 123:109385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.10938510.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109385 ↗
36. Tancogne-Dejean T, Diamantopoulou M, Gorji MB, Bonatti C, Mohr D (2018) 3d plate-lattices: an emerging class of low-density metamaterial exhibiting optimal isotropic stiffness. Adv Mater 30(45):1803334. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180333410.1002/adma.201803334 ↗
37. Thakolkaran P, Espinal M, Dhulipala S, Kumar S, Portela CM (2025) Experiment-informed finite-strain inverse design of spinodal metamaterials. Extreme Mech Lett 74:102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2024.10227410.1016/j.eml.2024.102274 ↗
38. Tian J, Tang K, Chen X, Wang X (2022) Machine learning-based prediction and inverse design of 2d metamaterial structures with tunable deformation-dependent poisson’s ratio. Nanoscale 14(35):12677–12691. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR02509D10.1039/D2NR02509D ↗
39. Vecchio KS, Dippo OF, Kaufmann KR, Liu X (2021) High-throughput rapid experimental alloy development (ht-read). Acta Mater 221:117352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11735210.1016/j.actamat.2021.117352 ↗
40. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, Burovski E, Peterson P, Weckesser W, Bright J, Walt SJ, Brett M, Wilson J, Millman KJ, Mayorov N, Nelson ARJ, Jones E, Kern R, Larson E, Carey CJ, Polat I, Feng Y, Moore EW, VanderPlas J, Laxalde D, Perktold J, Cimrman R, Henriksen I, Quintero EA, Harris CR, Archibald AM, Ribeiro AH, Pedregosa F, Mulbregt P (2020) SciPy 1.0 contributors: SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python. Nat Methods 17:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
41. Wang H, Zhang Y, Lin W, Qin QH (2020) A novel two-dimensional mechanical metamaterial with negative Poisson’s ratio. Comput Mater Sci 171:109232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10923210.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109232 ↗
42. Wang YC, Lakes R (2004) Negative stiffness-induced extreme viscoelastic mechanical properties: stability and dynamics. Philos. Mag. 84(35):3785–3801. https://doi.org/10.1080/147864304200028270210.1080/1478643042000282702 ↗
43. Wiesenhuetter S, Goertzen T, Vakaliuk I, Curbach M, Scheerer S, Niemeyer AC, Noennig JR (2023) Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces - A Novel Design Approach for Lightweight CRC Structures. In: A. Ilki, D. Çavunt, Y.S. Çavunt (eds.) Building for the future: durable, sustainable, resilient, pp. 1449–1458. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32511-3_14810.1007/978-3-031-32511-3_148 ↗
44. Wojciechowski B, Xue Y, Rabbani A, Bolton JS, Sharma B (2023) Additively manufactured spinodoid sound absorbers. Addit Manuf 71:103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.10360810.1016/j.addma.2023.103608 ↗
45. Yeh JW (2013) Alloy design strategies and future trends in high-entropy alloys. JOM 65(12):1759–1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0761-610.1007/s11837-013-0761-6 ↗
46. Yu X, Zhou J, Liang H, Jiang Z, Wu L (2018) Mechanical metamaterials associated with stiffness, rigidity and compressibility: a brief review. Prog Mater Sci 94:114–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.003 ↗
47. Yuan S, Chua CK, Zhou K (2019) 3d-printed mechanical metamaterials with high energy absorption. Adv Mater Technol 4(3):1800419. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20180041910.1002/admt.201800419 ↗
48. Zhang W, Tang M, Mu H, Yang X, Zeng X, Tuo R, Wei Chen Gao W (2024) Inverse design of nonlinear mechanics of bio-inspired materials through interface engineering and Bayesian optimization. arXiv:2412.1407110.1016/j.eml.2025.102359 ↗
49. Zhu L, Sun L, Wang X, Li N (2021) Optimisation of three-dimensional hierarchical structures with tailored lattice metamaterial anisotropy. Mater Des 210:110083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11008310.1016/j.matdes.2021.110083 ↗