journal article·2021-12Open access

A Bayesian Approach to the Eagar–Tsai Model for Melt Pool Geometry Prediction with Implications in Additive Manufacturing of Metals

Brendan J. Whalen, Ji Ma, Prasanna V. Balachandran

Abstract

This paper focuses on improving the melt pool geometry predictions and quantifying uncertainties using an adapted version of the Eagar–Tsai (E–T) model that incorporates temperature-dependent properties of the material as well as powder conditions. Additionally, Bayesian inference is employed to predict distributions for the E–T model input parameters of laser absorptivity and powder bed porosity by incorporating experimental results into the analysis. Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation is then used with these parameter distributions to estimate the melt pool depth and associated uncertainty. Our results for the 316L stainless steel suggest that both the absorptivity and powder bed porosity are strongly influenced by the laser power. In contrast, the scanning speed has only a marginal effect on both the absorptivity and powder bed porosity. We constructed a printability map using the Bayesian E–T model based on power-dependent input parameter values to demonstrate the merit of the approach. The Bayesian approach improved the accuracy in predicting the keyhole regions in the laser power-scan speed parameter space for the 316L stainless steel. Although applied to a specific adaptation of the E–T model, the method put forth can be extended to quantify uncertainties in other numerical models as well as in the estimation of unknown parameters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Bertoli US, Wolfer AJ, Matthews MJ, Delplanque JPR, Schoenung JM (2017) On the limitations of volumetric energy density as a design parameter for selective laser melting. Mater Des 113:331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.03710.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037 ↗
2. Kamath C (2016) Data mining and statistical inference in selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8289-210.1007/s00170-015-8289-2 ↗
3. Bassoli E, Sola A, Celesti M, Calcagnile S, Cavallini C (2018) Development of laser-based powder bed fusion process parameters and scanning strategy for new metal alloy grades: a holistic method formulation. Materials 11:2356. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1112235610.3390/ma11122356 ↗
4. Tan JH, Wong WLE, Dalgarno KW (2017) An overview of powder granulometry on feedstock and part performance in the selective laser melting process. Addit Manuf 18:228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.01110.1016/j.addma.2017.10.011 ↗
5. Oliveira J, LaLonde A, Ma J (2020) Processing parameters in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Mater Des 193:108762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10876210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108762 ↗
6. Cunningham R, Zhao C, Parab N, Kantzos C, Pauza J, Fezzaa K, Sun T, Rollett AD (2019) Keyhole threshold and morphology in laser melting revealed by ultrahigh-speed x-ray imaging. Science 363(6429):849. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav468710.1126/science.aav4687 ↗
7. Tan W, Shin YC (2014) Analysis of multi-phase interaction and its effects on keyhole dynamics with a multi-physics numerical model. J Phys D Appl Phys 47:345501. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/34/34550110.1088/0022-3727/47/34/345501 ↗
8. Johnson L, Mahmoudi M, Zhang B, Seede R, Huang X, Maier JT, Maier HJ, Karaman I, Elwany A, Arróyave R (2019) Assessing printability maps in additive manufacturing of metal alloys. Acta Materialia 176:199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.00510.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.005 ↗
9. Rosenthal D (1946) The theory of moving sources of heat and its application to metal treatments. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 68(8):84910.1115/1.4018624 ↗
10. Eagar TW, Tsai NS (1983) Temperature fields produced by traveling distributed heat sources. Weld Res Suppl 62:346–355
11. Carter MJ, El-Desouky A, Andre MA, Bardet P, LeBlanc S (2019) Pulsed laser melting of bismuth telluride thermoelectric materials. J Manuf Process 43:35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.02110.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.021 ↗
12. Mondal S, Gwynn D, Ray A, Basak A (2020) Investigation of melt pool geometry control in additive manufacturing using hybrid modeling. Metals 10(5):683. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1005068310.3390/met10050683 ↗
13. Kim CS (1975) Thermophysical properties of stainless steels. Technical report, Argonne National Lab., IL (USA)10.2172/4152287 ↗
14. Trapp J, Rubenchik AM, Guss G, Matthews MJ (2017) In situ absorptivity measurements of metallic powders during laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Appl Mater Today 9:341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.08.00610.1016/j.apmt.2017.08.006 ↗
15. Boley CD, Mitchell SC, Rubenchik AM, Wu SSQ (2016) Metal powder absorptivity: modeling and experiment. Appl Opt 55(23):6496. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.00649610.1364/AO.55.006496 ↗
16. Watson TW, Robinson HE (1963) Thermal conductivity of a sample of type 316L stainless steel. Technical Report 7818, NBS Heat Transfer Section, National Bureau of Standards, U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D. C. https://doi.org/10.6028/NBS.RPT.781810.6028/NBS.RPT.7818 ↗
17. Saxena S, Chen S (1975) Thermal conductivity of nitrogen in the temperature range 350-2500 K. Mol Phys 29(5):1507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0026897750010132110.1080/00268977500101321 ↗
18. Pal R (2008) On the Lewis–Nielsen model for thermal/electrical conductivity of composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39(5):718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.008 ↗
19. King WE, Anderson AT, Ferencz RM, Hodge NE, Kamath C, Khairallah SA, Rubenchik AM (2015) Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Appl Phys Rev 2(4):041304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493780910.1063/1.4937809 ↗
20. Rubenchik A, Wu S, Mitchell S, Golosker I, LeBlanc M, Peterson N (2015) Direct measurements of temperature-dependent laser absorptivity of metal powders. Appl Opt 54(24):7230. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.00723010.1364/AO.54.007230 ↗
21. Zhu H, Fuh J, Lu L (2007) The influence of powder apparent density on the density in direct laser-sintered metallic parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.01910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.019 ↗
22. Martin AA, Calta NP, Khairallah SA, Wang J, Depond PJ, Fong AY, Thampy V, Guss GM, Kiss AM, Stone KH, Tassone CJ, Nelson Weker J, Toney MF, van Buuren T, Matthews MJ (2019) Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Nat Commun 10(1):198710.1038/s41467-019-10009-2 ↗
23. Guo Q, Zhao C, Escano LI, Young Z, Xiong L, Fezzaa K, Everhart W, Brown B, Sun T, Chen L (2018) Transient dynamics of powder spattering in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process revealed by in-situ high-speed high-energy x-ray imaging. Acta Materialia 151:169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.03610.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.036 ↗
24. Nikam SH, Quinn J, McFadden S (2021) A simplified thermal approximation method to include the effects of Marangoni convection in the melt pools of processes that involve moving point heat sources. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl 79(7):53710.1080/10407782.2021.1872257 ↗
25. Rammos P (2020) Numerical framework for selective laser melting processing of thermoelectric materials. Master’s thesis, George Washington University (2020)
26. Bayes T (1763) LII. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 53:370. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1763.005310.1098/rstl.1763.0053 ↗
27. Hamada MS, Higdon DM, Abes J, Hills C, Peters AM (2015) Illustrating how science can be incorporated into a nonlinear regression model. Quality Eng 27(4):416. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2015.102331410.1080/08982112.2015.1023314 ↗
28. Spiegelhalter D, Rice K (2009) Bayesian statistics. Scholarpedia 4(8):5230. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.5230 (Revision 185711)10.4249/scholarpedia.5230 ↗
29. Xue D, Balachandran PV, Yuan R, Hu T, Qian X, Dougherty ER, Lookman T (2016) Accelerated search for BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics with vertical morphotropic phase boundary using Bayesian learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(47):13301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160741211310.1073/pnas.1607412113 ↗
30. Fancher CM, Han Z, Levin I, Page K, Reich BJ, Smith RC, Wilson AG, Jones JL (2016) Use of Bayesian inference in crystallographic structure refinement via full diffraction profile analysis. Sci Rep 6(1):31625. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3162510.1038/srep31625 ↗
31. Kim H, Inoue J, Kasuya T, Okada M, Nagata K (2020) Bayesian inference of ferrite transformation kinetics from dilatometric measurement. Comput Mater Sci 184:109837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10983710.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109837 ↗
32. Hartig F, Minunno F, Paul S (2019) BayesianTools: general-purpose MCMC and SMC samplers and tools for Bayesian statistics. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesianTools. R package version 0.1.7
33. Albert DR (2020) Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation with the NIST uncertainty machine. J Chem Educ 97(5):1491. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c0009610.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00096 ↗
34. Ning J, Sievers DE, Garmestani H, Liang SY (2019) Analytical modeling of in-process temperature in powder bed additive manufacturing considering laser power absorption, latent heat, scanning strategy, and powder packing. Materials 12(5):808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1205080810.3390/ma12050808 ↗
35. Seede R, Shoukr D, Zhang B, Whitt A, Gibbons S, Flater P, Elwany A, Arróyave R, Karaman I (2020) An ultra-high strength martensitic steel fabricated using selective laser melting additive manufacturing: densification, microstructure, and mechanical properties. Acta Materialia 186:199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.03710.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.037 ↗
36. Chen Y, Wang H, Wu Y, Wang H (2020) Predicting the printability in selective laser melting with a supervised machine learning method. Materials 13:5063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1322506310.3390/ma13225063 ↗
37. Tenbrock C, Fischer FG, Wissenbach K, Schleifenbaum JH, Wagenblast P, Meiners W, Wagner J (2020) Influence of keyhole and conduction mode melting for top-hat shaped beam profiles in laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Process Technol 278:116514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11651410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116514 ↗