Assessment of the Rock Elasticity Modulus Using Four Hybrid RF Models: A Combination of Data-Driven and Soft Techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
The determination of the rock elasticity modulus (EM) is an indispensable key step for the design of rock engineering problems. Traditional experimental analysis can accurately measure the rock EM, but it requires manpower and material resources, and it is time consuming. The EM estimation of new rocks using former published empirical formulas is also a possibility but can be attached of high uncertainties. In this paper, four types of metaheuristic optimization algorithms (MOA), named the backtracking search optimization algorithm (BSA), multi-verse optimizer (MVO), golden eagle optimizer (GEO) and poor and rich optimization algorithm (PRO), were utilized to optimize the random forest (RF) model for predicting the rock EM. A data-driven technology was used to generate an integrated database consisting of 120 rock samples from the literature. To verify the predictive performance of the proposed models, five common machine-learning models and one empirical formula were also developed to predict the rock EM. Four popular performance indices, including the root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), the coefficient of determination (R2) and Willmott’s index (WI), were adopted to evaluate all models. The results showed that the PRO-RF model has obtained the most satisfactory prediction accuracy. The porosity (Pn) is the most important variable for predicting the rock EM based on the sensitive analysis. This paper compares the performance of the RF models optimized by using four MOA for the rock EM prediction. It provides a good example for the subsequent application of soft techniques on the EM and other important rock parameter estimations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory 3SR, CNRS UMR 5521, Grenoble Alpes University, 38000 Grenoble, France
Funding
the China Scholarship Council
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Multicriteria decision-making analysis based methodology for predicting carbonate rocks’ uniaxial compressive strength
2. An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for predicting unconfined compressive strength and Young’s modulus: A study on Main Range granite10.1007/s10064-014-0687-4 ↗
3. Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of granite through an expert artificial neural network10.1007/s12517-015-2057-3 ↗
4. Prediction of compressive strength and elastic modulus of carbonate rocks10.1016/j.measurement.2016.03.050 ↗
5. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity for Travertine samples using an explainable artificial intelligence
6. The effect of specimen diameter size on uniaxial compressive strength, P-wave velocity and the correlation between them10.1080/17486025.2015.1006264 ↗
7. Estimation of rock modulus: For intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.06.007 ↗
8. On the ratios between elastic modulus and uniaxial compressive strength of heterogeneous carbonate rocks10.1007/s00603-010-0112-7 ↗
9. Empirical relations between strength and static and dynamic elastic properties of Asmari and Sarvak limestones, two main oil reservoirs in Iran10.1016/j.petrol.2014.12.010 ↗
10. Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.06.005 ↗
11. A simple regression based approach to estimate deformation modulus of rock masses10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.06.011 ↗
12. Deformation modulus of rock masses: An assessment of the existing empirical equations10.1007/s10706-018-0491-1 ↗
13. Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of gypsum using multiple regression, ANN, and ANFIS models10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.09.002 ↗
14. Predicting the uniaxial compressive strength and static Young’s modulus of intact sedimentary rocks using the ultrasonic test10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2009)9:1(14) ↗
15. Correlation of Schmidt hardness with unconfined compressive strength and Young’s modulus in gypsum from Sivas (Turkey)10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00041-8 ↗
16. Application of fuzzy inference system to predict uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of migmatites10.1007/s12665-019-8219-y ↗
17. Application of genetic programming to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of carbonate rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.08.004 ↗
18. Correlating sound velocity with the density, compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.01.012 ↗
19. Correlation between Schmidt hardness, uniaxial compressive strength and Young’s modulus for andesites, basalts and tuffs10.1007/s10064-004-0230-0 ↗
20. Proposing a new model to approximate the elasticity modulus of granite rock samples based on laboratory tests results10.1007/s10064-017-1210-5 ↗
21. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity for Travertine samples using regression and artificial neural networks
22. An intelligent approach to predict unconfined compressive strength of rock surrounding access tunnels in longwall coal mining10.1007/s00521-012-1221-x ↗
23. Jin, X., Zhao, R., and Ma, Y. (2022). Application of a Hybrid Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Compressive Strength and Elastic Modulus of Rocks. Minerals, 12.10.3390/min12121506 ↗
24. Machine learning models to estimate the elastic modulus of weathered magmatic rocks10.1007/s12665-021-09738-9 ↗
25. Developing an XGBoost regression model for predicting young’s modulus of intact sedimentary rocks for the stability of surface and subsurface structures10.3389/feart.2021.761990 ↗
26. Li, C., Zhou, J., Dias, D., and Gui, Y. (2022). A Kernel Extreme Learning Machine-Grey Wolf Optimizer (KELM-GWO) Model to Predict Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178468 ↗
27. An integrated approach for estimating static Young’s modulus using artificial intelligence tools10.1007/s00521-018-3344-1 ↗
28. Using non-destructive tests for estimating uniaxial compressive strength and static Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks via some modeling techniques10.1007/s10064-017-1043-2 ↗
29. Workflow to build a continuous static elastic moduli profile from the drilling data using artificial intelligence techniques10.1007/s13202-021-01274-3 ↗
30. Mei, X., Li, C., Sheng, Q., Cui, Z., Zhou, J., and Dias, D. (2022). Development of a hybrid artificial intelligence model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of a new aseismic layer made of rubber-sand concrete. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., 1–18.10.1080/15376494.2022.2051780 ↗
31. Estimation of elastic modulus of intact rocks by artificial neural network10.1007/s00603-012-0236-z ↗
32. Static elastic modulus of rocks predicted through regression models and Artificial Neural Network10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106829 ↗
33. Estimation of elastic constant of rocks using an ANFIS approach10.1016/j.asoc.2011.09.010 ↗
34. Determination of strength and modulus of elasticity of heterogenous sedimentary rocks: An ANFIS predictive technique10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.064 ↗
35. Models to estimate the elastic modulus of weak rocks based on least square support vector machine10.1007/s12517-020-05566-6 ↗
36. Al-Anazi, A.F., and Gates, I.D. (2015). Artificial Intelligent Approaches in Petroleum Geosciences, Springer.
37. Variable selection and prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity by random forest10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.030 ↗
38. Khan, N.M., Cao, K., Yuan, Q., Bin Mohd Hashim, M.H., Rehman, H., Hussain, S., and Khan, S. (2022). Application of Machine Learning and Multivariate Statistics to Predict Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Static Young’s Modulus Using Physical Properties under Different Thermal Conditions. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14169901 ↗
39. Mahmoud, A.A., Elkatatny, S., and Al Shehri, D. (2020). Application of machine learning in evaluation of the static young’s modulus for sandstone formations. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12051880 ↗
40. Shahani, N.M., Zheng, X., Guo, X., and Wei, X. (2022). Machine Learning-Based Intelligent Prediction of Elastic Modulus of Rocks at Thar Coalfield. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14063689 ↗
41. Tsang, L., He, B., Rashid, A.S.A., Jalil, A.T., and Sabri, M.M.S. (2022). Predicting the Young’s Modulus of Rock Material Based on Petrographic and Rock Index Tests Using Boosting and Bagging Intelligence Techniques. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122010258 ↗
42. Model tree approach for predicting uniaxial compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks10.1007/s10064-016-0931-1 ↗
43. The effect of ICA and PSO on ANN results in approximating elasticity modulus of rock material10.1007/s00366-018-0600-z ↗
44. Comparison of LLNF, ANN, and COA-ANN techniques in modeling the uniaxial compressive strength and static Young’s modulus of limestone of the Dalan formation10.1007/s11053-018-9383-6 ↗
45. Evolving neural network using a genetic algorithm for predicting the deformation modulus of rock masses10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.09.011 ↗
46. Gowida, A., Moussa, T., Elkatatny, S., and Ali, A. (2019). A hybrid artificial intelligence model to predict the elastic behavior of sandstone rocks. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11195283 ↗
47. A novel systematic and evolved approach based on XGBoost-firefly algorithm to predict Young’s modulus and unconfined compressive strength of rock10.1007/s00366-020-01241-2 ↗
48. Application of improved support vector regression model for prediction of deformation modulus of a rock mass10.1007/s00366-016-0433-6 ↗
49. Identification of visco-elastic models for rocks using genetic programming coupled with the modified particle swarm optimization algorithm10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.12.010 ↗
50. Application of soft computing methods to estimate uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of soft sedimentary rocks10.1007/s12517-022-09671-6 ↗
51. Application of Six Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms and Random Forest in the uniaxial compressive strength of rock prediction10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109729 ↗
52. Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of selected granitic rocks from Turkey10.1016/S0013-7952(98)00071-4 ↗
53. Backtracking search optimization algorithm for numerical optimization problems10.1016/j.amc.2013.02.017 ↗
54. Multi-verse optimizer: A nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization10.1007/s00521-015-1870-7 ↗
55. Golden eagle optimizer: A nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm10.1016/j.cie.2020.107050 ↗
56. Poor and rich optimization algorithm: A new human-based and multi populations algorithm10.1016/j.engappai.2019.08.025 ↗
57. COSMA-RF: New intelligent model based on chaos optimized slime mould algorithm and random forest for estimating the peak cutting force of conical picks10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100806 ↗
58. A hybrid metaheuristic approach using random forest and particle swarm optimization to study and evaluate backbreak in open-pit blasting10.1007/s00521-021-06776-z ↗
59. Employing a genetic algorithm and grey wolf optimizer for optimizing RF models to evaluate soil liquefaction potential10.1007/s10462-022-10140-5 ↗
60. Performance of hybrid SCA-RF and HHO-RF models for predicting backbreak in open-pit mine blasting operations10.1007/s11053-021-09929-y ↗
61. Developing a new intelligent technique to predict overbreak in tunnels using an artificial bee colony-based ANN10.1007/s12665-019-8163-x ↗
62. Hybrid machine learning-based triaxial jointed rock mass strength10.1007/s12665-022-10253-8 ↗
63. Optimal ELM–Harris Hawks optimization and ELM–Grasshopper optimization models to forecast peak particle velocity resulting from mine blasting10.1007/s11053-021-09826-4 ↗
64. Prediction of flyrock induced by mine blasting using a novel kernel-based extreme learning machine10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.07.007 ↗
65. Prediction of Young’s modulus of weathered igneous rocks using GRNN, RVM, and MPMR models with a new index10.1007/s11629-020-6331-9 ↗