journal article·2023-01-18Open access

Water Quality Evaluation and Prediction Based on a Combined Model

Guimei Jiao, Shaokang Chen, Fei Wang, Zhaoyang Wang, Fanjuan Wang, Hao Li, Fangjie Zhang, Jiali Cai, Jing Jin

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 3

Abstract

Along with increasingly serious water pollution, water environmental problems have become major factors that hinder the sustainable development of our economy and society. Reliable evaluation of water quality and accurate prediction of water pollution indicators are the key links in water resource management and water pollution control. In this paper, the water quality data of Lanzhou Xincheng Bridge section in the Yellow River Basin and Sichuan Panzhihua Longdong section in the Yangtze River Basin were used to establish a water quality evaluation model and a prediction model. For the water quality evaluation model, we constructed the research samples by means of equal intervals and uniform distribution of interpolated water quality index data according to Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water. The training samples were determined by a stratified sampling method, and the water quality evaluation model was established using a T-S fuzzy neural network. The experimental results show that the highest accuracy achieved by the evaluation model in water quality classification was 94.12%. With respect to the water quality prediction model, we propose ARIMA-WNN, which combines the autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) and a wavelet neural network (WNN) with the bat algorithm (BA) to determine the optimal weight of each individual model. The experimental results show that the highest prediction accuracy of ARIMA-WNN is 68.06% higher than that of the original model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Water Quality and Pollution Assessment · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Tracing lake pollution, eutrophication and partial recovery from the sediments of Windermere, UK, using geochemistry and sediment microfabrics10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137745 ↗
2. Cao, H., Guo, Z., Wang, S., Cheng, H., and Zhan, C. (2020). Intelligent wide-area water quality monitoring and analysis system exploiting unmanned surface vehicles and ensemble learning. Water, 12.10.3390/w12030681 ↗
3. Li, Z., Sun, Z., Liu, J., Dong, H., Xiong, W., Sun, L., and Zhou, H. (2022). Prediction of river sediment transport based on wavelet transform and neural network model. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020647 ↗
4. Jiao, G., Guo, T., and Ding, Y. (2016). A new hybrid forecasting approach applied to hydrological data: A case study on precipitation in Northwestern China. Water, 8.10.3390/w8090367 ↗
5. Improved complete ensemble EMD: A suitable tool for biomedical signal processing10.1016/j.bspc.2014.06.009 ↗
6. Backpropagation through time: What it does and how to do it10.1109/5.58337 ↗
7. Wang, H., and Hu, D. (2005, January 13–15). Comparison of SVM and LS-SVM for regression. Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain, Beijing, China.
8. Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources of Gomti river (India) using multivariate statistical techniques—A case study10.1016/j.aca.2005.02.006 ↗
9. Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.02.001 ↗
10. Application of multivariate statistical techniques in the assessment of water quality in the Southwest New Territories and Kowloon, Hong Kong10.1007/s10661-010-1366-y ↗
11. Use of multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of temporal and spatial variations in water quality of the Kaduna River, Nigeria10.1007/s10661-015-4354-4 ↗
12. Artificial neural network modeling of the river water quality—A case study10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.01.004 ↗
13. Forecasting Water Quality Parameters by ANN Model Using Pre-processing Technique at the Downstream of Cheongpyeong Dam10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.519 ↗
14. Water quality evaluation and forecast of Yellow River estuary
15. Comprehensive prediction model of water quality based on grey model and fuzzy neural network
16. Weighted support vector machine for regression and its application for prediction of water quality
17. Lee, M.A., and Takagi, H. (April, January 28). Integrating design stage of fuzzy systems using genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA.
18. Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., and Reinsel, G.C. (1970). Time Series Analysis, North-Holland Publishing, Co.
19. A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances10.1023/A:1007707430416 ↗
20. Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order10.1093/biomet/71.3.599 ↗
21. Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models10.1093/biomet/60.2.255 ↗
22. Wavelet networks10.1109/72.165591 ↗
23. Comparison of the ability of ARIMA, WNN and SVM models for drought forecasting in the Sanjiang Plain, China10.1007/s11053-019-09512-6 ↗
24. Bat algorithm: A novel approach for global engineering optimization10.1108/02644401211235834 ↗
25. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16 ↗
26. Decay of the velocity autocorrelation function10.1103/PhysRevA.1.18 ↗
27. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29 ↗
28. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance10.3354/cr030079 ↗
29. Mean absolute percentage error for regression models10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.114 ↗
30. Toward efficient multi-keyword fuzzy search over encrypted outsourced data with accuracy improvement10.1109/TIFS.2016.2596138 ↗
31. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529 ↗
32. A Comparison of “errorless” and “trial-and-error” learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits10.1080/096020100389309 ↗
33. Microarray data normalization and transformation10.1038/ng1032 ↗
34. Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix10.3758/BF03213026 ↗
35. Integration versus trend stationary in time series
36. Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors10.1111/1467-9280.00372 ↗
37. A study of the characteristics of white noise using the empirical mode decomposition method10.1098/rspa.2003.1221 ↗
38. Bearing fault diagnosis using FFT of intrinsic mode functions in Hilbert–Huang transform10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.12.004 ↗
39. Teodorof, L., Ene, A., Burada, A., Despina, C., Seceleanu-Odor, D., Trifanov, C., Ibram, O., Bratfanof, E., Tudor, M.I., and Tudor, M. (2021). Integrated Assessment of Surface Water Quality in Danube River Chilia Branch. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11199172 ↗
40. Schaffer, C. (1994). A conservation law for generalization performance. Machine Learning Proceedings 1994, Morgan Kaufmann.10.1016/B978-1-55860-335-6.50039-8 ↗
41. A survey of swarm intelligence for dynamic optimization: Algorithms and applications10.1016/j.swevo.2016.12.005 ↗
42. Ahmed, M., Mumtaz, R., and Anwar, Z. (2022). An Enhanced Water Quality Index for Water Quality Monitoring Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122412787 ↗