Tackling Structured Knowledge Extraction from Polymer Nanocomposite Literature as an NER/RE Task with seq2seq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topic Modeling · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. National Science and Technology Council (2011) Materials genome initiative for global competitiveness. https://www.mgi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/materials_genome_initiative-final.pdf
2. National Science and Technology Council (2021) Materials genome initiative strategic plan. https://www.mgi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/MGI-2021-Strategic-Plan.pdf
3. Morgan D, Jacobs R (2020) Opportunities and challenges for machine learning in materials science. Annu Rev Mater Res 50:71–103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-01001510.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010015 ↗
4. Himanen L, Geurts A, Foster AS, Rinke P (2019) Data-driven materials science: status, challenges, and perspectives. Adv Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20190080810.1002/advs.201900808 ↗
5. Schleder GR, Padilha ACM, Acosta CM et al (2019) From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science—a review. J Phys Mater 2:032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b ↗
6. Choudhury A (2021) The Role of machine learning algorithms in materials science: a state of art review on industry 4.0. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28:3361–3381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09503-410.1007/s11831-020-09503-4 ↗
7. Zhao H, Li X, Zhang Y et al (2016) Perspective: NanoMine: a material genome approach for polymer nanocomposites analysis and design. APL Mater 4:053204. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.494367910.1063/1.4943679 ↗
8. Zhao H, Wang Y, Lin A et al (2018) NanoMine schema: an extensible data representation for polymer nanocomposites. APL Mater 6:111108. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.504683910.1063/1.5046839 ↗
9. Brinson LC, Deagen M, Chen W et al (2020) Polymer nanocomposite data: curation, frameworks, access, and potential for discovery and design. ACS Macro Lett 9:1086–1094. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSMACROLETT.0C00264/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/MZ0C00264_0006.JPEG10.1021/ACSMACROLETT.0C00264/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/MZ0C00264_0006.JPEG ↗
10. Deagen ME, McCusker JP, Fateye T et al (2022) FAIR and interactive data graphics from a scientific knowledge graph. Sci Data 91(9):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01352-z10.1038/s41597-022-01352-z ↗
11. Hu B, Lin A, Brinson LC (2021) ChemProps: a RESTful API enabled database for composite polymer name standardization. J Cheminform. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-021-00502-610.1186/s13321-021-00502-6 ↗
12. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al (2017) Attention is all you need. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.0376210.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 ↗
13. Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-142310.18653/v1/N19-1423 ↗
14. Raffel C, Shazeer N, Roberts A, et al (2020) Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3455716.3455856
15. OpenAI (2023) GPT-4 technical report. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.0877410.48550/arXiv.2303.08774 ↗
16. Weston L, Tshitoyan V, Dagdelen J et al (2019) Named entity recognition and normalization applied to large-scale information extraction from the materials science literature. J Chem Inf Model 59:3692–3702. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0047010.1021/acs.jcim.9b00470 ↗
17. Jensen Z, Kim E, Kwon S et al (2019) A machine learning approach to zeolite synthesis enabled by automatic literature data extraction. ACS Cent Sci. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b0019310.1021/acscentsci.9b00193 ↗
18. Hiszpanski AM, Gallagher B, Chellappan K et al (2020) Nanomaterial synthesis insights from machine learning of scientific articles by extracting, structuring, and visualizing knowledge. J Chem Inf Model. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c0019910.1021/acs.jcim.0c00199 ↗
19. Agichtein E, Gravano L, Snowball: extracting relations from large plain-text collections. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/336597.336644
20. Shetty P, Rajan AC, Kuenneth C et al (2023) A general-purpose material property data extraction pipeline from large polymer corpora using natural language processing. npj Comput Mater 9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01003-w10.1038/s41524-023-01003-w ↗
21. Tchoua RB, Ajith A, Hong Z, et al (2019) Creating training data for scientific named entity recognition with minimal human effort. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics).10.1007/978-3-030-22734-0_29 ↗
22. Min B, Ross H, Sulem E et al (2021) Recent advances in natural language processing via large pre-trained language models: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 56(2):30. https://doi.org/10.1145/360594310.1145/3605943 ↗
23. Olivetti EA, Cole JM, Kim E et al (2020) Data-driven materials research enabled by natural language processing and information extraction. Appl Phys Rev 7:041317. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.002110610.1063/5.0021106 ↗
24. Kononova O, He T, Huo H et al (2021) Opportunities and challenges of text mining in materials research. iScience 24:102155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.10215510.1016/j.isci.2021.102155 ↗
25. Tay Y, Dehghani M, Tran VQ, et al (2022) UL2: unifying language learning paradigms. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.0513110.48550/arXiv.2205.05131 ↗
26. Liu Y, Ott M, Goyal N, et al (2019) RoBERTa: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1907.1169210.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 ↗
27. He P, Liu X, Gao J, Chen W (2020) DeBERTa: decoding-enhanced BERT with disentangled attention. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.0365410.48550/arXiv.2006.03654 ↗
28. Beltagy I, Lo K, Cohan A (2019) SCIBERT: a pretrained language model for scientific text. In: EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019 - 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and 9th international joint conference on natural language processing, proceedings of the conference.10.18653/v1/D19-1371 ↗
29. Trewartha A, Walker N, Huo H et al (2022) Quantifying the advantage of domain-specific pre-training on named entity recognition tasks in materials science. Patterns. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.10048810.1016/j.patter.2022.100488 ↗
30. Gupta T, Zaki M, Krishnan NMA, Mausam (2022) MatSciBERT: a materials domain language model for text mining and information extraction. npj Comput Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00784-w10.1038/s41524-022-00784-w ↗
31. Soares LB, FitzGerald N, Ling J, Kwiatkowski T (2020) Matching the blanks: distributional similarity for relation learning. In: ACL 2019 - 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, proceedings of the conference.
32. Paolini G, Athiwaratkun B, Krone J, et al (2021) Structured prediction as translation between augmented natural languages. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2101.0577910.48550/arxiv.2101.05779 ↗
33. Min B, Ross H, Sulem E et al (2023) Recent advances in natural language processing via large pre-trained language models: a survey. ACM Comput Surv. https://doi.org/10.1145/360594310.1145/3605943 ↗
34. Lu Y, Liu Q, Dai D, et al (2022) Unified structure generation for universal information extraction. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.39510.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.395 ↗
35. Brown TB, Mann B, Ryder N, et al (2020) Language models are few-shot learners. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.1416510.48550/arXiv.2005.14165 ↗
36. Chowdhery A, Narang S, Devlin J, et al (2022) PaLM: scaling language modeling with pathways. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3648699.3648939
37. Touvron H, Lavril T, Izacard G, et al (2023) LLaMA: open and efficient foundation language models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.1397110.48550/arXiv.2302.13971 ↗
38. Touvron H, Martin L, Stone K, Llama 2: open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.0928810.48550/arXiv.2307.09288 ↗
39. Jablonka KM, Ai Q, Al-Feghali A, et al (2023) 14 Examples of how LLMs can transform materials science and chemistry: a reflection on a large language model hackathon. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3DD00113J10.1039/D3DD00113J ↗
40. Pal S, Bhattacharya M, Lee S-S, Chakraborty C (2023) A domain-specific next-generation large language model (LLM) or ChatGPT is required for biomedical engineering and research. Ann Biomed Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03306-x10.1007/s10439-023-03306-x ↗
41. Fu Z, Lam W, Yu Q, et al (2023) Decoder-only or encoder-decoder? Interpreting language model as a regularized encoder-decoder. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2304.0405210.48550/ARXIV.2304.04052 ↗
42. Swain MC, Cole JM (2016) ChemDataExtractor: a toolkit for automated extraction of chemical information from the scientific literature. J Chem Inf Model 56:1894–1904. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b0020710.1021/acs.jcim.6b00207 ↗
43. Nakayama H, Kubo T, Kamura J, et al (2018) Doccano: text annotation tool for human. https://github.com/doccano/doccano
44. Kudo T, Richardson J (2018) SentencePiece: a simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-201210.18653/v1/D18-2012 ↗
45. Wolf T, Debut L, Sanh V, et al (2020) Transformers: state-of-the-art natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: system demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, pp 38–4510.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 ↗
46. Shetty P, Ramprasad R (2021) Automated knowledge extraction from polymer literature using natural language processing. iScience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.10192210.1016/j.isci.2020.101922 ↗