Prediction of EPB Shield Tunneling Advance Rate in Mixed Ground Condition Using Optimized BPNN Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Tunneling in mixed ground often results in severe torque fluctuations and a low advance rate. Therefore, choosing a reasonable set of parameters for accurate advance rate prediction is paramount to reduce cutter wear and improve tunneling efficiency. However, since the geological parameters in mixed ground conditions are diverse and uncertain, the prediction of the advance rate (AR) of EPB shield tunneling is significantly more difficult than that in homogeneous ground (i.e., full-face hard-rock ground). In addition, the operating parameters of the EPB shield tunneling can be subjective and suboptimal, and each of them has some intricate influence on AR. In this paper, an optimized back-propagation neural network by genetic algorithm (BPNN-GA) was proposed for reasonable operating parameter selection and accurate AR prediction, and four typical machine learning methods were used for comparison. Five processing strategies with different input parameters were also proposed and compared to determine the optimum selection of geological parameters in mixed ground conditions. The proposed models with strategies were adopted in the case study of the Nanjing Metro Line S6 project, and a total of 1188 rings of datasets were used for this study. The results showed that the proposed modified BPNN with the genetic algorithm could be effectively implemented for the AR prediction. It concluded that Strategy B—i.e., using the composite ratio and the geological parameters of each layer as input—was the best strategy in mixed ground conditions for advance rate prediction. Hence, a high correlation between measured and predicted AR was observed in this study with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.920.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Drilling and Well Engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System Safety, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Modeling and prediction for the thrust on EPB TBMs under different geological conditions by considering mechanical decoupling10.1007/s11431-016-6096-0 ↗
2. TBM Tunnelling under adverse geological conditions: An overview10.1016/j.tust.2016.04.002 ↗
3. Analysis of disc cutter failure in shield tunnelling using 3D circular cutting theory10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.02.015 ↗
4. Rehman, H., Naji, A.M., Nam, K., Ahmad, S., Muhammad, K., and Yoo, H.-K. (2021). Impact of Construction Method and Ground Composition on Headrace Tunnel Stability in the Neelum–Jhelum Hydroelectric Project: A Case Study Review from Pakistan. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11041655 ↗
5. Deep learning model for shield tunneling advance rate prediction in mixed ground condition considering past operations10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3041032 ↗
6. Time-series prediction of shield movement performance during tunneling based on hybrid model10.1016/j.tust.2021.104245 ↗
7. Rostami, J. (1997). Development of a Force Estimation Model for Rock Fragmentation with Disc Cutters through Theoretical Modeling and Physical Measurement of Crushed Zone Pressure. [Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines].
8. Determination of the cutterhead torque for EPB shield tunneling machine10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.010 ↗
9. Kim, K., Kim, J., Ryu, H., Rehman, H., Jafri, T.H., Yoo, H., and Ha, S. (2020). Estimation Method for TBM Cutterhead Drive Design Based on Full-Scale Tunneling Tests for Application in Utility Tunnels. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10155187 ↗
10. Torque fluctuation analysis and penetration prediction of EPB TBM in rock–soil interface mixed ground10.1016/j.tust.2019.103002 ↗
11. Advanced finite element modeling of excavation and advancement processes in mechanized tunneling10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.07.011 ↗
12. Lee, H., Choi, H., Choi, S.W., Chang, S.H., Kang, T.H., and Lee, C. (2021). Numerical simulation of EPB shield tunnelling with TBM operational condition control using coupled DEM–FDM. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11062551 ↗
13. Machine learning to inform tunnelling operations: Recent advances and future trends
14. Application of two non-linear prediction tools to the estimation of tunnel boring machine performance10.1016/j.engappai.2009.03.007 ↗
15. Mobarra, Y., Hajian, A., and Rahgozar, M. (2013, January 27–28). Application of artificial neural networks to the prediction of TBM penetration rate in TBM-driven golab water transfer tunnel. Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil Engineering Architecture & Urban Sustainable Development, Tabriz, Iran.
16. Salimi, A., Moormann, C., Singh, T., and Jain, P. (2015, January 2–5). TBM Performance Prediction in rock tunneling using various artificial intelligence algorithms. Proceedings of the 11th Iranian and 2nd Regional Tunnelling Conference “Tunnels and the Future”, Tehran, Iran.
17. Application of deep neural networks in predicting the penetration rate of tunnel boring machines10.1007/s10064-019-01538-7 ↗
18. Prediction of maximum surface settlement caused by earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling with ANN Methods10.1016/j.sandf.2018.11.005 ↗
19. Recurrent neural networks for real-time prediction of TBM operating parameters10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.013 ↗
20. Chen, H., Xiao, C., Yao, Z., Jiang, H., Zhang, T., and Guan, Y. (2019, January 6–8). Prediction of TBM Tunneling Parameters through an LSTM neural network. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Dali, China.10.1109/ROBIO49542.2019.8961809 ↗
21. Case studies of TBM tunneling performance in rock–soil interface mixed Ground10.1016/j.tust.2013.06.001 ↗
22. Estimation of the cutterhead torque for earth pressure balance TBM under mixed-face conditions10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.025 ↗
23. Top 10 algorithms in data mining10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2 ↗
24. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
25. A tutorial on support vector regression10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
26. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
27. Forecasting of TBM advance rate in hard rock condition based on artificial neural network and genetic programming techniques10.1007/s10064-019-01626-8 ↗
28. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems (John H. Holland)10.1137/1018105 ↗
29. Mirjalili, S. (2019). Genetic algorithm. Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-93025-1 ↗
30. A Genetic algorithm tutorial10.1007/BF00175354 ↗
31. Xu, H., Zhou, J., Asteris, P.G., Armaghani, D.J., and Tahir, M.M. (2019). Supervised machine learning techniques to the prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183715 ↗
32. Predicting EPBM advance rate performance using support vector regression modeling10.1016/j.tust.2020.103520 ↗