Augmented Reality-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Cadaveric Feasibility and Accuracy Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation is the keystone of minimally invasive spine surgery. Percutaneous screw placement demands experience and relies greatly on intra-operative image guidance. This study aims to validate the feasibility and accuracy of augmented-reality (AR)-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation. One cadaveric torso was prepared for this study. After a pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scan, the images were transferred to an AR station to generate a 3D hologram. The 3D hologram and navigation images were projected to a pair of goggles with a display screen. With registration, the 3D spine hologram was overlayed onto the cadaver. Bilateral instrumentation from T6 to L5 was performed by two surgeons using AR assistance. A post-operative CT scan was obtained. The Gertzbein–Robbins scale (grade 0–3) was used for accuracy assessment. A total of 24 screws were placed. The overall screw accuracy was 87.5%. There were three major medial breaches that occurred on Rt T6/7/8, which were the most distant screws from the iliac reference. The cause of the three major medial breaches appeared to be related to their distance from the iliac reference. AR-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation could improve anatomical visualization, facilitate surgical workflow, and provide an intuitive way of performing surgery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques · Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112201, Taiwan
School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation in Spine Surgery to Minimize Staff Radiation Exposure10.1097/BRS.0000000000003197 ↗
2. Mishra, R., Narayanan, M.D.K., Umana, G.E., Montemurro, N., Chaurasia, B., and Deora, H. (2022). Virtual Reality in Neurosurgery: Beyond Neurosurgical Planning. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19031719 ↗
3. Virtual Reality in Neurosurgery: “Can You See It?”—A Review of the Current Applications and Future Potential10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.066 ↗
4. Evaluation of a Wearable AR Platform for Guiding Complex Craniotomies in Neurosurgery10.1007/s10439-021-02834-8 ↗
5. Workflow Caveats in Augmented Reality-Assisted Pedicle Instrumentation: Cadaver Lab10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.118 ↗
6. Feasibility and Accuracy of Thoracolumbar Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement With Augmented Reality Navigation Technology10.1097/BRS.0000000000002502 ↗
7. Percutaneous placement of lumbar pedicle screws via intraoperative CT image-based augmented reality-guided technology10.3171/2019.10.SPINE19969 ↗
8. A cadaveric precision and accuracy analysis of augmented reality-mediated percutaneous pedicle implant insertion10.3171/2020.6.SPINE20370 ↗
9. Augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw insertion: A cadaveric proof-of-concept study10.3171/2018.12.SPINE181142 ↗
10. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo10.1097/00007632-199001000-00004 ↗
11. Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Spinal Deformity Surgery Algorithm: An Evidence-Based Approach to Surgical Strategies for Deformity Correction10.1016/j.nec.2018.03.007 ↗
12. The MISDEF2 algorithm: An updated algorithm for patient selection in minimally invasive deformity surgery10.3171/2019.7.SPINE181104 ↗
13. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Mild-to-Moderate Adult Spinal Deformities: Impact on Intensive Care Unit and Hospital Stay10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.237 ↗
14. State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity10.1007/s43390-020-00180-8 ↗
15. Factors affecting approach selection for minimally invasive versus open surgery in the treatment of adult spinal deformity: Analysis of a prospective, nonrandomized multicenter study10.3171/2020.4.SPINE20169 ↗
16. Minimally Invasive Spinal Deformity Surgery: Analysis of Patients Who Fail to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.025 ↗
17. Surgical Navigation Technology Based on Augmented Reality and Integrated 3D Intraoperative Imaging: A Spine Cadaveric Feasibility and Accuracy Study10.1097/BRS.0000000000001830 ↗
18. Augmented Reality-assisted Pedicle Instrumentation: Versatility Across Major Instrumentation Sets10.1097/BRS.0000000000003669 ↗