journal article·2021-12-11Open access

Cyber-Physical LPG Debutanizer Distillation Columns: Machine-Learning-Based Soft Sensors for Product Quality Monitoring

Jože Martin Rožanec, Elena Trajkova, Jinzhi Lu, Nikolaos Sarantinoudis, George Arampatzis, Pavlos Eirinakis, Ioannis Mourtos, Melike K. Onat, Deren Ataç Yilmaz, Aljaž Košmerlj, Klemen Kenda, Blaž Fortuna, Dunja Mladenić

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 24

Abstract

Refineries execute a series of interlinked processes, where the product of one unit serves as the input to another process. Potential failures within these processes affect the quality of the end products, operational efficiency, and revenue of the entire refinery. In this context, implementation of a real-time cognitive module, referring to predictive machine learning models, enables the provision of equipment state monitoring services and the generation of decision-making for equipment operations. In this paper, we propose two machine learning models: (1) to forecast the amount of pentane (C5) content in the final product mixture; (2) to identify if C5 content exceeds the specification thresholds for the final product quality. We validate our approach using a use case from a real-world refinery. In addition, we develop a visualization to assess which features are considered most important during feature selection, and later by the machine learning models. Finally, we provide insights on the sensor values in the dataset, which help to identify the operational conditions for using such machine learning models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Qlector d.o.o., Rovšnikova 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška 25, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

EPFL SCI-STI-DK, Station 9, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

School of Production Engineering and Management, Akrotiri Campus, Technical University of Crete, 731 00 Chania, Greece

Department of Industrial Management and Technology, University of Piraeus, Karaoli and Dimitriou 80, 185 34 Pireas, Greece

Department of Management Science and Technology, Athens University of Economics and Business, Patission 76, 104 34 Athens, Greece

Tüpras, Körfez-Kocaeli 41780, Turkey

Funding

EU Horizon 2020

References (98)

Show source-provided references
1. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2 ↗
2. On-line fault diagnosis support for real time evolution applied to multi-component distillation10.1016/S1570-7946(05)80002-1 ↗
3. Abdullah, Z., Aziz, N., and Ahmad, Z. (2007). Nonlinear Modelling Application in Distillation Column. Chem. Prod. Process. Model., 2.10.2202/1934-2659.1082 ↗
4. A comprehensive mechanistic model of a continuous Kamyr digester10.1016/0307-904X(95)00171-F ↗
5. Cutpoint Temperature Surrogate Modeling for Distillation Yields and Properties10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02868 ↗
6. First-principles distillation inference models for product quality prediction
7. Simple multicomponent batch distillation procedure with a variable reflux policy10.1590/0104-6632.20140312s00001590 ↗
8. Computationally efficient optimization models for preliminary distillation column design and separation energy targeting10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.107072 ↗
9. Soft sensor design for the optimisation of parallel debutaniser columns: An industrial case study10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.671 ↗
10. Optimization-based design of crude oil distillation units using rigorous simulation models10.1021/acs.iecr.7b01014 ↗
11. The Potential of Hybrid Mechanistic/Data-Driven Approaches for Reduced Dynamic Modeling: Application to Distillation Columns10.1002/cite.202000048 ↗
12. A review on data-driven linear parameter-varying modeling approaches: A high-purity distillation column case study10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.01.015 ↗
13. Neural Networks and First Principle Models for Bioprocesses10.1016/S1474-6670(17)57190-6 ↗
14. Hybrid Semi-parametric Modeling in Separation Processes: A Review10.1002/cite.202000025 ↗
15. Deterministic global process optimization: Flash calculations via artificial neural networks10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50157-0 ↗
16. Combining prior knowledge with data driven modeling of a batch distillation column including start-up10.1016/S0098-1354(03)00067-X ↗
17. Combining first principles with black-box techniques for reaction systems10.1016/j.conengprac.2003.09.006 ↗
18. Adaptive control using a hybrid-neural model: Application to a polymerisation reactor10.1590/S0104-66322001000100010 ↗
19. Dynamic modeling of batch polymerization reactors via the hybrid neural-network rate-function approach10.1016/j.cej.2006.11.011 ↗
20. Real-time quality monitoring in debutanizer column with regression tree and ANFIS10.1007/s40092-018-0276-4 ↗
21. Optimization of Heat-Integrated Crude Oil Distillation Systems. Part I: The Distillation Model10.1021/ie503802j ↗
22. Data-driven soft sensor development based on deep learning technique10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.01.012 ↗
23. Modelling of an Industrial Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit Using Neural Networks10.1205/02638760151095944 ↗
24. Using hybrid neural networks in scaling up an FCC model from a pilot plant to an industrial unit10.1016/S0255-2701(02)00206-4 ↗
25. Soft sensors for product quality monitoring in debutanizer distillation columns10.1016/j.conengprac.2004.04.013 ↗
26. Soft sensing of product quality in the debutanizer column with principal component analysis and feed-forward artificial neural network10.1016/j.aej.2016.02.016 ↗
27. A comparative study of just-in-time-learning based methods for online soft sensor modeling10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.09.008 ↗
28. Probabilistic learning of partial least squares regression model: Theory and industrial applications10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.08.014 ↗
29. Active learning strategy for smart soft sensor development under a small number of labeled data samples10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.06.015 ↗
30. Supervised Latent Factor Analysis for Process Data Regression Modeling and Soft Sensor Application10.1109/TCST.2015.2473817 ↗
31. Locally Weighted Prediction Methods for Latent Factor Analysis with Supervised and Semisupervised Process Data10.1109/TASE.2016.2608914 ↗
32. Nonlinear feature extraction for soft sensor modeling based on weighted probabilistic PCA10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.08.014 ↗
33. Data-driven soft sensor approach for online quality prediction using state dependent parameter models10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.01.004 ↗
34. Composition Prediction of a Debutanizer Column using Equation Based Artificial Neural Network Model10.1016/j.neucom.2013.10.039 ↗
35. White-box Machine learning approaches to identify governing equations for overall dynamics of manufacturing systems: A case study on distillation column
36. Shi, J., Wan, J., Yan, H., and Suo, H. (2011, January 9–11). A survey of cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), Nanjing, China.10.1109/WCSP.2011.6096958 ↗
37. Applications of cyber-physical system: A literature review10.1142/S2424862217500129 ↗
38. Cyber physical system (CPS)-based industry 4.0: A survey10.1142/S2424862217500142 ↗
39. Multivariate Sensor Data Analysis for Oil Refineries and Multi-mode Identification of System Behavior in Real-time10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877097 ↗
40. Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 ↗
41. Exclusivity and Paternalism in the public governance of explainable AI10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105490 ↗
42. El-Assady, M., Jentner, W., Kehlbeck, R., Schlegel, U., Sevastjanova, R., Sperrle, F., Spinner, T., and Keim, D. (2019, January 4). Towards XAI: Structuring the Processes of Explanations. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Human-Centered Machine Learning, Glasgow, UK.
43. Xu, F., Uszkoreit, H., Du, Y., Fan, W., Zhao, D., and Zhu, J. (2019, January 9–11). Explainable AI: A brief survey on history, research areas, approaches and challenges. Proceedings of the CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, Gansu, China.10.1007/978-3-030-32236-6_51 ↗
44. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 ↗
45. Black-box vs. white-box: Understanding their advantages and weaknesses from a practical point of view10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949286 ↗
46. Das, A., and Rad, P. (2020). Opportunities and challenges in explainable artificial intelligence (xai): A survey. arXiv.
47. Alicioglu, G., and Sun, B. (2021). A survey of visual analytics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods. Comput. Graph.10.1016/j.cag.2021.09.002 ↗
48. Messalas, A., Kanellopoulos, Y., and Makris, C. (2019, January 15–17). Model-agnostic interpretability with shapley values. Proceedings of the 2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), Patras, Greece.10.1109/IISA.2019.8900669 ↗
49. Frye, C., de Mijolla, D., Begley, T., Cowton, L., Stanley, M., and Feige, I. (2020). Shapley explainability on the data manifold. arXiv.
50. Polley, S., Koparde, R.R., Gowri, A.B., Perera, M., and Nuernberger, A. (2021, January 11–15). Towards trustworthiness in the context of explainable search. Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Online.10.1145/3404835.3462799 ↗
51. Chan, G.Y.Y., Bertini, E., Nonato, L.G., Barr, B., and Silva, C.T. (2020). Melody: Generating and Visualizing Machine Learning Model Summary to Understand Data and Classifiers Together. arXiv.
52. Chan, G.Y.Y., Yuan, J., Overton, K., Barr, B., Rees, K., Nonato, L.G., Bertini, E., and Silva, C.T. (2020). SUBPLEX: Towards a Better Understanding of Black Box Model Explanations at the Subpopulation Level. arXiv.
53. INFUSE: Interactive feature selection for predictive modeling of high dimensional data10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346482 ↗
54. Seifert, C., Aamir, A., Balagopalan, A., Jain, D., Sharma, A., Grottel, S., and Gumhold, S. (2017). Visualizations of deep neural networks in computer vision: A survey. Transparent Data Mining for Big and Small Data, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54024-5_6 ↗
55. Jin, W., Carpendale, S., Hamarneh, G., and Gromala, D. (2019, January 20–25). Bridging ai developers and end users: An end-user-centred explainable ai taxonomy and visual vocabularies. Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
56. Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B., and Müller-Putz, G. (2021). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): How the Visualization of AI Predictions Affects User Cognitive Load and Confidence, Springer.
57. Local affine multidimensional projection10.1109/TVCG.2011.220 ↗
58. Deepvid: Deep visual interpretation and diagnosis for image classifiers via knowledge distillation10.1109/TVCG.2019.2903943 ↗
59. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). “Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗
60. Collaris, D., and van Wijk, J.J. (2020, January 14–17). ExplainExplore: Visual exploration of machine learning explanations. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), Tianjin, China.10.1109/PacificVis48177.2020.7090 ↗
61. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016). Model-agnostic interpretability of machine learning. arXiv.
62. Alvarez-Melis, D., and Jaakkola, T.S. (2018). Towards robust interpretability with self-explaining neural networks. arXiv.
63. Viton, F., Elbattah, M., Guérin, J.L., and Dequen, G. (December, January 30). Heatmaps for Visual Explainability of CNN-Based Predictions for Multivariate Time Series with Application to Healthcare. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), Oldenburg, Germany.10.1109/ICHI48887.2020.9374393 ↗
64. Rožanec, J., Trajkova, E., Kenda, K., Fortuna, B., and Mladenić, D. (2021). Explaining Bad Forecasts in Global Time Series Models. Appl. Sci., 11.10.20944/preprints202108.0246.v1 ↗
65. pdp: An R package for constructing partial dependence plots10.32614/RJ-2017-016 ↗
66. Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models10.1111/rssb.12377 ↗
67. Council of the European Union, and European Parliament (2007). Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Official Journal of the European Union, Publications Office of the European Union. Technical report, 715/2007/EC.
68. Distillation column pressure selection10.1016/j.seppur.2016.05.015 ↗
69. The effect of operating pressure on distillation column throughput10.1016/S0098-1354(99)80204-X ↗
70. Kister, H.Z. (1990). Distillation Operation, McGraw-Hill.
71. Composition estimator in a pilot-plant distillation column using multiple temperatures10.1021/ie00060a008 ↗
72. Temperature control of an ideal heat-integrated distillation column (HIDiC)10.1016/j.ces.2007.05.015 ↗
73. Robust data-driven soft sensor based on iteratively weighted least squares support vector regression optimized by the cuckoo optimization algorithm10.1016/j.jngse.2014.11.017 ↗
74. Additions and Corrections-The Heat Capacity and Entropy, Heats of Fusion and Vaporization, and the Vapor Pressure of n-Butane10.1021/ja01857a607 ↗
75. PVT [pressure-volume-temperature] surface and thermodynamic properties of butane10.1021/je60058a002 ↗
76. Vapor pressure of normal paraffins ethane through n-decane from their triple points to about 10 mm mercury10.1021/je60057a009 ↗
77. Hindered rotation of the methyl groups in propane. The heat capacity, vapor pressure, heats of fusion and vaporization of propane. Entropy and density of the gas10.1021/ja01274a001 ↗
78. On a Feasible Level of Filling in of Reservoires by Liquid Hydrocarbons
79. Latent heat of vaporization of propane10.1021/je60032a015 ↗
80. Yaws, C., and Yang, H. (1989). To estimate vapor pressure easily. Hydrocarb. Process. (USA), 68.
81. Vapor-pressure relations for 15 hydrocarbons10.1021/je60061a022 ↗
82. Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules10.1093/bioinformatics/bti171 ↗
83. Estimating mutual information10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138 ↗
84. Support vector regression machines
85. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity10.1007/BF02478259 ↗
86. Visual feature extraction by a multilayered network of analog threshold elements10.1109/TSSC.1969.300225 ↗
87. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
88. An, K., and Meng, J. (2010, January 29–31). Voting-averaged combination method for regressor ensemble. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Xiamen, China.10.1007/978-3-642-14922-1_67 ↗
89. Dorogush, A.V., Ershov, V., and Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: Gradient boosting with categorical features support. arXiv.
90. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5 ↗
91. Of quantiles and expectiles: Consistent scoring functions, Choquet representations and forecast rankings10.1111/rssb.12154 ↗
92. Lin, T.Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., and Dollár, P. (2017, January 22–29). Focal loss for dense object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗
93. The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms 1. general considerations10.1093/imamat/6.1.76 ↗
94. A new approach to variable metric algorithms10.1093/comjnl/13.3.317 ↗
95. A family of variable-metric methods derived by variational means10.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0258249-6 ↗
96. Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization10.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0274029-X ↗
97. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x ↗
98. Wilcoxon, F. (1992). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Breakthroughs in Statistics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_16 ↗