Show source-provided references
3. Abdullah, Z., Aziz, N., and Ahmad, Z. (2007). Nonlinear Modelling Application in Distillation Column. Chem. Prod. Process. Model., 2.
10.2202/1934-2659.1082 ↗6. First-principles distillation inference models for product quality prediction
11. The Potential of Hybrid Mechanistic/Data-Driven Approaches for Reduced Dynamic Modeling: Application to Distillation Columns
10.1002/cite.202000048 ↗21. Optimization of Heat-Integrated Crude Oil Distillation Systems. Part I: The Distillation Model
10.1021/ie503802j ↗26. Soft sensing of product quality in the debutanizer column with principal component analysis and feed-forward artificial neural network
10.1016/j.aej.2016.02.016 ↗31. Locally Weighted Prediction Methods for Latent Factor Analysis with Supervised and Semisupervised Process Data
10.1109/TASE.2016.2608914 ↗35. White-box Machine learning approaches to identify governing equations for overall dynamics of manufacturing systems: A case study on distillation column
36. Shi, J., Wan, J., Yan, H., and Suo, H. (2011, January 9–11). A survey of cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), Nanjing, China.
10.1109/WCSP.2011.6096958 ↗39. Multivariate Sensor Data Analysis for Oil Refineries and Multi-mode Identification of System Behavior in Real-time
10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877097 ↗42. El-Assady, M., Jentner, W., Kehlbeck, R., Schlegel, U., Sevastjanova, R., Sperrle, F., Spinner, T., and Keim, D. (2019, January 4). Towards XAI: Structuring the Processes of Explanations. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Human-Centered Machine Learning, Glasgow, UK.
43. Xu, F., Uszkoreit, H., Du, Y., Fan, W., Zhao, D., and Zhu, J. (2019, January 9–11). Explainable AI: A brief survey on history, research areas, approaches and challenges. Proceedings of the CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, Gansu, China.
10.1007/978-3-030-32236-6_51 ↗46. Das, A., and Rad, P. (2020). Opportunities and challenges in explainable artificial intelligence (xai): A survey. arXiv.
47. Alicioglu, G., and Sun, B. (2021). A survey of visual analytics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods. Comput. Graph.
10.1016/j.cag.2021.09.002 ↗48. Messalas, A., Kanellopoulos, Y., and Makris, C. (2019, January 15–17). Model-agnostic interpretability with shapley values. Proceedings of the 2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), Patras, Greece.
10.1109/IISA.2019.8900669 ↗49. Frye, C., de Mijolla, D., Begley, T., Cowton, L., Stanley, M., and Feige, I. (2020). Shapley explainability on the data manifold. arXiv.
50. Polley, S., Koparde, R.R., Gowri, A.B., Perera, M., and Nuernberger, A. (2021, January 11–15). Towards trustworthiness in the context of explainable search. Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Online.
10.1145/3404835.3462799 ↗51. Chan, G.Y.Y., Bertini, E., Nonato, L.G., Barr, B., and Silva, C.T. (2020). Melody: Generating and Visualizing Machine Learning Model Summary to Understand Data and Classifiers Together. arXiv.
52. Chan, G.Y.Y., Yuan, J., Overton, K., Barr, B., Rees, K., Nonato, L.G., Bertini, E., and Silva, C.T. (2020). SUBPLEX: Towards a Better Understanding of Black Box Model Explanations at the Subpopulation Level. arXiv.
54. Seifert, C., Aamir, A., Balagopalan, A., Jain, D., Sharma, A., Grottel, S., and Gumhold, S. (2017). Visualizations of deep neural networks in computer vision: A survey. Transparent Data Mining for Big and Small Data, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-54024-5_6 ↗55. Jin, W., Carpendale, S., Hamarneh, G., and Gromala, D. (2019, January 20–25). Bridging ai developers and end users: An end-user-centred explainable ai taxonomy and visual vocabularies. Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
56. Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B., and Müller-Putz, G. (2021). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): How the Visualization of AI Predictions Affects User Cognitive Load and Confidence, Springer.
59. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). “Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗60. Collaris, D., and van Wijk, J.J. (2020, January 14–17). ExplainExplore: Visual exploration of machine learning explanations. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), Tianjin, China.
10.1109/PacificVis48177.2020.7090 ↗61. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016). Model-agnostic interpretability of machine learning. arXiv.
62. Alvarez-Melis, D., and Jaakkola, T.S. (2018). Towards robust interpretability with self-explaining neural networks. arXiv.
63. Viton, F., Elbattah, M., Guérin, J.L., and Dequen, G. (December, January 30). Heatmaps for Visual Explainability of CNN-Based Predictions for Multivariate Time Series with Application to Healthcare. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), Oldenburg, Germany.
10.1109/ICHI48887.2020.9374393 ↗64. Rožanec, J., Trajkova, E., Kenda, K., Fortuna, B., and Mladenić, D. (2021). Explaining Bad Forecasts in Global Time Series Models. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.20944/preprints202108.0246.v1 ↗66. Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models
10.1111/rssb.12377 ↗67. Council of the European Union, and European Parliament (2007). Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Official Journal of the European Union, Publications Office of the European Union. Technical report, 715/2007/EC.
70. Kister, H.Z. (1990). Distillation Operation, McGraw-Hill.
71. Composition estimator in a pilot-plant distillation column using multiple temperatures
10.1021/ie00060a008 ↗73. Robust data-driven soft sensor based on iteratively weighted least squares support vector regression optimized by the cuckoo optimization algorithm
10.1016/j.jngse.2014.11.017 ↗74. Additions and Corrections-The Heat Capacity and Entropy, Heats of Fusion and Vaporization, and the Vapor Pressure of n-Butane
10.1021/ja01857a607 ↗75. PVT [pressure-volume-temperature] surface and thermodynamic properties of butane
10.1021/je60058a002 ↗76. Vapor pressure of normal paraffins ethane through n-decane from their triple points to about 10 mm mercury
10.1021/je60057a009 ↗77. Hindered rotation of the methyl groups in propane. The heat capacity, vapor pressure, heats of fusion and vaporization of propane. Entropy and density of the gas
10.1021/ja01274a001 ↗78. On a Feasible Level of Filling in of Reservoires by Liquid Hydrocarbons
80. Yaws, C., and Yang, H. (1989). To estimate vapor pressure easily. Hydrocarb. Process. (USA), 68.
84. Support vector regression machines
87. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
88. An, K., and Meng, J. (2010, January 29–31). Voting-averaged combination method for regressor ensemble. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Xiamen, China.
10.1007/978-3-642-14922-1_67 ↗89. Dorogush, A.V., Ershov, V., and Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: Gradient boosting with categorical features support. arXiv.
91. Of quantiles and expectiles: Consistent scoring functions, Choquet representations and forecast rankings
10.1111/rssb.12154 ↗92. Lin, T.Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., and Dollár, P. (2017, January 22–29). Focal loss for dense object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.
10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗93. The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms 1. general considerations
10.1093/imamat/6.1.76 ↗