Automatic Breast Tumor Screening of Mammographic Images with Optimal Convolutional Neural Network
Source abstract
Abstract
Mammography is a first-line imaging examination approach used for early breast tumor screening. Computational techniques based on deep-learning methods, such as convolutional neural network (CNN), are routinely used as classifiers for rapid automatic breast tumor screening in mammography examination. Classifying multiple feature maps on two-dimensional (2D) digital images, a multilayer CNN has multiple convolutional-pooling layers and fully connected networks, which can increase the screening accuracy and reduce the error rate. However, this multilayer architecture presents some limitations, such as high computational complexity, large-scale training dataset requirements, and poor suitability for real-time clinical applications. Hence, this study designs an optimal multilayer architecture for a CNN-based classifier for automatic breast tumor screening, consisting of three convolutional layers, two pooling layers, a flattening layer, and a classification layer. In the first convolutional layer, the proposed classifier performs the fractional-order convolutional process to enhance the image and remove unwanted noise for obtaining the desired object’s edges; in the second and third convolutional-pooling layers, two kernel convolutional and pooling operations are used to ensure the continuous enhancement and sharpening of the feature patterns for further extracting of the desired features at different scales and different levels. Moreover, there is a reduction of the dimensions of the feature patterns. In the classification layer, a multilayer network with an adaptive moment estimation algorithm is used to refine a classifier’s network parameters for mammography classification by separating tumor-free feature patterns from tumor feature patterns. Images can be selected from a curated breast imaging subset of a digital database for screening mammography (CBIS-DDSM), and K-fold cross-validations are performed. The experimental results indicate promising performance for automatic breast tumor screening in terms of recall (%), precision (%), accuracy (%), F1 score, and Youden’s index.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung City 41170, Taiwan
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan
The Consultant Physician of Taichung Hospital of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taichung City 403, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Ministry Health and Welfare, Taiwan (2022, January 01). 2020 Cause of Death Statistics, Available online: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/lp-1800-113.html.
2. Classification of benign and malignant breast tumors by 2-D analysis based on contour description and scatterer characterization10.1109/TMI.2009.2037147 ↗
3. Unsupervised deep learning applied to breast density segmentation and mammographic risk scoring10.1109/TMI.2016.2532122 ↗
4. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital breast tomosynthesis: Effects of training sample size on multi-stage transfer learning using deep neuralnets10.1109/TMI.2018.2870343 ↗
5. Cytokeratin-supervised deep learning for automatic recognition of epithelial cells in breast cancers stained for ER, PR, and Ki-6710.1109/TMI.2019.2933656 ↗
6. Lee, S., Kim, H., Higuchi, H., and Ishikawa, M. (2021, January 13–16). Classification of metastatic breast cancer cell using deep learning approach. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC), Jeju Island, Korea.10.1109/ICAIIC51459.2021.9415245 ↗
7. Deep convolutional neural networks for breast cancer screening10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.011 ↗
8. Variable weight algorithm for convolutional neural networks and its applications to classification of seizure phases and types10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108226 ↗
9. DDCNNC: Dilated and depthwise separable convolutional neural network for diagnosis COVID-19 via chest X-ray images
10. University of South Florida DDSM: Digital Database for Screening Mammography, Version 1 (Updated 2017/09/14), University of South Florida. Available online: http://www.eng.usf.edu/cvprg/Mammography/Database.html.
11. Enterprise imaging and big data: A review from a medical physics perspective10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.004 ↗
12. Emergence of big data and its potential and current limitations in medical imaging10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.11.010 ↗
13. The European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics (EFOMP) (2018). White Paper: Big data and deep learning in medical imaging and in relation to medical physics profession. Phys. Med., 56, 90–93.10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.11.005 ↗
14. Data preparation for artificial intelligence in medical imaging: A comprehensive guide to open-access platforms and tools10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.007 ↗
15. A visualization algorithm for medical big data based on deep learning10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109808 ↗
16. Deep convolutional neural network feed-Forward and back propagation (DCNN-FBP) algorithm for predicting heart disease using internet of things10.35940/ijeat.A3212.1011121 ↗
17. Optimization of backpropagation neural network under the adaptive genetic algorithm10.1155/2021/1718234 ↗
18. Fuzzy C-means and region growing based classification of tumor from mammograms using hybrid texture feature10.1016/j.jocs.2018.09.015 ↗
19. Automatic multi-seed detection for MR breast image segmentation
20. 3D printing in cardiology: A review of applications and roles for advanced cardiac imaging10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100034 ↗
21. Learning normalized inputs for iterative estimation in medical image segmentation10.1016/j.media.2017.11.005 ↗
22. Racz, A., Bajusz, D., and Heberger, K. (2019). Multi-level compaeison of machine learning classifier and thrir performance metrics. Molecules, 24.10.3390/molecules24152811 ↗
23. Deep learning-based photoplethysmography classification for peripheral arterial disease detection: A proof-of-concept study10.1088/1361-6579/abf9f3 ↗
24. Panwar, M., Gautam, A., Dutt, R., and Acharyya, A. (2020, January 12–14). CardioNet: Deep learning framework for prediction of CVD risk factors. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Seville, Spain.10.1109/ISCAS45731.2020.9180636 ↗
25. ImageNet Classi-fication with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
26. Zeiler, M.D., and Fergus, R. (2014). Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer. 8689 LNCS.10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 ↗
27. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., and Li, F.-F. (2009, January 20–25). ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗
28. Automatic detection of atherosclerotic plaque and calcification from intravascular ultrasound Images by using deep convolutional neural networks10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3052486 ↗
29. Recent advances in convolutional neural network10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 ↗
30. 1D convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107398 ↗
31. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2015, January 7–9). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego, CA, USA.
32. Ma, J., and Yarats, D. (2019, January 6–9). Quasi-hyperbolic momentum and Adam for deep learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, New Orleans, LA, USA.
33. Pilot European Image Processing Archive (2022, January 01). The Mini-MIAS Database of Mammograms. Available online: http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/pix/mias/.
34. Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) (2022, January 01). Database v1.21. Available online: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/250394.
35. Multilayer fractional-order machine vision classifier for rapid typical lung diseases screening on digital chest X-ray images10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000186 ↗
36. Enhancement of chest X-ray images to improve screening accuracy rate using iterated function system and multilayer fractional-order machine learning classifier
37. Fractional differential mask: A fractional differential-based approach for multiscale texture enhancement10.1109/TIP.2009.2035980 ↗
38. Construction of fractional differential masks based on Riemann-Liouville definition
39. Chest X-ray image denoising using Nesterov optimization method with total variation regularization10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.210 ↗
40. Adaptive dropout for training deep neural networks
41. Clevert, D., Unterthiner, T., and Hochreite, S. (2016, January 2–4). Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (ELUs). Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
42. Hendrycks, D., and Gimpel, K. (2016). Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs). arXiv.
43. A tutorial on the cross-entropy method10.1007/s10479-005-5724-z ↗
44. Rubinstein, R.Y., and Kroese, D.P. (2004). The Cross-Entropy Method: A Unified Approach to Combinatorial Optimization, Monte-Carlo Simulation, and Machine Learning, Springer. Information Science and Statistics.10.1007/978-1-4757-4321-0_4 ↗
45. The real-world-weight cross- entropy loss function: Modeling the costs of mislabeling10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962617 ↗
46. Chen, X., Liu, S., Sun, R., and Hong, M. (2018). On the convergence of a class of ADAM-type algorithms for non-convex optimization. arXiv.
47. (2022, January 01). Syntax: Edge, 1994–2021 Years. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/edge.html.
48. Chicco, D., and Jurman, G. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genom., 21.10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 ↗
49. (2022, January 01). Syntax: Histeq, 1994–2021 Years. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/histeq.html.
50. (2022, January 01). Syntax: Imadjust, 1994–2021 Years. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/imadjust.html.
51. Enhancement of ARFI-VTI elastography images in order to preliminary rapid screening of benign and malignant breast tumors using multilayer fractional-order machine vision classifier10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022388 ↗
52. Valenzuela, G., Laimes, R., Chavez, I., Salazar, C., Bellido, E.G., Tirado, I., Pinto, J., Guerrero, J., and Lavarello, R.J. (2018, January 22–25). In vivo diagnosis of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes using backscatter coefficient. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Kobe, Japan.10.1109/ULTSYM.2018.8579850 ↗
53. Chansong, D., and Supratid, S. (2021, January 10–12). Impacts of Kernel size on different resized images in object recognition based on convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the 2021 9th International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON), Pattaya, Thailand.10.1109/iEECON51072.2021.9440284 ↗
54. ECG biometric with abnormal cardiac conditions in remote monitoring system10.1109/TSMC.2014.2336842 ↗
55. Zhang, X.-H. (2021). A Convolutional Neural Network Assisted Fast Tumor Screening System Based on Fractional-Order Image Enhancement: The Case of Breast X-ray Medical Imaging. [Master’s Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology].
56. A novel solution based on scale invariant feature transform descriptors and deep learning for the detection of suspicious regions in mammogram images10.4103/jmss.JMSS_31_19 ↗