journal article·2022-04-13Open access

A New CO2-EOR Methods Screening Model Based on Interdependency Parameters

Diyah Rosiani, Asep Kurnia Permadi, Hasian Parlindungan Septoratno Siregar, Agus Yodi Gunawan, Tutuka Ariadji

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 8

Abstract

The successful implementation of carbon dioxide-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) is crucial in increasing oil production and reducing carbon emissions. For this reason, screening criteria are needed for the initial characterization of a suitable CO2-EOR reservoir. The existing screening model treats the screening parameters independently. Therefore, each parameter has its criteria limit and does not relate to the others. However, in reality, several screening parameters are interdependent, so we need a method that treats the interdependent parameters simultaneously. This research develops a new simultaneous screening model using the interdependency of the parameters. Quantitative and actual data were collected from CO2-EOR field documentation worldwide with a comprehensive analysis. A statistical approach with a correlation analysis method was used to determine the interconnected screening parameters. The results were synchronized with the expert domain to match actual physical conditions. The limit of simultaneous screening criteria was acquired by multivariate quality control (MQC) based on the principal component analysis (PCA) method. The proposed screening model was compared with 13 actual projects, and demonstrated improvements to previous models. The results match actual operations and follow the expert domain rules. If the miscible CO2-EOR is met, then the immiscible should also be appropriate but not vice versa. Nevertheless, four different immiscible projects are predicted to be slightly optimistic as miscible or immiscible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Drilling and Well Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

Department of Oil and Gas Production Engineering, Politeknik Energi dan Mineral Akamigas, Cepu 58315, Indonesia

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

Funding

Indonesian Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Technologies and practice of CO2 flooding and sequestration in China10.1016/S1876-3804(19)60233-8 ↗
3. Alvarado, V., and Manrique, E. (2010). Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Planning and Development Strategies, Gulf Professional Publishing.10.1016/B978-1-85617-855-6.00008-5 ↗
4. Phase behavior and fluid interactions of a CO2-light oil system at high pressures and temperatures10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02057 ↗
5. Identification of CO2 sequestration opportunities: CO2 miscible flooding guidelines10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.072 ↗
6. Moghadasi, R., Rostami, A., and Hemmati-sarapardeh, A. (2018). Enhanced oil recovery using CO2. Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery from Conventional and Unconventional Reservoirs, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-813027-8.00003-5 ↗
7. Parera, M.S.A., Gamage, R.P., Rathnaweera, T.D., Ranathunga, A.S., Koay, A., and Choi, X. (2016). A Review of CO2-enhanced oil recovery with a simulated sensitivity analysis. Energies, 9.10.3390/en9070481 ↗
8. A review of chemical-assisted minimum miscibility pressure reduction in CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery10.1016/j.petlm.2021.01.001 ↗
9. Rotondi, M., Lamberti, A., Masserano, F., and Mogensen, K. (2015, January 11–13). Building an enhanced oil recovery culture to maximise asset values. Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.2118/174694-MS ↗
10. EOR screening criteria revisited—Part 1: Introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects10.2118/35385-PA ↗
11. Analysis of EOR projects and updated screening criteria10.1016/j.petrol.2011.07.005 ↗
12. Statistical and analytical review of worldwide CO2 immiscible field applications10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.140 ↗
13. Determination and prediction of CO2 minimum miscibility pressures10.2118/7477-PA ↗
14. An improved CO2-crude oil minimum miscibility pressure correlation10.1155/2015/175940 ↗
15. Wilcox, R.R. (2009). Basic Statistics Understanding Conventional Methods and Modern Insights, Oxford University Press Inc.10.1093/oso/9780195315103.001.0001 ↗
16. Statistical process control of multivariate processes10.1016/0967-0661(95)00014-L ↗
17. Montgomery, D.C. (2005). Introduction Statistical Quality Control, John Wiley & Sons.
18. Jolliffe, I.T. (2002). Principal Component Analysis, Springer.
19. EOR weathers low oil prices
20. Survey: Miscible CO2 continues to eclipse steam in US EOR production
21. Sauer, P.W., Burns, R.A., Skees, J.L., Aud, W.W., Gentry, B., and Wing, C. (2003, January 22–25). Re-fracturing: Evaluation, design, and implementation of a Chester oil well in SW Kansas. Proceedings of the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.10.2523/80916-MS ↗
22. Petrusak, R., Cyphers, S., Bumgardner, S., Hills, D., Pashin, J., and Esposito, R. (2010, January 10–12). Saline reservoir storage in an active oil field: Extracting maximum value from existing data for initial site characterization, southeast regional carbon sequestration partnership (SECARB) phase IIII anthropogenic CO2 test at Citronelle fields. Proceedings of the SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.2118/139700-MS ↗
23. Annual production report: EOR projects decline but CO2 pushes up production
24. Production/enhanced oil recovery report: Increased rate of EOR brightens outlook
25. Islam, A., Ziarani, A.S., Glover, K., and Schneider, B. (2015, January 20–22). Integrated reservoir modeling and optimization study of multi-fractured horizontal well in the Swan Hills formation: A case study of acid fracturing. Proceedings of the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.2118/175951-MS ↗
26. Batycky, R.P., Seto, A.C., and Fenwick, D.H. (2007, January 11–14). Assisted history matching of a 1.4-million-cell simulation model for Judy Creek—A pool waterflood/HCMF using a streamline-based workflow. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.2523/108701-MS ↗
27. Performance of a miscible flood in the Bear Lake Cardium Unit, Pembina Field, Alberta, Canada10.2118/4600-PA ↗
28. Field-scale compossitional simulation of a CO2 flood in the fractured Midale Field10.2118/06-02-03 ↗
29. Reservoir characteristics of The Weyburn field, Southeastern Saskatchewan10.2118/87-04-05 ↗
30. Singh, L.J.M., and Singhal, A.K. (2004, January 17–21). Lessons from Trinidad’s CO2 immiscible pilot projects. Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK, USA.
31. Sahin, S., Kalfa, U., Celebioglu, D., Duygu, E., and Lahna, H. (2012, January 12–14). A quarter century of progress in the application of CO2 immiscible EOR project in Bati Raman heavy oil field in Turkey. Proceedings of the SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.2118/157865-MS ↗
32. Lino, U.R.A. (2005, January 20–23). Case history of breaking a paradigm: Improvement of an immiscible gas-injection project in Buracica field by water injection at the gas/oil contact. Proceedings of the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.2523/94978-MS ↗
33. Davis, D., Scott, M., Roberson, K., and Robinson, A. (2011, January 19–21). Large scale CO2 flood begins along Texas Gulf Coast. Proceedings of the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.2118/144961-MS ↗