An Elliptic Blending Turbulence Model-Based Scale-Adaptive Simulation Model Applied to Fluid Flows Separated from Curved Surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
On the basis of a previously developed elliptic blending turbulence model (SST–k–ω–φ–α model), a scale-adaptive simulation (SAS) model is developed by following Menter and Egorov’s SAS concept. An SAS source term, which is related to the ratio of the modeled turbulence scale to the von Kármán length scale, is introduced into the corresponding length-scale determining equation. The major motivation of this study is that the conventional unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) models provide only large-scale unsteadiness. The introduction of the SAS term allows the proposed SAS model to dynamically adjust to resolved structures in a URANS framework because this term is sensitive to resolved fluctuations. The predictive capabilities of the proposed SAS model are demonstrated by computing the complex flow configurations in three cases with flow separation from curved surfaces, namely, three-dimensional (3D) diffuser flow, two-dimensional (2D) periodic hills flow, and 2D U-turn duct flow. For comparison, the results predicted by the SST–k–ω–φ–α model and the Menter and Egorov’s SAS model (SST–SAS) are provided. The results are also compared with the relevant experimental, direct numerical simulation, and large eddy simulation data. The results show that the SST–k–ω–φ–α model cannot capture the critical features for all three flows, and that the SST–SAS model is able to predict the results reasonably well. The proposed SAS model is capable of resolving more portions of the turbulence structures, and it yields the best results in all the cases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Wind and Air Flow Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Key Laboratory for Resilient Infrastructures of Coastal Cities (MOE), Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.001 ↗
2. Some Recent Developments in Turbulence Closure Modeling10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045020 ↗
3. Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.05.001 ↗
4. A review of hybrid RANS-LES methods for turbulent flows: Concepts and applications10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.100597 ↗
5. The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 1: Theory and model description10.1007/s10494-010-9264-5 ↗
6. Validation of a novel very large eddy simulation method for simulation of turbulent separated flow10.1002/fld.3807 ↗
7. Near-wall turbulence closure modelling without damping functions10.1007/BF00271513 ↗
8. A robust k-ε-v2/k elliptic blending turbulence model applied to near-wall, separated and buoyant flows10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2011.11.003 ↗
9. Recent progress in the development of the Elliptic Blending Reynolds-stress model10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.09.002 ↗
10. Development of a k-ω-φ-α turbulence model based on elliptic blending and applications for near-wall and separated flows10.1080/14685248.2016.1244336 ↗
11. An improved k-ω-φ-α turbulence model applied to near-wall, separated and impinging jet flows and heat transfer10.1016/j.camwa.2018.04.020 ↗
12. Development of an elliptic blending lag k−ω model10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.01.011 ↗
13. Shang, W., and Agarwal, R.K. (2020, January 15–19). Development and Validation of an Elliptic Blending Lag SST k−ω Turbulence Model. Proceedings of the AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM, Virtual Event.10.2514/6.2020-2976 ↗
14. A shear stress transport incorporated elliptic blending turbulence model applied to near-wall, separated and impinging jet flows and heat transfer10.1016/j.camwa.2020.01.024 ↗
15. Krumbein, B., Maduta, R., Jakirlić, S., and Tropea, C. (2020). A Scale-Resolving Elliptic-Relaxation-Based Eddy-Viscosity Model: Development and Validation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-25253-3_9 ↗
16. A robust near-wall elliptic-relaxation eddy-viscosity turbulence model for CFD10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2004.07.005 ↗
17. Menter, F., Ferreira, J.C., Esch, T., and Konno, B. (2003, January 2–7). The SST turbulence model with improved wall treatment for heat transfer predictions in gas turbines. Proceedings of the International Gas Turbine Congress, Tokyo, Japan.
18. Mathey, F., Cokljat, D., Bertoglio, J.P., and Sergent, E. (2003, January 12–17). Specification of LES inlet boundary conditions using vortex method. Proceedings of the 4th Internal Symposium, Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, Antalya, Turkey.
19. Geometric sensitivity of three-dimensional separated flows10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.01.018 ↗
20. Pressure measurements in a three-dimensional separated diffuser10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.10.003 ↗
21. Direct numerical simulation of separated flow in a three-dimensional diffuser10.1017/S0022112010000558 ↗
22. Application of recently developed elliptic blending based models to separated flows10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.04.012 ↗
23. Menter, F.R. (1992). Improved two equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows, NASA Technical Memorandum.10.2514/6.1993-2906 ↗
24. Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: An invariant dynamical systems approach10.1017/S0022112091000101 ↗
25. Elliptic blending model: A new near-wall Reynolds-stress turbulence closure10.1063/1.1432693 ↗
26. An investigation of LES and Hybrid LES/RANS models for predicting 3-D diffuser flow
27. Extending the bounds of ‘steady’ RANS closures: Toward an instability-sensitive Reynolds stress model10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.09.003 ↗
28. Temmerman, L., and Leschziner, M. (2001, January 27–29). Large eddy simulation of separated flow in a streamwise periodic channel constriction. In 2nd Internatioanl Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena: Stockholm, Sweden, 2001. Proceedings of the 2nd Internatioanl Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Stockholm, Sweden.10.1615/TSFP2.2300 ↗
29. Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions10.1017/S0022112004002812 ↗
30. Flow over periodic hills–Numerical and experimental study in a wide range of Reynolds numbers10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.05.002 ↗
31. Investigation of Anisotropy-Resolving Turbulence Models by Reference to Highly-Resolved LES Data for Separated Flow10.1023/A:1024764307706 ↗
32. Computations of transonic flow with the v2–f turbulence model10.1016/S0142-727X(00)00073-4 ↗
33. Modeling rotation and curvature effects within scalar eddy viscosity model framework10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.11.006 ↗
34. Review on the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation/curvature and the application to rotating machinery
35. Monson, D., Seegmiller, H., and McConnaughey, P. (1990, January 18–20). Comparison of experiment with calculations using curvature-corrected zero and two equation turbulence models for a two-dimensional U-duct. Proceedings of the 21st Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, Seattle, WA, USA. AIAA 90–1484.10.2514/6.1990-1484 ↗
36. A simple and robust linear eddy-viscosity formulation for curved and rotating flows10.1108/09615530910972995 ↗
37. Sensitization of the SST Turbulence Model to Rotation and Curvature by Applying the Spalart-Shur Correction Term10.1115/1.3070573 ↗
38. A Three-Equation Variant of the SST k-ω Model Sensitized to Rotation and Curvature Effects10.1115/1.4004940 ↗