journal article·2021-09-14Open access

Emergent Interfaces: Vague, Complex, Bespoke and Embodied Interaction between Humans and Computers

Tim Murray-Browne, Panagiotis Tigas

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 18

Abstract

Most Human–Computer Interfaces are built on the paradigm of manipulating abstract representations. This can be limiting when computers are used in artistic performance or as mediators of social connection, where we rely on qualities of embodied thinking: intuition, context, resonance, ambiguity and fluidity. We explore an alternative approach to designing interaction that we call the emergent interface: interaction leveraging unsupervised machine learning to replace designed abstractions with contextually derived emergent representations. The approach offers opportunities to create interfaces bespoke to a single individual, to continually evolve and adapt the interface in line with that individual’s needs and affordances, and to bridge more deeply with the complex and imprecise interaction that defines much of our non-digital communication. We explore this approach through artistic research rooted in music, dance and AI with the partially emergent system Sonified Body. The system maps the moving body into sound using an emergent representation of the body derived from a corpus of improvised movement from the first author. We explore this system in a residency with three dancers. We reflect on the broader implications and challenges of this alternative way of thinking about interaction, and how far it may help users avoid being limited by the assumptions of a system’s designer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Music Technology and Sound Studies · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Interactive and Immersive Displays

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 9EG, UK

Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK

Funding

Creative Scotland

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Gillies, M. (2019). Understanding the Role of Interactive Machine Learning in Movement Interaction Design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 26.10.1145/3287307 ↗
2. Bishop, J.M., and Martin, A.O. (2014). Non-representational Interaction Design. Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9 ↗
3. Natural user interfaces are not natural10.1145/1744161.1744163 ↗
4. Data Acquisition Methods for Human Brain Activity10.1007/978-3-030-30581-9_2 ↗
5. Zalta, E.N. (2017). Embodied Cognition. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2017 ed., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/.
6. The notion of embodied knowledge and its range
7. Dourish, P. (2004). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction, MIT Press.
8. Naturalistic Cognition: A Research Paradigm for Human-Centered Design
9. Rajko, J. (2018). A call to action: Embodied thinking and human-computer interaction design. The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities, Routledge.10.4324/9781315730479-19 ↗
10. McGilchrist, I. (2009). The Master and His Emissary, Yale University Press.
11. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow, Macmillan.
12. Adams, A.T., Costa, J., Jung, M.F., and Choudhury, T. (2015, January 7–11). Mindless Computing: Designing Technologies to Subtly Influence Behavior. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Osaka, Japan. UbiComp’15.10.1145/2750858.2805843 ↗
13. Hayles, N.K. (2000). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001 ↗
14. Neuhaus, B. (2021, May 30). Instant Composition. Available online: http://www.bettinaneuhaus.com/english/teacher-instant.htm.
15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Harper & Row. [2nd ed.].
16. Seevinck, J. (2017). Emergence in Interactive Art, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-45201-2 ↗
17. Fiebrink, R., Cook, P.R., and Trueman, D. (2011, January 7–12). Human model evaluation in interactive supervised learning. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada.10.1145/1978942.1978965 ↗
18. Michon, R., and Schroeder, F. Supporting Interactive Machine Learning Approaches to Building Musical Instruments in the Browser. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression.
19. Fiebrink, R., Trueman, D., and Cook, P.R. (2009, January 3–6). A Meta-Instrument for Interactive, On-the-fly Machine Learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
20. The importance of parameter mapping in electronic instrument design10.1076/jnmr.32.4.429.18853 ↗
21. Simple mappings, expressive movement: A qualitative investigation into the end-user mapping design of experienced mid-air musicians10.1080/14626268.2018.1510841 ↗
22. Digital Musical Interactions: Performer-system relationships and their perception by spectators10.1017/S1355771811000112 ↗
23. Kingma, D.P., and Welling, M. (2014, January 14–16). Stochastic gradient VB and the variational auto-encoder. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR, Banff, AB, Canada. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114.
24. Goodfellow, I.J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial networks. arXiv.
25. Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., and Le, Q.V. (2014, January 8–13). Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2014), Montreal, Canada. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3215.
26. Reynolds, C.W. (1987, January 27–31). Flocks, Herds and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Anaheim, CA, USA. SIGGRAPH’87.10.1145/37401.37406 ↗
27. Emergence in interactive artistic visualization10.1142/S0218194015400070 ↗
28. Crnkovic-Friis, L., and Crnkovic-Friis, L. (July, January 27). Generative Choreography using Deep Learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Creativity, Paris, France. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06921.
29. Pettee, M., Miret, S., Majumdar, S., and Nassar, M. (2020, January 6–12). CHOREO-GRAPH: Learning latent graph representations of the dancing body. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Machine Learning for Creativity and Design at NeurIPS 2020, Vancouver, BA, Canada.
30. McDonald, K. (2021, May 31). Dance x Machine Learning: First Steps. Available online: https://kcimc.medium.com/discrete-figures-7d9e9c275c47.
31. McGregor, W. (2021, September 13). Living Archive. Available online: https://waynemcgregor.com/research/living-archive.
32. Boddington, G. (2021). The Internet of Bodies—Alive, connected and collective: The virtual physical future of our bodies and our senses. AI Soc.10.1007/s00146-020-01137-1 ↗
33. Murray-Browne, T., and Tigas, P. Latent Mappings: Generating Open-Ended Expressive Mappings Using Variational Autoencoders. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Available online: https://nime.pubpub.org/pub/latent-mappings.
34. Wright, M., and Freed, A. (1997, January 25–30). Open sound control: A new protocol for communicating with sound synthesizers. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC), Thessaloniki, Greece.
35. Dahl, L. (July, January 30). Triggering Sounds From Discrete Air Gestures: What Movement Feature Has the Best Timing?. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Goldsmiths, UK.
36. Benford, S., Ramchurn, R., Marshall, J., Wilson, M.L., Pike, M., Martindale, S., Hazzard, A., Greenhalgh, C., Kallionpää, M., and Tennent, P. (2020). Contesting control: Journeys through surrender, self-awareness and looseness of control in embodied interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 1–29.10.1080/07370024.2020.1754214 ↗
37. Dodsworth, C. (1998). The construction of experience: Interface as content. Digital Illusion: Entertaining the Future with High Technology, ACM Press. Chapter 2.
38. Design AI so that it’s fair10.1038/d41586-018-05707-8 ↗
39. McGilchrist, I. (2017). Have We Lost Our Senses. Invited Lecture at The Open Senses Symposium. Institute of Philosophy; University of London.