A Collaborative Method for Scoping Software Product Lines: A Case Study in a Small Software Company
Source abstract
Abstract
SPL scoping is the activity for bounding Software Product Lines (SPL), gathering heterogeneous knowledge from diverse sources. For achieving an agreement among different stakeholders, a commonalty scope must be understood and committed to. However, gathering this knowledge from stakeholders with individual interests is a complex task. This paper reports the experience of scoping the SPL of a small Colombian software company, applying and evaluating a collaborative method called CoMeS-SPL. The company was looking to develop a set of products from a product previously developed with great potential to be adapted and sold to different customers. From a collaborative relationship university–enterprise model, the research groups that developed CoMeS-SPL proposed to use it answering to the company needs for defining an organization-suitable reuse scope around its platform called CORA. Both parties joined in the scoping co-production of the first SPL of the company. This method implied that the company would perform new tasks and involve other roles different for those who are used to defining the scope of a single product. The company actors considered that they obtained a useful scope and perceived the collaboration as valuable because they shared different knowledge and perspectives. The researchers were able to provide feedback on their proposed model, identifying successes and aspects to improve. The experience allowed strengthening the ties of cooperation with the company, and new projects and consultancies are being carried out.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies · Software Engineering Techniques and Practices · Software Engineering Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Grupo de Investigación y Desarrollo en Informática, Facultad de Ingeniería, Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor del Cauca, Popayán 190003, Colombia
Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Departamento de Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes 20100, Mexico
IDIS Research Group, Departamento de Sistemas, Facultad de Ingeniería Electrónica y Telecomunicaciones, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán 190003, Colombia
Escuela de Ingeniería, Universidad Católica del Norte, Coquimbo 1781421, Chile
Sunset Software House S.A.S, Popayán 190003, Colombia
Funding
Network of training of human talent 583 for social and productive innovation in the department of Cauca”
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Northrop, L.M., Clements, P.C., Bachmann, W.F., Bergey, J., Chastek, G., Cohen, S., Donohoe, P., Jones, L., Krut, R., and Little, R. (2012). A Framework for Software Product Line Practice, Version 5.0, Software Engineering Institute. Technical Report.
2. An organizational maturity model of software product line engineering10.1007/s11219-009-9088-5 ↗
3. Clements, P. (2002). On the Importance of Product Line Scope, Software Product-Family Engineering.10.1007/3-540-47833-7_8 ↗
4. Scoping software product lines, An Analysis of an Emerging Technology]
5. Chastek, G., Donohoe, P., Chul, K., Pohang, K., Thiel, S., and Bosch, R. (2001). Product Line Analysis: A Practical Introduction, Software Engineering Institute. CMU/SEI-2001-TR-001.10.21236/ADA388924 ↗
6. John, I., and Eisenbarth, M. (2009, January 24–28). A decade of scoping: A survey. Proceedings of the 13th International Software Product Line Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.
7. Ianzen, A., Malucelli, A., and Reinehr, S. (2012, January 1–5). Scope definition in software product lines: A semi-automatic approach through linguistic annotation. Proceedings of the 38th Latin America Conference on Informatics, CLEI 2012, Medellin, Colombia.10.1109/CLEI.2012.6427193 ↗
8. John, I., Knodel, J., Lehner, T., and Muthig, D. (2006, January 21–24). A Practical Guide to Product Line Scoping. Proceedings of the 10th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC’06), Baltimore, MD, USA.10.1109/SPLINE.2006.1691572 ↗
9. Helferich, A., Schmid, K., and Herzwurm, G. (2006, January 21–24). Reconciling marketed and engineered software product lines. Proceedings of the 10th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2006, Baltimore, MD, USA.
10. Carbon, R., Knodel, J., Muthig, D., and Meier, G. (2008, January 8–12). Providing Feedback from Application to Family Engineering—The Product Line Planning Game at the Testo AG. Proceedings of the 2008 12th International Software Product Line Conference, Limerick, Ireland. Number 01.10.1109/SPLC.2008.21 ↗
11. Rommes, E., and Research, P. (2003, January 23). A People Oriented Approach to Product Line Scoping. Proceedings of the PLEES 2003: International Workshop on Product Line Engineering: The Early Steps: Planning, Modeling, and Managing, Erfurt, Germany. Number 1.0.
12. Noor, M., Rabiser, R., and Grünbacher, P. (2006, January 21–24). A collaborative approach for reengineering-based product line scoping. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Agile Product Line Engineering APLE’06 in the 10th International Conference, SPLC 2006, Baltimore, MD, USA.
13. Burge, J.E., Carroll, J.M., McCall, R., and Mistrk, I. (2008). Decision-Making in Software Engineering. Rationale-Based Software Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-77583-6 ↗
14. Decision support for moving from a single product to a product portfolio in evolving software systems10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.049 ↗
15. Camacho Ojeda, M.C. (2019). A Collaborative Method for Scoping Software Product Lines. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad del Cauca].
16. Collaborative strategies supporting knowledge management in organizations10.29375/25392115.4026 ↗
17. Briggs, R., Kolfschoten, G., and de Vreede, G.J. (2006, January 4–6). Defining Key Concepts for Collaboration Engineering. Proceedings of the AMCIS 2006, Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Acapulco, Mexico.
18. Collaboration Engineering: Foundations and Opportunities: Editorial to the Special Issue on the Journal of the Association of Information Systems
19. The Collaboration Engineering Approach for Designing10.1007/978-3-540-74812-0_8 ↗
20. ThinkLets: A collaboration engineering pattern language10.1504/IJCAT.2006.009064 ↗
21. Santos de Moraes, M.B., Santana de Almeida, E., and Romero de Lemos Meira, S. (2009, January 11–13). A Systematic Review on Software Product Lines Scoping. Proceedings of the VI Experimental Software Engineering Latin American Workshop, ESELAW’09, São Carlos, Brazil.
22. Software product line evolution: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.infsof.2018.08.014 ↗
23. A Comparison of Software Product Line Scoping Approaches10.1142/S021819401000489X ↗
24. Using documentation for product line scoping10.1109/MS.2010.34 ↗
25. Balbino, M. (2010). RiPLE-SC: An Agile Scoping Process for Software Product Line, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. [Ph.D. Thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco].
26. da Silva, I.F. (2012, January 2–7). An agile approach for software product lines scoping. Proceedings of the 16th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC ’12, Salvador, Brazil.10.1145/2364412.2364450 ↗
27. Schmid, K. (2002, January 25). A comprehensive product line scoping approach and its validation. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering—ICSE ’02, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1145/581413.581415 ↗
28. Proposing formal notation for modeling collaborative processes extending HAMSTERS notation10.1007/978-3-319-05951-8_25 ↗
29. Modelado de Procesos Colaborativos Extendiendo Elementos de la Notación
30. Martinie, C., Palanque, P., and Winckler, M. (2015, January 14–18). Designing and Assessing Interactive Systems Using Task Models. Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Bamberg, Germany.
31. Koller, M., Bogdan, C., and Meixner, G. (2016, January 29–31). Collaborative Task Modeling: A First Prototype Integrated in HAMSTERS. Proceedings of the Human-Centered and Error-Resilient Systems Development, HESSD 2016, HCSE 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Stockholm, Sweden.10.1007/978-3-319-44902-9_24 ↗
32. Software Process Engineering Metamodel (SPEM)
33. De Vreede, G.J., and Briggs, R.O. (2005, January 3–6). Collaboration engineering: Designing repeatable processes for high-value collaborative tasks. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA.
34. Empirical software product line engineering: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106389 ↗
35. Researchers’ approaches to stakeholders: Interaction or transfer of knowledge?10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.008 ↗
36. Bergmann, M., and Engelbert, S. (2008). Transdisziplinarität in der Forschungspraxis. Transdisziplinäre Forschung. Integrative Forschungsprozesse verstehen und bewerten, Campus Verlag.
37. Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017 ↗
38. Camacho, M.C., Álvarez, F.J., Ruiz, P.H., and Alegría Hurtado, J.A. (2017). Review on Teamwork during the Scoping of Software Product Lines, Universidad del Cauca. Technical Report.
39. Camacho Ojeda, M.C., Hurtado Alegría, J.A., and Álvarez Rodriguez, F.J. (June, January 27). An exploratory study for scoping software product lines in a collaborative way. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, CHASE ’18, 40th International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE’18, Gothenburg, Sweden.
40. Camacho Ojeda, M.C., Hurtado Alegría, J.A., Álvarez Rodriguez, F.J., and Ruiz Melenje, P.H. (2018, January 1–3). A Collaborative Method for a Tangible Software Product Line Scoping. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Informatics Workshops, ICAIW 2018—Joint Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Engineering and Analytics, WDEA 2018, Workshop on Smart Sustainable Cities, WSSC 2018, Workshop on Intelligent Transportation Systems, WITS 2018 and Workshop on Empirical Experien, Bogota, Colombia.10.1109/ICAIW.2018.8554999 ↗
41. Ruiz, P.H., Camacho, C., and Hurtado, J.A. (2018, January 1–3). A Comparative Study for Scoping a Software Process Line. Proceedings of the 2018 ICAI Workshops, ICAIW 2018—Joint Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Engineering and Analytics, WDEA 2018, Workshop on Smart Sustainable Cities, WSSC 2018, Workshop on Intelligent Transportation Systems, WITS 2018 and Workshop on Empirical Experien, Bogota, Colombia.10.1109/ICAIW.2018.8554998 ↗
42. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M., Regnell, B., and Wesslén, A. (2012). Experimentation in Software Engineering, Publishing Company, Incorporated.10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2 ↗
43. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8 ↗
44. de Medeiros, T.F.L., and Santana Almeida, E. (2012, January 5–8). CodeScoping: A Source Code Based Tool to Software Product Lines Scoping. Proceedings of the 2012 38th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Cesme, Turkey.10.1109/SEAA.2012.70 ↗
45. Krueger, C. (2002). Eliminating the Adoption Barrier, IEEE Computer Society Press. Number 4.10.1109/MS.2002.1020284 ↗
46. Reo, D., Quintano, N., and Buglione, L. (1999, January 4–8). Measuring Software Process Improvement: There’s more to it than just measuring processes. Proceedings of the FESMA 99, 2nd European Software Measurement Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
47. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology10.2307/249008 ↗
48. Moody, D.L. (2003, January 16–21). The method evaluation model: A theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. Proceedings of the Event European Conference on Information Systems 2003 (ECIS ’03), Naples, Italy.
49. Evaluating requirements modeling methods based on user perceptions: A family of experiments10.1016/j.ins.2011.04.005 ↗
50. Visualizing and monitoring effective interactions in online collaborative groups10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00911.x ↗
51. Avouris, N., Margaritis, M., and Komis, V. (September, January 30). Modelling interaction during small-group synchronous problem-solving activities: The Synergo approach. Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems 7th International Conference, ITS 2004, Maceio, Brazil.
52. Product Management for Software Product Lines: An Unsolved Problem?10.1145/1183236.1183268 ↗