journal article·2021-02-13Open access

Accuracy of Implant Position Reproduction According to Exposed Length of the Scan Body during Optical Scanning: An In Vitro Study

Na-Eun Nam, Seung-Ho Shin, Jung-Hwa Lim, Bora Lee, June-Sung Shim, Jong-Eun Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 4

Abstract

Accuracy of implant position reproduction according to various types of scanners, implant placement depths, and tooth positions are unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of implant position reproduction for differences in the exposed length of the implant scan body according to scanner type and tooth position. Implants were placed at the positions of the lateral incisor, first premolar, and first molar in the study model at the bone level and submerged 1.5 mm, 3.0 mm, 4.5 mm, and 6.0 mm. The completed models were scanned with one type of tabletop scanner and three types of intraoral scanners (TRIOS 3, i500, and CS3600). A matching process was performed for all scan data to superimpose abutment library data on the scan body, and the root mean square errors were analyzed in three dimensions to evaluate the position reproducibility of the replaced abutment library. In the trueness analysis, the error increased rapidly for an implant placement depth of 4.5 mm, and was largest for a submersion of 6.0 mm. The precision analysis confirmed that the error increased for depths of at least 3.0 mm. The analysis by position identified that the accuracy was lowest for an implant placed at the position of the lateral incisor. These findings indicate that special care is required when making an impression of a deep implant with an optical scanner.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Radiography and Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

BK21 FOUR Project, Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea

Department of Dental Education, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea

Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Yonsei-ro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea

Funding

Advanced Technology Center(ATC) Program funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea)

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015 ↗
2. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: Accuracy and reproducibility10.1179/14653120722905 ↗
3. Impressions are changing: Deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054 ↗
4. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy10.1179/146531207225022626 ↗
5. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: A methodological in vitro study10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01382.x ↗
6. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays
7. Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: Effects of storage time and moisture contamination
8. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: Clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x ↗
9. Implants and the periodontium
10. Influence of clinician’s skill on primary implant stability with conventional and piezoelectric preparation techniques: An ex-vivo study
11. Implant treatment in partially edentulous patients: A report on prostheses after 3 years
12. Current challenges in successful rehabilitation with oral implants10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02170.x ↗
13. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implants: From prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup
14. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9 ↗
15. Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060203.x ↗
16. A review of dental CAD/CAM: Current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience10.4012/dmj.28.44 ↗
17. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth10.1111/cid.12124 ↗
18. Mai, H.Y., Seo, J.-M., Jung, J.-K., and Lee, D.-H. (2020). Strategic Use of CAD-CAM Interim Restoration for the Recovery of the Vertical Dimension of Occlusion in the Posterior Partially Edentulous Jaw. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217735 ↗
19. Implant-Supported Prosthetic Therapy of an Edentulous Patient: Clinical and Technical Aspects10.3390/prosthesis2030013 ↗
20. Minimally Invasive Treatment of Edentulous Maxillae with Overdenture Fully Supported by a Cad/Cam Titanium Bar with a Low-Profile Attachment Screwed on Four or Six Implants: A Case Series10.3390/prosthesis2020006 ↗
21. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0 ↗
22. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review10.1111/jopr.12527 ↗
23. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study10.1007/s00784-011-0564-5 ↗
24. Effects of scan body exposure and operator on the accuracy of image matching of implant impressions with scan bodies10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.004 ↗
25. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010 ↗
26. An In Vitro Study of Factors Influencing the Performance of Digital Intraoral Impressions Operating on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology with Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla10.1111/jopr.12457 ↗
27. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch10.11607/jomi.6855 ↗
28. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003 ↗
29. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial10.1016/j.jpor.2019.06.001 ↗
30. Comparison of Different Calculation Methods Used to Analyze Facial Soft Tissue Asymmetry: Global and Partial 3-Dimensional Quantitative Evaluation of Healthy Subjects10.1016/j.joms.2016.05.012 ↗
31. International Organization for Standardization (1994). ISO 5725-1: 1994: Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results-Part 1: General Principles and Definitions, International Organization for Standardization.
32. A Novel Method to Evaluate Precision of Optical Implant Impressions with Commercial Scan Bodies-An Experimental Approach10.1111/jopr.12362 ↗
33. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions10.1111/clr.12375 ↗
34. Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters10.11607/jomi.3689 ↗
35. Mangano, F.G., Hauschild, U., Veronesi, G., Imburgia, M., Mangano, C., and Admakin, O. (2019). Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: A comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7 ↗
36. Mangano, F., Gandolfi, A., Luongo, G., and Logozzo, S. (2017). Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health, 17.10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x ↗
37. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027 ↗
38. Imburgia, M., Logozzo, S., Hauschild, U., Veronesi, G., Mangano, C., and Mangano, F.G. (2017). Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health, 17.10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4 ↗