journal article·2020-11-02Open access

A Novel Explicit Analytical Multibody Approach for the Analysis of Upper Limb Dynamics and Joint Reactions Calculation Considering Muscle Wrapping

Alessandro Ruggiero, Alessandro Sicilia

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 21

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present an explicit analytical biomechanical multibody procedure able to be implemented in the solution of the musculoskeletal systems inverse dynamics problems. The model is proposed in formal multibody analysis and implemented in the Matlab numerical environment. It is based on the constraint kinematical behaviour analysis and considers both linear muscle actuators and curved ones, by calculating the geodesic muscle path over wrapping surfaces fixed to the bodies. The model includes the Hill muscle approach in order to evaluate both the contractile elements’ actions and the passive ones. With the aim to have a first validation, the model was applied to the dynamical analysis of the “arm26” OpenSim model, an upper limb subjected to external forces of gravity and to known kinematics. The comparison of results shows interesting matching in terms of kinematical analysis, driving forces, muscles’ activations and joint reactions, proving the reliability of the proposed approach in all cases in which it is necessary to achieve in-silico explicit determinations of the upper limb dynamics and joint reactions (i.e., in joint tribological optimization).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, nº 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy

Funding

Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Ruggiero, A., and Sicilia, A. (2020). A Mixed Elasto-Hydrodynamic Lubrication Model for Wear Calculation in Artificial Hip Joints. Lubricants, 8.10.3390/lubricants8070072 ↗
2. Lubrication modeling and wear calculation in artificial hip joint during the gait10.1016/j.triboint.2019.105993 ↗
3. In silico total hip replacement wear testing in the framework of ISO 14242-3 accounting for mixed elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication effects10.1016/j.wear.2020.203420 ↗
4. Musculoskeletal multibody dynamics simulation of the contact mechanics and kinematics of a natural knee joint during a walking cycle10.1177/0954411918767695 ↗
5. Loads in the hip joint during physically demanding occupational tasks: A motion analysis study10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.034 ↗
6. Multibody System of the Upper Limb Including a Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis10.1115/1.4025325 ↗
7. Multibody Muscle Driven Model of an Instrumented Prosthetic Knee During Squat and Toe Rise Motions10.1115/1.4023982 ↗
8. On the biotribology of total knee replacement: A new roughness measurements protocol on in vivo condyles considering the dynamic loading from musculoskeletal multibody model10.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.008 ↗
9. Loads on the prosthesis–socket interface of above-knee amputees during normal gait: Validation of a multi-body simulation10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.005 ↗
10. Ruggiero, A., Merola, M., and Affatato, S. (2018). Finite element simulations of hard-on-soft hip joint prosthesis accounting for dynamic loads calculated from a musculoskeletal model during walking. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11040574 ↗
11. A mechanical hand for prosthetic applications: Multibody model and contact simulation10.1177/0954411918787548 ↗
12. Bergmann, G., Bender, A., Dymke, J., Duda, G., and Damm, P. (2016). Standardized Loads Acting in Hip Implants. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0155612 ↗
13. Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.023 ↗
14. In vivo measurement of shoulder joint loads during activities of daily living10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.035 ↗
15. Nordin, M., and Frankel, V.H. (2001). Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
16. Estimated landmark calibration of biomechanical models for inverse kinematics10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.10.015 ↗
17. An efficient muscle fatigue model for forward and inverse dynamic analysis of human movements10.1016/j.piutam.2011.04.024 ↗
18. Solution of Redundant Muscle Forces in Human Locomotion with Multibody Dynamics and Optimization Tools10.1081/SME-120022856 ↗
19. Craniofacial biomechanics: An overview of recent multibody modelling studies10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01317.x ↗
20. Kinematic models of the upper limb joints for multibody kinematics optimisation: An overview10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.12.005 ↗
21. Development and validation of a discretised multi-body spine model in LifeMOD for biodynamic behaviour simulation10.1080/10255842.2013.786049 ↗
22. A Model of the Upper Extremity for Simulating Musculoskeletal Surgery and Analyzing Neuromuscular Control10.1007/s10439-005-3320-7 ↗
23. Shabana, A. (2020). Dynamics of Multibody Systems, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108757553 ↗
24. Systematic Construction of the Equations of Motion for Multibody Systems Containing Closed Kinematic Loops10.1115/1.2919310 ↗
25. Oliveira, H. (2016). Inverse Dynamic Analysis of the Human Locomotion Apparatus for Gait, Instituto Superior Técnico.
26. Hill’s and Huxley’s muscle models-tools for simulations in biomechanics10.2298/SJEE1501053J ↗
27. Flexing Computational Muscle: Modeling and Simulation of Musculotendon Dynamics10.1115/1.4023390 ↗
28. A comparison among different Hill-type contraction dynamics formulations for muscle force estimation10.5194/ms-7-19-2016 ↗
29. John, C. (2011). Complete Description of the Thelen 2003 Muscle Model, OpenSim.
30. Adjustment of Muscle Mechanics Model Parameters to Simulate Dynamic Contractions in Older Adults10.1115/1.1531112 ↗
31. Hada, M., Yamada, D., and Tsuji, T. (2007, January 25–28). An analysis of equivalent impedance characteristics by modeling the human musculoskeletal structure as a multibody system. Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference, Milano, Italy.
32. Computational method for muscle-path representation in musculoskeletal models10.1007/s00422-002-0326-1 ↗
33. Muscle wrapping on arbitrary meshes with the heat method
34. Stavness, I., Sherman, M., and Delp, S. (2012). A General Approach to Muscle Wrapping over Multiple Surfaces, Stanford University.
35. Improved Muscle Wrapping Algorithms Using Explicit Path-Error Jacobians10.1007/978-94-007-7214-4_44 ↗
36. Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00432-3 ↗