Health and Structural Integrity of Monitoring Systems: The Case Study of Pressurized Pipelines
Source abstract
Abstract
In the operation of some structures, particularly in energy or chemical industry where pressurized pipeline systems are employed, certain unexpected critical situations may occur, which must be definitely avoided. Otherwise, such situations would result in undesirable damage to the environment or even the endangerment of human life. For example, the occurrence of such nonstandard states can significantly affect the safety of high-pressure pipeline systems. The following paper discusses basic physical prerequisites for assembling the systems that can sense loading states and monitor the operational safety conditions of pressure piping systems in the long-run. The appropriate monitoring system hardware with cost-effective data management was designed in order to enable the real-time monitoring of operational safety parameters. Furthermore, the paper presents the results obtained from the measurements of existing real-time safety monitoring systems for selected pipeline systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Combustion and Detonation Processes · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Advanced Sensor Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics, Slovak University of Technology, Námestie Slobody 17, 81231 Bratislava, Slovakia
Funding
Research & Development Operational Programme funded by the ERDF · Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of Pipeline Steel Corrosion Data from NBS (NIST) Studies10.6028/jres.115.026 ↗
2. Causes, cost consequences, and risk implications of accidents in US hazardous liquid pipeline infrastructure10.1016/j.ijcip.2008.09.001 ↗
3. Wachal, J.C., and Smith, D.R. (1991). Vibration Troubleshooting of Existing Piping Systems, Engineering Dynamics Inc.. EDI Paper No.59.
4. A Computational Approach for Flow-acoustic Coupling in Closed Side Branches10.1121/1.1350618 ↗
5. Cylindrical Side-branch as Tone Generator10.1016/0022-460X(89)90492-6 ↗
6. Design Stage Acoustic Analysis of Natural Gas Piping Systems in Centrifugal Compressor Stations10.1115/1.2906649 ↗
7. Multistage Centrifugal Compressor Surge Analysis: Part I—Experimental Investigation10.1115/1.2841315 ↗
8. Multistage Centrifugal Compressor Surge Analysis: Part II—Numerical Simulation and Dynamic Control Parameters Evaluation10.1115/1.2841316 ↗
9. Modeling for Surge Control of Centrifugal Compressors: Comparison with experiment
10. Farrar, R.C., and Worden, K. (2012). Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118443118 ↗
11. Chmelko, V., and Garan, M. (2016, January 27–28). Long-term monitoring of strains in a real operation of structures. Proceedings of the 14th IMEKO TC10 Workshop on Technical Diagnostics, Milano, Italy.
12. Strain measurement on pipelines for long-term monitoring of structural integrity10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107863 ↗
13. Standardization of the rainflow counting method for fatigue analysis10.1016/0142-1123(94)90343-3 ↗
14. Mean stress effect in stress-life fatigue prediction re-evaluated10.1051/matecconf/201816510018 ↗
15. The exponential law of endurance tests
16. Morrow, J.D. (1968). Fatigue properties of metals, section 3.2. Fatigue Design Handbook, SAE. Pub. No. AE-4.
17. Goodman, J. (1919). Mechanics Applied to Engineering, Longmans, Green and Co.
18. Cyclic anelasticity of metals
19. In-time monitoring of fatigue damage10.1016/j.proeng.2015.02.013 ↗
20. Tennyson, R.C., Don, W., and Cherpillod, T. (2005, January 3–7). Monitoring Pipeline Integrity Using Fiber Optic Sensors. Proceedings of the CORROSION 2005, NACE International, Houston, TX, USA.10.1061/40800(180)64 ↗
21. Comparative study of distributed sensors for strain monitoring of pipelines
22. Hoffmann, K. (2012). Eine Einfuh-rung in die Technik des Messens mit Dehnungsmessstreifen, HBM.
23. Šulko, M., Garan, M., and Chmelko, V. (2015). PUV 5017-2015, G01L 1/22, Industrial Property Office.
24. National Research Council Canada (1984, January 3–7). Metallic corrosion. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Metallic Corrosion, Toronto, ON, Canada.
25. Analytical Solution of the Pipe Burst Pressure Using Bilinear Stress-Strain Model and Influence of Corrosion Defects on it10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.205 ↗
26. ASME B31.G (2009). Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, ASME.
27. (2015). DNV RP F101-Parts A & B: Corroded Pipelines, Det Norske Veritas AS.
28. Cosham, A., and Hopkins, P. (2003). The Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual (PDAM), Penspen Ltd.10.1115/IPC2002-27067 ↗
29. Nanney, S. (2012). Pipeline Safety Update, NAPCA Workshop.