journal article·2026-03

Revolutionizing Scientific Figure Decoding: Benchmarking LLM Data Extraction Performance

Ivan Turan, Taylor D. Sparks

Publisher page

Abstract

Large Language Models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and processing. However, as AI and LLMs continue to evolve, their ability to accurately and efficiently interpret data from scientific figures and plots remains obscure. In this study, we test and evaluate the ability of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) in analyzing and extracting information from scientific figures commonly found in materials science literature, including stress-strain curves, heatmaps, 3D plots, contour plots, and other visual representations. We utilize a benchmark dataset comprising figures derived from several published works to evaluate the model's performance in quantitative material property extraction. Preliminary results highlight both the potential and current limitations of LLMs in handling visual scientific content, pointing toward future opportunities for AI-assisted data extraction in materials informatics.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multimodal Machine Learning Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Data Visualization and Analytics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Seshadri R, Sparks T (2016) Perspective: interactive material property databases through aggregation of literature data. APL Mater 4:053206. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.494468210.1063/1.4944682 ↗
2. Sayeed H, Smallwood W, Baird S, Sparks T. NLP meets materials science: quantifying the presentation of materials data in scientific literature. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-wd5cr-v310.26434/chemrxiv-2023-wd5cr-v3 ↗
3. Morgan D, Polak MP (2025) Data, codes, and n figures for leveraging vision capabilities of multimodal LLMs for automated data extraction from plots. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28559639.v210.6084/m9.figshare.28559639.v2 ↗
4. Rohatgi A (2021) WebPlotDigitizer: Version 4.5. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer. Accessed 03 June 2025
5. Siegel N, Horvitz Z, Levin R, Divvala S, Farhadi A (2016) Figureseer: parsing result-figures in research papers, 9911:664–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_4110.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_41 ↗
6. Siegel N, Lourie N, Power R, Ammar W (2018) Extracting scientific figures with distantly supervised neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on joint conference on digital libraries. JCDL’18. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197026.319704010.1145/3197026.3197040 ↗
7. Pick JL, Nakagawa S, Noble DWA (2019) Reproducible, flexible and high-throughput data extraction from primary literature: the metadigitise R package. Methods Ecol Evol 10(3):426–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.1311810.1111/2041-210X.13118 ↗
8. Ray Choudhury S, Mitra P, Giles CL (2015) Automatic extraction of figures from scholarly documents. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM symposium on document engineering. DocEng’15, pp. 47–50. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2682571.279708510.1145/2682571.2797085 ↗
9. Yokoyama Y, Prime MB, Joshi VV, Clausen B, Vogel SC, Sharma HS (2018) Residual stress measurements in additively manufactured stainless steel using neutron diffraction. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 7:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-018-0117-810.1007/s40192-018-0117-8 ↗
10. Eger S, Cao Y, D’Souza J, Geiger A, Greisinger C, Gross S, Hou Y, Krenn B, Lauscher A, Li Y, Lin C, Moosavi NS, Zhao W, Miller T (2025) Transforming science with large language models: a survey on AI-assisted scientific discovery, experimentation, content generation, and evaluation. arXiv
11. Tshitoyan V, Dagdelen J, Weston L, Dunn A, Rong Z, Kononova O, Persson KA, Ceder G, Jain A (2022) Self-supervised discovery of scientific knowledge. NPJ Comput Mater 8(1):217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00784-w10.1038/s41524-022-00784-w ↗
12. Huyen N, Srivastava A, Xu X, Tiwary P (2022) Deep learning for materials with structure. NPJ Comput Mater 8(1):202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00765-z10.1038/s41524-022-00765-z ↗
13. Ramprasad R, Gomez-Bombarelli R, Cubuk ED, Hattrick-Simpers J, Agrawal A (2024) Artificial intelligence in materials science: a conversation with pioneers. Mach Learn Sci Technol 5(1):011501. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad52e910.1088/2632-2153/ad52e9 ↗
14. Kassambara A (2017) Facilitating exploratory data visualization: application to TCGA genomic data. Accessed 31 May 2025. https://www.sthda.com/english/articles/24-ggpubr-publication-ready-plots/77-facilitating-exploratory-data-visualization-application-to-tcga-genomic-data/
15. Stockwell W, Lawson C, Saunders E, Goliff W (2011) A review of tropospheric atmospheric chemistry and gas-phase chemical mechanisms for air quality modeling. Atmosphere 3:1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos301000110.3390/atmos3010001 ↗
16. Makhlouf SA, Bakr ZH, Aly KI, Moustafa MS (2013) Structural, electrical and optical properties of co3o4 nanoparticles. Superlattices Microstruct 64:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2013.09.02310.1016/j.spmi.2013.09.023 ↗
17. Evergreen S (2018) Engineering and Technology Scatter Plots. Accessed 03 June 2025. https://stephanieevergreen.com/data-viz-5bd5076ceab66/5bd505fee366a_engineering-and-technology-scatter-plots/
18. Miscircuitos (2022) How to characterise a thermoelectric. Accessed 03 June 2025. https://miscircuitos.com/how-to-characterise-a-thermoelectric/
19. Muro D, Mesquita E, Souza A, Paz R, Targino D (2022) Evaluation of machine learning models for compressive strength prediction on self-compacting concretes. PhD thesis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34959.3984210.13140/RG.2.2.34959.39842 ↗
20. Nuss P, Eckelman MJ (2018) Life cycle assessment of metals: a scientific synthesis. Sustainability 10(10):3367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1010336710.3390/su10103367 ↗
21. Król P, Wachowski M. Effect of fire temperature and exposure time on high-strength steel bolts microstructure and residual mechanical properties. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202105.0288.v110.20944/preprints202105.0288.v1 ↗
22. Polak MP, Morgan D (2025) Leveraging vision capabilities of multimodal LLMs for automated data extraction from plots. arXiv:https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12326