Robust Co-Optimization to Energy and Reserve Joint Dispatch Considering Wind Power Generation and Zonal Reserve Constraints in Real-Time Electricity Markets
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper proposes an energy and reserve joint dispatch model based on a robust optimization approach in real-time electricity markets, considering wind power generation uncertainties as well as zonal reserve constraints under both normal and N-1 contingency conditions. In the proposed model, the operating reserves are classified as regulating reserve and spinning reserve according to the response performance. More specifically, the regulating reserve is usually utilized to reduce the gap due to forecasting errors, while the spinning reserve is commonly adopted to enhance the ability for N-1 contingencies. Since the transmission bottlenecks may inhibit the deliverability of reserve, the zonal placement of spinning reserve is considered in this paper to improve the reserve deliverability under the contingencies. Numerical results on the IEEE 118-bus test system show the effectiveness of the proposed model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electric Power System Optimization · Optimal Power Flow Distribution · Smart Grid Energy Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, Liaoning, China
State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
Department of Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Robust optimization—Methodology and applications10.1007/s101070100286 ↗
2. Robust optimization—A comprehensive survey10.1016/j.cma.2007.03.003 ↗
3. Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L., and Nemirovski, A. (2009). Robust Optimization, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831050 ↗
4. Pattern search algorithm based automatic online parameter estimation for AGC with effects of wind power10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.05.009 ↗
5. Robust co-optimization to energy and ancillary service joint dispatch considering wind power uncertainties in real-time electricity markets10.1109/TSTE.2016.2561967 ↗
6. Bertsekas, D.P. (2016). Robust shortest path planning and semicontractive dynamic programming. NRL, 1–23.10.1002/nav.21697 ↗
7. Adaptive tobust optimization for the security constrained unit commitment problem10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2205021 ↗
8. An optimal power flow algorithm to achieve robust operation considering load and renewable generation uncertainties10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2194517 ↗
9. Wind power bidding in electricity markets with high wind penetration10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.055 ↗
10. Robust optimal risk sharing and risk premia in expanding pools10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.05.012 ↗
11. A robust wind power optimization method for look-ahead power dispatch10.1109/TSTE.2013.2294467 ↗
12. Fractional order AGC for distributed energy resources using robust optimization10.1109/TSG.2015.2459766 ↗
13. Risk measure based robust bidding strategy for arbitrage using a wind farm and energy storage10.1109/TSG.2013.2271283 ↗
14. Merit-order effects of renewable energy and price divergence in California’s day-ahead and real-time electricity markets10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.023 ↗
15. Unit commitment risk with sequential rescheduling10.1109/59.119241 ↗
16. A robust optimization approach to energy and reserve dispatch in electricity markets10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.081 ↗
17. Chen, Y., Keyser, M., Tackett, M.H., Leonard, R., and Gardner, J. (2015). Incorporating short-term stored energy resource into MISO energy and ancillary service market and development of performance-based regulation payment. Energy Storage Smart Grids, 171–199.10.1016/B978-0-12-410491-4.00006-3 ↗
18. Energy and ancillary service dispatch in a competitive pool10.1109/39.646966 ↗
19. Incorporating post zonal reserve deployment transmission constraints into energy and ancillary service co-optimization10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2284791 ↗
20. Chen, Y., Gribik, P.R., Zhang, L., Merring, R., Gardner, J., and Sperry, K. (2009, January 26–30). Real time ramp model in Midwest iso co-optimized energy and ancillary service market design. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1109/PES.2009.5275836 ↗
21. Ma, X., Chen, Y., and Wan, J. (2009, January 26–30). Midwest ISO co-optimization based real-time dispatch and pricing of energy and ancillary services. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1109/PES.2009.5276010 ↗
22. Ma, X., Song, H., Hong, M., and Wan, J. (2009, January 26–30). The security-constrained commitment and dispatch for Midwest ISO day-ahead co-optimized energy and ancillary service market. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1109/PES.2009.5275943 ↗
23. Contingency-based zonal reserve modeling and pricing in a co-optimized energy and reserve market10.1109/TPWRS.2008.919314 ↗
24. A nascent market for contingency reserve services using demand response10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.078 ↗
25. Robust N-k contingency constrained unit commitment with ancillary service demand response program10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0052 ↗
26. Robust optimal transmission switching with the consideration of corrective actions for N-k contingencies10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0126 ↗
27. Adjustable robust OPF with renewable energy sources10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2275013 ↗
28. (2016, November 15). MATPOWER. Available online: http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower.
29. Ye, H., Ge, Y., Shahidehpour, M., and Li, Z. (2016). Uncertainty marginal price, transmission reserve, and day-ahead market clearing with robust unit commitment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst.10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2595621 ↗