Comparative Analysis of Target Displacements in RC Buildings for 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes
Source abstract
Abstract
The Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquake on 6 February 2023, one of the largest earthquakes of the century, caused the collapse or severe damage of thousands of structures. This catastrophic disaster resulted in over 53,000 fatalities and rendered many structures unusable. This study addresses the observed damage in reinforced concrete (RC) structures, which constituted the majority of the existing urban building stock. In this study, firstly, information about the destructive Kahramanmaraş earthquakes was given. The predicted PGAs in the last two earthquake hazard maps used in Türkiye were compared with the measured PGAs from actual earthquakes to determine whether the earthquake hazard is adequately represented for eleven affected provinces in the earthquake region. The damages in RC structures were evaluated within the scope of civil and earthquake engineering. Structural analyses for the model created to represent mid-rise RC buildings in the region were carried out separately for each province using predicted and measured PGAs. Additionally, target displacements that were used in performance-based earthquake engineering for damage prediction, were examined comparatively for all provinces. While the predicted earthquake hazard and targeted displacements were exceeded in some provinces, there was no exceedance in the other provinces. The realistic representation of earthquake hazards will allow the predicted displacements for various performance levels of structures to be determined in a much more realistic way. Consequently, the performance levels predicted for the structures will be assessed with greater accuracy. The study highlights the importance of accurately presenting earthquake hazards to predict building performance effectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis 13100, Türkiye
Çan Vocational School, Çanakkale 18 Mart University, Çanakkale 17400, Türkiye
Department of Architecture, Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis 13100, Türkiye
References (92)
Show source-provided references
1. Goda, K., Kiyota, T., Pokhrel, R.M., Chiaro, G., Katagiri, T., Sharma, K., and Wilkinson, S. (2015). The 2015 Gorkha Nepal earthquake: Insights from earthquake damage survey. Front. Built Environ., 1.10.3389/fbuil.2015.00008 ↗
2. Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: Non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.016 ↗
3. Building damage in Dujiangyan during the Wenchuan earthquake10.1007/s11803-008-0870-3 ↗
4. Steel structures damage from the Christchurch earthquake series of 2010 and 2011
5. Damage assessment of churches after L’Aquila earthquake (2009)10.1007/s10518-011-9307-x ↗
6. Damage from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami—A quick report10.1007/s11027-011-9297-7 ↗
7. Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning10.1177/8755293019878137 ↗
8. Earthquake-induced damage assessment and partial failure mechanisms of an Italian Medieval castle10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.008 ↗
9. Damage classification of residential buildings in historical downtown after the ML5. 5 earthquake in Zagreb, Croatia in 2020
10. Ademović, N., Toholj, M., Radonić, D., Casarin, F., Komesar, S., and Ugarković, K. (2022). Post-earthquake assessment and strengthening of a cultural-heritage residential masonry building after the 2020 Zagreb earthquake. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12112024 ↗
11. A macro-modelling continuum approach with embedded discontinuities for the assessment of masonry arch bridges under earthquake loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114722 ↗
12. The earthquake environmental effects (EEEs) of the 6th February 2018, Hualien earthquake (Mw = 6.4): A contribution to the seismic hazard estimation in the epicentral area10.1016/j.quaint.2022.10.009 ↗
13. Archeoseismic study of damage in medieval monuments around New Delhi, India: An approach to understandingpaleoseismicity in an Intraplate Region10.3390/geohazards5010007 ↗
14. Damage by the 1855 Edo earthquake and response to the disaster—Study based on Edo Ohjishin no Zu (Picture Scroll of the 1855 Edo Earthquake)10.20965/jdr.2024.p0038 ↗
15. Rapid report of seismic damage to buildings in the 2022 M 6.8 Luding earthquake, China10.1016/j.eqrea.2022.100180 ↗
16. Conditions of structural irregularity. Relationships with observed earthquake damage in Mexico City in 201710.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106630 ↗
17. Damage assessment of buildings after 24 January 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake
18. 24 January 2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) earthquake damages and determination of earthquake parameters in the region
19. Structural damages observed in buildings after the January 24, 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake in Türkiye
20. Işık, E. (2023). Structural failures of adobe buildings during the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquakes. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13158937 ↗
21. Avcil, F. (2023). Investigation of Precast Reinforced Concrete Structures during the 6 February 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152014846 ↗
22. Structural damage assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Adıyaman after Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) Earthquakes on 6 February 202310.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107799 ↗
23. Structural damage observed in reinforced concrete buildings in Adiyaman during the 2023 Turkiye Kahramanmaras Earthquakes10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105578 ↗
24. Işık, E., Avcil, F., İzol, R., Büyüksaraç, A., Bilgin, H., Harirchian, E., and Arkan, E. (2024). Field reconnaissance and earthquake vulnerability of the rc buildings in Adıyaman during 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14072860 ↗
25. Yuzbasi, J. (2024). Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment: Field Observations And Recent developments with recommendations from the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Türkiye on February 6th, 2023 (Pazarcık M7.8 and Elbistan M7.6). J. Earthq. Eng., 1–26.10.1080/13632469.2024.2353864 ↗
26. Performance of hydraulic structures during 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, earthquake sequence10.1177/87552930241258295 ↗
27. Evaluation of soil liquefaction in the city of Hatay triggered after the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye earthquake sequence10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107648 ↗
28. Code-based damage assessment of existing precast industrial buildings following the February 6th, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Pazarcık Mw 7.7 and Elbistan Mw7.6)10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108811 ↗
29. Damage assessment of structural and geotechnical damages in Kahramanmaraş during the February 6, 2023 earthquakes
30. Performance of RC buildings after Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: Lessons toward performance based design10.1007/s11803-023-2206-8 ↗
31. Destructive impact of successive high magnitude earthquakes occurred in Türkiye’s Kahramanmaraş on February 6, 202310.1007/s10518-024-01865-5 ↗
32. Effect on RC buildings of 6 February 2023 Turkey earthquake doublets and new doctrines for seismic design10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107521 ↗
33. 06 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş depremlerinde (Mw 7.7–Mw 7.6) meydana gelen gerçek can kayıpları ve yapısal hasar değerlerinin tahmin edilen değerler ile karşılaştırılması
34. Assessment of seismic parameters for 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes
35. Impact of soil conditions and seismic codes on collapsed structures during the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: An in-depth study of 400 reinforced concrete buildings10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109119 ↗
36. Field observations and damage evaluation in reinforced concrete buildings after the February 6th, 2023, Kahramanmaraş–Türkiye Earthquakes10.1142/S1793431123500240 ↗
37. Seismic performance assessment of a base-isolated hospital building subjected to February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye earthquakes (Mw 7.7 Pazarcık and Mw 7.6 Elbistan) and seismic fragility analysis considering different construction stages10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108876 ↗
38. Design deficiencies, failure modes and recommendations for strengthening in reinforced concrete structures exposed to the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6)
39. Akar, F., Işık, E., Avcil, F., Büyüksaraç, A., Arkan, E., and İzol, R. (2024). Geotechnical and structural damages caused by the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes in Gölbaşı (Adıyaman). Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14052165 ↗
40. Liquefaction effects in the city of Gölbaşı: From the analysis of predisposing factors to damage survey10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107633 ↗
41. Tapia-Hernández, E., Geneş, M.C., and Gülkan, P. (2024). Damage assessment and seismic response of steel buildings during the Kahramanmaraş, Turkey earthquakes of February 6, 2023. Earthq. Spectra.10.1177/87552930241297937 ↗
42. Tapia-Hernández, E., Geneş, M.C., and Guerrero-Bobadilla, H. (2024). Structural behavior of hospitals during the Kahramanmaraş earthquake of February 6, 2023. Earthq. Spectra, 87552930241298678.10.1177/87552930241298678 ↗
43. Effect of infill walls on the seismic performance of a severely damaged substandard RC building during the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109117 ↗
44. Işık, E., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Avcil, F., Büyüksaraç, A., Arkan, E., Alkan, H., and Harirchian, E. (2024). Comparison of seismic and structural parameters of settlements in the East Anatolian Fault Zone in light of the 6 February Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. Infrastructures, 9.10.3390/infrastructures9120219 ↗
45. Evaluation of the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings in the light of lessons learned from the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye earthquake sequences
46. Mertol, H.C., Tunç, G., Akış, T., Kantekin, Y., and Aydın, İ.C. (2023). Investigation of RC buildings after 6 February 2023, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye earthquakes. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13071789 ↗
47. Damage observations of RC buildings from 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence and discussion on the seismic code regulations10.1007/s10518-023-01843-3 ↗
48. Ozdemir, A. (2024). Examining the effect of structural characteristics of Antakya building stock on the damage level after the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. J. Earthq. Eng., 1–30.10.1080/13632469.2024.2390088 ↗
49. Reconnaissance report on damage caused by the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes in reinforced-concrete structures10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109200 ↗
50. Characterisation of acrylic copolymer treated concretes and concretes of reinforced concrete buildings collapsed in the 6 February 2023 Mw = 7.8 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquake10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108249 ↗
51. Ulutaş, H. (2024). Investigation of the causes of soft-storey and weak-storey formations in low-and mid-rise rc buildings in Türkiye. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14051308 ↗
52. Rapid damage assessment effectiveness for the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Türkiye earthquake sequence10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104691 ↗
53. Image classification on post-earthquake damage assessment: A case of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake
54. Gencturk, B., Sezen, H., Mieler, M., Griffith, M., Gudhka, P., and Garai, R. (2025). Vulnerability assessment of buildings in the aftermath of 2023 Turkiye earthquake sequence. Earthq. Spectra, 87552930241307884.10.1177/87552930241307884 ↗
55. Determination of local site-specific spectra using probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bitlis Province, Turkey10.15446/esrj.v19n2.50101 ↗
56. Binaların yapısal performansının statik itme analizi ile belirlenmesi
57. Betonarme bir yapının performansa dayalı tasarımı: Deplasmana dayalı sismik yaklasım ve yerdeğistirme katsayıları yöntemi-performance–based desıgn of a reınforced concrete structure: Dısplacement–based seısmıc approach and dısplacement coeffıcıents
58. Fundamentals of performance-based building design10.1007/s12273-008-8527-8 ↗
59. A response spectrumbased nonlinear assessment tool for practice: Incremental response spectrum analysis (IRSA)
60. Doran, B., Akbaş, B., Sayım, İ., Fahjan, Y., and Alacalı, S.N. (2011, January 11–14). Uzun periyotlu bir yapıda yapısal sağlık izlemesi ve deprem performansının belirlenmesi. Proceedings of the Turkey Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Ankara, Türkiye.
61. The need for upgrading the seismic performance objectives10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.401 ↗
62. Yakın fay yer hareketlerinin yön etkisi
63. Güneş, N. (2009). Yakın Fay yer Hareketleri ve Performansa Dayalı Tasarıma Uyarlanmaları. [Ph.D. Thesis, Fırat Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü].
64. A comparative analysis of seismic and structural parameters for historical period earthquakes in Türkiye
65. Comparative investigation of seismic and structural parameters of earthquakes (M ≥ 6) after 1900 in Turkey10.1007/s12517-022-10255-7 ↗
66. Maidi, M., and Shufrin, I. (2024). Evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings for seismic retrofit through external stiffening: Limit displacement method. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14092781 ↗
67. A comparative study on the seismic provisions of different codes for RC buildings
68. Effects of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction in URM infills on the seismic performance of RC buildings designed to Eurocodes10.1080/13632469.2020.1733137 ↗
69. Performance based seismic design of reinforced concrete building
70. Active fault database of Turkey10.1007/s10518-016-0041-2 ↗
71. Coulomb stress change before and after 24.01. 2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) earthquake (Mw = 6.8) on the East Anatolian Fault Zone10.1007/s12517-021-09080-1 ↗
72. A catalogue of earthquakes for Turkey and surrounding area (11AD to 1964AD)
73. World Earthquake Belts10.1038/scientificamerican0428-306 ↗
74. Sieberg, A. (1932). Untersuchungen über Erdbeben und Bruchschollenbau im Östlichen Mittelmeergebiet, Gustav Fischer.
75. Some characteristic features of the Anatolian fault zone10.1016/0040-1951(70)90014-4 ↗
76. Soysal, H., Sipahioğlu, S., Kolçak, D., and Altınok, Y. (1981). Historical Earthquake Catalogue of Turkey and Surrounding Area (2100 BC–1900 AD), The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. Technical Report, TÜBİTAK, No. TBAG-341.
77. Time-dependent model for earthquake occurrence and effects of design spectra onstructural performance: A case study from the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey10.3906/yer-2004-20 ↗
78. AFAD-TADAS (2024, June 15). Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency Department of Earthquake Turkish Accelerometric Database and Analysis System, Available online: https://tadas.afad.gov.tr/.
79. (2024, October 15). AFAD, Available online: https://tdth.afad.gov.tr.
80. TBEC (2018). Turkish Building Earthquake Code, T.C. Resmi Gazete.
81. Development of a large shaking table test for sand liquefaction analysis
82. Effect of the loading frequency on the sand liquefaction behaviour in cyclic triaxial tests10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106779 ↗
83. Soil liquefaction manifestations at Hatay Airport after the February 2023 Türkiye earthquake sequence10.1177/87552930241285024 ↗
84. Seismosoft (2024, February 10). SeismoStruct 2024—A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures. Available online: http://www.seismosoft.com.
85. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings10.1002/eqe.144 ↗
86. Antoniou, S., and Pinho, R. (2022). Seismostruct–Seismic Analysis Program by Seismosoft, Seismosoft. Technical Manual and User Manual.
87. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8 ↗
88. Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.051 ↗
89. Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of RC buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021 ↗
90. Işık, M.F., Avcil, F., Harirchian, E., Bülbül, M.A., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Işık, E., İzol, R., and Radu, D. (2023). A Hybrid Artificial Neural Network—Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Model for the Determination of Target Displacements in Mid-Rise Regular Reinforced-Concrete Buildings. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15129715 ↗
91. (2005). Eurocode-8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-3).
92. Pinto, P.E., and Franchin, P. (2011, January 10–11). Eurocode 8-Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Proceedings of the Eurocode 8 Background and Applications, Dissemination of Information for Training, Lisbon, Portugal.