Evaluating the Potential for Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) in Lithuania: A Review of Geological Viability and Storage Integrity
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study is to review and identify H2 storage suitability in geological reservoirs of the Republic of Lithuania. Notably, Lithuania can store clean H2 effectively and competitively because of its wealth of resources and well-established infrastructure. The storage viability in Lithuanian geological contexts is highlighted in this study. In addition, when it comes to injectivity and storage capacity, salt caverns and saline aquifers present less of a challenge than other kinds of storage medium. Lithuania possesses sizable subterranean reservoirs (Cambrian rocks) that can be utilized to store H2. For preliminary assessment, the cyclic H2 injection, and production simulation is performed. A 10-year simulation of hydrogen injection and recovery in the Syderiai saline aquifer demonstrated the feasibility of UHS, though efficiency was reduced by nearly 50% when using a single well for both injection and production. The study suggests using separate wells to improve efficiency. However, to guarantee economic injectivity and containment security, a detailed assessment of the geological structures is required specifically at the pore scale level. The volumetric approach estimated a combined storage capacity of approximately 898.5 Gg H2 (~11 TWh) for the Syderiai and Vaskai saline aquifers, significantly exceeding previous estimates. The findings underscore the importance of detailed geological data and further research on hydrogen-specific factors to optimize UHS in Lithuania. Addressing technical, geological, and environmental challenges through multidisciplinary research is essential for advancing UHS implementation and supporting Lithuania’s transition to a sustainable energy system. UHS makes it possible to maximize the use of clean energy, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and build a more sustainable and resilient energy system. Hence, intensive research and advancements are needed to optimize H2 energy for broader applications in Lithuania.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mathematical Modeling, Kaunas University of Technology, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania
Funding
Lithuanian Research Council
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Economic, Societal, and Environmental Impacts of Available Energy Sources: A Review10.3390/eng5030067 ↗
2. Decarbonizing energy: Evaluating fossil fuel displacement by renewables in OECD countries10.1007/s11356-024-33324-8 ↗
3. IEA (2021). World Total Final Consumption by Source, 1971–2019, IEA. Available online: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/world-total-final-consumption-by-source-1971-2019.
4. Wang, J., and Azam, W. (2024). Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries. Geosci. Front., 15.10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101757 ↗
5. Singh, M.K., Malek, J., Sharma, H.K., and Kumar, R. (2024). Converting the threats of fossil fuel-based energy generation into opportunities for renewable energy development in India. Renew. Energy, 224.10.1016/j.renene.2024.120153 ↗
6. Perone, G. (2024). The relationship between renewable energy production and CO2 emissions in 27 OECD countries: A panel cointegration and Granger non-causality approach. J. Clean. Prod., 434.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139655 ↗
7. Impact of renewable and non-renewable energy resources on CO2 emission: Empirical evidence from SAARC10.32479/ijeep.15049 ↗
8. State of the Climate in 202110.1175/BAMS_1039_684-692_SoCExecSummary ↗
9. Energy systems in scenarios at net-zero CO2 emissions10.1038/s41467-021-26356-y ↗
10. Achieving 1.5 C and net-zero emissions target: The role of renewable energy and financial development10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.056 ↗
11. Maghami, M.R., Pasupuleti, J., and Ekanayake, J. (2024). Energy storage and demand response as hybrid mitigation technique for photovoltaic grid connection: Challenges and future trends. J. Energy Storage, 88.10.1016/j.est.2024.111680 ↗
12. Energy storage for mitigating the variability of renewable electricity sources: An updated review10.1016/j.esd.2010.09.007 ↗
13. Present status of pumped hydro storage operations to mitigate renewable energy fluctuations in Japan10.1016/j.gloei.2019.11.017 ↗
14. Liu, B., Lund, J.R., Liao, S., Jin, X., Liu, L., and Cheng, C. (2020). Optimal power peak shaving using hydropower to complement wind and solar power uncertainty. Energy Conv. Manag., 209.10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112628 ↗
15. Impact of climate changes on the stability of solar energy: Evidence from observations and reanalysis10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.114 ↗
16. Underground Hydrogen Storage: A Comprehensive Review10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.138 ↗
17. Hashemi, L., Blunt, M., and Hajibeygi, H. (2021). Pore-scale modeling and sensitivity analyses of hydrogen-brine multiphase flow in geological porous media. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-87490-7 ↗
18. WG, P.K., and Ranjith, P.G. (2023). An overview of underground hydrogen storage with prospects and challenges for the Australian context. Geoenergy Sci. Eng., 231.10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212354 ↗
19. Alms, K., Ahrens, B., Graf, M., and Nehler, M. (2023). Linking geological and infrastructural requirements for large-scale underground hydrogen storage in Germany. Front. Energy Res., 11.10.3389/fenrg.2023.1172003 ↗
20. Shahriar, M.F., Khanal, A., Khan, M.I., and Pandey, R. (2024). Current status of underground hydrogen storage: Perspective from storage loss, infrastructure, economic aspects, and hydrogen economy targets. J. Energy Storage, 97.10.1016/j.est.2024.112773 ↗
21. Luo, X., Tveit, S., Gholami, R., and Andersen, P.Ø. (2024). Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) in natural storage sites: A perspective of subsurface characterization and monitoring. Fuel, 364.10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131038 ↗
22. Malki, M.L., Chen, B., Mao, S., Chen, F., and Mehana, M. (2024). OPERATE–H2: A tool for optimizing underground hydrogen storage. J. Energy Storage, 90.10.1016/j.est.2024.111715 ↗
23. Hydrogen Storage Performance During Underground Hydrogen Storage in Depleted Gas Reservoirs: A Review10.1016/j.eng.2024.03.011 ↗
24. A review of analogue case studies relevant to large-scale underground hydrogen storage10.1016/j.egyr.2024.02.002 ↗
25. Raza, A., Mahmoud, M., Arif, M., and Alafnan, S. (2024). Underground hydrogen storage prospects in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Fuel, 357.10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129665 ↗
26. Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051 ↗
27. Gholami, R. (2023). Hydrogen storage in geological porous media: Solubility, mineral trapping, H2S generation, and salt precipitation. J. Energy Storage, 59.10.1016/j.est.2022.106576 ↗
28. Sekar, L.K., Kiran, R., Okoroafor, E.R., and Wood, D.A. (2023). Review of reservoir challenges associated with subsurface hydrogen storage and recovery in depleted oil and gas reservoirs. J. Energy Storage, 72.10.1016/j.est.2023.108605 ↗
29. Perera, M.S.A. (2023). A review of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: Insights into various rock-fluid interaction mechanisms and their impact on the process integrity. Fuel, 334.10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126677 ↗
30. Zeng, L., Sarmadivaleh, M., Saeedi, A., Chen, Y., Zhong, Z., and Xie, Q. (2023). Storage integrity during underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs. Earth Sci. Rev., 247.10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104625 ↗
31. Compositional reservoir simulation of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.355 ↗
32. Underground hydrogen storage: Integrated surface facilities and fluid flow modeling for depleted gas reservoirs10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.335 ↗
33. Assessment of hydrogen storage potential in depleted gas fields and power-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency: A northern California case study10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.239 ↗
34. Muhammed, N.S., Haq, M.B., Al Shehri, D.A., Al-Ahmed, A., Rahman, M.M., Zaman, E., and Iglauer, S. (2023). Hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: A comprehensive review. Fuel, 337.10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127032 ↗
35. Zamehrian, M., and Sedaee, B. (2022). Underground hydrogen storage in a partially depleted gas condensate reservoir: Influence of cushion gas. J. Pet. Eng., 212.10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110304 ↗
36. Jadhawar, P., and Saeed, M. (2023). Optimizing the operational efficiency of the underground hydrogen storage scheme in a deep North Sea aquifer through compositional simulations. J. Energy Storage, 73.10.1016/j.est.2023.108832 ↗
37. Liu, K., Zhu, W., and Pan, B. (2024). Feasibility of hydrogen storage in depleted shale gas reservoir: A numerical investigation. Fuel, 357.10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129703 ↗
38. Review on using the depleted gas reservoirs for the underground H2 storage: A case study in Niigata prefecture, Japan10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.108 ↗
39. Comprehensive study of the underground hydrogen storage potential in the depleted offshore Tapti-gas field10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.172 ↗
40. Ranaee, E., Inzoli, F., and Guadagnini, A. (2023, January 5–8). Role of Methanogenesis and Sulfate Reduction in Lifetime Performance of Hydrogen Storage in Depleted Gas Reservoirs. Proceedings of the 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Vienna, Austria.10.3997/2214-4609.2023101478 ↗
41. Understanding the carbon dioxide sequestration in low-permeability saline aquifers in the Ordos Basin with numerical simulations10.1002/ghg.1499 ↗
42. Akindipe, D., Saraji, S., and Piri, M. (2021). Salt precipitation during geological sequestration of supercritical CO2 in saline aquifers: A pore-scale experimental investigation. Adv. Water Resour., 155.10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104011 ↗
43. Ali, F., Negash, B.M., Ridha, S., and Abdulelah, H. (2023). A review on the interfacial properties of caprock/CO2/brine system-implications for the structural integrity of deep saline aquifers during geological carbon storage. Earth Sci. Rev., 247.10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104600 ↗
44. Izadpanahi, A., Blunt, M.J., Kumar, N., Ali, M., Tassinari, C.C.G., and Sampaio, M.A. (2024). A review of carbon storage in saline aquifers: Mechanisms, prerequisites, and key considerations. Fuel, 369.10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131744 ↗
45. A Review on Worldwide Underground Hydrogen Storage Operating and Potential Fields10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.126 ↗
46. Miocic, J., Heinemann, N., Edlmann, K., Scafidi, J., Molaei, F., and Alcalde, J. (2023). Underground Hydrogen Storage: A Review, Geological Society London Special Publication.10.1144/SP528-2022-88 ↗
47. Storage of Hydrogen, Natural Gas, and Carbon Dioxide- Geological and Legal Conditions10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.131 ↗
48. Pan, B., Liu, K., Ren, B., Zhang, M., Ju, Y., Gu, J., and Iglauer, S. (2023). Impacts of relative permeability hysteresis, wettability, and injection/withdrawal schemes on underground hydrogen storage in saline aquifers. Fuel, 333.10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126516 ↗
49. Hydrogen-brine mixture PVT data for reservoir simulation of hydrogen storage in deep saline aquifers10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.222 ↗
50. Underground hydrogen storage to balance seasonal variations in energy demand: Impact of well configuration on storage performance in deep saline aquifers10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.363 ↗
51. Sun, Q., Tang, H., Ruan, H., Tang, X., and Zhang, M. (2023). The use of a gravity-assisted-storage-extraction protocol for hydrogen storage in saline aquifers. J. Clean. Prod., 413.10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137408 ↗
52. A compilation of losses related to hydrogen storage in porous media: Implications for hydrogen recovery and productivity from saline aquifers10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.365 ↗
53. Pore-scale modeling on hydrogen transport in porous media: Implications for hydrogen storage in saline aquifers10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.299 ↗
54. Integrating capacity and efficiency for optimal hydrogen storage site selection in saline aquifers10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04852 ↗
55. Tarkowski, R., Lankof, L., Lubon, K., and Michalski, J. (2024). Hydrogen Storage Capacity of Salt Caverns and Deep Aquifers Versus Demand for Hydrogen Storage: A Case Study of Poland. Appl. Energy, 355.10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122268 ↗
56. Potential of Salt Caverns for Hydrogen Storage in Southern Ontario, Canada10.3390/mining3030024 ↗
57. Wu, F., Gao, R., Li, C., and Liu, J. (2023). A comprehensive evaluation of wind-PV-salt cavern-hydrogen energy storage and utilization system: A case study in Qianjiang salt cavern, China. Energy Conv. Manag., 277.10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116633 ↗
58. Minougou, J.D., Gholami, R., and Andersen, P. (2023). Underground hydrogen storage in caverns: Challenges of impure salt structures. Earth Sci. Rev., 247.10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104599 ↗
59. Zhu, S., Shi, X., Yang, C., Bai, W., Wei, X., Yang, K., and Wang, G. (2024). Site selection evaluation for salt cavern hydrogen storage in China. Renew. Energy, 224.10.1016/j.renene.2024.120143 ↗
60. Multiscale experimental and numerical study on hydrogen diffusivity in salt rocks and interlayers of salt cavern hydrogen storage10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.418 ↗
61. Peng, T., Wan, J., Liu, W., Li, J., Xia, Y., Yuan, G., and Liu, H. (2023). Choice of hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns and horizontal cavern construction technology. J. Energy Storage, 60.10.1016/j.est.2022.106489 ↗
62. The role of salt tectonics in the energy transition: An overview and future challenges10.55575/tektonika2023.1.1.11 ↗
63. Daniels, K.A., Harrington, J.F., Wiseall, A.C., Shoemark-Banks, E., Hough, E., Wallis, H.C., and Paling, S.M. (2023). Battery Earth: Using the subsurface at Boulby underground laboratory to investigate energy storage technologies. Front. Phys., 11.10.3389/fphy.2023.1249458 ↗
64. Habibi, R., Zare, S., Asgari, A., Singh, M., and Mahmoodpour, S. (2023). Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical processes in salt formations for storage applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 188.10.1016/j.rser.2023.113812 ↗
65. Bai, W., Shi, X., Yang, C., Zhu, S., Wei, X., Li, Y., and Liu, X. (2024). Assessment of the potential of salt mines for renewable energy peaking in China. Energy, 300.10.1016/j.energy.2024.131577 ↗
66. Salt domes in Poland–potential sites for hydrogen storage in caverns10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.212 ↗
67. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 ↗
68. Technical potential of salt caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.161 ↗
69. Preliminary investigation on the geological potential for underground hydrogen storage (UHS) in saline formations in Italy
70. Uliasz-Misiak, B., Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska, J., Matuła, R., and Tarkowski, R. (2022). Prospects for the Implementation of Underground Hydrogen Storage in the EU. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15249535 ↗
71. Hülsen, C., Anton, D., Geerdink, D., Renzand, M., and Taylor, C. (2024, July 01). Potential for a Baltic Hydrogen Offshore Backbone. Available online: https://www.dnv.com/news/dnv-study-indicates-high-potential-of-hydrogen-in-the-northern-baltic-sea-region/.
72. Harff, J., Björck, S., and Hoth, P. (2011). The baltic sea basin: Introduction. The Baltic Sea Basin, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-17220-5 ↗
73. Evaluating the competitiveness and uncertainty of offshore wind-to-hydrogen production: A case study of Poland10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.015 ↗
74. A comprehensive overview of the Europen and Baltic landscape for hydrogen applications and innovations
75. Uliasz-Misiak, B., and Misiak, J. (2024). Underground Gas Storage in Saline Aquifers: Geological Aspects. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17071666 ↗
76. Derakhshani, R., Lankof, L., GhasemiNejad, A., and Zaresefat, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence-driven assessment of salt caverns for underground hydrogen storage in Poland. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-64020-9 ↗
77. Derakhshani, R., Lankof, L., GhasemiNejad, A., Zarasvandi, A., Amani Zarin, M.M., and Zaresefat, M. (2024). A Novel Sustainable Approach for Site Selection of Underground Hydrogen Storage in Poland Using Deep Learning. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17153677 ↗
78. Luboń, K., Tarkowski, R., and Uliasz-Misiak, B. (2024). Impact of Depth on Underground Hydrogen Storage Operations in Deep Aquifers. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17061268 ↗
79. The ranking of geological structures in deep aquifers of the Polish Lowlands for underground hydrogen storage10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.106 ↗
80. Łysień, D. (2024, August 03). Gas Transmission Operators and Renewable Energy Developers to Launch the Baltic Sea Hydrogen Collector (BHC) Project 2022. Available online: https://balticwind.eu/gas-transmission-operators-and-leading-renewable-energy-developers-to-launch-the-baltic-sea-hydrogen-collector-bhc-project/.
81. CLIC (2024, September 01). Hydrogen Valley Project Starting between Finland and Estonia. Available online: https://clicinnovation.fi/hydrogen-valley-project-starting/.
82. Amber Grid (2024, August 15). Six Partners have Signed a Cooperation Agreement to Develop Nordic-Baltic Hydrogen Corridor. Available online: https://www.ambergrid.lt/en/for-media/news/six-partners-have-signed-a-cooperation-agreement-to-develop-nordic-baltic-hydrogen-corridor/697.
83. Lithuanian renewable energy landscape: CCUS, hydrogen and geothermal
84. Lithuania’s geo-energy landscape: A brief overview of CCUS, hydrogen, and geothermal10.21595/accus.2023.23903 ↗
85. Pal, M., Malik, S., Karaliūtė, V., Makauskas, P., and Sharma, R. (2023, January 5–8). Assessing the Feasibility of Carbon Capture and Storage Potential in Lithuanian Geological Formations: A Simulation-based Assessment. Proceedings of the 84th Annual Conference & Exhibition, Vienna, Austria.10.3997/2214-4609.202310502 ↗
86. Malik, S., Makauskas, P., Karaliūtė, V., Pal, M., and Sharma, R. (2024). Assessing the geological storage potential of CO2 in Baltic Basin: A case study of Lithuanian hydrocarbon and deep saline reservoirs. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 133.10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104097 ↗
87. Makauskas, P., Kaminskaite-Baranauskiene, I., Rashid Abdul Nabi Memon, A., and Pal, M. (2024). Assessing Geothermal Energy Production Potential of Cambrian Geothermal Complexes in Lithuania. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17051054 ↗
88. Prospects for CO2 geological storage in deep saline aquifers of Lithuania and adjacent territories
89. Kanopienė, R., Šliaupa, S., Lazauskienė, J., Mažeika, J., Maselienė, V., Baliukevičius, A., and Giedraitis, R. (2005). Investigations of Possibilities to Dispose of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Lithuania: A Model Case, Geological Survey of Lithuania.
90. Exploring CO2 storage potential in Lithuanian deep saline aquifers using digital rock volumes: A machine learning guided approach10.21595/bcf.2023.23615 ↗
91. Malik, S., and Pal, M. (2023). Role of Digital Rock Physics in Successful Implementation of Sub-Surface Carbon Storage, IOGP. [2nd ed.].
92. Malik, S., Makauskas, P., Karaliūtė, V., Sharma, R., and Pal, M. (2023, January 19–21). Assessing Long-Term Fate of Geological CO2 Storage in Lithuania: A Machine Learning Approach for Pore-Scale Processes and Reservoir Characterization, Extended Abstract. Proceedings of the 12th Trondheim Conference on CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage (TCCS), Trondheim, Norway.
93. Malik, S., Makauskas, P., Sharma, R., and Pal, M. (2024). Evaluating Petrophysical Properties Using Digital Rock Physics Analysis: A CO2 Storage Feasibility Study of Lithuanian Reservoirs. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142310826 ↗
94. A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004 ↗
95. Assessment of hydrogen storage capacity in porous media at the European scale10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.158 ↗
96. Shogenova, A., Sliaupa, S., and Shogenov, K. (2022, January 6–9). Underground Hydrogen Storage in the Baltic Countries: Future Outlook for Lithuania. Proceedings of the 83rd European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers (EAGE), Madrid, Spain.10.3997/2214-4609.202210707 ↗
97. Alms, K., Berndsen, M., Groeneweg, A., Graf, M., Nehler, M., and Ahrens, B. (2023). Underground Hydrogen Storage in the Bunter Sandstone Formation in the North German Basin: Capacity Assessment and Geochemical Modeling. Energy Technol.10.1002/ente.202300847 ↗
98. Hydrogen storage: Materials, methods, and perspectives10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.011 ↗
99. Potential risk of H2S generation and release in salt cavern gas storage10.1016/j.jngse.2017.09.007 ↗
100. Electrochemical hydrogen compression and purification versus competing technologies: Part I. Pros and cons10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63404-2 ↗