An Improved Pied Kingfisher Optimizer for Maritime UAV Path Planning
Source abstract
Abstract
Maritime activities have become increasingly frequent with the deepening of economic globalization, highlighting the burgeoning significance of maritime rescue. However, in practical applications, UAVs for maritime rescue face numerous challenges, such as limited endurance and inadequate autonomous planning capabilities. To optimize flight routes and circumvent adverse sea conditions, an improved Pied Kingfisher Optimizer (IPKO) that incorporates refraction reverse learning, variable spiral search, and Cauchy mutation strategies was proposed. Comparative experiments conducted on CEC2005 and CEC2022 datasets with seven traditional algorithms demonstrate that the proposed algorithm exhibits superior precision and convergence speed. Subsequently, a path planning objective function was constructed based on trajectory cost and threat cost to simulate a 3D space for UAV maritime rescue missions, and the IPKO algorithm was applied to address the UAV path planning problem. The results showed that the total cost incurred by the IPKO algorithm decreased by 5.77% compared to the PKO algorithm and by 51.19% compared to the SCA algorithm. Finally, through UAV flight tests validating its practical applicability, it is ascertained that IPKO can enhance rescue efficiency in complex maritime rescue environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability · Maritime Navigation and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology & Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
Funding
Equipment Development Department of the Central Military Commission · Ningbo Municipal People’s Government
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Li, W., Wu, M., and Niu, Z. (2024). Spatialization and Analysis of China’s GDP Based on NPP/VIIRS Data from 2013 to 2023. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14198599 ↗
2. Vukić, L., Vidov, J., and Karin, I. (2024). Method in Selecting Vehicles for Interventions and Surveillance of Navigation Safety at Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12060979 ↗
3. Collaborative Multi-Robot Search and Rescue: Planning, Coordination, Perception, and Active Vision10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030190 ↗
4. (2024, April 20). Guidance on Accelerating the Development of Emergency Robots, Available online: https://www.mem.gov.cn/gk/zfxxgkpt/fdzdgknr/202401/t20240104_474181.shtml.
5. (2024, April 24). National Emergency Management System Plan During the 14th Five-Year Plan Period, Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-07/01/content_5698783.htm.
6. A survey of maritime unmanned search system: Theory, applications and future directions10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115359 ↗
7. A review of urban air mobility-enabled Intelligent Transportation Systems: Mechanisms, applications and challenges10.1016/j.sysarc.2023.102902 ↗
8. A Comprehensive Survey of Security Schemes and Privacy-Preserving Techniques for the Internet of Underwater Things
9. Fragkos, G. (2022). Autonomous Decision-Making in Interdependent Computing Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence. [Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of New Mexico].
10. Warren, C.W. (1989, January 14–19). Global path planning using artificial potential fields. Proceedings of the 1989 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
11. Ju, C., Luo, Q., and Yan, X. (2020, January 23–25). Path planning using an improved a-star algorithm. Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on Prognostics and System Health Management (PHM-2020 Jinan), Jinan, China.10.1109/PHM-Jinan48558.2020.00012 ↗
12. An adaptive rapidly-exploring random tree10.1109/JAS.2021.1004252 ↗
13. Artificial intelligence in smart logistics cyber-physical systems: State-of-the-arts and potential applications10.1109/TICPS.2023.3283230 ↗
14. Decision-making strategy on highway for autonomous vehicles using deep reinforcement learning10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022755 ↗
15. A review on representative swarm intelligence algorithms for solving optimization problems: Applications and trends10.1109/JAS.2021.1004129 ↗
16. Sun, W., Tang, M., Zhang, L., Huo, Z., and Shu, L.J. (2020). A survey of using swarm intelligence algorithms in IoT. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20051420 ↗
17. A multi-mechanism balanced advanced learning sparrow search algorithm for UAV path planning10.1007/s10586-024-04290-0 ↗
18. A novel reinforcement learning based grey wolf optimizer algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) path planning10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106099 ↗
19. A hybrid algorithm based on grey wolf optimizer and differential evolution for UAV path planning10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119327 ↗
20. SaCHBA_PDN: Modified honey badger algorithm with multi-strategy for UAV path planning10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119941 ↗
21. Adaptive multi-UAV path planning method based on improved gray wolf algorithm10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108377 ↗
22. Pied kingfisher optimizer: A new bio-inspired algorithm for solving numerical optimization and industrial engineering problems
23. Wang, H., Li, C., Liu, Y., and Zeng, S. (2007, January 1–5). A hybrid particle swarm algorithm with Cauchy mutation. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/SIS.2007.367959 ↗
24. Dynamic opposite learning enhanced teaching–learning-based optimization10.1016/j.knosys.2019.104966 ↗
25. SCA: A sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022 ↗
26. Papadimitriou, C.H. (2003). Computational complexity. Encyclopedia of Computer Science, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
27. Snake Optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108320 ↗
28. The whale optimization algorithm10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 ↗
29. Dingo optimizer: A nature-inspired metaheuristic approach for engineering problems10.1155/2021/2571863 ↗
30. Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2005 special session on real-parameter optimization