journal article·2024-09-17Open access

Numerical Study on the Lateral Load Response of Offshore Monopile Foundations in Clay: Effect of Slenderness Ratio

Ali Khezri, Hongbae Park, Daeyong Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 18

Abstract

To meet growing energy demands, offshore wind turbines (OWTs) with higher energy outputs are being developed, presenting increased challenges for their foundation design. Over the past decade, extensive research on the design optimization of OWT support structures has significantly reduced the anticipated costs of offshore wind farm development. Various design methods have been developed and applied in practice, each with its own advantages and limitations. In this study, 3D finite element (FE) modeling, validated against the measured response of a large-scale test monopile, is used to investigate the lateral load response of monopiles with different geometries and slenderness ratios in smaall and large displacements. The results are compared to the standard p–y method, and specific behavioral and design aspects of large-diameter monopiles, such as the moment contribution ratio from different resisting components and the minimum embedment length criteria, are evaluated and discussed. The results showed that the maximum and minimum differences between the 3D FE modeling and one-dimensional (1D) DNV p–y method are 41% and 11% for large displacements, and 32.5% and 13.3% for small displacements, respectively. As the slenderness ratio increases, the discrepancy between the finite element (FE) modeling results and the 1D DNV p–y method decreases, with an average difference of about 13% across all monopile diameters at an L/D ratio of 10, in both small and large displacements, indicating the reasonable accuracy of the 1D method for slenderness ratios of 10 and above. Among the three minimum embedment length criteria examined, the DNV recommended and vertical-tangent criteria offered shorter embedment lengths. The primary resisting moment across all slenderness ratios comes from the distributed lateral load along the monopile shaft (MCRp−y), which increases as the L/D ratio increases.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Energy Innovation Research Center for Wind Turbine Support Structures, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Gunsan-si 54150, Republic of Korea

Department of Wind Energy, The Graduate School of Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Gunsan-si 54150, Republic of Korea

Funding

Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) · Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Optimum Geometry of Monopiles with Respect to the Geotechnical Design
2. Cyclic Lateral Loading of Monopiles for Offshore Wind Turbines10.1201/b18442-97 ↗
3. Islam, M.A., Park, H., and Lee, D. (2024). Structural Behavior of a PIP Slip Joint under Pure Bending Considering Nonlinear Buckling. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17010035 ↗
4. Alsharedah, Y.A., Newson, T., El Naggar, M.H., and Black, J.A. (2023). Lateral Ultimate Capacity of Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines: Effects of Monopile Geometry and Soil Stiffness Properties. Appl. Sci., 13.10.20944/preprints202308.1860.v1 ↗
5. Panagoulias, S., Hosseini, S., and Brinkgreve, R.B.J. (2018, January 11–14). An Innovative Design Methodology for Offshore Wind Monopile Foundations. Proceedings of the 26th European Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference, Graz, Austria.
6. (2010). RP 2A-WSD, American Petroleum Institute (API). Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms.
7. (2016). Support Structure for Wind Turbines (Standard No. DNVGL-ST-0126).
8. PISA Design Model for Monopiles for Offshore Wind Turbines: Application to a Stiff Glacial Clay Till10.1680/jgeot.18.P.255 ↗
9. Laterally Loaded Monopile Design for Offshore Wind Farms
10. Byrne, B.W., McAdam, R.A., Burd, H.J., Houlsby, G.T., Martin, C.M., Beuckelaers, W.J.A.P., Zdravković, L., Taborda, D.M.G., Potts, D.M., and Jardine, R.J. (2017, January 12–14). PISA: New Design Methods for Offshore Wind Turbine Monopiles. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics, Smarter Solutions for Offshore Developments, London, UK.
11. Matlock, H. (1970, January 22–24). Correlations for Design of Laterally Loaded Piles in Soft Clay. Proceedings of the 2nd Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.10.4043/1204-MS ↗
12. Effects of Embedding Depth and Load Eccentricity on Lateral Response of Offshore Monopiles in Dense Sand: A Centrifuge Study10.1680/jgeot.21.00200 ↗
13. Puech, A., and Garnier, J. (2017). Design of Piles under Cyclic Loading: SOLCYP Recommendations, ISTE—Wiley.10.1002/9781119469018 ↗
14. Static Response of Monopile to Lateral Load in Overconsolidated Dense Sand10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001698 ↗
15. Jardine, R.J., Buckley, R.M., Byrne, B., Kontoe, S., Macadam, R., and Vinck, K. (2019, January 1–6). The ALPACA Research Project to Improve Driven Pile Design in Chalk. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Reykjavik, Iceland. Paper No. 0071.
16. Centrifugal Testing of Laterally Loaded Piles in Sand10.1139/t92-024 ↗
17. Li, Z., Haigh, S.K., and Bolton, M.D. (July, January 28). Centrifuge Modelling of Monopile under Cyclic Lateral Loads. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Zurich, Switzerland.
18. Effect of Load Eccentricity and Stress Level on Monopile Support for Offshore Wind Turbines10.1139/cgj-2013-0475 ↗
19. Bayton, S.M., and Black, J.A. (2016, January 1–3). The Effect of Soil Density on Offshore Wind Turbine Monopile Foundation Performance. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Nantes, France.
20. Experimental Development of the p-y Relationship for Large-Diameter Offshore Monopiles in Sands: Centrifuge Tests10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001373 ↗
21. Centrifuge Modelling of Monopiles Subjected to Lateral Loading
22. Empirical Approach Based on Centrifuge Testing for Cyclic Deformations of Laterally Loaded Piles in Sand10.1680/jgeot.17.P.203 ↗
23. Centrifuge Modelling on Monotonic and Cyclic Lateral Behaviour of Monopiles in Kaolin Clay10.1680/jgeot.19.P.402 ↗
24. Hearn, E.N., and Edgers, L. (2010). Finite Element Analysis of an Offshore Wind Turbine Monopile. GeoFlorida, Advances in Analysis, Modeling & Design (GPS 199), ASCE.10.1061/41095(365)188 ↗
25. Ahmed, S.S., Hawlader, B., and Roy, K. (June, January 31). Finite Element Modeling of Large Diameter Monopiles in Dense Sand for Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations. Proceedings of the ASME 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, St. John’s, NL, Canada.
26. 3D FEM Approach for Laterally Loaded Monopile Design10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.03.013 ↗
27. Finite-Element Modelling of Laterally Loaded Piles in a Stiff Glacial Clay Till at Cowden10.1680/jgeot.18.PISA.006 ↗
28. Finite-Element Modelling of Laterally Loaded Piles in a Dense Marine Sand at Dunkirk10.1680/jgeot.18.PISA.006 ↗
29. Elastoplastic Solutions for Single Piles under Combined Vertical and Lateral Loads10.1007/s11771-011-0682-x ↗
30. Generalized Solutions for Axially and Laterally Loaded Piles in Multilayered Soil Deposits with Transfer Matrix Method10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000800 ↗
31. PISA Design Model for Monopiles for Offshore Wind Turbines: Application to a Marine Sand10.1680/jgeot.18.P.277 ↗
32. Byrne, B.W., McAdam, R.A., Burd, H.J., Houlsby, G.T., Martin, C.M., Zdravković, L., Taborda, D.M.G., Potts, D.M., Jardine, R.J., and Sideri, M. (2015, January 10–12). New Design Methods for Large Diameter Piles under Lateral Loading for Offshore Wind Applications. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG 2015), Oslo, Norway.10.1201/b18442-96 ↗
33. Bittner, R.B., and Ellman, A. (2013). Diameter Effects on P-y Curves. Deep Marine Foundations: A Perspective on the Design and Construction of Deep Marine Foundations, Deep Foundations Institute.
34. Soil Reaction Curves for Monopiles in Clay10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.12.009 ↗
35. The Advanced P-y Method for Analyzing the Behaviour of Large-Diameter Monopiles Supporting Offshore Wind Turbines10.1051/e3sconf/202020512008 ↗
36. Lateral Loading of Deep Foundations in Stiff Clay10.1061/AJGEB6.0000177 ↗
37. Andresen, L., and Jostad, H.P. (2020). Application of an Anisotropic Hardening Model for Undrained Response of Saturated Clay. Numerical Models in Geomechanics, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003078548-100 ↗
38. NGI-ADP: Anisotropic Shear Strength Model for Clay10.1002/nag.1016 ↗
39. Minga, E., and Burd, H.J. (2019). Validation of PLAXIS MoDeTo Based on the Cowden Till PISA Field Tests, Oxford University.
40. Panagoulias, S., Brinkgreve, R.B.J., and Zampich, L. (2018). PLAXIS MoDeTo Manual 2018, Plaxis bv.
41. Monotonic Laterally Loaded Pile Testing in a Stiff Glacial Clay Till at Cowden10.1680/jgeot.18.PISA.003 ↗
42. Ground Characterization for PISA Pile Testing and Analysis10.1680/jgeot.18.PISA.001 ↗
43. (2021). DNV-RP-C212, DNV AS. Recommended Practice: Offshore Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
44. Reese, L.C., Cox, W.R., and Koop, F.D. (1975, January 5–8). Field Testing and Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Stiff Clay. Proceedings of the VII Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.10.4043/2312-MS ↗
45. Reese, L.C., and Van Impe, W.F. (2011). Single Piles and Pile Groups under Lateral Loading, Taylor & Francis Group. [2nd ed.].10.1201/b17499 ↗
46. Reese, L.C., Isenhower, W.M., and Wang, S.T. (2024). LPILE V2022 Technical Manual, Ensoft.
47. Brinkgreve, R., Lisi, D., Lahoz, M., and Panagoulias, S. (2020). Validation and Application of a New Software Tool Implementing the PISA Design Methodology. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8060457 ↗
48. Germanischer Lloyd (GL) (2005). Guideline for the Certification of Offshore Wind Turbines, GL.
49. Faber, T., and Klose, M. (June, January 28). Experiences with Certification of Offshore Wind Farms. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Cupertino, CA, USA.
50. Kuo, Y.-S. (2008). On the Behavior of Large-Diameter Piles under Cyclic Lateral Load. [Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering, Leibniz University].