journal article·2021-09

Estimation of Local Strain Fields in Two-Phase Elastic Composite Materials Using UNet-Based Deep Learning

Mayank Raj, Sanket Thakre, Ratna Kumar Annabattula, Anand K Kanjarla

Publisher page

Abstract

The knowledge of the distribution of local micromechanical fields is crucial in the design of composite materials. Traditionally full-field methods (such as finite element methods) and fast Fourier transformation-based methods are used to obtain the local fields. However, full-field simulations are computationally expensive and time-consuming. Recently, there has been a push toward using the big-data-driven machine learning approaches to estimate the local fields and establish the structure–property linkages. In this work, we use one of the deep learning-based algorithms known as the UNet to predict the local strain fields in a two-phase composite material subjected to uniaxial tensile load. The model is trained and tested on 1200 two-phase microstructures comprising two-volume fraction categories and six different morphological classes. An R2 score of 94% is achieved on the test dataset. A detailed statistical analysis is performed to understand the role of the volume fraction and the ratio of elastic moduli of the phases in the deep learning model’s trainability. The insights drawn in this work are then discussed in the context of generating artificial datasets and training a robust predictive deep learning model for localization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Brough DB, Kannan A, Haaland B, Bucknall DG, Kalidindi SR (2017) Extraction of process-structure evolution linkages from X-ray scattering measurements using dimensionality reduction and time series analysis. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6(2):147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0093-410.1007/s40192-017-0093-4 ↗
2. Fernandez-Zelaia P, Melkote SN (2019) Process-structure-property modeling for severe plastic deformation processes using orientation imaging microscopy and data-driven techniques. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-019-00125-810.1007/s40192-019-00125-8 ↗
3. Kalidindi SR (2015) Hierarchical materials informatics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston
4. Thakre S, Harshit V, Kanjarla AK (2021) Intrinsic dimensionality of microstructure data. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00200-z10.1007/s40192-021-00200-z ↗
5. Fullwood DT, Niezgoda SR, Adams BL, Kalidindi SR (2010) Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Prog Mater Sci 55(6):47710.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.08.002 ↗
6. Liu R, Kumar A, Chen Z, Agrawal A, Sundararaghavan V, Choudhary A (2015) A predictive machine learning approach for microstructure optimization and materials design. Sci Rep 5(1):11551. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1155110.1038/srep11551 ↗
7. Paul A, Acar P, Liao WK, Choudhary A, Sundararaghavan V, Agrawal A (2019) Microstructure with constrained design objectives using machine learning-based feedback-aware data-generation. Comput Mater Sci 160:334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.01510.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.015 ↗
8. Jung J, Yoon JI, Park HK, Jo H, Kim HS (2020) Microstructure design using machine learning generated low dimensional and continuous design space. Materialia 11:100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2020.10069010.1016/j.mtla.2020.100690 ↗
9. Bessa M, Pellegrino S (2018) Design of ultra-thin shell structures in the stochastic post-buckling range using, Bayesian machine learning and optimization. Int J Solids Struct 139–140:174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.03510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.035 ↗
10. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):18210.1109/4235.996017 ↗
11. Liu R, Yabansu YC, Agrawal A, Kalidindi SR, Choudhary AN (2015) Machine learning approaches for elastic localization linkages in high-contrast composite materials. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 4(1):192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-015-0042-z10.1186/s40192-015-0042-z ↗
12. Kapoor K, Noraas R, Seetharaman V, Sangid MD (2019) Modeling strain localization in microtextured regions in a titanium alloy: Ti–6Al–4V. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8(4):455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-019-00159-y10.1007/s40192-019-00159-y ↗
13. Moulinec H, Suquet P (1998) A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 157(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00218-110.1016/S0045-7825(97)00218-1 ↗
14. Kitahara AR, Holm EA (2018) Integr microstructure cluster analysis with transfer learning and unsupervised learning. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 7(3):148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-018-0116-910.1007/s40192-018-0116-9 ↗
15. Bessa M, Bostanabad R, Liu Z, Hu A, Apley DW, Brinson C, Chen W, Liu WK (2017) A framework for data-driven analysis of materials under uncertainty: countering the curse of dimensionality. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 320:633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.03.03710.1016/j.cma.2017.03.037 ↗
16. Fernandez-Zelaia P, Yabansu YC, Kalidindi SR (2019) A comparative study of the efficacy of local/global and parametric/nonparametric machine learning methods for establishing structure-property linkages in high-contrast 3D Elastic composites. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 8(2):67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-019-00129-410.1007/s40192-019-00129-4 ↗
17. Brough DB, Wheeler D, Kalidindi SR (2017) Materials knowledge systems in python—a data science framework for accelerated development of hierarchical materials. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0089-010.1007/s40192-017-0089-0 ↗
18. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA, Pal CJ (2017) Chapter 10–deep learning, 4th edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804291-5.00010-610.1016/B978-0-12-804291-5.00010-6 ↗
19. Dimiduk DM, Holm EA, Niezgoda SR (2018) Perspectives on the impact of machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence on materials, processes, and structures engineering. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 7(3):157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-018-0117-810.1007/s40192-018-0117-8 ↗
20. Wang H, Raj B (2017) On the origin of deep learning. arXiv 1702.07800
21. Ma B, Ban X, Huang H, Chen Y, Liu W, Zhi Y (2018) Deep learning-based image segmentation for Al-La alloy microscopic images. Symmetry 10(4):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym1004010710.3390/sym10040107 ↗
22. Silvoster ML, Govindan VK (2012) Enhanced CNN based electron microscopy image segmentation. Cybern Inf Technol 12(2):84. https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2012-001410.2478/cait-2012-0014 ↗
23. Li X, Yang Z, Brinson LC, Choudhary A, Agrawal A, Chen W (2018) In: A deep adversarial learning methodology for designing microstructural material systems, international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, vol. 2B: 44th design automation conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-85633.V02BT03A00810.1115/DETC2018-85633.V02BT03A008 ↗
24. Cecen A, Dai H, Yabansu YC, Kalidindi SR, Song L (2018) Material structure-property linkages using three-dimensional convolutional neural networks. Acta Mater 146:76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.05310.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.053 ↗
25. Yang Z, Yabansu YC, Jha D, Liao WK, Choudhary AN, Kalidindi SRA, Agrawal A (2019) Establishing structure-property localization linkages for elastic deformation of three-dimensional high contrast composites using deep learning approaches. Acta Mater 166:335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.04510.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.045 ↗
26. Yang C, Kim Y, Ryu S, Gu GX (2020) Prediction of composite microstructure stress-strain curves using convolutional neural networks. Mater Des 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10850910.1016/j.matdes.2020.108509 ↗
27. Frankel A, Tachida K, Jones R (2020) Prediction of the evolution of the stress field of polycrystals undergoing elastic-plastic deformation with a hybrid neural network model. Mach Learn Sci Technol 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ab929910.1088/2632-2153/ab9299 ↗
28. Nie Z, Jiang H, Kara LB, J, (2019) Stress field prediction in cantilevered structures using convolutional neural networks. Comput Inf Sci Eng 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044097.01100210.1115/1.4044097.011002 ↗
29. Sun Y, Hanhan I, Sangid MD, Lin G (2020) Predicting mechanical properties from microstructure images in fiber-reinforced polymers using convolutional neural networks. arXiv 2010.03675
30. Pandey A, Pokharel R (2021) Machine learning based surrogate modeling approach for mapping crystal deformation in three dimensions. Scr Mater 193:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.10.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.10.028 ↗
31. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells WM, Frangi AF (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015. Springer, Cham, pp 234–24110.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
32. Ward CH, Warren JA, Hanisch RJ (2014) Making materials science and engineering data more valuable research products. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3(1):292. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-014-0022-810.1186/s40192-014-0022-8 ↗
33. Rumble JR (2017) Accessing materials data: challenges and directions in the digital era. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6(2):172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0095-210.1007/s40192-017-0095-2 ↗
34. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, Killeen T, Lin Z, Gimelshein N, Antiga L, Desmaison A, Köpf A, Yang E, DeVito Z, Raison M, Tejani A, Chilamkurthy S, Steiner B, Fang L, Bai J, Chintala S (2019) Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. arXiv 1912.01703
35. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 770–778. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
36. Bottou L, Bousquet O (2007) The tradeoffs of large scale learning. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on neural information processing systems, NIPS’07. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, pp 161–168
37. Sra S, Nowozin S, Wright S (2012) Optimization for machine learning. Neural information processing series. MIT Press, Cambridge
38. Duchi J, Hazan E, Singer Y (2011) Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. J Mach Learn Res 12:2121–2159
39. Zeiler MD (212) Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method. arXiv 1212.5701
40. Kingma DP, Adam JB (2017) A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv 1412.6980
41. Niezgoda SR, Kanjarla AK, Kalidindi SR (2013) Novel microstructure quantification framework for databasing, visualization, and analysis of microstructure data. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 2(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9772-2-310.1186/2193-9772-2-3 ↗
42. Hyman JD, Winter CL (2014) Stochastic generation of explicit pore structures by thresholding Gaussian random fields. J Comput Phys 277:16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.04610.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.046 ↗
43. Smith M (2009) ABAQUS/standard user’s manual, version 6.9. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, USA
44. Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P (1998) Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE 86(11):227810.1109/5.726791 ↗
45. Shimodaira H (2000) Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. J Stat Plan Inference 90(2):227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00115-410.1016/S0378-3758(00)00115-4 ↗
46. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift (2015). arXiv 1502.03167
47. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088):533. https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a010.1038/323533a0 ↗