Rapid Tooling for Microinjection Moulding of Proof-of-Concept Microfluidic Device: Resin Insert Capability and Preliminary Validation
Source abstract
Abstract
Producing sustainable microfluidic devices on a large scale has become a trend in the biomedical field. However, the transition from laboratory prototyping to large-scale industrial production poses several challenges due to the gap between academia and industry. In this context, prototyping with a mass production approach could be the novel strategy necessary to bridge academic research to the market. Here, the performance of polymer inserts to produce PMMA microfluidic devices using the microinjection moulding process is presented. Inserts were fabricated with an additive manufacturing process: material jetting technology. The importance of the inserts’ orientation on the printing plate in order to produce samples with more uniform thickness and lower roughness has been demonstrated using a flat cavity insert. In addition, preliminary tests were carried out on microstructured inserts with inverted channels of various cross-section shapes (semi-circular or trapezoidal) and widths (200 or 300 µm) in order to investigate the microstructures’ resistance during the moulding cycles. The best geometry was found in the channel with the trapezoidal cross-section with a width equal to 300 µm. Finally, a preliminary microfluidic test was performed to demonstrate the devices’ workability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CNR STIIMA—Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, 70124 Bari, Italy
Department of Innovation Engineer, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
Advanced Prototyping Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
CNR NANOTEC—Institute of Nanotechnology, 73100 Lecce, Italy
Funding
Ministry of University
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Mastrangeli, M., Millet, S., Partners, T.O., and van den Eijnden-van Raaij, J. (2019). Organ-on-Chip in Development:Towards a Roadmap for Organs-on-Chip. Preprints, 2019030031.10.20944/preprints201903.0031.v1 ↗
2. Lab-on-chip technology: A review on design trends and future scope in biomedical applications10.14257/ijbsbt.2016.8.5.28 ↗
3. Azizipour, N., Avazpour, R., Rosenzweig, D.H., Sawan, M., and Ajji, A. (2020). Evolution of biochip technology: A review from lab-on-a-chip to organ-on-a-chip. Micromachines, 11.10.3390/mi11060599 ↗
4. 3D printing in pharmaceutics: A new tool for designing customized drug delivery systems10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071 ↗
5. Structural analysis of full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein from an advanced vaccine candidate10.1126/science.abe1502 ↗
6. Hypocalcemia: A key biomarker in hospitalized COVID-19 patients10.1016/j.bj.2022.08.005 ↗
7. A lab-on-a-chip for the concurrent electrochemical detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in saliva and plasma10.1038/s41551-022-00919-w ↗
8. Fernandes, R.S., de Oliveira Silva, J., Gomes, K.B., Azevedo, R.B., Townsend, D.M., de Paula Sabino, A., and de Barros, A.L.B. (2022). Recent advances in point of care testing for COVID-19 detection. Biomed. Pharmacother., 153.10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113538 ↗
9. Azzouz, A., Hejji, L., Kim, K.H., Kukkar, D., Souhail, B., Bhardwaj, N., Brown, R.J., and Zhang, W. (2022). Advances in surface plasmon resonance–based biosensor technologies for cancer biomarker detection. Biosens. Bioelectron., 197.10.1016/j.bios.2021.113767 ↗
10. A novel plasmonic optical-fiber-based point-of-care test for periodontal MIP-1α detection10.1016/j.isci.2023.108539 ↗
11. Pandey, C.M., Augustine, S., Kumar, S., Kumar, S., Nara, S., Srivastava, S., and Malhotra, B.D. (2018). Microfluidics based point-of-care diagnostics. Biotechnol. J., 13.10.1002/biot.201700047 ↗
12. Cong, H., and Zhang, N. (2022). Perspectives in translating microfluidic devices from laboratory prototyping into scale-up production. Biomicrofluidics, 16.10.1063/5.0079045 ↗
13. Commercialization of microfluidic devices10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.04.010 ↗
14. Ramadan, Q., and Zourob, M. (2020). Organ-on-a-chip engineering: Toward bridging the gap between lab and industry. Biomicrofluidics, 14.10.1063/5.0011583 ↗
15. Temporal Trends of Aortic Custom Medical Device Use in Canada10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.047 ↗
16. Plasmon resonance biosensor for interleukin-1β point-of-care determination: A tool for early periodontitis diagnosis10.1016/j.isci.2023.108741 ↗
17. Pyrosequencing evaluation of low-frequency KRAS mutant alleles for EGF receptor therapy selection in metastatic colorectal carcinoma10.2217/fon.13.233 ↗
18. The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research10.1038/nature13118 ↗
19. Cost-effective rapid prototyping and assembly of poly (methyl methacrylate) microfluidic devices10.1038/s41598-018-25202-4 ↗
20. 3D printing: An emerging tool for novel microfluidics and lab-on-a-chip applications10.1007/s10404-016-1715-4 ↗
21. 3D printed metal molds for hot embossing plastic microfluidic devices10.1039/C6LC01430E ↗
22. 3D Micropatterned All-Flexible Microfluidic Platform for Microwave-Assisted Flow Organic Synthesis10.1002/cplu.201700440 ↗
23. Towards nano-injection moulding10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70092-5 ↗
24. Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip systems based on polymers—Fabrication and application10.1016/j.cej.2004.01.016 ↗
25. Dempsey, D., McDonald, S., Masato, D., and Barry, C. (2020). Characterization of stereolithography printed soft tooling for micro injection moulding. Micromachines, 11.10.3390/mi11090819 ↗
26. Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks
27. Tsao, C.-W. (2016). Polymer Microfluidics: Simple, Low-Cost Fabrication Process Bridging Academic Lab Research to Commercialized Production. Micromachines, 7.10.3390/mi7120225 ↗
28. Polymer Microfabrication Methods for Microfluidic Analytical Applications10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000101)21:1<12::AID-ELPS12>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
29. Lucyshyn, T., Des Enffans d’Avernas, L.V., and Holzer, C. (2021). Influence of the mold material on the injection moulding cycle time and warpage depending on the polymer processed. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13183196 ↗
30. Rapid tooling: Investigation of soft-tooled micro-injection moulding process characteristics using in-line measurements and surface metrology10.1108/RPJ-06-2022-0187 ↗
31. Manufacturing microstructured tool inserts for the production of polymeric microfluidic devices10.1088/0960-1317/25/9/095005 ↗
32. Vieten, T., Stahl, D., Schilling, P., Civelek, F., and Zimmermann, A. (2021). Feasibility study of soft tooling inserts for injection moulding with integrated automated slides. Micromachines, 12.10.3390/mi12070730 ↗
33. X-ray computed tomography for predictive quality assessment, 3D visualisation of micro-injection mouldings and soft-tool deformation10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111741 ↗
34. Personalised organs-on-chips: Functional testing for precision medicine10.1039/C8LC00827B ↗
35. Prototype tooling for producing small series of polymer microparts10.1177/2041297510393799 ↗
36. Thermal behaviour of resin inserts for micro injection moulding: A FEM analysis10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.334 ↗
37. High resolution thermoplastic rapid manufacturing using injection moulding with SU-8 based silicon tools10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.04.001 ↗
38. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomedical sensing devices10.1002/adfm.202107671 ↗
39. 3D-printed biosensors in biomedical applications exploiting plasmonic phenomena and antibody self-assembled monolayers10.1364/BOE.516565 ↗
40. Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs10.1039/C4LC00030G ↗
41. Organ printing: From bioprinter to organ biofabrication line10.1016/j.copbio.2011.02.006 ↗
42. Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034 ↗
43. Weinert, A., Tormey, D., O’Hara, C., and McAfee, M. (2023). Condition Monitoring of Additively Manufactured Injection Mould Tooling: A Review of Demands, Opportunities and Potential Strategies. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23042313 ↗
44. Scott, S.M., and Ali, Z. (2021). Fabrication methods for microfluidic devices: An overview. Micromachines, 12.10.3390/mi12030319 ↗
45. Bagalkot, A., Pons, D., Symons, D., and Clucas, D. (2021). Analysis of raised feature failures on 3D printed injection moulds. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13101541 ↗
46. In-situ monitoring of deformation in rapid prototyped injection molds
47. Development of 3D printed rapid tooling for micro-injection moulding10.1016/j.ces.2021.116498 ↗
48. An experimental study to investigate the micro-stereolithography tools for micro injection moulding10.1108/RPJ-10-2015-0152 ↗
49. Udroiu, R., Braga, I., and Nedelcu, A. (2019). Evaluating the quality surface performance of additive manufacturing systems: Methodology and a material jetting case study. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12060995 ↗
50. Micro injection moulding process with high-temperature resistance resin insert produced with material jetting technology: Effect of part orientation
51. (2023, October 21). VisiJet M2S-HT250 (MJP). Available online: https://www.3dsystems.com/materials/visijet-m2s-ht250.
52. Study of rheological behaviour of polymer melt in micro injection moulding with a miniaturized parallel plate rheometer10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107068 ↗
53. Micro-injection moulding of polymer microfluidic devices, Microfluid10.1007/s10404-009-0421-x ↗