Mobile Robot for Security Applications in Remotely Operated Advanced Reactors
Source abstract
Abstract
This review paper addresses the escalating operation and maintenance costs of nuclear power plants, primarily attributed to rising labor costs and intensified competition from renewable energy sources. The paper proposes a paradigm shift towards a technology-centric approach, leveraging mobile and automated robots for physical security, aiming to replace labor-intensive methods. Focusing on the human–robot interaction principle, the review conducts a state-of-the-art analysis of dog robots’ potential in infrastructure security and remote inspection within human–robot shared environments. Additionally, this paper surveys research on the capabilities of mobile robots, exploring their applications in various industries, including disaster response, exploration, surveillance, and environmental conservation. This study emphasizes the crucial role of autonomous mobility and manipulation in robots for diverse tasks, and discusses the formalization of problems, performance assessment criteria, and operational capabilities. It provides a comprehensive comparison of three prominent robotic platforms (SPOT, Ghost Robotics, and ANYmal Robotics) across various parameters, shedding light on their suitability for different applications. This review culminates in a research roadmap, delineating experiments and parameters for assessing dog robots’ performance in safeguarding nuclear power plants, offering a structured approach for future research endeavors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems · Space Satellite Systems and Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Research Division, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA
Funding
Center for Advanced Energy Studies
References (88)
Show source-provided references
1. Yadav, V., and Biersdorf, J. (2019). Utilizing FLEX Equipment for Operations and Maintenance Cost Reduction in Nuclear Power Plants.10.2172/1476447 ↗
2. (2024, March 02). Gallery—World Nuclear Association. Available online: https://world-nuclear.org/gallery/nuclear-power-economics-and-project-structuring-re/breakdown-of-operating-costs-for-nuclear,-coal-and.aspx.
3. Garcia, M.L. (2005). Vulnerability Assessment of Physical Protection Systems, Elsevier.
4. (2012). Robots and Robotic Devices—Vocabulary (Standard No. ISO 8373:2012).
5. Kurfess, T.R. (2005). Robotics and Automation Handbook, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420039733 ↗
6. Challenges and future trends in marine robotics10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.10.002 ↗
7. Future trends in marine robotics [tc spotlight]10.1109/MRA.2014.2385561 ↗
8. A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.03.002 ↗
9. Achievements in space robotics10.1109/MRA.2009.934818 ↗
10. Sensor-based space robotics-ROTEX and its telerobotic features10.1109/70.258056 ↗
11. Robotics for medical applications10.1109/100.540149 ↗
12. A review of robotics in surgery10.1243/0954411001535309 ↗
13. Taylor, R.H., Menciassi, A., Fichtinger, G., Fiorini, P., and Dario, P. (2016). Handbook of Robotics, Springer.
14. Fu, K.S., Gonzalez, R.C., Lee, C.G., and Freeman, H. (1987). Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision, and Intelligence, McGraw-Hill.
15. Robots for nuclear power plants
16. Iqbal, J., Tahir, A.M., and ul Islam, R. (2012, January 11–13). Robotics for nuclear power plants—Challenges and future perspectives. Proceedings of the 2012 2nd International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry (CARPI), Zurich, Switzerland.10.1109/CARPI.2012.6473373 ↗
17. Flexible gait transition for six wheel-legged robot with unstructured terrains10.1016/j.robot.2021.103989 ↗
18. Towards hybrid gait obstacle avoidance for a six wheel-legged robot with payload transportation10.1007/s10846-021-01417-y ↗
19. Flexible motion framework of the six wheel-legged robot: Experimental results10.1109/TMECH.2021.3100879 ↗
20. Haynes, G.C., and Rizzi, A.A. (2006, January 15–19). Gaits and gait transitions for legged robots. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA 2006, Orlando, FL, USA.
21. Wermelinger, M., Fankhauser, P., Diethelm, R., Krüsi, P., Siegwart, R., and Hutter, M. (2016, January 9–14). Navigation planning for legged robots in challenging terrain. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.10.1109/IROS.2016.7759199 ↗
22. Moeller, R., Deemyad, T., and Sebastian, A. (2020, January 2–3). Autonomous navigation of an agricultural robot using RTK GPS and Pixhawk. Proceedings of the 2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC), Orem, UT, USA.10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249176 ↗
23. Deemyad, T., Moeller, R., and Sebastian, A. (2020, January 2–3). Chassis design and analysis of an autonomous ground vehicle (AGV) using genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the 2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC), Orem, UT, USA.10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249180 ↗
24. Moderator, A. (2024, March 12). Security and Nuclear Power Plants: Robust and Significant, U.S. NRC Blog, Available online: https://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/2013/08/23/security-and-nuclear-power-plants-robust-and-significant/.
25. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2024, March 12). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 73, Section 45. Performance Capabilities for Fixed Site Physical Protection Systems, Available online: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part073/part073-0045.html.
26. Siegwart, R., Nourbakhsh, I.R., and Scaramuzza, D. (2011). Introduction to Autonomous Mobile Robots, The MIT Press. [2nd ed.].
27. Bellbot—A hotel assistant system using mobile robots10.5772/54954 ↗
28. Emergency response to the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants using mobile rescue robots10.1002/rob.21439 ↗
29. A review of mobile robots: Concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications10.1177/1729881419839596 ↗
30. A systematic review of current and emergent manipulator control approaches10.1007/s11465-015-0335-0 ↗
31. Zomerdijk, M.J.J., and van der Wijk, V. (2022). Structural Design and Experiments of a Dynamically Balanced Inverted Four-Bar Linkage as Manipulator Arm for High Acceleration Applications. Actuators, 11.10.3390/act11050131 ↗
32. Pick and place robotic arm: A review paper
33. Yudha, H.M., Dewi, T., Risma, P., and Oktarina, Y. (2018, January 16–18). Arm robot manipulator design and control for trajectory tracking; a review. Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI), Malang, Indonesia.10.1109/EECSI.2018.8752950 ↗
34. Review of Wheeled Mobile Robots’ Navigation Problems and Application Prospects in Agriculture10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2868848 ↗
35. Bae, B., and Lee, D.H. (2023). Design of a Four-Wheel Steering Mobile Robot Platform and Adaptive Steering Control for Manual Operation. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12163511 ↗
36. Mittal, S., and Rai, J.K. (2016, January 4–6). Wadoro: An autonomous mobile robot for surveillance. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 1st International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems (ICPEICES), Delhi, India.10.1109/ICPEICES.2016.7853652 ↗
37. Wheeled Mobile Robots: A review10.1109/TLA.2012.6418124 ↗
38. Nicosia, S., Siciliano, B., Bicchi, A., and Valigi, P. (2001). Ramsete, Springer.10.1007/3-540-45000-9 ↗
39. Design of Dynamic Legged Robots10.1561/2300000044 ↗
40. Legged robots—An overview10.1177/0142331207075610 ↗
41. Roscia, F., Cumerlotti, A., Del Prete, A., Semini, C., and Focchi, M. (2023). Orientation control system: Enhancing aerial maneuvers for quadruped robots. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23031234 ↗
42. Development of quadruped walking robots: A review10.1016/j.asej.2020.11.005 ↗
43. Bruzzone, L., Nodehi, S.E., and Fanghella, P. (2022). Tracked locomotion systems for ground mobile robots: A review. Machines, 10.10.3390/machines10080648 ↗
44. Wang, C., Zhang, H., Ma, H., Wang, S., Xue, X., Tian, H., and Liu, P. (2023). Simulation and Validation of a Steering Control Strategy for Tracked Robots. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131911054 ↗
45. Dong, P., Wang, X., Xing, H., Liu, Y., and Zhang, M. (2016, January 18–20). Design and control of a tracked robot for search and rescue in nuclear power plant. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), Macau, China.10.1109/ICARM.2016.7606941 ↗
46. RICA: A tracked robot for sampling and radiological characterization in the nuclear field10.1002/rob.21650 ↗
47. Tadakuma, K., Tadakuma, R., Maruyama, A., Rohmer, E., Nagatani, K., Yoshida, K., Ming, A., Shimojo, M., Higashimori, M., and Kaneko, M. (2010, January 18–22). Mechanical design of the wheel-leg hybrid mobile robot to realize a large wheel diameter. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/IROS.2010.5651912 ↗
48. Vargas, G.A., Gómez, D.J., Mur, O., and Castillo, R.A. (2016, January 29–30). Simulation of a wheelleg hybrid robot in Webots. Proceedings of the IEEE Colombian Conference on Robotics and Automation (CCRA), Bogota, Colombia.10.1109/CCRA.2016.7811403 ↗
49. Yokota, S., Kawabata, K., Blazevic, P., and Kobayashi, H. (2006, January 25–28). Control law for rough terrain robot with leg-type crawler. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Luoyang, China.10.1109/ICMA.2006.257570 ↗
50. Kim, J., Kim, Y.G., Kwak, J.H., Hong, D.H., and An, J. (, January 18–21). An wheel &track hybrid robot platform for optimal navigation in an urban environment. Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference 2010, Taipei, Taiwan.
51. Multi-modal locomotion robotic platform using leg-track-wheel articulations10.1007/s10514-005-0722-1 ↗
52. Ordoñez-Avila, J.L., Moreno, H.A., Perdomo, M.E., and Calderón, I.G.C. (2023). Designing Legged Wheels for Stair Climbing. Symmetry, 15.10.3390/sym15112071 ↗
53. Arjomandi, M., Agostino, S., Mammone, M., Nelson, M., and Zhou, T. (2006). Classification of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, University of Adelaide. Report for Mechanical Engineering Class.
54. Recent advances in unmanned aerial vehicles: A review10.1007/s13369-022-06738-0 ↗
55. Fitrikananda, B.P., Jenie, Y.I., Sasongko, R.A., and Muhammad, H. (2023). Risk Assessment Method for UAV’s Sense and Avoid System Based on Multi-Parameter Quantification and Monte Carlo Simulation. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10090781 ↗
56. Modelling and control of quadcopter. Independent research project in applied mathematics
57. Review on unmanned underwater robotics, structure designs, materials, sensors, actuators, and navigation control
58. Jorge, V.A., Granada, R., Maidana, R.G., Jurak, D.A., Heck, G., Negreiros, A.P., Dos Santos, D.H., Gonçalves, L.M., and Amory, A.M. (2019). A survey on unmanned surface vehicles for disaster robotics: Main challenges and directions. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19030702 ↗
59. Liu, G., Zhang, S., Ma, G., and Pan, Y. (2023). Path Planning of Unmanned Surface Vehicle Based on Improved Sparrow Search Algorithm. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.20944/preprints202309.0331.v1 ↗
60. Akib, A., Tasnim, F., Biswas, D., Hashem, M.B., Rahman, K., Bhattacharjee, A., and Fattah, S.A. (2019, January 17–20). Unmanned floating waste collecting robot. Proceedings of the TENCON 2019–2019 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON), Kochi, India.10.1109/TENCON.2019.8929537 ↗
61. Xu, X., Wang, C., Xie, H., Wang, C., and Yang, H. (2023). Dual-Loop Control of Cable-Driven Snake-like Robots. Robotics, 12.10.3390/robotics12050126 ↗
62. Medical micro/nanorobots in precision medicine10.1002/advs.202002203 ↗
63. Martinez-Sanchez, D.E., Sandoval-Castro, X.Y., Cruz-Santos, N., Castillo-Castaneda, E., Ruiz-Torres, M.F., and Laribi, M.A. (2023). Soft Robot for Inspection Tasks Inspired on Annelids to Obtain Peristaltic Locomotion. Machines, 11.10.3390/machines11080779 ↗
64. Robots in human environments: Basic autonomous capabilities10.1177/02783649922066501 ↗
65. Khatib, O., and Roth, B. (1991, January 3–5). New robot mechanisms for new robot capabilities. Proceedings of the IROS, Osaka, Japan.
66. Arbib, M.A. (2002). The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, MIT Press. [2nd ed.].10.7551/mitpress/3413.001.0001 ↗
67. Nebel, B., Dornhege, C., and Hertle, A. (2013, January 14–15). How much does a household robot need to know in order to tidy up. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Robotic Systems, Bellevue, DC, USA.
68. Ivaldi, S., Lyubova, N., Droniou, A., Gerardeaux-Viret, D., Filliat, D., Padois, V., Sigaud, O., and Oudeyer, P.Y. (2013, January 18–22). Learning to recognize objects through curiosity-driven manipulation with the iCub humanoid robot. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Third Joint International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL), Osaka, Japan.
69. Messina, E.R., and Jacoff, A.S. (2007, January 16–17). Measuring the performance of urban search and rescue robots. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, Woburn, MA, USA.10.1109/THS.2007.370015 ↗
70. Singh, R., Mozaffari, S., Akhshik, M., Ahamed, M.J., Rondeau-Gagné, S., and Alirezaee, S. (2023). Human–Robot Interaction Using Learning from Demonstrations and a Wearable Glove with Multiple Sensors. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23249780 ↗
71. On quantitative performance measures of robot behaviour10.1016/0921-8890(95)00017-A ↗
72. Madhavan, R., Lakaemper, R., and Kalmár-Nagy, T. (2009, January 22–26). Benchmarking and standardization of intelligent robotic systems. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Munich, Germany.
73. An options view of robot performance parameters in a dynamic environment10.1080/002075499191238 ↗
74. Lampe, A., and Chatila, R. (2006, January 15–19). Performance measure for the evaluation of mobile robot autonomy. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation ICRA 2006, Orlando, FL, USA.
75. Huang, H.M., Messina, E., Wade, R., English, R., Novak, B., and Albus, J. (2004, January 13–19). Autonomy measures for robots. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1115/IMECE2004-61812 ↗
76. Steinfeld, A., Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A., and Goodrich, M. (2006, January 2–3). Common metrics for human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1145/1121241.1121249 ↗
77. Schaefer, K.E. (2016). Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems, Springer.
78. Olsen, D.R., and Goodrich, M.A. (2003, January 16–18). Metrics for evaluating human-robot interactions. Proceedings of the PERMIS, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
79. Formalizing and guaranteeing human-robot interaction10.1145/3433637 ↗
80. Crandall, J.W., and Cummings, M.L. (2007, January 8–11). Developing performance metrics for the supervisory control of multiple robots. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Arlington, VA, USA.10.1145/1228716.1228722 ↗
81. Boston Dynamics (2022, October 26). Spot Specifications. Boston Dynamics Support Center. 26 October 2022. Available online: https://support.bostondynamics.com/s/article/Robot-specifications.
82. Ghost Robotics (2024, March 12). Vision 60: Ghost Robotics. Home. Available online: https://www.ghostrobotics.io/vision-60.
83. ANYbotics (2024, March 12). Anymal. ANYbotics. 1 September 2023. Available online: https://www.anybotics.com/robotics/anymal/#:~:text=ANYmal%20technical%20specifications%201%20360%C2%B0%20vision%20ANYmal%20navigates,ruggedized%20tablet%20for%20remote%20control%2C%20transportation%20box%20.
84. (2010). Safety of Machinery—General Principles for Design—Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction (Standard No. ISO 12100:2010).
85. (2016). Safety of Machinery—Electrical Equipment of Machines—Part 1: General Requirements (Standard No. IEC 60204-1:2016).
86. European Commission (2014). Directive 2014/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union, L 96, 79–107.
87. European Commission (2014). Directive 2014/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment and repealing Directive 1999/5/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union, L 153, 62–112.
88. European Commission (2011). Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union, L 174, 88–110.