journal article·2023-12-21Open access

Concrete with Organic Waste Materials as Aggregate Replacement

Nicolas Bertoldo, Tanvir Qureshi, Dylan Simpkins, Alessandro Arrigoni, Giovanni Dotelli

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

The disposal of high volumes of organic waste is a global issue. Using organic waste instead of sand as an aggregate material for concrete could reduce the strain on waste treatment processes and on the extraction of finite resources. At the same time, it could be a climate change mitigation strategy, by storing the biogenic carbon contained in the organic waste. This project investigated the viability of replacing 10% of fine aggregate in concrete with various organic waste materials, namely rice husk ash, wood ash, corncob granules, and wheat straw. The fresh concrete’s properties were studied using the slump test, and the hardened concrete’s mechanical properties were measured using the compressive strength and flexural strength tests. In this study, 14 days of curing were considered for the mechanical tests, although the 28-day mechanical strength is more generally accepted. The mechanical performances along with a life cycle assessment (LCA) comparison between the concrete with organic waste and traditional concrete were conducted. The results suggested that rice husk ash and wood ash are the most-suitable organic waste products for use as aggregate replacers considering the mechanical properties. The concrete samples incorporating wheat straw and corncob granules exhibited relatively low strength; unless advanced treatment methods are applied to enhance the concrete’s performance, the utilization of these organic wastes in concrete may be limited. The environmental impact assessment of traditional concrete shows that the main contributor to almost every impact category is the production of Portland cement. Sand production contributes only marginally to the overall impact of the concrete. In terms of life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, traditional concrete exhibits the lowest GWP impact per cubic meter when mechanical properties are included in the functional unit used for the comparison. Nevertheless, concrete samples with wood ash and rice husk ash partially offset their lower compressive strength with higher carbon sequestration, showing a similar GWP impact to traditional concrete. This makes them promising alternatives, especially for cases where limited compressive strengths are needed. Further investigations to improve their mechanical properties and optimize their performance are warranted.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy

Department of Engineering Design and Mathematics, The University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, 286 Plant Road, Chalk River, ON K0J 1J0, Canada

Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, 1755 LE Petten, The Netherlands

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Concrete’s carbon footprint
2. Greenhouse gas emissions in the construction industry: An analysis and evaluation of a concrete supply chain10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.225 ↗
3. Earth construction: Lessons from the past for future eco-efficient construction10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.054 ↗
4. Memon, S.A., Javed, U., Haris, M., Khushnood, R.A., and Kim, J. (2021). Incorporation of wheat straw ash as partial sand replacement for production of eco-friendly concrete. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14082078 ↗
5. Impacts of booming concrete production on water resources worldwide10.1038/s41893-017-0009-5 ↗
6. Volume based design approach for sustainable palm oil clinker as whole replacement for conventional sand in mortar10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101660 ↗
7. UNEP (2019). Sand and Sustainability: Finding New Solutions for Environmental Governance of Global Sand Resources, United Nations Environment Programme.
8. Time is running out for sand10.1038/d41586-019-02042-4 ↗
9. Mahadevan, P. (2019). Sand Mafias in India, The Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime.
10. A life-cycle approach to environmental, mechanical, and durability properties of “green” concrete mixes with rice husk ash10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.029 ↗
11. Fast-growing bio-based materials as an opportunity for storing carbon in exterior walls10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.006 ↗
12. Eco-concrete for sustainability: Utilizing aluminium dross and iron slag as partial replacement materials10.1007/s10098-017-1419-9 ↗
13. Why the world is running out of sand
14. Eco-friendly utilization of corncob ash as partial replacement of sand in concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.063 ↗
15. Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of fly ash–rice husk ash blended alkali-activated concrete10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113140 ↗
16. Utilization of wood ash in concrete manufacturing10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.07.004 ↗
17. Is the beneficial use of wood ash environmentally beneficial? A screening-level life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis10.1111/jiec.13019 ↗
18. Potential applications of rice husk ash waste from rice husk biomass power plant10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.051 ↗
19. Siddique, R., and Khan, M.I. (2011). Supplementary Cementing Materials, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-17866-5 ↗
20. Utilization of Rice Husk Ash
21. Performance of rice husk ash produced using a new technology as a mineral admixture in concrete10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00038-3 ↗
22. Bakker, R., Elbersen, W., Poppens, R., and Lesschen, J.P. (2013). Rice Straw and Wheat Straw-Potential Feedstocks for the Biobased Economy, NL Agency. Technical report.
23. Santolini, E., Bovo, M., Barbaresi, A., Torreggiani, D., and Tassinari, P. (2021). Turning agricultural wastes into biomaterials: Assessing the sustainability of scenarios of circular valorization of corncob in a life-cycle perspective. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11146281 ↗
24. Agricultural bio-waste materials as potential sustainable precursors used for activated carbon production: A review10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.051 ↗
25. Cleaner production of carbon adsorbents by utilizing agricultural waste corncob10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00093-8 ↗
26. (2013). Testing Concrete Methods for Mixing and Sampling Fresh Concrete in the Laboratory (Standard No. BS 1881-125:2013).
27. (2019). Testing Fresh Concrete. Slump Test (Standard No. BS EN 12350-2:2019).
28. (2019). Testing Hardened Concrete. Compressive Strength of Test Specimens (Standard No. BS EN 12390-3:2019).
29. (2019). Testing Hardened Concrete. Flexural Strength of Test Specimens (Standard No. BS EN 12390-5:2019).
30. Modelling of the mechanical properties of concrete with cement ratio partially replaced by aluminium waste and sawdust ash using artificial neural network10.1007/s42452-019-1504-2 ↗
31. (2023, July 14). Ecoinvent, Allocation, Cut-Off by Classification, Ecoinvent Database Version 3.9.1. Available online: https://ecoinvent.org/the-ecoinvent-database/data-releases/ecoinvent-3-9-1/.
32. (2023, July 14). Brightway 2.5. Available online: https://github.com/brightway-lca/brightway25.
33. Brightway: An open source framework for Life Cycle Assessment10.21105/joss.00236 ↗
34. (2019). Sustainability of ConstructionWorks—Environmental Product Declarations—Core Rules for the Product Category of Construction Products (Standard No. BS EN 15804:2012+A2:2019).
35. Biogenic carbon in buildings: A critical overview of LCA methods10.5334/bc.46 ↗
36. Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.009 ↗
37. Could reactive MgO cement be a green solution? The effect of CO2 mineralization and manufacturing route on the potential global warming impact10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104263 ↗
38. The importance of use and end-of-life phases to the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of concrete—A review10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.070 ↗
39. Innovative technologies for recycling End-of-Life concrete waste in the built environment10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104911 ↗
40. Estate, T.C. (2023, August 23). Marine Aggregates, 2023. Available online: https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/4505/marine-aggregates-annual-review-2023.pdf.
41. Kemp, R. (2008). Energy Consumption of Marine Aggregate Extraction, The Crown Estate. Marine Estate Research Report Energy.
42. Rigamonti, L., Pantini, S., and Borghi, G. (2017). Relazione Finale Valutazione con Metodologia LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) dei Flussi e del Destino dei Rifiuti da Costruzione e Demolizione, Centro Studi MatER.
43. (2002). Guide to Specifying Concrete (Standard No. BS 5328-1:1997). Available online: https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/.
44. Consequential life cycle assessment: A review10.1007/s11367-011-0275-9 ↗