Seismic Elastic Parameter Inversion via a FCRN and GRU Hybrid Network with Multi-Task Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Seismic elastic parameter inversion translates seismic data into subsurface structures and physical properties of formations. Traditional model-based inversion methods have limitations in retrieving complex geological structures. In recent years, deep learning methods have emerged as preferable alternatives. Nevertheless, inverting multiple elastic parameters using neural networks individually is computationally intensive and can lead to overfitting due to a shortage of labeled data in field applications. Multi-task learning can be employed to invert elastic parameters simultaneously. In this work, a hybrid network that leverages the fully convolutional residual network (FCRN) and the gated recurrent unit network (GRU) is designed for the simultaneous inversion of P-wave velocity and density from post-stack seismic data. The FCRN efficiently extracts local information from seismic data, while the GRU captures global dependency over time. To further improve the horizontal continuity and inversion stability, we use a multi-trace to single-trace (M2S) inversion strategy. Consequently, we name our proposed method the M2S multi-task FCRN and GRU hybrid network (M2S-MFCRGRU). Through anti-noise experiments and blind well tests, M2S-MFCRGRU exhibits superior anti-noise performance and generalization ability. Comprehensive experimental inversion results also showcase the excellent lateral continuity, vertical resolution, and stability of the M2S-MFCRGRU inversion results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
Funding
Key Laboratory of Geophysics, PetroChina
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Maurya, S.P., Singh, N.P., and Singh, K.H. (2020). Seismic Inversion Methods: A Practical Approach, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-45662-7 ↗
2. Seismic inversion tracks in situ combustion: A case study from Balol oil field, India10.1190/1.3129262 ↗
3. Detection and estimation of gas hydrates using rock physics and seismic inversion: Examples from the northern deepwater Gulf of Mexico10.1190/1.1645456 ↗
4. Joint inversion of seismic traveltimes and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration
5. Estimation of groundwater storage from seismic data using deep learning10.1111/1365-2478.12831 ↗
6. Deep Learning for Seismic Inverse Problems: Toward the Acceleration of Geophysical Analysis Workflows10.1109/MSP.2020.3037429 ↗
7. Improving the Generalization of Deep Neural Networks in Seismic Resolution Enhancement
8. Deep learning for seismic lithology prediction
9. Integration of knowledge-based seismic inversion and sedimentological investigations for heterogeneous reservoir10.1016/j.jseaes.2020.104541 ↗
10. Tang, Z., Wu, B., Wu, W., and Ma, D. (2023). Fault Detection via 2.5D Transformer U-Net with Seismic Data Pre-Processing. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15041039 ↗
11. MTL-FaultNet: Seismic data reconstruction assisted multi-task deep learning 3D fault interpretation10.1109/TGRS.2023.3299378 ↗
12. Deep-learning-based seismic data interpolation: A preliminary result10.1190/geo2017-0495.1 ↗
13. Attention and Hybrid Loss Guided Deep Learning for Consecutively Missing Seismic Data Reconstruction
14. Poststack Seismic Data Denoising Based on 3-D Convolutional Neural Network10.1109/TGRS.2019.2947149 ↗
15. S2S-WTV: Seismic Data Noise Attenuation Using Weighted Total Variation Regularized Self-Supervised Learning
16. Prestack and poststack inversion using a physics-guided convolutional neural network10.1190/INT-2018-0236.1 ↗
17. Convolutional neural network for seismic impedance inversion10.1190/geo2018-0838.1 ↗
18. Bhattacharya, S., and Di, H. (2022). Advances in Subsurface Data Analytics, Elsevier.
19. Wang, Y. (2016). Seismic Inversion: Theory and Applications, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119258032 ↗
20. Generalized linear inversion of reflection seismic data10.1190/1.1441497 ↗
21. A simple algorithm for band-limited impedance inversion
22. Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb04500.x ↗
23. Neural network analysis and impedance inversion—Case study
24. Seismic Impedance Inversion Using Fully Convolutional Residual Network and Transfer Learning10.1109/LGRS.2019.2963106 ↗
25. Pattern recognition to forecast seismic time series10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.050 ↗
26. Lipton, Z.C. (2015). A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence Learning. arXiv.
27. Graves, A. (2012). Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2 ↗
28. Chung, J., Gülçehre, Ç., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling. arXiv.
29. Seismic velocity inversion based on CNN-LSTM fusion deep neural network10.1007/s11770-021-0913-3 ↗
30. Elastic Impedance Inversion with GRU-CNN Hybrid Deep Learning: Visualizing the Black Box
31. Building large-scale density model via a deep learning based data-driven method10.1190/geo2019-0332.1 ↗
32. Guo, R., Zhang, J., Liu, D., Zhang, Y., and Zhang, D. (2019, January 3–6). Application of Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network for Seismic Impedance Inversion. Proceedings of the 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019, London, UK.10.3997/2214-4609.201901386 ↗
33. Semisupervised sequence modeling for elastic impedance inversion10.1190/INT-2018-0250.1 ↗
34. Data-driven S-wave velocity prediction method via a deep-learning-based deep convolutional gated recurrent unit fusion network10.1190/geo2020-0886.1 ↗
35. Collobert, R., and Weston, J. (2008, January 5–9). A Unified Architecture for Natural Language Processing: Deep Neural Networks with Multitask Learning. Proceedings of the ICML’08: 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, Helsinki, Finland.10.1145/1390156.1390177 ↗
36. Deng, L., Hinton, G., and Kingsbury, B. (2013, January 26–31). New types of deep neural network learning for speech recognition and related applications: An overview. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6639344 ↗
37. Girshick, R. (2015, January 7–13). Fast R-CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile.10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
38. Multitask Learning10.1023/A:1007379606734 ↗
39. Alaei, N., Soleimani Monfared, M., Roshandel Kahoo, A., and Bohlen, T. (2022). Seismic imaging of complex velocity structures by 2D pseudo-viscoelastic time-domain full-waveform inversion. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12157741 ↗
40. Zheng, X., Wu, B., Zhu, X., and Zhu, X. (2022). Multi-Task Deep Learning Seismic Impedance Inversion Optimization Based on Homoscedastic Uncertainty. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031200 ↗
41. Pertinent Multigate Mixture-of-Experts-Based Prestack Three-Parameter Seismic Inversion
42. AVO Inversion Based on Closed-Loop Multitask Conditional Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network
43. Mustafa, A., and AlRegib, G. (2020). SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2020, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
44. Multi-Task Full Attention U-Net for Prestack Seismic Inversion10.1109/LGRS.2023.3303698 ↗
45. Ruder, S. (2017). An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networks. arXiv.
46. Liu, Z., Chen, X., Li, J., Hou, S., Li, Z., and Liu, G. (IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2023). Robust weakly supervised learning pre-stack multi-trace seismic inversion, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., early access.10.1109/TGRS.2023.3302352 ↗
47. Marmousi2: An elastic upgrade for Marmousi10.1190/1.2172306 ↗