Predictive Analysis of Vehicular Lane Changes: An Integrated LSTM Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
In the rapidly advancing domain of vehicular traffic management and autonomous driving, accurate lane change predictions are paramount for ensuring safety and optimizing traffic flow. This study introduces a comprehensive two-stage prediction model that harnesses the capabilities of long short-term memory (LSTM) for anticipating vehicular lane changes. Initially, we employed a variety of models, such as regression methods, SVMs, and a multilayer perceptron, to categorize lane change behaviors. The dataset was then segmented based on vehicle trajectories and lane change patterns. In the subsequent phase, we utilized the superior classification outcomes from LinearSVC to curate our training data. We developed two dedicated LSTM networks tailored to specific datasets: the lane-keeping LSTM (LK-LSTM) and the lane-changing LSTM (LC-LSTM). By integrating insights from both models, we achieved a comprehensive prediction of vehicular lane changes. Our results indicate that the unified prediction model markedly enhances prediction precision. Accurate lane change predictions offer valuable contributions to advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), with the potential to minimize traffic mishaps and enhance traffic fluidity. As we transition to a more autonomous automotive era, refining these predictions becomes essential in seamlessly merging human and automated driving experiences.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Traffic control and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Guangdong Planning and Designing Institute of Telecommunications Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510630, China
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA
College of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Pang, M.Y. (2019, January 26–28). Trajectory Data Based Clustering and Feature Analysis of Vehicle Lane-Changing Behavior. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Electromechanical Control Technology and Transportation (ICECTT), Guilin, China.10.1109/ICECTT.2019.00059 ↗
2. Lane-changes prediction based on adaptive fuzzy neural network10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.025 ↗
3. A data-driven lane-changing model based on deep learning10.1016/j.trc.2019.07.002 ↗
4. Prediction of surrounding vehicles lane change intention using machine learning
5. Su, S., Muelling, K., Dolan, J., Palanisamy, P., and Mudalige, P. (, January June). Learning vehicle cooperative lane-changing behavior from observed trajectories in the NGSIM dataset. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., Suzhou, China.10.1109/IVS.2018.8500445 ↗
6. A novel lane change decision-making model of autonomous vehicle based on support vector machine10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900416 ↗
7. Prediction of lane-changing maneuvers with automatic labeling and deep learning10.1177/0361198120922210 ↗
8. An integrated car-following and lane changing vehicle trajectory prediction algorithm based on a deep neural network10.1016/j.physa.2022.127303 ↗
9. Simultaneous modeling of car-following and lane-changing behaviors using deep learning10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.021 ↗
10. A review of game theory models of lane changing
11. A xgboost-based lane change prediction on time series data using feature engineering for autopilot vehicles10.1109/TITS.2022.3170628 ↗
12. Shen, Y., Wijayaratne, N., Du, P., Jiang, S., and Driggs-Campbell, K. (2021, January 8–13). AutoPreview: A Framework for Autopilot Behavior Understanding. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan.10.1145/3411763.3451591 ↗
13. A critical evaluation of the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) vehicle trajectory dataset10.1016/j.trb.2017.09.018 ↗
14. Reliable accuracy estimates from k-fold cross validation10.1109/TKDE.2019.2912815 ↗
15. Logistic regression was as good as machine learning for predicting major chronic diseases10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.002 ↗
16. Stochastic gradient descent and its variants in machine learning10.1007/s41745-019-0098-4 ↗
17. Ridge regression: A historical context10.1080/00401706.2020.1742207 ↗
18. An improved lasso regression model for evaluating the efficiency of intervention actions in a system reliability analysis10.1007/s00521-020-05537-8 ↗
19. Problem formulations and solvers in linear SVM: A review10.1007/s10462-018-9614-6 ↗
20. Finzi, M., Welling, M., and Wilson, A.G. (2021, January 18–24). A practical method for constructing equivariant multilayer perceptrons for arbitrary matrix groups. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, Vienna, Austria.
21. Graves, A., and Graves, A. (2012). Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2 ↗
22. Dhruv, P., and Naskar, S. (2020). Machine Learning and Information Processing: Proceedings of ICMLIP 2019, Springer.