Differences Evaluation of Pavement Roughness Distribution Based on Light Detection and Ranging Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Pavement roughness serves as a crucial indicator for evaluating road performance. However, traditional measurement methods, such as laser detection vehicles, are limited to providing roughness values for a single profile, failing to capture the overall pavement condition comprehensively. To address this limitation, this study utilized high-precision light detection and ranging technology (LiDAR) to acquire three-dimensional point cloud data for a 25 km road section in Shanghai. Road elevations were extracted from different lateral survey lines. Subsequently, variance analysis and the Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test were conducted to evaluate the differences in the lateral distribution and longitudinal variability of the pavement roughness. The findings revealed significant differences in the international roughness index (IRI) among the survey lines within the road section. Moreover, the observed variations in the lateral distribution of pavement roughness were influenced by the characteristics of the road section itself. Roads exhibiting discrete roughness patterns displayed a higher likelihood of significant detection disparities. Additionally, it was discovered that the discrepancy between the detection length and the actual road length introduced volatility in repeated detection results, necessitating a limitation of this discrepancy to 30 m. Consequently, it has been recommended to consider the lateral distribution of pavement roughness and to regulate the detection length in road performance evaluations to enhance reliability and facilitate more accurate maintenance decision making. The study highlights the importance of incorporating comprehensive assessment approaches for pavement roughness in road management practices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, 4800 Cao’an Road, Shanghai 201804, China
Yancheng Highway Development Center, No. 8 Qingnian Middle Road, Yancheng 224005, China
Funding
Scientific Research Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Scientific Research Project of Shanghai Housing and Urban-Rural Construction Management Committee
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Eco-based pavement lifecycle maintenance scheduling optimization for equilibrated networks10.1016/j.trd.2020.102471 ↗
2. Development of relationship between roughness (IRI) and visible surface distresses: A study on PMGSY roads10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.125 ↗
3. The influence of pavement evenness and macrotexture on fuel consumption
4. Chesher, A., and Harrison, R. (1987). Vehicle Operating Costs: Evidence from Developing Countries, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
5. Sayers, M.W. (1995). On the Calculation of International Roughness Index from Longitudinal Road Profile, Transportation Research Record; Transportation Research Board.
6. Large-scale pavement roughness measurements with vehicle crowdsourced data using semi-supervised learning10.1016/j.trc.2021.103048 ↗
7. Design and verification of a laser based device for pavement macrotexture measurement10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.001 ↗
8. Automated extraction of expressway road surface from mobile laser scanning data10.1007/s11771-020-4420-0 ↗
9. How comfortable are your cycling tracks? A new method for objective bicycle vibration measurement10.1016/j.trc.2015.05.007 ↗
10. Response-based methods to measure road surface irregularity: A state-of-the-art review10.1186/s12544-019-0380-6 ↗
11. Pavement roughness measurement method based on automobile mounted multiple sensors
12. Applicability of smartphone-based roughness data for rural road pavement condition evaluation10.1080/10298436.2020.1765243 ↗
13. Measurement of pavement roughness using android-based smartphone application10.3141/2457-04 ↗
14. Overview on evaluation methods of pavement evenness for pavements without speed limitations in Germany
15. Zhang, W. (2010, January 21–24). Lidar-based road and road-edge detection. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, La Jolla, CA, USA.10.1109/IVS.2010.5548134 ↗
16. Use of mobile LiDAR in road information inventory: A review10.1080/19479832.2016.1188860 ↗
17. Urban curb robust detection algorithm based on 3D-LIDAR
18. Automatic classification of urban pavements using mobile LiDAR data and roughness descriptors10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.199 ↗
19. Spatial pavement roughness from stationary laser scanning10.1080/10298436.2015.1065403 ↗
20. A LiDAR application for the study of taxiway surface evenness and slope10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-65-2014 ↗
21. Mechanistic Excess Fuel Consumption of a 3D Passenger Vehicle on Rough Pavements10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-926 ↗
22. Linsen, L. (2001). Point Cloud Representation, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Karlsruhe.
23. Computing and rendering point set surfaces10.1109/TVCG.2003.1175093 ↗
24. Multi-level partition of unity algebraic point set surfaces10.1007/s11390-011-9429-2 ↗
25. Fleishman, S., Drori, I., and Cohen-Or, D. (2003, January 27–30). Bilateral mesh denoising. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1145/1201775.882368 ↗
26. Jones, T.R., Durand, F., and Desbrun, M. (2003, January 27–30). Non-iterative, feature-preserving mesh smoothing. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1145/1201775.882367 ↗
27. (2010). Vehicle Bearing Road Laser Profilometer (Standard No. JJG 075-2010).
28. (2019). Field Test Methods of Highway Subgrade and Pavement (Standard No. JTG 3450-2019).
29. Asymptotic inference for coefficients of variation10.1080/03610929708831944 ↗