journal article·2021-09Open access

Macroscale Property Prediction for Additively Manufactured IN625 from Microstructure Through Advanced Homogenization

Sourav Saha, Orion L. Kafka, Ye Lu, Cheng Yu, Wing Kam Liu

Abstract

Design of additively manufactured metallic parts requires computational models that can predict the mechanical response of parts considering the microstructural, manufacturing, and operating conditions. This article documents our response to Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Additive Manufacturing Modeling Challenge 3, which asks the participants to predict the mechanical response of tensile coupons of IN625 as function of microstructure and manufacturing conditions. A representative volume element (RVE) approach was coupled with a crystal plasticity material model solved within the Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) framework for mechanics to address the challenge. During the competition, material model calibration proved to be a challenge, prompting the introduction in this manuscript of an advanced material model identification method using proper generalized decomposition (PGD). Finally, a mechanistic reduced order method called Self-consistent Clustering Analysis (SCA) is shown as a possible alternative to the FFT method for solving these problems. Apart from presenting the response analysis, some physical interpretation and assumptions associated with the modeling are discussed.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Yan W, Lian Y, Yu C, Kafka OL, Liu Z, Wing KL, Wagner GJ (2018) An integrated process-structure-property modeling framework for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 339:184–20410.1016/j.cma.2018.05.004 ↗
2. Francois MM, Sun A, King WE, Henson NJ, Tourret D, Bronkhorst CA, Carlson NN, Newman CK, Haut T, Bakosi J, Gibbs JW, Livescu V, Vander Wiel SA, Clarke AJ, Schraad MW, Blacker T, Lim H, Rodgers T, Owen S, Abdeljawad F, Madison J, Anderson AT, Fattebert J-L, Ferencz RM, Hodge NE, Khairallah SA, Walton O (2017) Modeling of additive manufacturing processes for metals: challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 21(4):198–20610.1016/j.cossms.2016.12.001 ↗
3. Sames WJ, List FA, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 61(5):315–36010.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 ↗
4. Smith J, Xiong W, Yan W, Lin S, Cheng P, Kafka OL, Wagner GJ, Cao J, Wing KL (2016) Linking process, structure, property, and performance for metal-based additive manufacturing: computational approaches with experimental support. Comput Mech 57(4):583–61010.1007/s00466-015-1240-4 ↗
5. Ghorbanpour S, Zecevic M, Kumar A, Jahedi M, Bicknell J, Jorgensen L, Beyerlein IJ, Knezevic M (2017) A crystal plasticity model incorporating the effects of precipitates in superalloys: application to tensile, compressive, and cyclic deformation of Inconel 718. Int J Plast 99:162–18510.1016/j.ijplas.2017.09.006 ↗
6. Prithivirajan V, Sangid MD (2018) The role of defects and critical pore size analysis in the fatigue response of additively manufactured IN718 via crystal plasticity. Mater Design 150:139–15310.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.022 ↗
7. Tabei A, Mirkoohi E, Garmestani H, Liang S (2019) Modeling of texture development in additive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(1):1057–106610.1007/s00170-019-03555-y ↗
8. Wei HL, Mukherjee T, Zhang W, Zuback JS, Knapp GL, De A, DebRoy T (2020) Mechanistic models for additive manufacturing of metallic components. Prog Mater Sci 10070310.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100703 ↗
9. Moulinec H, Suquet P (1998) A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 157(1–2):69–9410.1016/S0045-7825(97)00218-1 ↗
10. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B, Elkhodary K (2013) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, Hoboken
11. Lebensohn RA, Kanjarla AK, Eisenlohr P (2012) An elasto-viscoplastic formulation based on fast fourier transforms for the prediction of micromechanical fields in polycrystalline materials. Int J Plast 32:59–6910.1016/j.ijplas.2011.12.005 ↗
12. Rodgers TM, Bishop JE, Madison JD (2018) Direct numerical simulation of mechanical response in synthetic additively manufactured microstructures. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 26(5)10.1088/1361-651X/aac616 ↗
13. Feyel F, Chaboche J-L (2000) FE2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 183(3–4):309–33010.1016/S0045-7825(99)00224-8 ↗
14. Kochmann J, Wulfinghoff S, Reese S, Jaber RM, Svendsen B (2016) Two-scale FE-FFT- and phase-field-based computational modeling of bulk microstructural evolution and macroscopic material behavior. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 305:89–11010.1016/j.cma.2016.03.001 ↗
15. Matouš K, Geers MGD, Kouznetsova VG, Gillman A (2017) A review of predictive nonlinear theories for multiscale modeling of heterogeneous materials. J Comput Phys 330:192–22010.1016/j.jcp.2016.10.070 ↗
16. Liu Z, Bessa MA, Wing KL (2016) Self-consistent clustering analysis: an efficient multi-scale scheme for inelastic heterogeneous materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 306:319–34110.1016/j.cma.2016.04.004 ↗
17. Yu C, Kafka OL, Wing KL (2019) Self-consistent clustering analysis for multiscale modeling at finite strains. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 349:339–35910.1016/j.cma.2019.02.027 ↗
18. Kafka OL, Jones KK, Yu C, Cheng P, Liu WK (2021) Image-based multiscale modeling with spatially varying microstructures from experiments: demonstration with additively manufactured metal in fatigue and fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 10435010.1016/j.jmps.2021.104350 ↗
19. Kafka OL, Yu C, Shakoor M, Liu Z, Wagner GJ, Wing KL (2018) Data-driven mechanistic modeling of influence of microstructure on high-cycle fatigue life of nickel titanium. JOM 70(7):1154–115810.1007/s11837-018-2868-2 ↗
20. Bate P (1999) Modelling deformation microstructure with the crystal plasticity finite-element method. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 357(1756):1589–160110.1098/rsta.1999.0391 ↗
21. Roters F, Eisenlohr P, Hantcherli L, Denny DT, Bieler TR, Raabe D (2010) Overview of constitutive laws, kinematics, homogenization and multiscale methods in crystal plasticity finite-element modeling: theory, experiments, applications. Acta Mater 58(4):1152–121110.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.058 ↗
22. Kapoor K, Ravi P, Noraas R, Park J-S, Venkatesh V, Sangid MD (2021) Modeling Ti-6Al-4V using crystal plasticity, calibrated with multi-scale experiments, to understand the effect of the orientation and morphology of the $$\alpha $$ and $$\beta $$ phases on time dependent cyclic loading. J Mech Phys Solids 146:10419210.1016/j.jmps.2020.104192 ↗
23. Deka D, Joseph DS, Ghosh S, Mills MJ (2006) Crystal plasticity modeling of deformation and creep in polycrystalline Ti-6242. Metall Mater Trans A 37(5):1371–138810.1007/s11661-006-0082-2 ↗
24. Lu Y, Blal N, Gravouil A (2018) Adaptive sparse grid based HOPGD: toward a nonintrusive strategy for constructing space-time welding computational vademecum. Int J Numer Meth Eng 114(13):1438–146110.1002/nme.5793 ↗
25. Lu Y, Blal N, Gravouil A (2019) Datadriven HOPGD based computational vademecum for welding parameter identification. Comput Mech 64(1):47–6210.1007/s00466-018-1656-8 ↗
26. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) additive manufacturing (AM) modeling challenge series (2021). https://materials-data-facility.github.io/MID3AS-AM-Challenge/. Accessed 4 Mar 2021
27. ASTM E8/E8M-16ae1 (2021) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials
28. Saha S, Kafka OL, Lu Y, Yu C, Liu WK (2021) Microscale structure to property prediction for additively manufactured IN625 through advanced material model parameter identification. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10(2):142–15610.1007/s40192-021-00208-5 ↗
29. Kabel M, Böhlke T, Schneider M (2014) Efficient fixed point and Newton-Krylov solvers for FFT-based homogenization of elasticity at large deformations. Comput Mech 54(6):1497–151410.1007/s00466-014-1071-8 ↗
30. Liu Z, Kafka OL, Yu C, Liu WK (2018) Data-driven self-consistent clustering analysis of heterogeneous materials with crystal plasticity. In: Advances in computational plasticity. Springer, pp 221–24210.1007/978-3-319-60885-3_11 ↗
31. Shakoor M, Kafka OL, Yu C, Wing KL (2018) Data science for finite strain mechanical science of ductile materials. Comput Mech 64(1):33–4510.1007/s00466-018-1655-9 ↗
32. Groeber MA, Jackson MA (2014) DREAM.3D: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3d. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3(1):56–7210.1186/2193-9772-3-5 ↗
33. Yu C, Kafka OL, Wing KL (2021) Multiresolution clustering analysis for efficient modeling of hierarchical material systems. Comput Mech 67(5):1293–130610.1007/s00466-021-01982-x ↗
34. Wang Z, Stoica AD, Ma D, Beese AM (2016) Diffraction and single-crystal elastic constants of Inconel 625 at room and elevated temperatures determined by neutron diffraction. Mater Sci Eng A 674:406–41210.1016/j.msea.2016.08.010 ↗