AFRL Additive Manufacturing Modeling Series: Challenge 2, Microscale Process-to-Structure Data Description
Source abstract
Abstract
The Air Force Research Laboratory Additive Manufacturing Modeling Series was executed to create calibration and validation data sets relevant to models of laser powder bed fusion-processed metallic materials. This article describes the data generated for the 2nd of 4 challenge questions which was specifically focused on microscale process-to-structure modeling needs. This work describes the experimental methods, and the resulting characterization data collected from a series of single-track and multi-track deposits built with an EOS M280 from the nickel-based alloy IN625. In general, track dimensions followed common scaling behaviors as a function of processing parameters in quasi-steady-state regions, but significant systematic track geometry variations were quantified in transient regions with more dynamic energy input processes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Groeber M, Schwalbach E, Musinski W, Shade P, Donegan S, Uchic M, Daniel S, Turner T, Miller J (2018) A preview of the US air force research laboratory additive manufacturing modeling challenge series. JOM 70:441–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-2806-310.1007/s11837-018-2806-3 ↗
2. Cox ME, Schwalbach EJ, Blaiszik BJ, Groeber MA (2021) AFRL additive manufacturing modeling series: overview. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00215-610.1007/s40192-021-00215-6 ↗
3. Chuang AC, Park J-S, Shade PA, Schwalbach EJ, Groeber MA, and Musinski WD AFRL additive manufacturing modeling series: challenge 1, characterization of residual strain distribution in additively-manufactured metal parts using energy dispersive diffraction. Integr Mater Manuf Innov (In Review)
4. Musinski W, Blosser P, Torbet C, Schwalbach E, Chapman M, Donegan S, Pollock T, and Groeber M AFRL additive manufacturing modeling series: challenge 3, room temperature testing of additively-manufactured Inconel 625 under a range of microstructural and specimen configurations. Integr Mater Manuf Innov (In Review)
5. Chapman MG, Shah MN, Donegan SP, Scott JM, Shade PA, Menasche D, Uchic MD (2021) AFRL additive manufacturing modeling series: challenge 4, 3D reconstruction of an IN625 high-energy diffraction microscopy sample using multi-modal serial sectioning. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 10:111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00212-910.1007/s40192-021-00212-9 ↗
6. Menasche DB, Musinski WD, Obstalecki M, Shah MN, Donegan SP, Bernier JV, Kenesei P, Park J-S and Shade PA (2021) AFRL additive manufacturing modeling series: challenge 4, in situ mechanical test of an IN625 sample with concurrent high-energy diffraction microscopy characterization. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00218-310.1007/s40192-021-00218-3 ↗
7. Montgomery C, Beuth J, Sheridan L and Klingbeil N Process mapping of Inconel 625 in laser powder bed additive manufacturing. In:Solid freeform fabrication proceedings 2015. Austin, TX. http://utw10945.utweb.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2015/2015-97-Montgomery.pdf. Accessed 21 Jun 2021
8. Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H, Starr T, Stucker B (2014) Analysis of defect generation in Ti–6Al–4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 1–4:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00210.1016/j.addma.2014.08.002 ↗
9. Poulin JR, Brailovski V, Terriault P (2018) Long fatigue crack propagation behavior of Inconel 625 processed by laser powder bed fusion: influence of build orientation and post-processing conditions. Int J Fatigue 116(July):634–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.008 ↗
10. Poulin JR, Kreitcberg A, Terriault P, Brailovski V (2019) Long fatigue crack propagation behavior of laser powder bed-fused inconel 625 with intentionally-seeded porosity. Int J Fatigue 127(June):144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.06.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.06.008 ↗
11. Heigel JC, Lane BM (2018) Measurement of the melt pool length during single scan tracks in a commercial laser powder bed fusion process. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(5):051012. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403757110.1115/1.4037571 ↗
12. Heigel J, Lane B, Levine L, Phan T, Whiting J (2020) Thermography of the metal bridge structures fabricated for the 2018 additive manufacturing benchmark test series (AMBench 2018). J Res Nat Inst Stand Technol 125:125005. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.125.00510.6028/jres.125.005 ↗
13. Lane B, Heigel J, Ricker R, Zhirnov I, Khromschenko V, Weaver J, Phan T, Stoudt M, Mekhontsev S, Levine L (2020) Measurements of melt pool geometry and cooling rates of individual laser traces on IN625 bare plates. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:16–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-020-00169-110.1007/s40192-020-00169-1 ↗
14. Masoomi M, Gao X, Thompson SM, Shamsaei N, Bian L, and Elwany A (2015) Modeling, simulation and experimental validation of heat transfer during selective laser melting. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. Houston, TX. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2015-5216510.1115/IMECE2015-52165 ↗
15. ISO/ASTM (2013) 52921: Standard terminology for additive manufacturing - coordinate systems and test methodologies, ISO/ASTM International
16. Tang M, Pistorius P, Beuth J (2017) Prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity for powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 14:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.12.00110.1016/j.addma.2016.12.001 ↗
17. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White D, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
18. Uchic M, Groeber M, Shah M, Callahan P, Shiveley A, Scott M, Chapman M and Spowart J (2016) An automated multi-modal serial sectioning system for characterization of grain-scale microstructures in engineering materials. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on 3D materials science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48762-5_3010.1007/978-3-319-48762-5_30 ↗
19. Rubenchik A, King W, Wu S (2018) Scaling laws for the additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 257:234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.03410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.034 ↗
20. Trapp J, Rubenchik A, Guss G, Matthews M (2017) In situ absorptivity measurements of metallic powders during laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Appl Mater Today 9(Suppl. C):341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.08.00610.1016/j.apmt.2017.08.006 ↗
21. Lowe DG (2006) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60:91–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.9410.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94 ↗
22. Ostu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.431007610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
23. Blaiszik B, Chard K, Pruyne J, Ananthakrishnan R, Tuecke S, Foster I (2016) The materials data facility: data services to advance materials science research. JOM 68(8):2045–2052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2001-310.1007/s11837-016-2001-3 ↗
24. Blaiszik B, Ward L, Schwarting M, Gaff J, Chard R, Pike D, Chard K, Foster I (2019) A data ecosystem to support machine learning in materials science. MRS Commun. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2019.11810.1557/mrc.2019.118 ↗
25. Groeber M, Schwalbach E, Donegan S, Uchic M, Chapman M, Shade P, Musinski W, Miller J, Turner T, Sparkman D and Cox M AFRL AM modeling challenge series: challenge 2 data package. https://doi.org/10.18126/M27H1Z10.18126/M27H1Z ↗
26. Schwalbach EJ, Donegan SP, Chapman MG, Chaput KJ, Groeber MA (2019) A discrete source model of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing thermal history. Addit Manuf 25:485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.00410.1016/j.addma.2018.12.004 ↗
27. Martin AA, Calta NP, Khairallah SA, Wang J, Depond PJ, Fong AY, Thampy V, Guss GM, Kiss AM, Stone KH, Tassone CJ, Weker JN, Toney MF, van Buuren T (2019) Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Nat Commun 10:1987. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10009-210.1038/s41467-019-10009-2 ↗
28. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Li P, Male AT (2003) Weld deposition-based rapid prototyping: a preliminary study. J Mater Process Technol 135:347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00867-110.1016/S0924-0136(02)00867-1 ↗
29. Khairallah S, Martin A, Lee J, Guss G, Calta N, Hammons J, Nielsen M, Chaput K, Schwalbach E, Shah M, Chapman M, Willey T, Rubenchik A, Anderson A, Wang Y, Matthews M, King W (2020) Controlling interdependent meso-nanosecond dynamics and defect generation in metal 3D printing. Science 368(6491):660–665. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay783010.1126/science.aay7830 ↗